CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 243Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CLIPort: What and Where Pathways for Robotic Manipulation

Open access
Shridhar, Mohit, Manuelli, Lucas, Fox, Dieter·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2109.12098arXiv 2109.12098
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

How can we imbue robots with the ability to manipulate objects precisely but also to reason about them in terms of abstract concepts? Recent works in manipulation have shown that end-to-end networks can learn dexterous skills that require precise spatial reasoning, but these methods often fail to generalize to new goals or quickly learn transferable concepts across tasks. In parallel, there has been great progress in learning generalizable semantic representations for vision and language by training on large-scale internet data, however these representations lack the spatial understanding necessary for fine-grained manipulation. To this end, we propose a framework that combines the best of both worlds: a two-stream architecture with semantic and spatial pathways for vision-based manipulation. Specifically, we present CLIPort, a language-conditioned imitation-learning agent that combines the broad semantic understanding (what) of CLIP [1] with the spatial precision (where) of Transporter [2]. Our end-to-end framework is capable of solving a variety of language-specified tabletop tasks from packing unseen objects to folding cloths, all without any explicit representations of object poses, instance segmentations, memory, symbolic states, or syntactic structures. Experiments in simulated and real-world settings show that our approach is data efficient in few-shot settings and generalizes effectively to seen and unseen semantic concepts. We even learn one multi-task policy for 10 simulated and 9 real-world tasks that is better or comparable to single-task policies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2109.12098

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [4][4] D. Kalashnikov, A. Irpan, P. Pastor, J. Ibarz, A. Herzog, E. Jang, D. Quillen, E. Holly, M. Kalakrishnan, V. Vanhoucke, et al. Qt-opt: Scalable deep reinforcement learning for visionbased robotic manipulation. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) , 2018. -
  2. [21][21] K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Doll´ ar, and R. Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2017. -
  3. [26][26] C. Xie, Y. Xiang, A. Mousavian, and D. Fox. The best of both modes: Separately leveraging rgb and depth for unseen object instance segmentation. In Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) , pages 1369-1378. PMLR, 2020. -
  4. [30][30] L. Manuelli, W. Gao, P. Florence, and R. Tedrake. kpam: Keypoint affordances for categorylevel robotic manipulation. In International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR) , 2019. -
  5. [34][34] S. Song, A. Zeng, J. Lee, and T. Funkhouser. Grasping in the wild: Learning 6dof closedloop grasping from low-cost demonstrations. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 5(3): 4978-4985, 2020. -
  6. [45][45] V. Blukis, R. A. Knepper, and Y. Artzi. Few-shot object grounding for mapping natural language instructions to robot control. In Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) , 2020. -
  7. [52][52] E. Kazakos, A. Nagrani, A. Zisserman, and D. Damen. Slow-fast auditory streams for audio recognition. In ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pages 855-859. IEEE, 2021. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–243 of 243

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shridhar, M., Manuelli, L., & Fox, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Nvidia (United Kingdom) (GB)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2109.12098
arXiv
2109.12098
OpenAlex
W3203511201
Cited by
223
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Conference on Robot Learning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
robotic manipulation, vision-based manipulation, CLIP, transporters, dual-stream architecture, spatial reasoning, semantic representation, cloth folding, few-shot generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review