PreprintCited by 54Speech Recognition and SynthesisDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningSpeech and Audio Processing

SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark

Open access
Yang, Shu-wen, Chi, Po-Han, Chuang, Yung-Sung, Lai, Cheng-I Jeff, Lakhotia, Kushal, Lin, Yist Y., Liu, Andy T., Shi, Jiatong +12 more·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has proven vital for advancing research in natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision (CV). The paradigm pretrains a shared model on large volumes of unlabeled data and achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) for various tasks with minimal adaptation. However, the speech processing community lacks a similar setup to systematically explore the paradigm. To bridge this gap, we introduce Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark (SUPERB). SUPERB is a leaderboard to benchmark the performance of a shared model across a wide range of speech processing tasks with minimal architecture changes and labeled data. Among multiple usages of the shared model, we especially focus on extracting the representation learned from SSL due to its preferable re-usability. We present a simple framework to solve SUPERB tasks by learning task-specialized lightweight prediction heads on top of the frozen shared model. Our results demonstrate that the framework is promising as SSL representations show competitive generalizability and accessibility across SUPERB tasks. We release SUPERB as a challenge with a leaderboard and a benchmark toolkit to fuel the research in representation learning and general speech processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2105.01051

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Layer-wise analyses of self-supervised speech models show that acoustic and speaker-related cues concentrate in lower and intermediate layers while deeper layers drift toward lexical and semantic content, and that a learnable combination of all layers consistently outperforms the last-layer representation across diverse speech tasks.

    “Layer-wise analyses of self-supervised speech models showthat acoustic and speaker-related cues concentrate in lower and intermediate layers while deeper layers drift toward lexical and semantic content [19, 20], and that a learnable combination of all layers consistently outperforms the last-layer representation across diverse speech tasks [21].”

    From MOSS-Audio Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. C.-I. Lai, Y.-S. Chuang, H.-Y. Lee, S.-W. Li, and J. Glass, "Semi- supervised spoken language understanding via self-supervised speech and language model pretraining," in ICASSP, 2021.
  2. T. Giorgino, "Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: The dtw package," Journal of Statistical Soft- ware, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1-24, 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, S.-W., Chi, P.-H., Chuang, Y.-S., Lai, C.-I. J., Lakhotia, K., Lin, Y. Y., Liu, A. T., Shi, J., Chang, X., Lin, G.-T., Huang, T.-H., Tseng, W.-C., Lee, K.-T., Liu, D.-R., Huang, Z., Dong, S., Li, S.-W., Watanabe, S., Mohamed, A., & Lee, H.-Y.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157923770
Cited by
52
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
self-supervised learning, speech processing, benchmark, shared models, representation learning, frozen pre-trained models, task generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review