The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 15 are not checked yet.
Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) can perform complex reasoning by generating intermediate reasoning steps. Providing these steps for prompting demonstrations is called chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. CoT prompting has two major paradigms. One leverages a simple prompt like "Let's think step by step" to facilitate step-by-step thinking before answering a question. The other uses a few manual demonstrations one by one, each composed of a question and a reasoning chain that leads to an answer. The superior performance of the second paradigm hinges on the hand-crafting of task-specific demonstrations one by one. We show that such manual efforts may be eliminated by leveraging LLMs with the "Let's think step by step" prompt to generate reasoning chains for demonstrations one by one, i.e., let's think not just step by step, but also one by one. However, these generated chains often come with mistakes. To mitigate the effect of such mistakes, we find that diversity matters for automatically constructing demonstrations. We propose an automatic CoT prompting method: Auto-CoT. It samples questions with diversity and generates reasoning chains to construct demonstrations. On ten public benchmark reasoning tasks with GPT-3, Auto-CoT consistently matches or exceeds the performance of the CoT paradigm that requires manual designs of demonstrations. Code is available at https://github.com/amazon-research/auto-cot
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, when the model's internal knowledge is flawed, the entire reasoning chain may still hallucinate (Zhang et al., 2022).”
From VeReaFine: Iterative Verification Reasoning Refinement RAG for Hallucination-Resistant on Open-Ended Clinical QA (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, forms of weak supervision that would normally require task-specific (Khattab et al., 2021a;b) or hand-built (Ratner et al., 2016; Hancock et al., 2018) heuristics are now done by LMs (Wang et al., 2022b; Zelikman et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022; Shao et al., 2023).”
From DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting results in intermediate reasoning text and improves multi-step problem-solving (Zhang et al., 2022), but remains vulnerable when its internal knowledge is incomplete or outdated (Madaan et al., 2023).”
From VeReaFine: Iterative Verification Reasoning Refinement RAG for Hallucination-Resistant on Open-Ended Clinical QA (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2022
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Zhang et al. (2022) reports 48% for text-davinci-002 , which aligns closely with our llama2-13b-chat results, and reports 59.4% with codex when employing a manual CoT approach and 62.8% with an automatic CoT method.”
From DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. (2022)
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Descriptions of skills (computer programs that interact with the Minecraft engine) that an agent has learned are retained in a vector database and a GPT model is used to generate plans. Plans and a description of the environment are embedded and the closest skills in the db are retrieved.”
From Memory Matters: The Need to Improve Long-Term Memory in LLM-Agents (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language models are few-shot learners. In Hugo Larochelle, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Raia Hadsell, Maria-Florina Balcan, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual , 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/ 1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html .
- Romal Thoppilan, Daniel De Freitas, Jamie Hall, Noam Shazeer, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Heng-Tze Cheng, Alicia Jin, Taylor Bos, Leslie Baker, Yu Du, YaGuang Li, Hongrae Lee, Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Amin Ghafouri, Marcelo Menegali, Yanping Huang, Maxim Krikun, Dmitry Lepikhin, James Qin, Dehao Chen, Yuanzhong Xu, Zhifeng Chen, Adam Roberts, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Zhao, Yanqi Zhou, Chung-Ching Chang, Igor Krivokon, Will Rusch, Marc Pickett, Pranesh Srinivasan, Laichee Man, Kathleen Meier-Hellstern, Meredith Ringel Morris, Tulsee Doshi, Renelito Delos Santos, Toju Duke, Johnny Soraker, Ben Zevenbergen, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Mark Diaz, Ben Hutchinson, Kristen Olson, Alejandra Molina, Erin Hoffman-John, Josh Lee, Lora Aroyo, Ravi Rajakumar, Alena Butryna, Matthew Lamm, Viktoriya Kuzmina, Joe Fenton, Aaron Cohen, Rachel Bernstein, Ray Kurzweil, Blaise Aguera-Arcas, Claire Cui, Marian Croak, Ed Chi, and Quoc Le. Lamda: Language models for dialog applications, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08239 . · arXiv
- Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, Eliza Rutherford, Tom Hennigan, Jacob Menick, Albin Cassirer, Richard Powell, George van den Driessche, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Maribeth Rauh, Po-Sen Huang, Amelia Glaese, Johannes Welbl, Sumanth Dathathri, Saffron Huang, Jonathan Uesato, John Mellor, Irina Higgins, Antonia Creswell, Nat McAleese, Amy Wu, Erich Elsen, Siddhant Jayakumar, Elena Buchatskaya, David Budden, Esme Sutherland, Karen Simonyan, Michela Paganini, Laurent Sifre, Lena Martens, Xiang Lorraine Li, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Aida Nematzadeh, Elena Gribovskaya, Domenic Donato, Angeliki Lazaridou, Arthur Mensch, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Maria Tsimpoukelli, Nikolai Grigorev, Doug Fritz, Thibault Sottiaux, Mantas Pajarskas, Toby Pohlen, Zhitao Gong, Daniel Toyama, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Yujia Li, Tayfun Terzi, Vladimir Mikulik, Igor Babuschkin, Aidan Clark, Diego de Las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Chris Jones, James Bradbury, Matthew Johnson, Blake Hechtman, Laura Weidinger, Iason Gabriel, William Isaac, Ed Lockhart, Simon Osindero, Laura Rimell, Chris Dyer, Oriol Vinyals, Kareem Ayoub, Jeff Stanway, Lorrayne Bennett, Demis Hassabis, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Geoffrey Irving. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training gopher, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2112. 11446 .
- Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du, Ben Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, James Bradbury, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Pengcheng Yin, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier Garcia, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, Liam Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, Andrew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Rewon Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zongwei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang, Brennan Saeta, Mark Diaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeff Dean, Slav Petrov, and Noah Fiedel. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02311 . · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022) , 2022a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903 . · arXiv
- Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022) , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.11916 . · arXiv
- Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. CommonsenseQA: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American
- Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. Training verifiers to solve math word problems, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14168 . · arXiv
- Denny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei, Nathan Scales, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Olivier Bousquet, Quoc Le, and Ed Chi. Least-to-most prompting enables complex reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10625 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10625 . · arXiv
- Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, and Denny Zhou. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11171 , 2022a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2203.11171 . · arXiv
- Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, and Denny Zhou. Rationale-augmented ensembles in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00747 , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00747 . · arXiv
- Yifei Li, Zeqi Lin, Shizhuo Zhang, Qiang Fu, Bei Chen, Jian-Guang Lou, and Weizhu Chen. On the advance of making language models better reasoners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02336 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206. 02336 . · arXiv
- Hongjin Su, Jungo Kasai, Chen Henry Wu, Weijia Shi, Tianlu Wang, Jiayi Xin, Rui Zhang, Mari Ostendorf, Luke Zettlemoyer, Noah A Smith, et al. Selective annotation makes language models better few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01975 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01975 . · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M. Dai, and Quoc V Le. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022b. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=gEZrGCozdqR .
- Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Jonathan Chang, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Han Wang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen, Zheng Xin Yong, Harshit Pandey, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Trishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, Andrea Santilli, Thibault Fevry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Teven Le Scao, Stella Biderman, Leo Gao, Thomas Wolf, and Alexander M Rush. Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=9Vrb9D0WI4 .
- Zihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein, and Sameer Singh. Calibrate before use: Improving few-shot performance of language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 12697-12706, 2021. URL http://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/zhao21c/zhao21c.pdf .
