PreprintCited by 94Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control

Mastering Visual Continuous Control: Improved Data-Augmented Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Yarats, Denis, Fergus, Rob, Lazaric, Alessandro, Pinto, Lerrel·2021·arXiv

Abstract

We present DrQ-v2, a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for visual continuous control. DrQ-v2 builds on DrQ, an off-policy actor-critic approach that uses data augmentation to learn directly from pixels. We introduce several improvements that yield state-of-the-art results on the DeepMind Control Suite. Notably, DrQ-v2 is able to solve complex humanoid locomotion tasks directly from pixel observations, previously unattained by model-free RL. DrQ-v2 is conceptually simple, easy to implement, and provides significantly better computational footprint compared to prior work, with the majority of tasks taking just 8 hours to train on a single GPU. Finally, we publicly release DrQ-v2's implementation to provide RL practitioners with a strong and computationally efficient baseline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2107.09645

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dreamer establishes a new state-of-the-art on Visual Control, outperforming DrQ-v2 and CURL.

    “Dreamer establishes a new state-of-the-art on this benchmark, outperforming DrQ-v2 and CURL 47 , which are specialized to visual environments and leverage data augmentation.”

    From Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Introduction (p. 2) says DrQ-v2 matches Dreamer-v2 in sample efficiency and performance, while training four times faster—not that Dreamer generally outperforms it. Section 4.3 (p. 9) reports that Dreamer-v2 outperforms DrQ-v2 on several individual tasks, but does not support the claimed overall ranking against DrQ-v2 and CURL. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The magnitude of the value estimate and entropy can vary greatly between datasets and different stages of training, making it necessary to balance the two losses to prevent premature entropy collapse.

    “As magnitude of the value estimate Q ( z t , p ( z t )) and entropy H can vary greatly between datasets and different stages of training, it is necessary to balance the two losses to prevent premature entropy collapse (Yarats et al., 2021).”

    From TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control (2023) · cites this paper as Yarats et al., 2021

    The Ablation Study (p. 9) reports that automatic entropy adjustment can lead to premature entropy collapse. It does not say that the magnitudes of Q estimates and entropy vary across datasets or training stages, or that balancing their losses prevents collapse; it instead examines switching from SAC to DDPG. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The state-of-the-art baseline for the Sphero navigation task is DrQv2.

    “For the Sphero navigation task, inputs are images and actions are continuous. The state-of-the-art baseline in this category is DrQv2 (Yarats et al., 2021), which uses image augmentation to increase sample-efficiency.”

    From DayDreamer: World Models for Physical Robot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as Yarats et al., 2021

    The Abstract (p. 1) presents DrQ-v2 as a strong baseline for visual continuous control, and Section 3.1 (p. 3) describes its image augmentation. But the experiments evaluate DeepMind Control Suite tasks (Section 4, p. 5), not Sphero navigation, so the source does not establish that DrQ-v2 is state of the art for that specific task. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The similar performance of Dreamer and DrQv2 on the Sphero navigation task matches the simulated experiments of Yarats et al. (2021), which showed the two algorithms to perform similarly for continuous control tasks from images.

    “This result matches the simulated experiments of Yarats et al. (2021) that showed the two algorithms to perform similarly for continuous control tasks from images.”

    From DayDreamer: World Models for Physical Robot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as Yarats et al. (2021)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Gabriel Barth-Maron, Matthew W. Hoffman, David Budden, Will Dabney, Dan Horgan, Dhruva TB, Alistair Muldal, Nicolas Heess, and Timothy Lillicrap. Distributional policy gradients. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018.
  2. Tuomas Haarnoja, Aurick Zhou, Kristian Hartikainen, George Tucker, Sehoon Ha, Jie Tan, Vikash Kumar, Henry Zhu, Abhishek Gupta a nd Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Soft actor-critic algorithms and applications. CoRR , 2018a.
  3. Danijar Hafner, Timothy Lillicrap, Ian Fischer, Ruben Villegas, David Ha, Honglak Lee, and James Davidson. Learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04551 , 2018. · arXiv
  4. A. X. Lee, A. Nagabandi, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine. Stochastic latent actor-critic: Deep reinforcement learning with a latent variable model. arXiv e-prints , 2019.
  5. Alex X Lee, Anusha Nagabandi, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Stochastic latent actor-critic: Deep reinforcement learning with a latent variable model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.00953 , 2019. · arXiv
  6. Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jonathan J. Hunt, Alexander Pritzel, Nicolas Heess, Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, David Silver, and Daan Wierstra. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. CoRR , 2015a.
  7. Max Schwarzer, Ankesh Anand, Rishab Goel, R. Devon Hjelm, Aaron C. Courville, and Philip Bachman. Data-efficient reinforcement learning with momentum predictive representations. CoRR , 2020b.
  8. Albert Zhan, Philip Zhao, Lerrel Pinto, Pieter Abbeel, and Michael Laskin. A framework for efficient robotic manipulation. CoRR , 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yarats, D., Fergus, R., Lazaric, A., & Pinto, L.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3186672455
Cited by
89
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 17 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Keywords
data augmentation, model-free reinforcement learning, off-policy actor-critic, humanoid locomotion, DeepMind Control Suite, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review