PreprintCited by 179Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataMachine Learning and Data ClassificationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learning

Open access
Ginart, Antonio, Guan, Melody Y., Valiant, Gregory, Zou, James·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Intense recent discussions have focused on how to provide individuals with control over when their data can and cannot be used --- the EU's Right To Be Forgotten regulation is an example of this effort. In this paper we initiate a framework studying what to do when it is no longer permissible to deploy models derivative from specific user data. In particular, we formulate the problem of efficiently deleting individual data points from trained machine learning models. For many standard ML models, the only way to completely remove an individual's data is to retrain the whole model from scratch on the remaining data, which is often not computationally practical. We investigate algorithmic principles that enable efficient data deletion in ML. For the specific setting of k-means clustering, we propose two provably efficient deletion algorithms which achieve an average of over 100X improvement in deletion efficiency across 6 datasets, while producing clusters of comparable statistical quality to a canonical k-means++ baseline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1907.05012

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine unlearning could be used to accelerate the process of leave-one-out-crossvalidation, removing adversarial or poisoning samples, and identifying significant and valuable data samples within a model.

    “For instance, it could be used to accelerate the process of leave-one-out-crossvalidation, removing adversarial or poisoning samples, and identifying significant and valuable data samples within a model [13].”

    From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction (p. 2) explicitly lists speeding up leave-one-out cross-validation and identifying important or valuable datapoints as possible uses of efficient data deletion. It does not list removing adversarial or poisoning samples; searches for those terms found no passage supporting that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [38][38] R. M. Gray and D. L. Neuhoff. Quantization. IEEE transactions on information theory , 44(6):2325-2383, 1998. -
  2. [39][39] S. Guha, R. Rastogi, and K. Shim. Cure: an efficient clustering algorithm for large databases. In ACMSigmod Record , pages 73-84. ACM, 1998. -
  3. [47][47] M. Kearns and D. Ron. Algorithmic stability and sanity-check bounds for leave-one-out crossvalidation. Neural computation , 11(6):1427-1453, 1999. -
  4. [55][55] J. H. Maindonald. Statistical Computation . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1984. -
  5. [64][64] N. Papernot, M. Abadi, U. Erlingsson, I. Goodfellow, and K. Talwar. Semi-supervised knowledge transfer for deep learning from private training data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05755 , 2016. - · arXiv
  6. [66][66] F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 12:2825-2830, 2011. -
  7. [74][74] S. Schelter. 'amnesia'-towards machine learning models that can forget user data very fast. In 1st International Workshop on Applied AI for Database Systems and Applications (AIDB'19) , 2019. -
  8. [88][88] G. I. Webb. Lazy Learning , pages 571-572. Springer US, 2010. -
  9. [91][91] J. Zhang, A. May, T. Dao, and C. Ré. Low-precision random fourier features for memoryconstrained kernel approximation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00155 , 2018. - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ginart, A., Guan, M. Y., Valiant, G., & Zou, J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
32
Pages
3513-3526
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2961073278
Cited by
175
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1704417, 1763191, 1813049)
  • National Institutes of Health (R21 MD012867-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG059307)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-18, N00014-18-1-2295, N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
data deletion, machine learning, K-means clustering, right to be forgotten, privacy, retraining costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review