The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 15 are not checked yet.
Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) can perform complex reasoning by generating intermediate reasoning steps. Providing these steps for prompting demonstrations is called chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. CoT prompting has two major paradigms. One leverages a simple prompt like "Let's think step by step" to facilitate step-by-step thinking before answering a question. The other uses a few manual demonstrations one by one, each composed of a question and a reasoning chain that leads to an answer. The superior performance of the second paradigm hinges on the hand-crafting of task-specific demonstrations one by one. We show that such manual efforts may be eliminated by leveraging LLMs with the "Let's think step by step" prompt to generate reasoning chains for demonstrations one by one, i.e., let's think not just step by step, but also one by one. However, these generated chains often come with mistakes. To mitigate the effect of such mistakes, we find that diversity matters for automatically constructing demonstrations. We propose an automatic CoT prompting method: Auto-CoT. It samples questions with diversity and generates reasoning chains to construct demonstrations. On ten public benchmark reasoning tasks with GPT-3, Auto-CoT consistently matches or exceeds the performance of the CoT paradigm that requires manual designs of demonstrations. Code is available at https://github.com/amazon-research/auto-cot
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, when the model's internal knowledge is flawed, the entire reasoning chain may still hallucinate (Zhang et al., 2022).”
From VeReaFine: Iterative Verification Reasoning Refinement RAG for Hallucination-Resistant on Open-Ended Clinical QA (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, forms of weak supervision that would normally require task-specific (Khattab et al., 2021a;b) or hand-built (Ratner et al., 2016; Hancock et al., 2018) heuristics are now done by LMs (Wang et al., 2022b; Zelikman et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022; Shao et al., 2023).”
From DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting results in intermediate reasoning text and improves multi-step problem-solving (Zhang et al., 2022), but remains vulnerable when its internal knowledge is incomplete or outdated (Madaan et al., 2023).”
From VeReaFine: Iterative Verification Reasoning Refinement RAG for Hallucination-Resistant on Open-Ended Clinical QA (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2022
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Zhang et al. (2022) reports 48% for text-davinci-002 , which aligns closely with our llama2-13b-chat results, and reports 59.4% with codex when employing a manual CoT approach and 62.8% with an automatic CoT method.”
From DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. (2022)
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Descriptions of skills (computer programs that interact with the Minecraft engine) that an agent has learned are retained in a vector database and a GPT model is used to generate plans. Plans and a description of the environment are embedded and the closest skills in the db are retrieved.”
From Memory Matters: The Need to Improve Long-Term Memory in LLM-Agents (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language models are few-shot learners. In Hugo Larochelle, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Raia Hadsell, Maria-Florina Balcan, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual , 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/ 1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html .
- Romal Thoppilan, Daniel De Freitas, Jamie Hall, Noam Shazeer, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Heng-Tze Cheng, Alicia Jin, Taylor Bos, Leslie Baker, Yu Du, YaGuang Li, Hongrae Lee, Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Amin Ghafouri, Marcelo Menegali, Yanping Huang, Maxim Krikun, Dmitry Lepikhin, James Qin, Dehao Chen, Yuanzhong Xu, Zhifeng Chen, Adam Roberts, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Zhao, Yanqi Zhou, Chung-Ching Chang, Igor Krivokon, Will Rusch, Marc Pickett, Pranesh Srinivasan, Laichee Man, Kathleen Meier-Hellstern, Meredith Ringel Morris, Tulsee Doshi, Renelito Delos Santos, Toju Duke, Johnny Soraker, Ben Zevenbergen, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Mark Diaz, Ben Hutchinson, Kristen Olson, Alejandra Molina, Erin Hoffman-John, Josh Lee, Lora Aroyo, Ravi Rajakumar, Alena Butryna, Matthew Lamm, Viktoriya Kuzmina, Joe Fenton, Aaron Cohen, Rachel Bernstein, Ray Kurzweil, Blaise Aguera-Arcas, Claire Cui, Marian Croak, Ed Chi, and Quoc Le. Lamda: Language models for dialog applications, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08239 . · arXiv
- Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, Eliza Rutherford, Tom Hennigan, Jacob Menick, Albin Cassirer, Richard Powell, George van den Driessche, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Maribeth Rauh, Po-Sen Huang, Amelia Glaese, Johannes Welbl, Sumanth Dathathri, Saffron Huang, Jonathan Uesato, John Mellor, Irina Higgins, Antonia Creswell, Nat McAleese, Amy Wu, Erich Elsen, Siddhant Jayakumar, Elena Buchatskaya, David Budden, Esme Sutherland, Karen Simonyan, Michela Paganini, Laurent Sifre, Lena Martens, Xiang Lorraine Li, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Aida Nematzadeh, Elena Gribovskaya, Domenic Donato, Angeliki Lazaridou, Arthur Mensch, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Maria Tsimpoukelli, Nikolai Grigorev, Doug Fritz, Thibault Sottiaux, Mantas Pajarskas, Toby Pohlen, Zhitao Gong, Daniel Toyama, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Yujia Li, Tayfun Terzi, Vladimir Mikulik, Igor Babuschkin, Aidan Clark, Diego de Las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Chris Jones, James Bradbury, Matthew Johnson, Blake Hechtman, Laura Weidinger, Iason Gabriel, William Isaac, Ed Lockhart, Simon Osindero, Laura Rimell, Chris Dyer, Oriol Vinyals, Kareem Ayoub, Jeff Stanway, Lorrayne Bennett, Demis Hassabis, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Geoffrey Irving. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training gopher, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2112. 11446 .
- Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du, Ben Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, James Bradbury, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Pengcheng Yin, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier Garcia, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, Liam Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, Andrew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Rewon Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zongwei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang, Brennan Saeta, Mark Diaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeff Dean, Slav Petrov, and Noah Fiedel. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02311 . · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022) , 2022a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903 . · arXiv
- Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022) , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.11916 . · arXiv
- Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. CommonsenseQA: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American
- Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. Training verifiers to solve math word problems, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14168 . · arXiv
- Denny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei, Nathan Scales, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Olivier Bousquet, Quoc Le, and Ed Chi. Least-to-most prompting enables complex reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10625 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10625 . · arXiv
- Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, and Denny Zhou. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11171 , 2022a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2203.11171 . · arXiv
- Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, and Denny Zhou. Rationale-augmented ensembles in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00747 , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00747 . · arXiv
- Yifei Li, Zeqi Lin, Shizhuo Zhang, Qiang Fu, Bei Chen, Jian-Guang Lou, and Weizhu Chen. On the advance of making language models better reasoners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02336 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206. 02336 . · arXiv
- Hongjin Su, Jungo Kasai, Chen Henry Wu, Weijia Shi, Tianlu Wang, Jiayi Xin, Rui Zhang, Mari Ostendorf, Luke Zettlemoyer, Noah A Smith, et al. Selective annotation makes language models better few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01975 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01975 . · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M. Dai, and Quoc V Le. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022b. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=gEZrGCozdqR .
- Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Jonathan Chang, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Han Wang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen, Zheng Xin Yong, Harshit Pandey, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Trishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, Andrea Santilli, Thibault Fevry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Teven Le Scao, Stella Biderman, Leo Gao, Thomas Wolf, and Alexander M Rush. Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=9Vrb9D0WI4 .
- Zihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein, and Sameer Singh. Calibrate before use: Improving few-shot performance of language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 12697-12706, 2021. URL http://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/zhao21c/zhao21c.pdf .
