CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1,016Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisImage and Signal Denoising MethodsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models

Open access
Rombach, Robin, Blattmann, Andreas, Lorenz, Dominik, Esser, Patrick, Ommer, Björn·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2112.10752arXiv 2112.10752
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

By decomposing the image formation process into a sequential application of denoising autoencoders, diffusion models (DMs) achieve state-of-the-art synthesis results on image data and beyond. Additionally, their formulation allows for a guiding mechanism to control the image generation process without retraining. However, since these models typically operate directly in pixel space, optimization of powerful DMs often consumes hundreds of GPU days and inference is expensive due to sequential evaluations. To enable DM training on limited computational resources while retaining their quality and flexibility, we apply them in the latent space of powerful pretrained autoencoders. In contrast to previous work, training diffusion models on such a representation allows for the first time to reach a near-optimal point between complexity reduction and detail preservation, greatly boosting visual fidelity. By introducing cross-attention layers into the model architecture, we turn diffusion models into powerful and flexible generators for general conditioning inputs such as text or bounding boxes and high-resolution synthesis becomes possible in a convolutional manner. Our latent diffusion models (LDMs) achieve a new state of the art for image inpainting and highly competitive performance on various tasks, including unconditional image generation, semantic scene synthesis, and super-resolution, while significantly reducing computational requirements compared to pixel-based DMs. Code is available at https://github.com/CompVis/latent-diffusion .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2112.10752

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. [1][1] Eirikur Agustsson and Radu Timofte. NTIRE 2017 chal- lenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPR Workshops 2017, Honolulu, HI, USA, July 21-26, 2017, pages 1122–1131. IEEE Com- puter Society, 2017. 1
  2. [3][3] Andrew Brock, Jeff Donahue, and Karen Simonyan. Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthe- sis. In Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2019. 1, 2, 7, 8, 22, 28
  3. [4][4] Holger Caesar, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, and Vittorio Ferrari. Coco-stuff: Thing and stuff classes in context. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition, CVPR 2018, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 18- 22, 2018, pages 1209–1218. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE Computer Society, 2018. 7, 20, 22
  4. [5][5] Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramer, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Katherine Lee, Adam Roberts, Tom Brown, Dawn Song, Ulfar Erlingsson, et al. Extracting training data from large language models. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21), pages 2633–2650, 2021. 9
  5. [6][6] Mark Chen, Alec Radford, Rewon Child, Jeffrey Wu, Hee- woo Jun, David Luan, and Ilya Sutskever. Generative pre- training from pixels. In ICML, volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1691–1703. PMLR, 2020. 3
  6. [7][7] Nanxin Chen, Yu Zhang, Heiga Zen, Ron J. Weiss, Mo- hammad Norouzi, and William Chan. Wavegrad: Estimat- ing gradients for waveform generation. In ICLR. OpenRe- view.net, 2021. 1
  7. [8][8] Lu Chi, Borui Jiang, and Yadong Mu. Fast fourier convolu- tion. In NeurIPS, 2020. 8
  8. [11][11] Bin Dai and David P. Wipf. Diagnosing and enhancing VAE models. In ICLR (Poster). OpenReview.net, 2019. 2, 3
  9. [12][12] Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Fei-Fei Li. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical im- age database. In CVPR, pages 248–255. IEEE Computer Society, 2009. 1, 5, 7, 22
  10. [13][13] Emily Denton. Ethical considerations of generative ai. AI for Content Creation Workshop, CVPR, 2021. 9
  11. [19][19] Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Ben- gio. Density estimation using real NVP. In 5th Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net, 2017. 1, 3
  12. [20][20] Alexey Dosovitskiy and Thomas Brox. Generating images with perceptual similarity metrics based on deep networks. In Daniel D. Lee, Masashi Sugiyama, Ulrike von Luxburg, Isabelle Guyon, and Roman Garnett, editors, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., pages 658–666, 2016. 3
