These Deals Won't Last! Longevity, Uniformity and Bias in Product Badge Assignment in E-Commerce Platforms
Open accessAbstract
Product badges are ubiquitous in e-commerce platforms, acting as effective psychological triggers to nudge customers to buy specific products, boosting revenues. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no attempt to systematically study these badges and their several idiosyncrasies - we intend to close this gap in our current work. Specifically, we try to answer questions such as: How long does a product retain a badge on a given platform? If a product is sold on different platforms, then does it receive similar badges? How do the products that receive badges differ from those which do not, in terms of price, customer rating, etc. We collect longitudinal data from several e-commerce platforms over 45 days, and find that although most of the badges are short-lived, there are several permanent badge assignments and that too for badges meant to denote urgency or scarcity. Furthermore, it is unclear how the badge assignments are done, and we find evidence that highly-rated products are missing out on badges compared to lower quality ones. Our work calls for greater transparency in the badge assignment process to inform customers, as well as to reduce dissatisfaction among the sellers dependent on the platforms for their revenues.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent empirical evidence suggests badges can meaningfully change clicks and add-to-cart probabilities, and complementary work studies badge longevity, uniformity, bias across marketplaces, and causal effects of badges in online communities.
“Recent empirical evidence suggests badges can meaningfully change clicks and add-to-cart probabilities [29]; complementary work studies badge longevity, uniformity, and bias across marketplaces, and the causal effects of badges in online communities [3, 22, 28].”
From What Is Your AI Agent Buying? Evaluation, Biases, Model Dependence, & Emerging Implications for Agentic E-Commerce (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Adaji, Ifeoma, and Julita Vassileva. 2016. "Evaluating Personalization and Persuasion in E- Commerce." In PPT@PERSUASIVE, Vol. 1582 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 107-113.
- Bhuiyan, Md Momen, Michael Horning, Sang Won Lee, and Tanushree Mitra. 2021. "Nudge- Cred: Supporting News Credibility Assessment on Social Media Through Nudges." Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5 (CSCW2). bigcommerce. 2009. "Ecommerce For a New Era." https://www.bigcommerce.com.
- Chen, Zhilong, Hancheng Cao, Fengli Xu, Mengjie Cheng, Tao Wang, and Yong Li. 2020. "Understanding the Role of Intermediaries in Online Social E-Commerce: An Exploratory Study of Beidian." Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4 (CSCW2).
- Lilliefors, Hubert W. 1967. "On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown." Journal of the American statistical Association 62 (318): 399-402.
- Mathur, Arunesh, Gunes Acar, Michael J. Friedman, Elena Lucherini, Jonathan Mayer, Marshini Chetty, and Arvind Narayanan. 2019. "Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites." Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3 (CSCW).
- Mota, Nuno, Abhijnan Chakraborty, Asia J. Biega, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Hoda Heidari. 2020. "On the Desiderata for Online Altruism: Nudging for Equitable Donations." Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4 (CSCW2).
- Schuckert, Markus, Xianwei Liu, and Rob Law. 2016. "Stars, Votes, and Badges: How Online Badges Affect Hotel Reviewers." Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 33 (4): 440-452.
- Sorokina, Daria, and Erick Cantu-Paz. 2016. "Amazon search: The joy of ranking products." In ACM SIGIR, .
- Xu, Fengli, Zhenyu Han, Jinghua Piao, and Yong Li. 2019. ""I Think You'll Like It" Modelling the Online Purchase Behavior in Social E-commerce." Proceedings of the ACM on Human- Computer Interaction 3 (CSCW): 1-23.
- Zhang, Chenglong. 2018. "Home Sharing Economy: Reputation Badge and Hosts Competi- tion." SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3270361. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Allouah, A., Besbes, O., Figueroa, J., Kanoria, Y., & Kumar, A. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5381574 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Allouah, A., Besbes, O., Figueroa, J. D., Kanoria, Y., & Kumar, A. (2025) · arXiv
- Authors
- Bansal, A., Banerjee, K., & Chakraborty, A.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2204.12552
- OpenAlex
- W4225081788
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- e-commerce platforms, nudging, product ratings, price, algorithmic bias, transparency, consumer behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
