The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 15 are not checked yet.
Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) can perform complex reasoning by generating intermediate reasoning steps. Providing these steps for prompting demonstrations is called chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. CoT prompting has two major paradigms. One leverages a simple prompt like "Let's think step by step" to facilitate step-by-step thinking before answering a question. The other uses a few manual demonstrations one by one, each composed of a question and a reasoning chain that leads to an answer. The superior performance of the second paradigm hinges on the hand-crafting of task-specific demonstrations one by one. We show that such manual efforts may be eliminated by leveraging LLMs with the "Let's think step by step" prompt to generate reasoning chains for demonstrations one by one, i.e., let's think not just step by step, but also one by one. However, these generated chains often come with mistakes. To mitigate the effect of such mistakes, we find that diversity matters for automatically constructing demonstrations. We propose an automatic CoT prompting method: Auto-CoT. It samples questions with diversity and generates reasoning chains to construct demonstrations. On ten public benchmark reasoning tasks with GPT-3, Auto-CoT consistently matches or exceeds the performance of the CoT paradigm that requires manual designs of demonstrations. Code is available at https://github.com/amazon-research/auto-cot
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, when the model's internal knowledge is flawed, the entire reasoning chain may still hallucinate (Zhang et al., 2022).”
From VeReaFine: Iterative Verification Reasoning Refinement RAG for Hallucination-Resistant on Open-Ended Clinical QA (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, forms of weak supervision that would normally require task-specific (Khattab et al., 2021a;b) or hand-built (Ratner et al., 2016; Hancock et al., 2018) heuristics are now done by LMs (Wang et al., 2022b; Zelikman et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022; Shao et al., 2023).”
From DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting results in intermediate reasoning text and improves multi-step problem-solving (Zhang et al., 2022), but remains vulnerable when its internal knowledge is incomplete or outdated (Madaan et al., 2023).”
From VeReaFine: Iterative Verification Reasoning Refinement RAG for Hallucination-Resistant on Open-Ended Clinical QA (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2022
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Zhang et al. (2022) reports 48% for text-davinci-002 , which aligns closely with our llama2-13b-chat results, and reports 59.4% with codex when employing a manual CoT approach and 62.8% with an automatic CoT method.”
From DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. (2022)
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Descriptions of skills (computer programs that interact with the Minecraft engine) that an agent has learned are retained in a vector database and a GPT model is used to generate plans. Plans and a description of the environment are embedded and the closest skills in the db are retrieved.”
From Memory Matters: The Need to Improve Long-Term Memory in LLM-Agents (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language models are few-shot learners. In Hugo Larochelle, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Raia Hadsell, Maria-Florina Balcan, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual , 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/ 1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html .
- Romal Thoppilan, Daniel De Freitas, Jamie Hall, Noam Shazeer, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Heng-Tze Cheng, Alicia Jin, Taylor Bos, Leslie Baker, Yu Du, YaGuang Li, Hongrae Lee, Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Amin Ghafouri, Marcelo Menegali, Yanping Huang, Maxim Krikun, Dmitry Lepikhin, James Qin, Dehao Chen, Yuanzhong Xu, Zhifeng Chen, Adam Roberts, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Zhao, Yanqi Zhou, Chung-Ching Chang, Igor Krivokon, Will Rusch, Marc Pickett, Pranesh Srinivasan, Laichee Man, Kathleen Meier-Hellstern, Meredith Ringel Morris, Tulsee Doshi, Renelito Delos Santos, Toju Duke, Johnny Soraker, Ben Zevenbergen, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Mark Diaz, Ben Hutchinson, Kristen Olson, Alejandra Molina, Erin Hoffman-John, Josh Lee, Lora Aroyo, Ravi Rajakumar, Alena Butryna, Matthew Lamm, Viktoriya Kuzmina, Joe Fenton, Aaron Cohen, Rachel Bernstein, Ray Kurzweil, Blaise Aguera-Arcas, Claire Cui, Marian Croak, Ed Chi, and Quoc Le. Lamda: Language models for dialog applications, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08239 . · arXiv
- Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, Eliza Rutherford, Tom Hennigan, Jacob Menick, Albin Cassirer, Richard Powell, George van den Driessche, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Maribeth Rauh, Po-Sen Huang, Amelia Glaese, Johannes Welbl, Sumanth Dathathri, Saffron Huang, Jonathan Uesato, John Mellor, Irina Higgins, Antonia Creswell, Nat McAleese, Amy Wu, Erich Elsen, Siddhant Jayakumar, Elena Buchatskaya, David Budden, Esme Sutherland, Karen Simonyan, Michela Paganini, Laurent Sifre, Lena Martens, Xiang Lorraine Li, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Aida Nematzadeh, Elena Gribovskaya, Domenic Donato, Angeliki Lazaridou, Arthur Mensch, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Maria Tsimpoukelli, Nikolai Grigorev, Doug Fritz, Thibault Sottiaux, Mantas Pajarskas, Toby Pohlen, Zhitao Gong, Daniel Toyama, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Yujia Li, Tayfun Terzi, Vladimir Mikulik, Igor Babuschkin, Aidan Clark, Diego de Las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Chris Jones, James Bradbury, Matthew Johnson, Blake Hechtman, Laura Weidinger, Iason Gabriel, William Isaac, Ed Lockhart, Simon Osindero, Laura Rimell, Chris Dyer, Oriol Vinyals, Kareem Ayoub, Jeff Stanway, Lorrayne Bennett, Demis Hassabis, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Geoffrey Irving. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training gopher, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2112. 11446 .
- Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du, Ben Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, James Bradbury, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Pengcheng Yin, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier Garcia, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, Liam Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, Andrew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Rewon Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zongwei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang, Brennan Saeta, Mark Diaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeff Dean, Slav Petrov, and Noah Fiedel. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02311 . · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022) , 2022a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903 . · arXiv
- Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022) , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.11916 . · arXiv
- Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. CommonsenseQA: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American
- Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. Training verifiers to solve math word problems, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14168 . · arXiv
- Denny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei, Nathan Scales, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Olivier Bousquet, Quoc Le, and Ed Chi. Least-to-most prompting enables complex reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10625 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10625 . · arXiv
- Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, and Denny Zhou. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11171 , 2022a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2203.11171 . · arXiv
- Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, and Denny Zhou. Rationale-augmented ensembles in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00747 , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00747 . · arXiv
- Yifei Li, Zeqi Lin, Shizhuo Zhang, Qiang Fu, Bei Chen, Jian-Guang Lou, and Weizhu Chen. On the advance of making language models better reasoners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02336 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206. 02336 . · arXiv
- Hongjin Su, Jungo Kasai, Chen Henry Wu, Weijia Shi, Tianlu Wang, Jiayi Xin, Rui Zhang, Mari Ostendorf, Luke Zettlemoyer, Noah A Smith, et al. Selective annotation makes language models better few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01975 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01975 . · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M. Dai, and Quoc V Le. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022b. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=gEZrGCozdqR .
- Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Jonathan Chang, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Han Wang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen, Zheng Xin Yong, Harshit Pandey, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Trishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, Andrea Santilli, Thibault Fevry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Teven Le Scao, Stella Biderman, Leo Gao, Thomas Wolf, and Alexander M Rush. Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=9Vrb9D0WI4 .
- Zihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein, and Sameer Singh. Calibrate before use: Improving few-shot performance of language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 12697-12706, 2021. URL http://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/zhao21c/zhao21c.pdf .
- Haokun Liu, Derek Tam, Mohammed Muqeeth, Jay Mohta, Tenghao Huang, Mohit Bansal, and Colin Raffel. Few-shot parameter-efficient fine-tuning is better and cheaper than in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05638 , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05638 . · arXiv
- Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe, Mike Lewis, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Rethinking the role of demonstrations: What makes in-context learning work? arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12837 , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.12837 . · arXiv
- Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ashish Sabharwal, Oren Etzioni, and Siena Dumas Ang. Parsing algebraic word problems into equations. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 3:585-597, 2015. doi: 10.1162/tacl\_a\_00160. URL https://aclanthology.org/Q15-1042 . · DOI
- Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 , 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374 . · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Brief Overview of ChatGPT: The History, Status Quo and Potential Future Development
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q.-L., & Tang, Y. (2023) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2023.123618 · Cited by 1,452
Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate
Liang, T., He, Z., Jiao, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, R., Yang, Y., Shi, S., & Tu, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.992 · Cited by 1,062
Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?
