The DOI matches its DataCite record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 5 are not checked yet.
CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Program synthesis strives to generate a computer program as a solution to a given problem specification, expressed with input-output examples or natural language descriptions. The prevalence of large language models advances the state-of-the-art for program synthesis, though limited training resources and data impede open access to such models. To democratize this, we train and release a family of large language models up to 16.1B parameters, called CODEGEN, on natural language and programming language data, and open source the training library JAXFORMER. We show the utility of the trained model by demonstrating that it is competitive with the previous state-of-the-art on zero-shot Python code generation on HumanEval. We further investigate the multi-step paradigm for program synthesis, where a single program is factorized into multiple prompts specifying subproblems. To this end, we construct an open benchmark, Multi-Turn Programming Benchmark (MTPB), consisting of 115 diverse problem sets that are factorized into multi-turn prompts. Our analysis on MTPB shows that the same intent provided to CODEGEN in multi-turn fashion significantly improves program synthesis over that provided as a single turn. We make the training library JAXFORMER and model checkpoints available as open source contribution: https://github.com/salesforce/CodeGen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Recent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in understanding and generating code, from competitive programming to repository-level software engineering.”
From Code as Agent Harness (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“HumanEval [7]-developed by OpenAI for evaluating Codex-and other benchmarks [2,13,20] only consist of programming problems in a single language”
From CodeGeeX: A Pre-Trained Model for Code Generation with Multilingual Benchmarking on HumanEval-X (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In code generation tasks, the smaller LLMs trained for the tasks are competitive in performance, and CodeGen-16B [141] is comparable in performance to ChatGPT using a larger parameter setting, reaching about a 78% match [125].”
From A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [141]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Previous studies (Chen et al., 2021;Nijkamp et al., 2022;Chen et al., 2022) have demonstrated the effectiveness of utilizing large pre-trained language models for code generation in a zero-shot completion manner, conditioned on the provided context.”
From RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation (2023) · cites this paper as Nijkamp et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Rajas Agashe, Srinivasan Iyer, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Juice: A large scale distantly supervised dataset for open domain context-based code generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) , pp. 5436-5446, 2019.
- Jacob Andreas, John Bufe, David Burkett, Charles Chen, Josh Clausman, Jean Crawford, Kate Crim, Jordan DeLoach, Leah Dorner, Jason Eisner, et al. Task-oriented dialogue as dataflow synthesis. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 8:556-571, 2020.
- Jacob Austin, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye, Maarten Bosma, Henryk Michalewski, David Dohan, Ellen Jiang, Carrie Cai, Michael Terry, Quoc Le, et al. Program synthesis with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07732 , 2021. · arXiv
- Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473 , 2014. · arXiv
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems , 33:1877-1901, 2020.
- Bei Chen, Fengji Zhang, Anh Nguyen, Daoguang Zan, Zeqi Lin, Jian-Guang Lou, and Weizhu Chen. Codet: Code generation with generated tests. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.10397 , 2022. · arXiv
- Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 , 2021. · arXiv
- Alvin Cheung, Armando Solar-Lezama, and Samuel Madden. Optimizing database-backed applications with query synthesis. ACM SIGPLAN Notices , 48(6):3-14, 2013.
- Colin Clement, Dawn Drain, Jonathan Timcheck, Alexey Svyatkovskiy, and Neel Sundaresan. Pymt5: multi-mode translation of natural language and python code with transformers. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pp. 9052-9065, 2020.
- Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In ICLR , 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=YicbFdNTTy .
- Zhangyin Feng, Daya Guo, Duyu Tang, Nan Duan, Xiaocheng Feng, Ming Gong, Linjun Shou, Bing Qin, Ting Liu, Daxin Jiang, et al. Codebert: A pre-trained model for programming and natural languages. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , pp. 1536-1547, 2020.
- Daniel Fried, Armen Aghajanyan, Jessy Lin, Sida Wang, Eric Wallace, Freda Shi, Ruiqi Zhong, Wen-tau Yih, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Mike Lewis. Incoder: A generative model for code infilling and synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05999 , 2022. · arXiv
- Leo Gao, Stella Biderman, Sid Black, Laurence Golding, Travis Hoppe, Charles Foster, Jason Phang, Horace He, Anish Thite, Noa Nabeshima, et al. The pile: An 800gb dataset of diverse text for language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00027 , 2020. · arXiv
- Sumit Gulwani. Automating string processing in spreadsheets using input-output examples. ACM Sigplan Notices , 46(1):317-330, 2011.