  13. [23][23] Patrick Esser, Robin Rombach, and Björn Ommer. Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. CoRR, abs/2012.09841, 2020. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 21, 22, 29, 34, 36 · arXiv
  14. [27][27] Ian J. Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron C. Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial networks. CoRR, 2014. 1, 2
  15. [29][29] Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equi- librium. In Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., pages 6626– 6637, 2017. 1, 5, 26
  16. [30][30] Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. In NeurIPS, 2020. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 17
  17. [32][32] Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. In NeurIPS 2021 Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applications, 2021. 6, 7, 16, 22, 28, 37, 38
  18. [33][33] Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A. Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adver- sarial networks. In CVPR, pages 5967–5976. IEEE Com- puter Society, 2017. 3, 4
  19. [34][34] Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A. Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adver- sarial networks. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5967–5976, 2017. 4
  20. [36][36] Andrew Jaegle, Felix Gimeno, Andy Brock, Oriol Vinyals, Andrew Zisserman, and João Carreira. Perceiver: General perception with iterative attention. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 4651–4664. PMLR, 2021. 4, 5
  21. [40][40] Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., pages 4401– 4410, 2019. 1
  22. [41][41] T. Karras, S. Laine, and T. Aila. A style-based gener- ator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition (CVPR), 2019. 5, 6
  23. [42][42] Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila. Analyzing and improv- ing the image quality of stylegan. CoRR, abs/1912.04958, 2019. 2, 6, 28 · arXiv
  24. [44][44] Durk P Kingma and Prafulla Dhariwal. Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions. In S. Bengio, H. Wal- lach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, 2018. 3
  25. [46][46] Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-Encoding Vari- ational Bayes. In 2nd International Conference on Learn- ing Representations, ICLR, 2014. 1, 3, 4, 29
  26. [48][48] Zhifeng Kong, Wei Ping, Jiaji Huang, Kexin Zhao, and Bryan Catanzaro. Diffwave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis. In ICLR. OpenReview.net, 2021. 1
  27. [51][51] Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge J. Belongie, Lubomir D. Bourdev, Ross B. Girshick, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C. Lawrence Zit- nick. Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. CoRR, abs/1405.0312, 2014. 6, 7, 27 · arXiv
  28. [55][55] Luke Metz, Ben Poole, David Pfau, and Jascha Sohl- Dickstein. Unrolled generative adversarial networks. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net, 2017. 3
  29. [61][61] Taesung Park, Ming-Yu Liu, Ting-Chun Wang, and Jun- Yan Zhu. Semantic image synthesis with spatially-adaptive normalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019. 4, 7
  30. [62][62] Taesung Park, Ming-Yu Liu, Ting-Chun Wang, and Jun- Yan Zhu. Semantic image synthesis with spatially-adaptive normalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2019. 22
  31. [63][63] Gaurav Parmar, Dacheng Li, Kwonjoon Lee, and Zhuowen Tu. Dual contradistinctive generative autoencoder. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2021, virtual, June 19-25, 2021, pages 823–832. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE, 2021. 6
  32. [67][67] Ali Razavi, Aäron van den Oord, and Oriol Vinyals. Gen- erating diverse high-fidelity images with VQ-VAE-2. In NeurIPS, pages 14837–14847, 2019. 1, 2, 3, 22
  33. [68][68] Scott E. Reed, Zeynep Akata, Xinchen Yan, Lajanugen Lo- geswaran, Bernt Schiele, and Honglak Lee. Generative ad- versarial text to image synthesis. In ICML, 2016. 4
  34. [69][69] Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed, and Daan Wierstra. Stochastic backpropagation and approximate in- ference in deep generative models. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML, 2014. 1, 4, 29
  35. [70][70] Robin Rombach, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. Network-to-network translation with conditional invertible neural networks. In NeurIPS, 2020. 3
  36. [71][71] Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation. In MICCAI (3), volume 9351 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 234–241. Springer, 2015. 2, 3, 4