Qin, C., Zhang, A., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., Yasunaga, M., & Yang, D. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.85 · Cited by 869
Self-citationUnleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models
CHEN, B. ‐., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101260 · Cited by 1,097
Self-citationTowards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey
Huang, J., & Chang, K. C.-C. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.67 · Cited by 428
Chen, K., Liu, C., Chen, H., Zhang, H., Li, W., Zou, Z., & Shi, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3356074 · Cited by 466
Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models
Wang, L., Xu, W., Lan, Y., Hu, Z., Lan, Y., Lee, R. K.-W., & Lim, E.-P. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.147 · Cited by 344
Query Rewriting in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Ma, X., Gong, Y., He, P., Zhao, H., & Duan, N. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.322 · Cited by 602
Large Language Models Can Self-Improve
Huang, J., Gu, S. S., Hou, L., Wu, Y., Wang, X., Yu, H., & Han, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.11610 · Cited by 230
Text Classification via Large Language Models
Sun, X., Li, X., Li, J., Wu, F. Q., Guo, S., Zhang, T., & Wang, G. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.603 · Cited by 376
AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models
Zhong, W., Cui, R., Guo, Y., Liang, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Y., Saied, A., Chen, W., & Duan, N. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06364 · Cited by 211
“Large Foundation Model: Recently, large foundation models, like LLMs (e.g., GPT-3 (Brown et al., 2020), GPT-4 (OpenAI, 2023), OPT (Zhang et al., 2022a) and FLAN-T5 (Chung et al., 2022)) have successfully demonstrated unprecedented performance in a wide range of natural language tasks.”
Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models (LLMs)in Learning on Graphs
Chen, Z., Mao, H., Li, H., Jin, W., Wen, H., Wei, X., Wang, S., Yin, D., Fan, W., Liu, H., et al. (2024) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3655103.3655110 · Cited by 209
Large Language Models Can Self-Improve
Huang, J., Gu, S., Hou, L., Wu, Y., Wang, X., Yu, H., & Han, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.67 · Cited by 230
Expel: LLM agents are experiential learners
Zhao, A., Huang, D., Xu, Q., Lin, M., Liu, Y.-J., & Huang, G. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29936 · Cited by 153
Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Survey
Qiao, S., Ou, Y., Zhang, N., Chen, X., Yao, Y., Deng, S., Tan, C., Huang, F., & Chen, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.294 · Cited by 346
Zhang, K., Li, J., Li, G., Shi, X., & Jin, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.737 · Cited by 138
AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models
Zhong, W., Cui, R., Guo, Y., Liang, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Y., Saied, A., Chen, W., & Duan, N. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.149 · Cited by 211
Reasoning Implicit Sentiment with Chain-of-Thought Prompting
Fei, H., Li, B., Liu, Q., Bing, L., Li, F., & Chua, T. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.101 · Cited by 207
Espejel, J. L., Ettifouri, E. H., Alassan, M. S. Y., Chouham, E. M., & Dahhane, W. (2023) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100032 · Cited by 148
Williams, C. Y. K., Miao, B. Y., Kornblith, A. E., & Butte, A. J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52415-1 · Cited by 119
Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters
Wang, B., Min, S., Deng, X., Shen, J., Wu, Y., Zettlemoyer, L., & Sun, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.153 · Cited by 120
Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification
Weng, Y., Zhu, M., Xia, F., Li, B., He, S., Liu, S., Sun, B., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.167 · Cited by 110
Compositional Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Multimodal Models
Mitra, C., Huang, B., Darrell, T., & Herzig, R. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01367 · Cited by 150
Exploring Human-Like Translation Strategy with Large Language Models
He, Z., Liang, T., Jiao, W., Zhang, Z., Yang, Y., Wang, R., Tu, Z., Shi, S., & Wang, X. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00642 · Cited by 162
Self-citationWhen brain-inspired AI meets AGI
Zhao, L., Zhang, L., Wu, Z., Chen, Y., Dai, H., Yu, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, T., Hu, X., Jiang, X., et al. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100005 · Cited by 116
UAVs meet LLMs: Overviews and perspectives towards agentic low-altitude mobility
Tian, Y., Lin, F., Li, Y., Zhang, T., Zhang, Q., Fu, X., Huang, J., Dai, X., Wang, Y., Tian, C., et al. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103158 · Cited by 139
Evaluating Generative AI in Mental Health: Systematic Review of Capabilities and Limitations
Wang, L., Bhanushali, T., Huang, Z., Yang, J., Badami, S., & Hightow-Weidman, L. (2025) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/70014 · Cited by 73
Large language models for life cycle assessments: Opportunities, challenges, and risks
Preuss, N., Alshehri, A. S., & You, F. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142824 · Cited by 71
Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: a Theoretical Perspective
Feng, G., Zhang, B., Gu, Y., Ye, H., He, D., & Wang, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.15408 · Cited by 69
“[63] Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, and Alex Smola.”
