PreprintCited by 43Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataRecommender Systems and TechniquesEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Making Recommender Systems Forget: Learning and Unlearning for Erasable Recommendation

Open access
Li, Yuyuan, Zheng, Xiaolin, Chen, Chaochao, Liu, Junlin·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Privacy laws and regulations enforce data-driven systems, e.g., recommender systems, to erase the data that concern individuals. As machine learning models potentially memorize the training data, data erasure should also unlearn the data lineage in models, which raises increasing interest in the problem of Machine Unlearning (MU). However, existing MU methods cannot be directly applied into recommendation. The basic idea of most recommender systems is collaborative filtering, but existing MU methods ignore the collaborative information across users and items. In this paper, we propose a general erasable recommendation framework, namely LASER, which consists of Group module and SeqTrain module. Firstly, Group module partitions users into balanced groups based on their similarity of collaborative embedding learned via hypergraph. Then SeqTrain module trains the model sequentially on all groups with curriculum learning. Both theoretical analysis and experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that LASER can not only achieve efficient unlearning, but also outperform the state-of-the-art unlearning framework in terms of model utility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2203.11491

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine unlearning has played an essential role in many applications.

    “Machine unlearning has played an essential role in many applications [33, 34].”

    From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction describes machine unlearning as important for erasing user data from recommendation models, and Related Work (§5) discusses methods for clustering and classification. The paper does not establish that machine unlearning has already played an essential role across many applications. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kenneth Ward Church. Word2vec. Natural Language Engineering, 23(1):155-162, 2017.
  2. He et al., 2015] Xiangnan He, Tao Chen, Min-Yen Kan, and Xiao Chen. Trirank: Review-aware explainable recom- mendation by modeling aspects. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), pages 1661-1670, 2015.
  3. He et al., 2017] Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. Neural collab- orative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pages 173-182, 2017.
  4. J Ben Schafer, Dan Frankowski, Jon Herlocker, and Shilad Sen. Collaborative filtering recom- mender systems. In The adaptive web, pages 291-324. Springer, 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Zheng, X., Chen, C., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Xiaolin
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Volume
283
Pages
111124-111124
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388069167
Cited by
43
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
machine unlearning, recommender systems, data deletion, privacy, hypergraph embedding, data sharding, curriculum learning, early stopping, model utility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review