- Haokun Liu, Derek Tam, Mohammed Muqeeth, Jay Mohta, Tenghao Huang, Mohit Bansal, and Colin Raffel. Few-shot parameter-efficient fine-tuning is better and cheaper than in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05638 , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05638 . · arXiv
- Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe, Mike Lewis, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Rethinking the role of demonstrations: What makes in-context learning work? arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12837 , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.12837 . · arXiv
- Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ashish Sabharwal, Oren Etzioni, and Siena Dumas Ang. Parsing algebraic word problems into equations. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 3:585-597, 2015. doi: 10.1162/tacl\_a\_00160. URL https://aclanthology.org/Q15-1042 . · DOI
- Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 , 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374 . · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 301
Li, S., Tan, W., Zhang, C., Li, J., Ren, H., Guo, Y., Jia, J., Liu, Y., Pan, X., Guo, J., et al. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125920 · Cited by 22
Knowledge-Aware Code Generation with Large Language Models
Huang, T., Sun, Z., Jin, Z. G., Li, G., & Lyu, C. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) · doi:10.1145/3643916.3644418 · Cited by 20
Addressing Technical Challenges in Large Language Model-Driven Educational Software System
Chondamrongkul, N., Hristov, G., & Temdee, P. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3531380 · Cited by 21
Bellini-Leite, S. C. (2023) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/10597123231206604 · Cited by 25
CALLM: Enhancing Clinical Interview Analysis Through Data Augmentation With Large Language Models
Wu, Y., Mao, K., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3435085 · Cited by 23
Hou, S., Zhao, A., Liang, J., Shen, Z., & Wu, H. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113624 · Cited by 25
Hou, S., Liang, J., Zhao, A., & Wu, H. (2025) · Geo-spatial Information Science · doi:10.1080/10095020.2025.2505556 · Cited by 18
Artificial Intelligence in the 21st Century
奥宮, 正. (2023) · Research on Intelligent Manufacturing and Assembly · doi:10.25082/rima.2023.01.002 · Cited by 21
A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation ModelsPreprint
Sun, J., Zheng, C., Xie, E., Liu, Z., Chu, R., Liu, J., Xu, J., Ding, M., Li, H., Geng, M., et al. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ac4sp · Cited by 143
FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models
Li, Y., Liu, X., Wang, X., Lee, B., Wang, S., Rocha, A. D. R., & Lin, W. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3597211 · Cited by 59
There and Back Again: Extracting Formal Domains for Controllable Neurosymbolic Story Authoring
Kelly, J., Calderwood, A., Wardrip–Fruin, N., & Mateas, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment · doi:10.1609/aiide.v19i1.27502 · Cited by 21
Prompting Large Language Models for Malicious Webpage Detection
Li, L., & Gong, B. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (PRML) · doi:10.1109/prml59573.2023.10348229 · Cited by 19
Li, J., Yang, Y., Mao, C., Pang, P. C., Zhu, Q., Xu, D., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/66344 · Cited by 19
Chain-of-Thought Improves Text Generation with Citations in Large Language Models
Ji, B., Liu, H., Du, M., & Ng, S.-K. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29794 · Cited by 19
Lu, M., Gao, F., Tang, X., & Chen, L. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109451 · Cited by 19
Self-Polish: Enhance Reasoning in Large Language Models via Problem Refinement
Xi, Z., Jin, S., Zhou, Y., Zheng, R., Gao, S., Liu, J., Gui, T., Zhang, Q., & Huang, X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.762 · Cited by 40
Overloaded minds and machines: a cognitive load framework for human-AI symbiosis
Wang, P., Liu, H., Zou, L., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-026-11510-z · Cited by 18
Learning a Structural Causal Model for Intuition Reasoning in Conversation
Chen, H., Liao, B., Luo, J., Zhu, W., & Yang, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3352575 · Cited by 19
Su, H., Wang, X., Li, J., Xie, S., & Luo, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3368171 · Cited by 15
Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Ma, X., Gong, Y., He, P., Zhao, H., & Duan, N. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14283 · Cited by 14
“, 2023a) and the selection of demonstrations shows effects on the in-context learning performance (Su et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023b).”