BackgroundA Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical Reasoning
Lu, P., Qiu, L., Yu, W., Welleck, S., & Chang, K.-W. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.817 · Cited by 145
SmartGuard: An LLM-enhanced framework for smart contract vulnerability detection
Ding, H., Liu, Y., Piao, X., Song, H., & Ji, Z. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126479 · Cited by 77
Automatic Prompt Augmentation and Selection with Chain-of-Thought from Labeled Data
Shum, K., Diao, S., & Zhang, T. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.811 · Cited by 79
DetGPT: Detect What You Need via Reasoning
Pi, R., Gao, J., Diao, S., Pan, R., Dong, H., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Han, J., Xu, H., Kong, L., et al. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.876 · Cited by 127
Self-Knowledge Guided Retrieval Augmentation for Large Language Models
Wang, Y., Li, P., Sun, M., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.691 · Cited by 141
Toward large reasoning models: A survey of reinforced reasoning with large language models
Xu, F., Hao, Q., Shao, C., Zong, Z., Li, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Lan, X., Gong, J., et al. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101370 · Cited by 533
Natural Language Reasoning, A Survey
Yu, F., Zhang, H., Tiwari, P., & Wang, B. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3664194 · Cited by 131
DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines
Khattab, O., Singhvi, A., Maheshwari, P., Zhang, Z., Santhanam, K., Vardhamanan, S., Haq, S., Sharma, A., Joshi, T. T., Moazam, H., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.03714 · Cited by 911
Self-citationEfficient Prompting for LLM-Based Generative Internet of Things
Xiao, B., Kantarcı, B., Kang, J., Niyato, D. T., & Guizani, M. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3470210 · Cited by 77
AttacKG+: Boosting attack graph construction with Large Language Models
Zhang, Y., Du, T., Ma, Y., Wang, X., Xie, Y., Yang, G., Lu, Y., & Chang, E. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104220 · Cited by 87
Large Language Model Instruction Following: A Survey of Progresses and Challenges
Lou, R., Zhang, K., & Yin, W. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00523 · Cited by 133
Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Xu, Z., & He, Y. (2025) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2025.04.003 · Cited by 63
Kim, S., Joo, S., Kim, D., Jang, J., Ye, S., Shin, J., & Seo, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.782 · Cited by 139
VIP5: Towards Multimodal Foundation Models for Recommendation
Geng, S., Tan, J., Liu, S., Fu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.644 · Cited by 111
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Tabular Language Models
Zheng, M., Yang, H., Jiang, W., Lin, Z., Lyu, Y., She, Q., & Wang, W. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.734 · Cited by 52
Liu, Q., Li, F., Ng, K. K. H., Han, J.-H., & Feng, S. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126422 · Cited by 59
Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debate
Xiong, K., Ding, X., Cao, Y., Liu, T., & Qin, B. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.508 · Cited by 66
KAM-CoT: Knowledge Augmented Multimodal Chain-of-Thoughts Reasoning
Mondal, D., Modi, S., Panda, S., Singh, R., & Rao, G. S. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29844 · Cited by 67
Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debate
Xiong, K., Ding, X., Cao, Y., Liu, T., & Qin, B. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.11595 · Cited by 45
Shuai, B. (2023) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2023.103940 · Cited by 46
Exploring the Effectiveness of Prompt Engineering for Legal Reasoning Tasks
Yu, F., Quartey, L., & Schilder, F. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.858 · Cited by 58
Romero, O. J., Zimmerman, J., Steinfeld, A. M., & Tomasic, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series · doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27706 · Cited by 56
