CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 207Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisModel Reduction and Neural NetworksGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flow Matching for Generative Modeling

Open access
Lipman, Yaron, Chen, Ricky T. Q., Ben-Hamu, Heli, Nickel, Maximilian, Le, Matt·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2210.02747arXiv 2210.02747
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We introduce a new paradigm for generative modeling built on Continuous Normalizing Flows (CNFs), allowing us to train CNFs at unprecedented scale. Specifically, we present the notion of Flow Matching (FM), a simulation-free approach for training CNFs based on regressing vector fields of fixed conditional probability paths. Flow Matching is compatible with a general family of Gaussian probability paths for transforming between noise and data samples -- which subsumes existing diffusion paths as specific instances. Interestingly, we find that employing FM with diffusion paths results in a more robust and stable alternative for training diffusion models. Furthermore, Flow Matching opens the door to training CNFs with other, non-diffusion probability paths. An instance of particular interest is using Optimal Transport (OT) displacement interpolation to define the conditional probability paths. These paths are more efficient than diffusion paths, provide faster training and sampling, and result in better generalization. Training CNFs using Flow Matching on ImageNet leads to consistently better performance than alternative diffusion-based methods in terms of both likelihood and sample quality, and allows fast and reliable sample generation using off-the-shelf numerical ODE solvers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2210.02747

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The original flow matching papers sample the flow matching timestep from a uniform distribution τ ∼ U(0,1).

    “The original flow matching papers [28, 32] sample the flow matching timestep from a uniform distribution: τ ∼ U (0 , 1) .”

    From $π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control (2024) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Flow matching is adopted for training diffusion models because of its conceptual simplicity and practical effectiveness.

    “We adopt flow matching (FM) (Lipman et al., 2022) for training diffusion models because of its conceptual simplicity and practical effectiveness.”

    From World Simulation with Video Foundation Models for Physical AI (2025) · cites this paper as Lipman et al., 2022

  • Continuous visual tokenizers compress visual data into a continuous latent space where diffusion-based models can be efficiently trained.

    “Continuous visual tokenizers, often including Autoencoder (AE) and Variational Autoencoder (VAE), compress visual data into a continuous latent space where diffusion-based models can be efficiently trained on (Ho et al., 2020; Lipman et al., 2022; Song et al., 2020).”

    From Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AI (2025) · cites this paper as Lipman et al., 2022

  • Flow matching has recently emerged as a new family of generative models, successfully applied to large-scale image, language and video data.

    “flow matching (Lipman et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022; Albergo et al., 2023) has recently emerged as a new family of generative models, successfully applied to large-scale image (Lipman et al., 2022; Esser et al., 2024), language (Gat et al., 2024) and video (Polyak et al., 2024) data.”

    From Video Diffusion Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Lipman et al., 2022

  • Flow matching models have demonstrated improvements in both performance and efficiency, outperforming diffusion-based models in many tasks.

    “flow matching models have demonstrated improvements in both performance and efficiency, outperforming diffusion-based models in many tasks.”

    From Video Diffusion Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Lipman et al., 2022

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Lipman, Y., Chen, R. T. Q., Ben-Hamu, H., Nickel, M., & Le, M.
ORCID
Nickel, Maximilian
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2210.02747
arXiv
2210.02747
OpenAlex
W4303647933
Semantic Scholar
af68f10ab5078bfc519caae377c90ee6d9c504e9
Cited by
192
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
flow matching, continuous normalizing flows, generative models, diffusion models, image generation, likelihood estimation, ODE solvers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review