- Haokun Liu, Derek Tam, Mohammed Muqeeth, Jay Mohta, Tenghao Huang, Mohit Bansal, and Colin Raffel. Few-shot parameter-efficient fine-tuning is better and cheaper than in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05638 , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05638 . · arXiv
- Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe, Mike Lewis, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Rethinking the role of demonstrations: What makes in-context learning work? arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12837 , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.12837 . · arXiv
- Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ashish Sabharwal, Oren Etzioni, and Siena Dumas Ang. Parsing algebraic word problems into equations. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 3:585-597, 2015. doi: 10.1162/tacl\_a\_00160. URL https://aclanthology.org/Q15-1042 . · DOI
- Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 , 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374 . · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 301
The Sectarian Divide: The Dynamics of Populism in South Korea
Jung, Y. J. (2025) · Journal of East Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/jea.2025.13 · Cited by 4
Large Language Models Are Efficient Learners as Zero-Shot Speech Translators
Liu, C., Chen, L., Tang, P., Zhang, W., Li, X., Ghosh, S., Ye, Z., & Yu, M. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889325 · Cited by 4
Fu, Y., Li, B., Li, L., Zhang, W., & Xie, T. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3728947 · Cited by 7
Comprehensive survey of large models-driving intelligent decision making
Zheng, Y., Wu, T., Xiao, X., & Xu, Z. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113524 · Cited by 5
Cheng, D., Niu, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., & Jiang, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26662 · Cited by 5
From Wrong To Right: A Recursive Approach Towards Vision-Language Explanation
Ge, J., Subramanian, S., Darrell, T., & Li, B. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.75 · Cited by 4
CoT-STS: A Zero Shot Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Semantic Textual Similarity
Hussain, M., Rehman, U. U., Nguyen, T. D. T., & Lee, S. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference (AICCC) · doi:10.1145/3639592.3639611 · Cited by 5
Li, B., Liu, T., Ma, J., Dai, J., & Liao, P. (2025) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111074 · Cited by 4
Li, Q., Tang, K. L., Li, S., Zhang, K., Li, Z., Chang, L., Li, W., Shen, B., Ding, J., & Min, X. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.07.11.23292512 · Cited by 4
Enabling Generalized Zero-Shot Vulnerability Classification
Hu, J., Guo, J., Luo, C., Hu, Y., Lanzinger, M., & Li, Z. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2025.3532487 · Cited by 4
Xie, J., Lei, S., Yu, Y., Xiang, Y., Wang, H., Wu, X., & Wu, Z. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889870 · Cited by 11
Dynamic Voting for Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models
Xue, M., Liu, D., Lei, W., Ren, X., Yang, B., Xie, J., Zhang, Y., Peng, D., & Lv, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.203 · Cited by 10
INFORM : Information eNtropy based multi-step reasoning FOR large language Models
Zhou, C., You, W., Li, J., Ye, J., Chen, K., & Zhang, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.216 · Cited by 4
Authorship style transfer with inverse transfer data augmentation
Shao, Z., Zhang, J., Li, H., Huang, X., Zhou, C., Wang, Y., Gong, J., Li, C., & Chen, H. (2024) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2024.08.003 · Cited by 5
Schuerkamp, R., Ahlstrom, H., & Giabbanelli, P. J. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113151 · Cited by 4
RECoT: Relation-enhanced Chains-of-Thoughts for knowledge-intensive multi-hop questions answering
Li, R., Li, D., Yang, H., Liu, X., Jin, H., Pu, R., & Miao, Q. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129903 · Cited by 5
Santra, P., Ghosh, M., Ganguly, D., Basuchowdhuri, P., & Naskar, S. K. (2025) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.70021 · Cited by 5
Reorder and then Parse, Fast and Accurate Discontinuous Constituency Parsing
Sun, K., Li, Z., & Zhao, H. Y. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.723 · Cited by 3
Tian, Q., Zhu, H., Wang, L., Li, Y., & Lan, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.114 · Cited by 4
Pyramid Coder: Hierarchical Code Generator for Compositional Visual Question Answering
Shen, R., Inoue, N., & Shinoda, K. (2024) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip51287.2024.10648180 · Cited by 7
TAPO: Task-Referenced Adaptation for Prompt Optimization
Luo, W., Wang, W.-P., Li, X., Zhou, W., Jia, P., & Zhao, X. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888677 · Cited by 3
Bilgin, T. T., Avcı, M. F., Günay, S. M., Şahin, B., Sayaca, Ç., Altan, L., Özkal, Ö., Coşkun, T., & Özkaynak, H. (2025) · The European Research Journal · doi:10.18621/eurj.1672422 · Cited by 2
Object-scene semantics correlation analysis for image emotion classification
Zhou, Z., Zhai, Z., Chen, H., & Sheng, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1657562 · Cited by 2
Borg, M., Aasa, E., Etemadi, K., & Monperrus, M. (2023) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2023.3244638 · Cited by 2
Empower Nested Boolean Logic via Self-Supervised Curriculum Learning
Wu, H., Liu, L., Zhao, H. Y., & Zhang, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.847 · Cited by 5
Task-Level Thinking Steps Help Large Language Models for Challenging Classification Task
Du, C., Tian, J., Liao, H., Chen, J., He, H., & Jin, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.150 · Cited by 2
Preble: Efficient Distributed Prompt Scheduling for LLM Serving
Srivatsa, V., He, Z., Abhyankar, R., Li, D., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.00023 · Cited by 1
“…queried many times with different questions [22]; different requests us-ing the same tools share tool instructions in tool-augmented LLMs [13]; chain-or tree-structured prompting calls an * Equal contribution LLM in steps, with each subsequent step reusing context from previous steps [57, 58, 62].”