- Sumit Gulwani, Oleksandr Polozov, Rishabh Singh, et al. Program synthesis. Foundations and Trends® in Programming Languages , 4(1-2):1-119, 2017.
- Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Saurav Kadavath, Mantas Mazeika, Akul Arora, Ethan Guo, Collin Burns, Samir Puranik, Horace He, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring coding challenge competence with APPS. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2) , 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id= sD93GOzH3i5 .
- Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. The curious case of neural text degeneration. In ICLR , 2020. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=rygGQyrFvH .
- Rajeev Joshi, Greg Nelson, and Keith Randall. Denali: A goal-directed superoptimizer. ACM SIGPLAN Notices , 37(5):304-314, 2002.
- John Jumper, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ronneberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin Žídek, Anna Potapenko, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold. Nature , 596(7873):583-589, 2021.
- Aditya Kanade, Petros Maniatis, Gogul Balakrishnan, and Kensen Shi. Learning and evaluating contextual embedding of source code. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 5110-5121. PMLR, 2020.
- Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR (Poster) , 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980 . · arXiv
- Sumith Kulal, Panupong Pasupat, Kartik Chandra, Mina Lee, Oded Padon, Alex Aiken, and Percy S Liang. Spoc: Search-based pseudocode to code. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 32, 2019.
- Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Veselin Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pp. 7871-7880, 2020.
- Zohar Manna and Richard J Waldinger. Toward automatic program synthesis. Communications of the ACM , 14(3):151-165, 1971.
- Maxwell Nye, Anders Johan Andreassen, Guy Gur-Ari, Henryk Michalewski, Jacob Austin, David Bieber, David Dohan, Aitor Lewkowycz, Maarten Bosma, David Luan, et al. Show your work: Scratchpads for intermediate computation with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00114 , 2021. · arXiv
- Aaron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748 , 2018. · arXiv
- Pavel Panchekha, Alex Sanchez-Stern, James R Wilcox, and Zachary Tatlock. Automatically improving accuracy for floating point expressions. ACM SIGPLAN Notices , 50(6):1-11, 2015.
- Emilio Parisotto, Abdel rahman Mohamed, Rishabh Singh, Lihong Li, Dengyong Zhou, and Pushmeet Kohli. Neuro-symbolic program synthesis. In ICLR (Poster) , 2017. URL https://openreview. net/forum?id=rJ0JwFcex .
- Razvan Pascanu, Tomas Mikolov, and Yoshua Bengio. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In International conference on machine learning , pp. 1310-1318. PMLR, 2013.
- Oleksandr Polozov and Sumit Gulwani. Flashmeta: A framework for inductive program synthesis. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications , pp. 107-126, 2015.
- Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 21:1-67, 2020.
- Samyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yuxiong He. Zero: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models. In SC20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis , pp. 1-16. IEEE, 2020.
- Veselin Raychev, Pavol Bielik, and Martin Vechev. Probabilistic model for code with decision trees. ACM SIGPLAN Notices , 51(10):731-747, 2016.
- Eric Schkufza, Rahul Sharma, and Alex Aiken. Stochastic superoptimization. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News , 41(1):305-316, 2013.
- Mohammad Shoeybi, Mostofa Patwary, Raul Puri, Patrick LeGresley, Jared Casper, and Bryan Catanzaro. Megatron-lm: Training multi-billion parameter language models using model parallelism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.08053 , 2019. · arXiv
- Priyan Vaithilingam, Tianyi Zhang, and Elena L Glassman. Expectation vs. experience: Evaluating the usability of code generation tools powered by large language models. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts , pp. 1-7, 2022.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 5998-6008, 2017.
- Yue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq Joty, and Steven C.H. Hoi. Codet5: Identifier-aware unified pretrained encoder-decoder models for code understanding and generation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2021 , 2021.
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11903 , 2022. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602
A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., Chen, H., Yi, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3641289 · Cited by 4,254
“In code generation tasks, the smaller LLMs trained for the tasks are competitive in performance, and CodeGen16B (Nijkamp et al., 2022) is comparable in performance to ChatGPT using a larger parameter setting, reaching about a 78% match (Liu et al.”