BackgroundMerging Generated and Retrieved Knowledge for Open-Domain QA
Zhang, Y., Khalifa, M., Logeswaran, L., Lee, M., Lee, H., & Wang, L. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.286 · Cited by 26
A Causality-Aware Paradigm for Evaluating Creativity of Multimodal Large Language Models
Huang, Z., Zhong, S., Zhou, P., Gao, S., Žitnik, M., & Lin, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3539433 · Cited by 16
Masikisiki, B., Marivate, V., & Hlophe, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the 4th African Human Computer Interaction Conference · doi:10.1145/3628096.3628747 · Cited by 13
Wu, W., Guo, Y., Li, Q., & Jia, C. (2024) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.16112 · Cited by 13
Liang, J., Hou, S., Zhao, A., Xu, Q., Xiang, L., Li, R., & Wu, H. (2025) · Geo-spatial Information Science · doi:10.1080/10095020.2025.2483884 · Cited by 16
Structured knowledge-based causal discovery: Agentic streams of thought
Meier, S., Raut, P. N., Mahr, F., Thielen, N., Franke, J. E., & Risch, F. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104202 · Cited by 14
Gong, X., Xu, W., & Qiao, A. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00552-y · Cited by 18
Wu, S., Qiao, Y., He, S., Zhou, J., Wang, Z., Li, X., & Wang, F. (2025) · Fire · doi:10.3390/fire8060237 · Cited by 13
OpenICL: An Open-Source Framework for In-context Learning
Wu, Z., Wang, Y., Ye, J., Wu, Z., Feng, J., Xu, J., & Qiao, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.47 · Cited by 14
Rewriting the Script: Adapting Text Instructions for Voice Interaction
Hwang, A., Oza, N., Callison-Burch, C., & Head, A. (2023) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3563657.3596059 · Cited by 12
A Video Is Worth 4096 Tokens: Verbalize Story Videos To Understand Them In Zero Shot
Bhattacharyya, A., Singla, Y., Krishnamurthy, B., Shah, R. R., & Chen, C. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.608 · Cited by 28
How Many Demonstrations Do You Need for In-context Learning?
Chen, J., Chen, L., Zhu, C., & Zhou, T. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.745 · Cited by 12
Zeng, Y., Brown, C., Raymond, J., Byari, M., Hotz, R., & Rounsevell, M. (2025) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-16-423-2025 · Cited by 20
Proceedings of the 4th New Frontiers in Summarization Workshop
(2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.newsum-1 · Cited by 12
Multimodal Medical Image Analysis: Integrating LLM and RAG Deep Learning Strategies
Yan, H., & Shao, D. (2025) · Journal of Advances in Information Technology · doi:10.12720/jait.16.4.568-581 · Cited by 14
LLMs with User-defined Prompts as Generic Data Operators for Reliable Data Processing
Ma, L., Thakurdesai, N., Chen, J., Xu, J., Körpeoğlu, E., Kumar, S., & Achan, K. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386472 · Cited by 16
Chen, S., Wang, W., Chen, X., Lu, P., Yang, Z., & Du, Y. (2024) · Data Intelligence · doi:10.1162/dint_a_00251 · Cited by 14
Guo, Y., Wang, H., Ren, X., Wang, T., Chen, W., Xu, Z., & Ge, H. (2025) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.70004 · Cited by 11
Jin, K., Wang, Y., Santos, L., Fang, T., Yang, X., & Im, S. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10887684 · Cited by 11
Automated Generation of Test Scenarios for Autonomous Driving Using LLMs
Danso, A. A., & Büker, U. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14163177 · Cited by 13
Agarwal, R., Singh, A., Zhang, L. M., Bohnet, B., Rosias, L., Chan, S., Zhang, B., Anand, A., Abbas, Z., Nova, A., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.11018 · Cited by 35
“Another related approach is AutoCoT [70] that uses a zero-shot CoT prompt to produce model-generated demonstrations for few-shot ICL.”
Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Key Condition Verification
Wu, Z., Zeng, Q., Zhang, Z., Tan, Z., Shen, C., & Jiang, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.714 · Cited by 36
Self-citationKnowledge-Augmented Interpretable Network for Zero-Shot Stance Detection on Social Media
Zhang, B., Ding, D., Huang, Z., Li, A., Li, Y., Zhang, B., & Huang, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3388723 · Cited by 12
Yuan, Z., Liu, K., Peng, R., Li, S., Leybourne, D. J., Musa, N., Huang, H., & Yang, P. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Magazine · doi:10.1109/iotm.001.2400036 · Cited by 11
HiPrompt: Few-Shot Biomedical Knowledge Fusion via Hierarchy-Oriented Prompting
Lu, J., Shen, J., Xiong, B., Ma, W., Staab, S., & Yang, C. (2023) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3539618.3591997 · Cited by 14