BackgroundMitigating Political Bias in Large Language Models Using Chain of thought Prompting Techniques
Poosarla, H. (2024) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2024.58057 · Cited by 1
İSTEM MÜHENDİSLİĞİNİN BÜYÜK DİL MODELLERİNİN PERFORMANSINDAKİ ROLÜ: ANALİZ VE UYGULAMA ÖRNEKLERİ
Tan, F. G., Yüksel, A. S., & Karabıyık, M. A. (2024) · Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.17780/ksujes.1480838 · Cited by 3
Inference Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Modal Chain-of-Thoughts Reasoning for Language Models
He, Q., Qian, S., Zhang, J., & Wang, C. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888701 · Cited by 2
Insufficient task description can impair in-context learning: A study from information perspective
Xuanyuan, M., Yang, T., Fu, J., Zhao, S., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103116 · Cited by 1
UPCMR: A Universal Prompt-Guided Model for Random Sampling Cardiac MRI Reconstruction
Lyu, D., Rao, C., Staring, M., van Osch, M. J. P., Doneva, M., Lamb, H. J., & Pezzotti, N. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87756-8_44 · Cited by 1
Self-Regeneration: Step-Level Regeneration Improves the LLM's Causal Reasoning Ability
Jiang, W., Zhao, S., & Dai, H.-W. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design · doi:10.1109/cscwd64889.2025.11033548
Monitoring water reservoirs extent with Segment Anything Model applied to Sentinel imagery
Sergi, G., Bocchino, F., Ravanelli, R., & Crespi, M. (2025) · European Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/22797254.2025.2527248 · Cited by 1
Research on enhancing model performance by merging with Korean language models
Cho, T., Kim, R., & Choi, A. J. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111686 · Cited by 1
Dong, W., Wang, W., Han, X., Huang, J., Li, L., & Huang, Y. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110789 · Cited by 2
Prompt Optimization with Two Gradients for Classification in Large Language Models
Lieander, A. J., Wang, H., & Rafferty, K. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6080182 · Cited by 4
AIPO: Automatic Instruction Prompt Optimization by model itself with “Gradient Ascent”
Park, K., & Kim, D. (2025) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2025.101889 · Cited by 1
Jiang, T., Wu, S., Yang, S., Yuan, X., Gu, L., & Wu, X. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130496 · Cited by 1
EMRDCM : An experience-enhanced multi-role debate method based on compromise mechanisms
Zhang, Y., Feng, J., Yiming, X., Wang, Z., Yang, T., & Wang, X. (2026) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-026-01022-1 · Cited by 1
On the Evaluation of Large Language Models in Unit Test Evolution (Experience Paper)
None, Zhang, J., Niu, Y., & Zhou, B. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3832282 · Cited by 1
Prompting Steganography: A New Paradigm
Wu, H. (2024) · Electronic Imaging · doi:10.2352/ei.2024.36.4.mwsf-338 · Cited by 2
Fan, C., Tian, J., Li, Y., He, H., & Jin, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10448239 · Cited by 4
Unlocking Chain of Thought in Base Language Models by Heuristic Instruction
Ren, Z., Wang, B., Sun, S., Wang, Y., Ding, Z., & Liu, W. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10650937 · Cited by 1
DIEM: Decomposition-Integration Enhancing Multimodal Insights
Jiang, X., Wang, G., Guo, J., Li, J., Zhang, W., Lu, R., & Tang, S. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02578 · Cited by 2
Reseach on Prompmt Engineering for Generative AI to Create Business Data Analysis Reports
Park, Y., Kim, D., Yoo, S., Bae, Y., & Kim, K. (2024) · The Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology · doi:10.14801/jkiit.2024.22.11.167
Natural Language Querying on Domain-Specific NoSQL Database with Large Language Models
Zhang, W., He, C., Yang, G., Bandyopadhyay, D., Shi, T., & Wang, P. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822485 · Cited by 1
SHR: Enhancing Event Argument Extraction Ability of Large language Models with Simple-Hard Refining
Wu, J., Zhang, C., Zheng, H., & Yu, J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825685 · Cited by 1
A Semantic Verifier for Optimizing Small-Scale Large Language Models on Reasoning Tasks
Bai, Y., Li, J., Cai, F., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc54092.2024.10831379 · Cited by 1
Hussain, M., Rehman, U. U., Nguyen, T. D. T., Lee, S., Kim, S. T., Bae, S., & Kim, J. U. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00250 · Cited by 1
Is ChatGPT capable of solving classical Communications and Networking problems?Preprint