ResultAutonomous chemical research with large language models
Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B., & Gomes, G. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06792-0 · Cited by 1,050
Bandi, A., Adapa, P. V. S. R., & Kuchi, Y. E. V. P. K. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15080260 · Cited by 638
Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
Rozière, B., Gehring, J., Gloeckle, F., Sootla, S., Gat, I., Tan, X. E., Adi, Y., Liu, J., Sauvestre, R., Remez, T., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.12950 · Cited by 531
“Code Llama 7B outperforms larger models such as CodeGen-Multi or StarCoder, and is on par with Codex (code-cushman-001, Chen et al., 2021).”
MethodLarge language models for software engineering: survey and open problems
Fan, A., Gokkaya, B., Harman, M., Lyubarskiy, M., Sengupta, S., Yoo, S., & Zhang, J. M. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Future of Software Engineering (ICSE-FoSE) · doi:10.1109/icse-fose59343.2023.00008 · Cited by 650
Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models
CHEN, B. ‐., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101260 · Cited by 1,097
Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models
Romera-Paredes, B., Barekatain, M., Novikov, A., Balog, M., Kumar, M. P., Dupont, E., Ruiz, F. J. R., Ellenberg, J. S., Wang, P., Fawzi, O., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06924-6 · Cited by 544
“Whereas large language models (LLMs) have recently seen notable improvements in their coding capabilities 4–8 , with applications including debugging 9,10 , solving code competitions 11,12 and improving code performance 13 , synthesizing ‘solve’ programs for open problems requires finding new ideas…”
BackgroundMethodProGen2: Exploring the boundaries of protein language models
Nijkamp, E., Ruffolo, J. A., Weinstein, E. N., Naik, N., & Madani, A. (2023) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2023.10.002 · Cited by 480
Self-citationBecker, B. A., Denny, P., Finnie-Ansley, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Prather, J., & Santos, E. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 · doi:10.1145/3545945.3569759 · Cited by 401
A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4
Kalyan, K. S. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100048 · Cited by 335
CodeGeeX: A Pre-Trained Model for Code Generation with Multilingual Benchmarking on HumanEval-X
Zheng, Q., Xia, X., Zou, X., Dong, Y., Wang, S., Xue, Y., Shen, L., Wang, Z., Wang, A., Li, Y., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599790 · Cited by 563
Self-collaboration code generation via ChatGPT
Dong, Y., Jiang, X., Jin, Z., & Li, G. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3672459 · Cited by 256
“In particular, large language models (LLMs) have achieved excellent performance and demonstrate promising potential on code generation tasks [15, 18, 38, 64].”
Zhou, H., Hu, C., Yuan, Y., Cui, Y., Jin, Y., Chen, C., Wu, H., Yuan, D., Jiang, L., Wu, D., et al. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3465447 · Cited by 344
Lau, S., & Guo, P. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research V.1 · doi:10.1145/3568813.3600138 · Cited by 241
Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models
Wang, G., Xie, Y., Jiang, Y., Mandlekar, A., Xiao, C., Zhu, Y., Fan, L., & Anandkumar, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.16291 · Cited by 222
“[81] Erik Nijkamp, Bo Pang, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu, Huan Wang, Yingbo Zhou, Silvio Savarese, and Caiming Xiong.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback
Madaan, A., Tandon, N., Gupta, P., Hallinan, S., Gao, L., Wiegreffe, S., Alon, U., Dziri, N., Prabhumoye, S., Yang, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.17651 · Cited by 2,314
MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework
Hong, S., Zhuge, M., Chen, J., Zheng, X., Cheng, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Yau, S. K. S., Lin, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.00352 · Cited by 214
Invited Paper: VerilogEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Verilog Code Generation
Liu, M., Pinckney, N., Khailany, B., & Ren, H. M. (2023) · doi:10.1109/iccad57390.2023.10323812 · Cited by 346
RTLLM: An Open-Source Benchmark for Design RTL Generation with Large Language Model
Lu, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, Q., & Xie, Z. (2024) · Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC) · doi:10.1109/asp-dac58780.2024.10473904 · Cited by 284
InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesis
Fried, D., Aghajanyan, A., Lin, J., Wang, S., Wallace, E., Shi, F., Zhong, R., Yih, W.-T., Zettlemoyer, L., & Lewis, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05999 · Cited by 187
“While differences in details of the Transformer model architectures, datasets, and training procedures across papers and experimental setups make a rigorous comparison impossible, we note that our model achieves roughly comparable performance on the HumanEval metrics to CodeGen-Multi [46], which is also a ∼6B paramete…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRetrieval-Based Prompt Selection for Code-Related Few-Shot Learning
Nashid, N., Sintaha, M., & Mesbah, A. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00205 · Cited by 178
Evaluating Large Language Models in Class-Level Code Generation
Du, X., Liu, M., Wang, K., Wang, H., Jun-wei, L., Chen, Y., Feng, J., Sha, C., Peng, X., & Lou, Y. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3597503.3639219 · Cited by 271
Self-citationSelf-Planning Code Generation with Large Language Models
Jiang, X., Dong, Y., Wang, L., Fang, Z., Shang, Q., Li, G., Jin, Z., & Jiao, W. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3672456 · Cited by 158
RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation
Zhang, F., Chen, B., Zhang, Y., Keung, J., Liu, J., Zan, D., Mao, Y., Lou, J.-G., & Chen, W. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.151 · Cited by 173
A comprehensive survey on pretrained foundation models: a history from BERT to ChatGPT
Zhou, C., Li, Q., Li, C., Yu, J., Liu, Y., Wang, G., Zhang, K., Ji, C., Yan, Q., He, L., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.09419 · Cited by 574
Self-citationEvolutionary Computation in the Era of Large Language Model: Survey and Roadmap
Wu, X., Wu, S.-H., Wu, J., Feng, L., & Tan, K. C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2024.3506731 · Cited by 230
Large Language Models for Code: Security Hardening and Adversarial Testing
He, J., & Vechev, M. (2023) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3576915.3623175 · Cited by 229
Large Language Models for Test-Free Fault Localization
Yang, A. Z. H., Le Goues, C., Martins, R., & Hellendoorn, V. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3597503.3623342 · Cited by 144
Zhang, K., Li, J., Li, G., Shi, X., & Jin, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.737 · Cited by 138
Natural Language Generation and Understanding of Big Code for AI-Assisted Programming: A Review
Wong, M.-F., Guo, S., Hang, C. N., Ho, S., & Tan, C. W. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25060888 · Cited by 169
Lost in Translation: A Study of Bugs Introduced by Large Language Models while Translating Code
Pan, R., Ibrahimzada, A. R., Krishna, R., Sankar, D., Wassi, L. P., Merler, M., Sobolev, B., Pavuluri, R., Sinha, S., & Jabbarvand, R. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3597503.3639226 · Cited by 133
No Need to Lift a Finger Anymore? Assessing the Quality of Code Generation by ChatGPT
Liu, Z., Tang, Y., Luo, X., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, L. F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3392499 · Cited by 128
Self-citationLu, J., Yu, L., Xiao-jia, L., Li, Y., & Zuo, C. (2023) · Proceedings/Proceedings - International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering · doi:10.1109/issre59848.2023.00026 · Cited by 172
Large Language Models Meet NL2Code: A Survey
Zan, D., Chen, B., Zhang, F., Lu, D., Wu, B., Guan, B., Yongji, W., & Lou, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.411 · Cited by 226
GPT4AIGChip: Towards Next-Generation AI Accelerator Design Automation via Large Language Models
Fu, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, Z., Li, S., Ye, Z., Li, C., Wan, C., & Lin, Y. (2023) · doi:10.1109/iccad57390.2023.10323953 · Cited by 144
Wei, Y., Xia, C. S., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3611643.3616271 · Cited by 115
MultiPL-E: A Scalable and Polyglot Approach to Benchmarking Neural Code Generation
Cassano, F., Gouwar, J., Nguyen, D., Nguyen, S., Phipps-Costin, L., Pinckney, D., Yee, M.-H., Zi, Y., Anderson, C. J., Feldman, M. Q., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3267446 · Cited by 394
Assessment of chemistry knowledge in large language models that generate code
