PreprintCited by 1Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingNatural Language Processing Techniques

Unified Speech-Text Pre-training for Speech Translation and Recognition

Open access
Tang, Yun, Gong, Hongyu, Dong, Ning, Wang, Changhan, Hsu, Wei-Ning, Gu, Jiatao, Baevski, Alexei, Li, Xian +3 more·2022·arXiv

Abstract

We describe a method to jointly pre-train speech and text in an encoder-decoder modeling framework for speech translation and recognition. The proposed method incorporates four self-supervised and supervised subtasks for cross modality learning. A self-supervised speech subtask leverages unlabelled speech data, and a (self-)supervised text to text subtask makes use of abundant text training data. Two auxiliary supervised speech tasks are included to unify speech and text modeling space. Our contribution lies in integrating linguistic information from the text corpus into the speech pre-training. Detailed analysis reveals learning interference among subtasks. Two pre-training configurations for speech translation and recognition, respectively, are presented to alleviate subtask interference. Our experiments show the proposed method can effectively fuse speech and text information into one model. It achieves between 1.7 and 2.3 BLEU improvement above the state of the art on the MuST-C speech translation dataset and comparable WERs to wav2vec 2.0 on the Librispeech speech recognition task.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2204.05409

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing speech-language and audio-language models primarily focus on speech-text conversion, spoken dialogue, or speech generation rather than unified understanding of speech, music, and general audio.

    “These works demonstrate the feasibility of bringing speech into language-model-style generation and interaction, but their primary focus is speech-text conversion, spoken dialogue, or speech generation rather than unified understanding of speech, music, and general audio.”

    From MOSS-Audio Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • MOSS-Audio Technical Report

    Yang, C., Yu, C., Chen, H., Zhu, J., Chen, J., Chen, K., Wang, W., Wang, Y., Jiang, Y., Jiang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.01802

    “Unified Speech-Text Pre-training [46] further studies joint speech-text pre-training for speech recognition and speech translation by combining self-supervised speech learning, text modeling, and supervised cross-modal objectives.”

Authors
Tang, Y., Gong, H., Dong, N., Wang, C., Hsu, W.-N., Gu, J., Baevski, A., Li, X., Mohamed, A., Auli, M., & Pino, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297399268
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
speech translation, speech recognition, cross-modal learning, self-supervised learning, encoder-decoder architecture, MuST-C, LibriSpeech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review