Cited by 95Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The Surprising Effectiveness of Representation Learning for Visual Imitation

Open access
Pari, Jyothish, Shafiullah, Nur Muhammad (Mahi), Arunachalam, Sridhar Pandian, Pinto, Lerrel·2022·Robotics: Science and Systems XVIII

Abstract

While visual imitation learning offers one of the most effective ways of learning from visual demonstrations, generalizing from them requires either hundreds of diverse demonstrations, task specific priors, or large, hard-to-train parametric models.One reason such complexities arise is because standard visual imitation frameworks try to solve two coupled problems at once: learning a succinct but good representation from the diverse visual data, while simultaneously learning to associate the demonstrated actions with such representations.Such joint learning causes an interdependence between these two problems, which often results in needing large amounts of demonstrations for learning.To address this challenge, we instead propose to decouple representation learning from behavior learning for visual imitation.First, we learn a visual representation encoder from offline data using standard supervised and self-supervised learning methods.Once the representations are trained, we use non-parametric Locally Weighted Regression to predict the actions.We experimentally show that this simple decoupling improves the performance of visual imitation models on both offline demonstration datasets and real-robot door opening compared to prior work in visual imitation.All of our generated data, code, and robot videos are publicly available at https://jyopari.github.io/VINN/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15607/rss.2022.xviii.010

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Handheld tools for demonstration still need a system-specific tool or modifications to the robot's original hardware to align the end-effector's physical interactions with the recorded visual observations.

    “While these approaches simplify tool design, they still require a system-specific tool or modifications to a robot's original hardware to align the end-effector's physical interactions and the recorded visual observations.”

    From LEGATO: Cross-Embodiment Imitation Using a Grasping Tool (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Robot details section (page unavailable) describes a handheld reacher-grabber fitted with a camera and modifications to both its grip and the robot’s gripper. It says the gripper changes were made for easier resets, not to align physical interactions with visual observations. The paper documents those changes in its own setup but does not establish that handheld demonstration approaches generally require them. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]25. Yusuke Matsui, Yusuke Uchida, Hervé Jégou, and Shin'ichi Satoh. A survey of product quantization. ITE Transactions on Media Technology and Applications, 6 (1):2-10, 2018.
  2. [43]43. Faraz Torabi, Garrett Warnell, and Peter Stone. Be- havioral cloning from observation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01954, 2018. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pari, J., Shafiullah, N. M. (., Arunachalam, S. P., & Pinto, L.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Pinto, Lerrel
Venue
Robotics: Science and Systems XVIII
Published
2022-06-27
OpenAlex
W3214952050
Cited by
95
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4
FWCI
11.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Robotics: Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Office of Naval Research (N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
visual imitation learning, representation learning, self-supervised learning, locally weighted regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review