White, A. D., Hocky, G. M., Gandhi, H. A., Ansari, M., Cox, S., Wellawatte, G. P., Sasmal, S., Yang, Z., Liu, K., Singh, Y., et al. (2023) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d2dd00087c · Cited by 130
On Hardware Security Bug Code Fixes by Prompting Large Language Models
Ahmad, B., Thakur, S., Tan, B., Karri, R., & Pearce, H. A. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3374558 · Cited by 149
LLM for SoC Security: A Paradigm Shift
Saha, D., Tarek, S., Yahyaei, K., Saha, S. K., Zhou, J., Tehranipoor, M. M., & Farahmandi, F. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3427369 · Cited by 128
Exploring and Unleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Automated Code Translation
Yang, Z., Liu, F., Yu, Z., Keung, J. W., Li, J., Liu, S., Hong, Y., Ma, X., Jin, Z., & Li, G. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3660778 · Cited by 104
How Effective Are Neural Networks for Fixing Security Vulnerabilities
Wu, Y., Jiang, N., Pham, H. V., Lutellier, T., Davis, J., Tan, L., Babkin, P., & Shah, S. (2023) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3597926.3598135 · Cited by 148
(Security) Assertions by Large Language Models
Kande, R., Pearce, H. A., Tan, B., Dolan-Gavitt, B., Thakur, S., Karri, R., & Rajendran, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3372809 · Cited by 160
Evolution and Prospects of Foundation Models: From Large Language Models to Large Multimodal Models
Chen, Z., Xu, L., Zheng, H., Chen, L., Tolba, A. K. R., Zhao, L., Yu, K., & Feng, H. (2024) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2024.052618 · Cited by 126
Siddiq, M. L., & Santos, J. C. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories Applications for Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/3549035.3561184 · Cited by 101
What Makes Good In-Context Demonstrations for Code Intelligence Tasks with LLMs?
Gao, S., Wen, X.-C., Gao, C., Wang, W., Zhang, H., & Lyu, M. R. (2023) · 2023 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00109 · Cited by 106
When Software Security Meets Large Language Models: A Survey
Zhu, X., Zhou, W., Han, Q., Ma, W., Wen, S., & Xiang, Y. (2025) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2024.124971 · Cited by 110
Reducing hallucination in structured outputs via Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Ayala, O., & Bechard, P. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 6: Industry Track) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-industry.19 · Cited by 97
“In particular, Code LLMs enable developers to write code faster by providing instructions to the LLM to generate code snippets (Chen et al., 2021; Nijkamp et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023a; Roziere et al., 2023).”
MethodSoftware Vulnerability Detection using Large Language Models
Purba, M. D., Ghosh, A., Radford, B. J., & Chu, B. (2023) · IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW) · doi:10.1109/issrew60843.2023.00058 · Cited by 117
Automatic Semantic Augmentation of Language Model Prompts (for Code Summarization)
Ahmed, T., Pai, K. S., Devanbu, P., & Barr, E. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3597503.3639183 · Cited by 112
When brain-inspired AI meets AGI
Zhao, L., Zhang, L., Wu, Z., Chen, Y., Dai, H., Yu, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, T., Hu, X., Jiang, X., et al. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100005 · Cited by 116
ChatScene: Knowledge-Enabled Safety-Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Vehicles
Zhang, J., Xu, C., & Li, B. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01464 · Cited by 117
Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs
Patil, S. G., Zhang, T., Wang, X., & Gonzalez, J. E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.15334 · Cited by 226
The impact of AI in physics education: a comprehensive review from GCSE to university levels
Yeadon, W., & Hardy, T. (2024) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ad1fa2 · Cited by 116
Generalized Planning in PDDL Domains with Pretrained Large Language Models
Silver, T., Dan, S., Srinivas, K., Tenenbaum, J. B., Kaelbling, L. P., & Katz, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i18.30006 · Cited by 150
Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug
Chen, X., Lin, M., Schärli, N., & Zhou, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.05128 · Cited by 812
“In particular, recent large language models have demonstrated a significant leap in improvement over prior deep neural networks (Chen et al., 2021a; Nijkamp et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2022).”