Hernández, J. A., Conde, J., Reviriego, P., & de Arcaute, G. M. R. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23727174 · Cited by 1
Is ChatGPT capable of solving classical Communications and Networking problems?Preprint
Hernández, J. A., Conde, J., Reviriego, P., & de Arcaute, G. M. R. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23727174.v1 · Cited by 1
Tao, K., Osman, Z. A., Tzou, P. L., Rhee, S., Ahluwalia, V., & Shafer, R. W. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3847311/v2 · Cited by 1
Bridging Today and the Future of Humanity: AI Safety in 2024 and BeyondPreprint
Han, S. (2025) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/zhm9uq · Cited by 4
Wang, X., Tan, R., Wang, B., & Cristea, S. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.17.659642 · Cited by 2
Phasook, P., Pitijaroonpong, R., Kinchagawat, J., Chinkamol, A., Saengja, T., Udomlapsakul, K., Sawatphol, J., & Ittichaiwong, P. (2025) · Proceedings of the 24th Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing (Shared Tasks) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.bionlp-share.34
Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernet
Zhang, G., Niu, L., Fang, J., Wang, K., Bai, L., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.04180
EvoFlow: Evolving Diverse Agentic Workflows On The Fly
Zhang, G., Chen, K., Wan, G., Chang, H., Cheng, H., Wang, K., Hu, S., & Bai, L. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.07373
Lu, M., Gao, F., Tang, X., & Chen, L. (2023) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-gxmxr
The student becomes the master: Outperforming GPT3 on Scientific Factual Error Correction
Ashok, D., Kulkarni, A., Pham, H., & Póczos, B. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.451
Simple and Effective Input Reformulations for Translation
Yu, B., Lillemark, H. J., & Keutzer, K. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.638
Dynamic Few-shot Learning for Computational Social SciencePreprint
Malla, R., Coan, T., Srinivasan, V., & Boussalis, C. (2024) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/nfhe8
Mao, T., Fu, J., & Yoshie, O. (2024) · Asia Conference on Information Engineering (ACIE) · doi:10.1109/acie61839.2024.00033
Dissecting Disposition Effect of Large Language Models in Financial DecisionsPreprint
Tan, L., & Li, C. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4818096 · Cited by 1
Guan, I. Y. N., Zhang, G., Liu, X., Zhao, E., & Wu, J. (2024) · International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Control and Robotics (EECR) · doi:10.1109/eecr60807.2024.10607324
Huang, Y., Li, L., Dong, W., Dong, Y., Huang, Y., & Liu, H. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.65435 · Cited by 1
Unleashing Creativity in Natural Language
Packiam, R. S. L., & Murugappan, A. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8557-9.ch003
KG-CQAM: knowledge graph and mind-mapping-based complex question answering for large language models
Lai, X., Tang, L., Zhu, X., Xiao, L., Chen, Z., & Yang, J. (2024) · International Conference on Control, Robotics and Intelligent System (CCRIS) · doi:10.1117/12.3050113
Do Large Language Models solve Computer Science problems
Gupta, H. K., Dhaked, D., & Patvardhan, C. (2024) · IEEE World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC) · doi:10.1109/aic61668.2024.10731104
SMOOTHIE: Label Free Language Model RoutingPreprint
Guha, N., Chen, M. F., Chow, T., Khare, I. S., & Ré, C. (2025) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/f319w4
Xu, B., Qiao, X., Zhang, X., Wan, J., Liu, X., Zong, L., & Lin, H. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822192
Zhao, Y., & Chen, K. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5069851
A Multi-Attribute Mixture Expert Reasoning Approach Based on Large Language ModelsPreprint
Zhang, L., Yuan, J., He, Y., Yu, M., Zhu, K., Luo, J., Yu, Z., & Li, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5167458
Self-citationAudio Texture Manipulation by Exemplar-Based Analogy
Cheng, K. J., Li, T., & Anumanchipalli, G. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10890704 · Cited by 1
Tvarozek, R., & Haffner, O. (2025) · Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I) · doi:10.1109/ki64036.2025.10916478
Generation and Evaluation of Twisted-Plot Stories Using Large Language Models
Park, J., & Bae, B.-C. (2025) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2025.26.3.763
Wu, O. T., Chan, F. K. S., & Law, Y. N. (2024) · International Conference on Computers and Artificial Intelligence Technology (CAIT) · doi:10.1109/cait64506.2024.10963264