ChatGPT-Based Scenario Engineer: A New Framework on Scenario Generation for Trajectory Prediction
Li, X., Liu, E., Shen, T., Huang, J., & Wang, F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2024.3363232 · Cited by 48
Han, C., Kim, D. W., Kim, S., You, S. C., Park, J. Y., Bae, S., & Yoon, D. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109022 · Cited by 46
Xu, H., Zhang, N., Yin, Z., & Njock, P. G. A. (2025) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106257 · Cited by 47
Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Summarization via Large Language Models
Wang, J., Liang, Y., Meng, F., Zou, B., Li, Z., Qu, J., & Zhou, J. (2023) · Workshop on New Frontiers in Summarization (NewSum) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.newsum-1.2 · Cited by 81
Memory Matters: The Need to Improve Long-Term Memory in LLM-Agents
Hatalis, K., Christou, D., Myers, J., Jones, S., Lambert, K., Amos-Binks, A., Dannenhauer, Z., & Dannenhauer, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series · doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27688 · Cited by 42
Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformation
Lucas, J., Uchendu, A., Yamashita, M., Lee, J., Rohatgi, S., & Lee, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.883 · Cited by 37
Generative Type Inference for Python
Peng, Y. F., Wang, C., Wang, W., Gao, C., & Lyu, M. R.-T. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00031 · Cited by 47
LLM4SGG: Large Language Models for Weakly Supervised Scene Graph Generation
Kim, K., Yoon, K., Jeon, J., In, Y., Moon, J., Kim, D., & Park, C. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02674 · Cited by 39
Cue-CoT: Chain-of-thought Prompting for Responding to In-depth Dialogue Questions with LLMs
Wang, H., Wang, R., Mi, F., Deng, Y., Wang, Z., Liang, B., Xu, R., & Wong, K.-F. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.806 · Cited by 38
PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection
Yang, T., Shi, T., Wan, F., Quan, X., Wang, Q., Wu, B., & Wu, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.216 · Cited by 50
A comprehensive overview of Generative AI (GAI): Technologies, applications, and challenges
Zhang, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., & Mai, W. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129645 · Cited by 45
Self-citationJain, R., Sojitra, D., Acharya, A., Saha, S., Jatowt, A., & Dandapat, S. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.418 · Cited by 39
Wang, L., Bi, W., Zhao, S., Ma, Y., Lv, L., Meng, C., Fu, J., & Lv, H. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/53216 · Cited by 35
How to Prompt Your Robot: A PromptBook for Manipulation Skills with Code as Policies
Arenas, M. G., Xiao, T. G., Singh, S., Jain, V., Ren, A. Z., Vuong, Q., Varley, J., Herzog, A., Leal, I. M. P., Kirmani, S., et al. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610784 · Cited by 40
Thelwall, M. A., & Yaghi, A. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05287-1 · Cited by 36
Evaluating GPT-3 Generated Explanations for Hateful Content Moderation
Wang, H., Hee, M. S., Awal, M. R., Choo, K. T. W., & Lee, R. K.-W. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/694 · Cited by 59
Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement via Prompt Evolution
Fernando, C., Banarse, D., Michalewski, H., Osindero, S., & Rocktäschel, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.16797 · Cited by 31
Leypold, T., Schäfer, B., Boos, A. M., & Beier, J. P. (2024) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.06.002 · Cited by 31
Liang, Y., Wang, J., Zhu, H., Wang, L., Qian, W., & Lan, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.263 · Cited by 46
Large Knowledge Model: Perspectives and Challenges
Chen, H. (2024) · Data Intelligence · doi:10.3724/2096-7004.di.2024.0001 · Cited by 56
FLTRNN: Faithful Long-Horizon Task Planning for Robotics with Large Language Models
Zhang, J., Tang, L., Song, Y., Meng, Q., Qian, H., Shao, J., Song, W., Zhu, S., & Gu, J. J. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10611663 · Cited by 32
Is a Large Language Model a Good Annotator for Event Extraction?