  37. [77][77] Edgar Schönfeld, Bernt Schiele, and Anna Khoreva. A u- net based discriminator for generative adversarial networks. In 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2020, Seattle, WA, USA, June 13-19, 2020, pages 8204–8213. Computer Vision Founda- tion / IEEE, 2020. 6
  38. [79][79] Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep con- volutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun, editors, Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2015. 29, 43, 44, 45
  39. [83][83] Kihyuk Sohn, Honglak Lee, and Xinchen Yan. Learn- ing structured output representation using deep conditional generative models. In C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 28. Curran Asso- ciates, Inc., 2015. 4
  40. [84][84] Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denois- ing diffusion implicit models. In ICLR. OpenReview.net, 2021. 3, 5, 6, 22
  41. [86][86] Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. Energy and policy considerations for modern deep learn- ing research. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second In- novative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2020, The Tenth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2020, New York, NY, USA, February 7-12, 2020, pages 13693–13696. AAAI Press, 2020. 2 12 https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/getting-immediate-speedups-with-a100-tf32 https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/getting-immediate-speedups-with-a100-tf32 https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/getting-immediate-speedups-with-a100-tf32 https://ml.berkeley.edu/blog/posts/clip-art/ https://ml.berkeley.edu/blog/posts/clip-art/
  42. [89][89] Tristan Sylvain, Pengchuan Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, R. De- von Hjelm, and Shikhar Sharma. Object-centric image gen- eration from layouts. In Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021, Virtual Event, Febru- ary 2-9, 2021, pages 2647–2655. AAAI Press, 2021. 20, 22, 27
  43. [90][90] Patrick Tinsley, Adam Czajka, and Patrick Flynn. This face does not exist... but it might be yours! identity leakage in generative models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Win- ter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 1320–1328, 2021. 9
  44. [91][91] Antonio Torralba and Alexei A Efros. Unbiased look at dataset bias. In CVPR 2011, pages 1521–1528. IEEE, 2011. 9
  45. [92][92] Arash Vahdat and Jan Kautz. NVAE: A deep hierarchical variational autoencoder. In NeurIPS, 2020. 3
  46. [94][94] Aaron van den Oord, Nal Kalchbrenner, Lasse Espeholt, koray kavukcuoglu, Oriol Vinyals, and Alex Graves. Con- ditional image generation with pixelcnn decoders. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2016. 3
  47. [96][96] Aäron van den Oord, Oriol Vinyals, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Neural discrete representation learning. In NIPS, pages 6306–6315, 2017. 2, 4, 29
  48. [97][97] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In NIPS, pages 5998–6008, 2017. 3, 4, 5, 7
  49. [100][100] Zhisheng Xiao, Karsten Kreis, Jan Kautz, and Arash Vah- dat. VAEBM: A symbiosis between variational autoen- coders and energy-based models. In 9th International Con- ference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net, 2021. 6
  50. [104][104] Jiahui Yu, Zhe L. Lin, Jimei Yang, Xiaohui Shen, Xin Lu, and Thomas S. Huang. Free-form image inpainting with gated convolution. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 4470–4479, 2019. 9
  51. [105][105] K. Zhang, Jingyun Liang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timo- fte. Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution. ArXiv, abs/2103.14006, 2021. 23 · arXiv
  52. [106][106] Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A. Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition (CVPR), June 2018. 3, 8, 19
  53. [108][108] Bolei Zhou, Àgata Lapedriza, Aditya Khosla, Aude Oliva, and Antonio Torralba. Places: A 10 million image database for scene recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Anal- ysis and Machine Intelligence, 40:1452–1464, 2018. 8, 9, 26

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2112.10752
arXiv
2112.10752
OpenAlex
W4226317937
Cited by
737
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 220 · 2024: 299 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
latent diffusion models, diffusion models, high-resolution image generation, denoising autoencoder, latent representations, cross-attention, image inpainting, super-resolution, text-to-image generation, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review