Making language models better human-like learners
Qin, C. (2025) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/183806
Kim, G., & Bae, B.-C. (2025) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2025.26.4.1137
Strengths-Leverage Chain-of-Thought: Enhancing Multimodal Reasoning with LLM and LMM
Xu, Q., & Zhang, L. (2024) · International Conference on Virtual Reality and Visualization · doi:10.1109/icvrv62410.2024.00063
Coft: Making Large Language Models Better Zero-Shot Learners for Code Generation
Li, W., Qian, Y., Gao, K., Chen, H., Wang, X., Tong, Y., Li, L., Wu, Y., & Zhao, C. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) · doi:10.1109/icpc66645.2025.00059 · Cited by 1
SoK: On-Device Large Language Model Personalization for Meta Computing
Shi, Y., Jia, Z., Shen, Z., & Zhao, M. (2024) · International Conference on Meta Computing (ICMC) · doi:10.1109/icmc60390.2024.00036
Guariso, D., Adewoyin, R. A., Aguilar, G. R., Guerrero, O. A., & Davies, A. R. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103203
A Reasoning Framework for Precise Cooking Process Based on Graph-Guided Chain of Thought
Zhao, X., Huang, J., Wu, Y., Yu, C., Wu, J., Wu, Z., & Han, L. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd64986.2025.11081975
Enigme: Generative Text Puzzles for Evaluating Reasoning in Language Models
Hawkins, J. (2025) · International Conference on Engineering, Applied Sciences, and Technology (ICEAST) · doi:10.1109/iceast64767.2025.11088210 · Cited by 1
Zhu, X., Xie, J., Zhou, F., Meng, Y., Wang, C., & Nick, R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5374357
Optimizing Small-Scale Language Models for Robotic Task Planning: Insights into Prompt Design
Wu, F., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Wu, Q. (2025) · International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) · doi:10.1109/iccai66501.2025.00066
Kalyan Chakravarthy, K. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5393117
Risk-Aware Automatic Text Summarization with Pre-Identification of Risk Categories and Emphasis
Huang, H., Liu, H., Wu, X., & Cai, Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW) · doi:10.1109/icdew67478.2025.00034
Style prompt tuning for bridging visual gaps in autonomous driving
Cha, S., Choi, G., Kwak, M., & Choi, J. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112105
Liu, E., & Liu, C.-Y. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.11.675485
CE-Prompt: enhance prompt expression stability by multiple understanding
Yang, W., Jin, C., Chen, G., & Jin, H. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3231
Comparison of representative demonstration designing methods of Language Models
Tiwari, S. (2023) · Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) · doi:10.48366/r598308
Do We Like AI to Show “Thinking”? Revealing the Effect of Chain-of-Thought on Human Perceptions
Gao, Z., & Sang, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2655929
Benzarti, S., & Berrabah, C. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16638-8_11
Less is more: a PMA framework for zero-shot multi-hop question answering
Dong, R., Wang, X., Li, S. X., & Li, F. (2026) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-026-01081-4
Joint modeling of source, target, and context for metaphor sentiment analysis: Dataset and method
Niu, C., Liu, H., Zhu, S., Wang, X., He, C., & Jia, Y. (2026) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-026-01079-y
Iachizzi, M., & Grantham, S. (2026) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x261490628
Trustworthy Medical Question Answering: An Evaluation-Centric Survey
Wang, Y., Wang, B., Mercer, R. E., Rudzicz, F., Roy, S. S., Ren, P., Chen, Z., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.03659
InferCept: Efficient Intercept Support for Augmented Large Language Model Inference
Abhyankar, R., He, Z., Srivatsa, V., Zhang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01869
“For example, Chain-of-Thought (Wei et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2023) breaks one request into a chain of “thought” steps, each being a new prompt to an LLM that continues the history of thoughts.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Zhang, A., Li, M., & Smola, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2210.03493
- OpenAlex
- W4304194220
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- chain-of-thought prompting, large language models, reasoning chains, GPT-3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