BackgroundMultitask-Based Evaluation of Open-Source LLM on Software Vulnerability
Yin, X., Ni, C., & Wang, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3470333 · Cited by 101
Integration of large language models and federated learning
Chen, C., Feng, X., Li, Y., Lyu, L., Zhou, J., Zheng, X., & Yin, J. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101098 · Cited by 140
Language Model Crossover: Variation through Few-Shot Prompting
Meyerson, E., Nelson, M. J., Bradley, H., Gaier, A., Moradi, A., Hoover, A. K., & Lehman, J. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3694791 · Cited by 75
Refactoring Programs Using Large Language Models with Few-Shot Examples
Shirafuji, A., Oda, Y., Suzuki, J., Morishita, M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023) · Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC) · doi:10.1109/apsec60848.2023.00025 · Cited by 97
Look Before You Leap: An Exploratory Study of Uncertainty Analysis for Large Language Models
Huang, Y., Song, J., Wang, Z., Zhao, S., Chen, H., Juefei-Xu, F., & Ma, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3519464 · Cited by 275
Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Code
Nadas, M. D., Dioşan, L. S., & Tomescu, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3589503 · Cited by 161
Initial policy considerations for generative artificial intelligence
Lorenz, P., Perset, K., & Berryhill, J. (2023) · OECD artificial intelligence papers · doi:10.1787/fae2d1e6-en · Cited by 123
How Beginning Programmers and Code LLMs (Mis)read Each Other
Nguyen, S., Babe, H. M., Zi, Y., Guha, A., Anderson, C. J., & Feldman, M. Q. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642706 · Cited by 120
CERT: Continual Pre-training on Sketches for Library-oriented Code Generation
Zan, D., Chen, B., Yang, D., Lin, Z., Kim, M., Guan, B., Wang, Y., Chen, W., & Lou, J. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/329 · Cited by 127
Self-Edit: Fault-Aware Code Editor for Code Generation
Zhang, K., Li, Z., Li, J., Li, G., & Jin, Z. G. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.45 · Cited by 141
StructCoder: Structure-Aware Transformer for Code Generation
Tipirneni, S., Zhu, M., & Reddy, C. K. A. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3636430 · Cited by 90
Language Models for Code Completion: A Practical Evaluation
Izadi, M., Katzy, J., van Dam, T., Otten, M., Popescu, R. M., & Arie Van Deursen, A. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3597503.3639138 · Cited by 88
Pre-gated MoE: An Algorithm-System Co-Design for Fast and Scalable Mixture-of-Expert Inference
Hwang, R., Wei, J., Cao, S., Hwang, C., Tang, X., Cao, T., & Yang, M. F. (2024) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/isca59077.2024.00078 · Cited by 102
A Survey of Research in Large Language Models for Electronic Design Automation
Pan, J., Zhou, G.-S., Chang, C.-C., Jacobson, I., Hu, J., & Chen, Y. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems · doi:10.1145/3715324 · Cited by 88
A systematic literature review on the impact of AI models on the security of code generation
Negri-Ribalta, C., Géraud, R., Sergeeva, A., & Lenzini, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1386720 · Cited by 67
Chain-of-Thought in Neural Code Generation: From and for Lightweight Language Models
Yang, G., Zhou, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, X., Zhuo, T. Y., & Chen, T. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3440503 · Cited by 75
Self-citationDong, Y., Jiang, X., Liu, H., Jin, Z., Gu, B., Yang, M., & Li, G. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.15938 · Cited by 52
Liu, R., Wang, Y., Xu, H., Sun, J., Zhang, F., Li, P., & Guo, Z.-H. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102748 · Cited by 75
Detecting AI-Generated Code Assignments Using Perplexity of Large Language Models
Xu, Z., & Sheng, V. S. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i21.30361 · Cited by 59
A Review of Current Trends, Techniques, and Challenges in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Patil, R., & Gudivada, A. V. (2024) · doi:10.20944/preprints202402.0357.v1 · Cited by 296
Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models
Muennighoff, N., Rush, A., Barak, B., Scao, T. L., Tazi, N., Piktus, A., Pyysalo, S., Wolf, T., & Raffel, C. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-2191 · Cited by 47
LLMatic: Neural Architecture Search Via Large Language Models And Quality Diversity Optimization
Nasir, M. U., Earle, S., Togelius, J., James, S., & Cleghorn, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference · doi:10.1145/3638529.3654017 · Cited by 52
AVATAR: A Parallel Corpus for Java-Python Program Translation
