Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 4

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

QAMPARI: An Open-domain Question Answering Benchmark for Questions with Many Answers from Multiple Paragraphs

Amouyal, Samuel Joseph, Wolfson, Tomer, Rubin, Ohad, Yoran, Ori, Herzig, Jonathan, Berant, Jonathan·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2205.12665arXiv 2205.12665
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Existing benchmarks for open-domain question answering (ODQA) typically focus on questions whose answers can be extracted from a single paragraph. By contrast, many natural questions, such as "What players were drafted by the Brooklyn Nets?" have a list of answers. Answering such questions requires retrieving and reading from many passages, in a large corpus. We introduce QAMPARI, an ODQA benchmark, where question answers are lists of entities, spread across many paragraphs. We created QAMPARI by (a) generating questions with multiple answers from Wikipedia's knowledge graph and tables, (b) automatically pairing answers with supporting evidence in Wikipedia paragraphs, and (c) manually paraphrasing questions and validating each answer. We train ODQA models from the retrieve-and-read family and find that QAMPARI is challenging in terms of both passage retrieval and answer generation, reaching an F1 score of 32.8 at best. Our results highlight the need for developing ODQA models that handle a broad range of question types, including single and multi-answer questions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2205.12665

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Oshin Agarwal, Heming Ge, Siamak Shakeri, and Rami Al-Rfou. 2021. Knowledge graph based synthetic corpus generation for knowledge-enhanced language model pre-training. In Proceedings of the 2021 Con- ference of the North American Chapter of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan- guage Technologies, pages 3554-3565, Online. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Payal Bajaj, Daniel Campos, Nick Craswell, Li Deng, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong Liu, Rangan Majumder, An- drew McNamara, Bhaskar Mitra, Tri Nguyen, Mir Rosenberg, Xia Song, Alina Stoica, Saurabh Tiwary, and Tong Wang. 2016. Ms marco: A human gener- ated machine reading comprehension dataset. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Jonathan Berant, Andrew Chou, Roy Frostig, and Percy Liang. 2013. Semantic parsing on Freebase from question-answer pairs. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan- guage Processing, pages 1533-1544, Seattle, Wash- ington, USA. Association for Computational Linguis- tics.
  4. Eric Brill, Susan Dumais, and Michele Banko. 2002. An analysis of the AskMSR question-answering sys- tem. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing (EMNLP 2002), pages 257-264. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  5. Danqi Chen, Adam Fisch, Jason Weston, and Antoine Bordes. 2017. Reading Wikipedia to answer open- domain questions. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1870-1879, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Jifan Chen and Greg Durrett. 2019. Understanding dataset design choices for multi-hop reasoning. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4026-4032, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Se- bastian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. 2021. Towards unsupervised dense information retrieval with contrastive learning. ArXiv preprint, abs/2112.09118. · arXiv
  8. Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. 2021. Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open do- main question answering. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 874-880, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Mandar Joshi, Eunsol Choi, Daniel Weld, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2017. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehen- sion. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol- ume 1: Long Papers), pages 1601-1611, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis, Ledell Wu, Sergey Edunov, Danqi Chen, and Wen-tau Yih. 2020. Dense passage retrieval for open- domain question answering. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 6769-6781, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Red- field, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Ken- ton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Llion Jones, Matthew Kelcey, Ming-Wei Chang, Andrew M. Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc Le, and Slav Petrov. 2019. Natu- ral questions: A benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, 7:452-466. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. Latent retrieval for weakly supervised open domain question answering. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 6086-6096, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Patrick Lewis, Pontus Stenetorp, and Sebastian Riedel. 2021. Question and answer test-train overlap in open- domain question answering datasets. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 1000-1008, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Patrick S. H. Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Pik- tus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Con- ference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual.
  15. Shayne Longpre, Kartik Perisetla, Anthony Chen, Nikhil Ramesh, Chris DuBois, and Sameer Singh. 2021. Entity-based knowledge conflicts in question answering. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, pages 7052-7063, Online and Punta Cana, Do- minican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Sewon Min, Julian Michael, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2020. AmbigQA: Answering am- biguous open-domain questions. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat- ural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 5783- 5797, Online. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mike Mintz, Steven Bills, Rion Snow, and Daniel Ju- rafsky. 2009. Distant supervision for relation ex- traction without labeled data. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 1003-1011, Suntec, Singapore. Association for Com- putational Linguistics.