Chen, R., Qin, C., Jiang, W., & Choi, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29730 · Cited by 35
Li, F., Hogg, D., & Cohn, A. G. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29811 · Cited by 30
Chain of Thought with Explicit Evidence Reasoning for Few-shot Relation Extraction
Ma, X., Li, J., & Zhang, M. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.153 · Cited by 37
Jin, Y., & Ma, J. (2024) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105940 · Cited by 33
Xu, K., Zhang, K., Li, J., Huang, W. D., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14010047 · Cited by 38
Mitigating reasoning hallucination through Multi-agent Collaborative Filtering
Shi, J., Zhao, J., Wu, X., Xu, R., Jiang, Y.-H., & He, L. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125723 · Cited by 34
Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Self-Adaptive Prompting
Wan, X., Sun, R., Dai, H., Arık, S. Ö., & Pfister, T. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.216 · Cited by 56
Self-Contrast: Better Reflection Through Inconsistent Solving Perspectives
Zhang, W., Shen, Y., Wu, L., Peng, Q., Wang, J., Zhuang, Y., & Lu, W. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.197 · Cited by 27
Gu, Z., Jia, W., Piccardi, M., & Yu, P. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103078 · Cited by 27
Zhou, J., & Camba, J. D. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127520 · Cited by 30
Exchange-of-Thought: Enhancing Large Language Model Capabilities through Cross-Model Communication
Yin, Z., Sun, Q., Chang, C., Guo, Q., Dai, J., Huang, X., & Qiu, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.936 · Cited by 26
Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities
Wang, J., Wang, J., Athiwaratkun, B., Zhang, C., & Zou, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04692 · Cited by 386
“To automate CoT prompting, Auto-CoT (Zhang et al., 2022b) constructs demonstrations by sampling diverse questions and generating reasoning chains.”
MethodWang, Y., Zhang, C., Li, J., Pang, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, M., & Wang, D. (2024) · Journal of Optical Communications and Networking · doi:10.1364/jocn.521913 · Cited by 25
Zhong, S., Huang, Z., Gao, S., Wen, W., Lin, L., Žitnik, M., & Zhou, P. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01258 · Cited by 36
Sood, A. K., Zeadally, S., & Hong, E. (2025) · Computers and Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110307 · Cited by 33
Correia, A., Hickey, S., & Xu, F. (2025) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2025.2528545 · Cited by 34
Agentic Large Language Models for day-to-day route choices
Wang, L., Duan, P., He, Z., Lyu, C., Chen, X., Zheng, N., Yao, L., & Ma, Z. (2025) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2025.105307 · Cited by 49
Tao, K., Osman, Z. A., Tzou, P. L., Rhee, S., Ahluwalia, V., & Shafer, R. W. (2024) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-024-02253-y · Cited by 25
Opportunities and Challenges of Foundation Models in Industrial Manufacturing
Ayyat, M., Osman, M., & Nadeem, T. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3589777 · Cited by 25
MM-Narrator: Narrating Long-form Videos with Multimodal In-Context Learning
Zhang, C., Lin, K., Yang, Z., Wang, J., Li, L., Lin, C.-C., Liu, Z., & Wang, L. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01295 · Cited by 24
A Proposal for a Language Model Based Cognitive Architecture
Knowles, K., Witbrock, M., Dobbie, G., & Yogarajan, V. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series · doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27691 · Cited by 23
MoT: Memory-of-Thought Enables ChatGPT to Self-Improve
Li, X., & Qiu, X. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.392 · Cited by 53
Lin, H., Luo, Z., Ma, J., & Chen, L. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.611 · Cited by 40
Transfer learning for language model adaptation
Saiful, B. M. (2023) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/169892 · Cited by 22
End-to-end Task-oriented Dialogue: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, and Future Directions
Qin, L., Pan, W., Chen, Q., Liao, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Che, W., & Li, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.363 · Cited by 39
Self-citationLarge language model for medical images: a survey of taxonomy, systematic review, and future trends
Wang, P., Lu, W., Lu, C., Zhou, R., Li, M., & Qin, L. (2025) · Big Data Mining and Analytics · doi:10.26599/bdma.2024.9020090 · Cited by 21
Self-citationChain of Thought Prompting Elicits Knowledge Augmentation
Wu, D., Zhang, J., & Huang, X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.408 · Cited by 33
Large Language Models are Complex Table Parsers
Zhao, B., Ji, C., Zhang, Y., He, W., Wang, Y., Wang, Q., Feng, R., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.914 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Zhang, A., Li, M., & Smola, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2210.03493
- OpenAlex
- W4304194220
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- chain-of-thought prompting, large language models, reasoning chains, GPT-3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