Ahmad, W. U., Tushar, M. G. R., Chakraborty, S., & Chang, K.-W. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.143 · Cited by 46
Domain-specialized LLM: Financial fine-tuning and utilization method using Mistral 7B
Jeong, C. (2024) · Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems · doi:10.13088/jiis.2024.30.1.093 · Cited by 117
Enhanced automated code vulnerability repair using large language models
de-Fitero-Dominguez, D., Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A., & Martinez-Herraiz, J.-J. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109291 · Cited by 43
ReCode: Robustness Evaluation of Code Generation Models
Wang, S., Li, Z., Qian, H., Yang, C., Wang, Z., Shang, M., Kumar, V., Tan, S., Ray, B., Bhatia, P., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.773 · Cited by 42
Better Patching Using LLM Prompting, via Self-Consistency
Ahmed, T., & Dévanbu, P. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00065 · Cited by 56
The Plastic Surgery Hypothesis in the Era of Large Language Models
Xia, C. S., Ding, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023) · 2023 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00047 · Cited by 67
Hajipour, H., Haßler, K., Holz, T., Schönherr, L., & Fritz, M. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml59370.2024.00040 · Cited by 87
Teaching Code LLMs to Use Autocompletion Tools in Repository-Level Code Generation
Wang, C., Zhang, J., Feng, Y., Li, T., Sun, W., Liu, Y., & Peng, X. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3714462 · Cited by 40
“Recent advancements have introduced a variety of code large language models (LLMs) [7, 12, 13, 15, 17, 21, 28, 29, 33, 37, 46, 53, 54] constructed upon the Transformer model architecture [45], achieving promising performance in code-related applications [19, 20, 47—50, 52, 57, 59, 60].”
When Language Model Meets Private Library
Zan, D., Chen, B., Lin, Z., Guan, B., Yongji, W., & Lou, J. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.21 · Cited by 72
Incremental learning of humanoid robot behavior from natural interaction and large language models
Bärmann, L., Kartmann, R., Peller-Konrad, F., Niehues, J., Waibel, A., & Asfour, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1455375 · Cited by 46
Multi-lingual Evaluation of Code Generation Models
Athiwaratkun, B., Gouda, S. K., Wang, Z., Li, X., Tian, Y., Tan, M., Ahmad, W. U., Wang, S., Sun, Q., Shang, M., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.14868 · Cited by 38
Bias Testing and Mitigation in LLM-based Code Generation
Huang, D., Zhang, J. M., Bu, Q., Xie, X., Chen, J., & Cui, H. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3724117 · Cited by 128
Hot or Cold? Adaptive Temperature Sampling for Code Generation with Large Language Models
Zhu, Y., Li, J., Li, G., Zhao, Y., Li, J., Jin, Z. G., & Mei, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i1.27798 · Cited by 69
Lost at C: A User Study on the Security Implications of Large Language Model Code Assistants
Sandoval, G., Pearce, H., Nys, T., Karri, R., Garg, S., & Dolan-Gavitt, B. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.09727 · Cited by 52
Generative Type Inference for Python
Peng, Y. F., Wang, C., Wang, W., Gao, C., & Lyu, M. R.-T. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00031 · Cited by 47
Guo, J., Wang, M., Yin, H., Song, B., Chi, Y., Yu, F. R., & Yuen, C. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3496491 · Cited by 42
AutoVCoder: A Systematic Framework for Automated Verilog Code Generation using LLMs
Mingzhe, G., Zhao, J., Lin, Z., Ding, W., Hou, X., Feng, Y., Li, C., & Guo, M. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors (ICCD) · doi:10.1109/iccd63220.2024.00033 · Cited by 38
Wickramasekara, A., Breitinger, F., & Scanlon, M. (2025) · Forensic Science International Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301859 · Cited by 58
CRUXEVAL-X: A Benchmark for Multilingual Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution
Xu, R., Cao, J., Lu, Y., Wen, M., Lin, H., Han, X., He, B., Cheung, S.-C., & Sun, L. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1158 · Cited by 35
TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering Dataset
Chen, W., Yin, M., Ku, M., Lu, P., Wan, Y., Ma, X., Xu, J., Wang, X., & Xia, T. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.489 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Nijkamp, E., Pang, B., Hayashi, H., Tu, L., Wang, H., Zhou, Y., Savarese, S., & Xiong, C.
- Affiliations
- Salesforce (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2203.13474
- OpenAlex
- W4226485558
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- program synthesis, large language models, code generation, open-source models, HumanEval, natural language programming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