  18. Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Gray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe. 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
  19. Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2019. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text trans- former. ArXiv preprint, abs/1910.10683. · arXiv
  20. Ori Ram, Gal Shachaf, Omer Levy, Jonathan Berant, and Amir Globerson. 2022. Learning to retrieve passages without supervision. In North American Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL).
  21. Adam Roberts, Colin Raffel, and Noam Shazeer. 2020. How much knowledge can you pack into the param- eters of a language model? In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 5418-5426, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Stephen Robertson and Hugo Zaragoza. 2009. The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and be- yond. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 3(4):333-389. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Devendra Singh Sachan, Siva Reddy, William L. Hamil- ton, Chris Dyer, and Dani Yogatama. 2021. End-to- end training of multi-document reader and retriever for open-domain question answering. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
  24. Christopher Sciavolino, Zexuan Zhong, Jinhyuk Lee, and Danqi Chen. 2021. Simple entity-centric ques- tions challenge dense retrievers. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing, pages 6138-6148, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Alon Talmor, Ori Yoran, Amnon Catav, Dan Lahav, Yizhong Wang, Akari Asai, Gabriel Ilharco, Han- naneh Hajishirzi, and Jonathan Berant. 2021. Mul- timodalqa: complex question answering over text, tables and images. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net.
  26. Yi Tay, Vinh Q Tran, Mostafa Dehghani, Jianmo Ni, Dara Bahri, Harsh Mehta, Zhen Qin, Kai Hui, Zhe Zhao, Jai Gupta, et al. 2022. Transformer mem- ory as a differentiable search index. ArXiv preprint, abs/2202.06991. · arXiv
  27. Nandan Thakur, Nils Reimers, Andreas Rücklé, Ab- hishek Srivastava, and Iryna Gurevych. 2021. BEIR: A heterogeneous benchmark for zero-shot evaluation of information retrieval models. In Thirty-fifth Con- ference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2).
  28. James Thorne, Majid Yazdani, Marzieh Saeidi, Fab- rizio Silvestri, Sebastian Riedel, and Alon Halevy. 2021. Database reasoning over text. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3091-3104, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  29. Harsh Trivedi, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2022a. MuSiQue: Multi- hop questions via single-hop question composition. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:539-554. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Harsh Trivedi, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2022b. Teaching broad rea- soning skills for multi-step qa by generating hard contexts. · DOI
  31. Duc-Thuan Vo and Ebrahim Bagheri. 2017. Open in- formation extraction. Encyclopedia with semantic computing and Robotic intelligence, 1(01):1630003.
  32. Ellen Voorhees. 2005. Overview of the trec 2004 ques- tion answering track. · DOI
  33. Ellen M. Voorhees and Dawn M. Tice. 2000. The TREC- 8 question answering track. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Re- sources and Evaluation (LREC'00), Athens, Greece. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
  34. Denny Vrandečić and Markus Krötzsch. 2014. Wiki- data: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Communi- cations of the ACM, 57(10):78-85.
  35. Yushi Wang, Jonathan Berant, and Percy Liang. 2015. Building a semantic parser overnight. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1332-1342, Beijing, China. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  36. Johannes Welbl, Pontus Stenetorp, and Sebastian Riedel. 2018. Constructing datasets for multi-hop reading comprehension across documents. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6:287- 302. · DOI
  37. Wei Yang, Yuqing Xie, Aileen Lin, Xingyu Li, Luchen Tan, Kun Xiong, Ming Li, and Jimmy Lin. 2019. End-to-end open-domain question answering with BERTserini. In Proceedings of the 2019 Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics (Demonstrations), pages 72-77, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  38. Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christo- pher D. Manning. 2018. HotpotQA: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empiri- cal Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2369-2380, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Com- putational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Victor Zhong, Weijia Shi, Wen-tau Yih, and Luke Zettle- moyer. 2022. Romqa: A benchmark for robust, multi- evidence, multi-answer question answering. · DOI

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Amouyal, S. J., Wolfson, T., Rubin, O., Yoran, O., Herzig, J., & Berant, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2205.12665
arXiv
2205.12665
References
0
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QAMPARI: An Open-domain Question Answering Benchmark for Questions with Many Answers from Multiple Paragraphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2205.12665
The paper
Amouyal, S. J., Wolfson, T., Rubin, O., Yoran, O., Herzig, J., & Berant, J. (2022). QAMPARI: An Open-domain Question Answering Benchmark for Questions with Many Answers from Multiple Paragraphs. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2205.12665

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.