GROVE: A Retrieval-augmented Complex Story Generation Framework with A Forest of Evidence
Wen, Z., Tian, Z., Wu, W., Yang, Y., Shi, Y., Huang, Z., & Li, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.262 · Cited by 23
Failures Pave the Way: Enhancing Large Language Models through Tuning-free Rule Accumulation
Yang, Z., Li, P., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.109 · Cited by 24
Xu, Q., Li, J., Tian, Y., Zhou, L., Zhang, F., & Huang, R. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126951 · Cited by 9
Self-prompted Chain-of-Thought on Large Language Models for Open-domain Multi-hop Reasoning
Wang, J., Li, J., & Zhao, H. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.179 · Cited by 9
Self-ICL: Zero-Shot In-Context Learning with Self-Generated Demonstrations
Chen, W., Wu, C.-K., Chen, Y.-N., & Chen, H. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.968 · Cited by 33
Knowledge-Prompted Estimator: A Novel Approach to Explainable Machine Translation Assessment
Yang, H., Zhang, M., Tao, S., Wang, M., Wei, D., & Jiang, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Advanced Communications Technology (ICACT) · doi:10.23919/icact60172.2024.10471974 · Cited by 10
Reverse Multi-Choice Dialogue Commonsense Inference with Graph-of-Thought
Zheng, L., Fei, H., Li, F., Li, B., Liao, L., Ji, D., & Teng, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29942 · Cited by 11
Language-Models-as-a-Service: Overview of a New Paradigm and its Challenges
La Malfa, E., Petrov, A., Frieder, S., Weinhuber, C., Burnell, R., Nazar, R., Cohn, A., Shadbolt, N., & Wooldridge, M. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.15865 · Cited by 9
Huda, N. U., Sahito, S. F., Gilal, A. R., Abro, A., Alshanqiti, A. M., Alsughayyir, A., & Palli, A. S. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2024.0150442 · Cited by 13
A Novel RAG Framework with Knowledge-Enhancement for Biomedical Question Answering
Du, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, B., Jin, X., & Yu, P. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822837 · Cited by 10
Dong, Y., Meng, X., Yu, N., Li, Z., & Guo, S. (2025) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp61157.2025.00119 · Cited by 48
Question Answering as Programming for Solving Time-Sensitive Questions
Zhu, X., Yang, C., Chen, B., Li, S., Lou, J., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.787 · Cited by 11
Krag, C. H., Balschmidt, T., Bruun, F. J., Brejnebøl, M. W., Xu, J. J., Boesen, M., Andersen, M. B., & Müller, F. C. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.10.01.24314702 · Cited by 8
Tax Intelligent Decision-Making Language Model
Zhong, Y., Wong, D., & Lan, K. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3419079 · Cited by 7
An adaptive confidence-based data revision framework for Document-level Relation Extraction
Jiang, C., Liao, J., Zhao, X. H., Zeng, D., & Dai, J. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103909 · Cited by 8
RAGFix: Enhancing LLM Code Repair Using RAG and Stack Overflow Posts
Mansur, E., Chen, J., Raza, M. A., & Wardat, M. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825785 · Cited by 10
GeoFactory: an LLM performance enhancement framework for geoscience factual and inferential tasks
Chen, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Lin, M., Liao, Y., Li, J., & Bai, Y. (2025) · Big Earth Data · doi:10.1080/20964471.2025.2506291 · Cited by 8
Automated Factual Benchmarking for In-Car Conversational Systems Using Large Language Models
Giebisch, R., Friedl, K. E., Sorokin, L., & Stocco, A. (2025) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/iv64158.2025.11097480 · Cited by 7
A Three-Stage Framework for Event-Event Relation Extraction with Large Language Model
Huang, F., Huang, Q., Zhao, Y., Qi, Z., Wang, B., Huang, Y., & Li, S. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8181-6_33 · Cited by 7
GRACE: Discriminator-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Khalifa, M., Logeswaran, L., Lee, M., Lee, H., & Wang, L. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.1022 · Cited by 31
Using GPT-4 Turbo to Automatically Identify Defeaters in Assurance Cases
Shahandashti, K. K., Belle, A. B., Mohajer, M. M., Odu, O., Lethbridge, T. C., Hemmati, H., & Wang, S. (2024) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew61692.2024.00011 · Cited by 7
Zentner, N. L. (2025) · Wirtschaftsinformatik & Management · doi:10.1365/s35764-024-00544-z · Cited by 7
Universal Self-Adaptive Prompting
Wan, X., Sun, R., Nakhost, H., Dai, H., Eisenschlos, J. M., Arık, S. Ö., & Pfister, T. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.461 · Cited by 21
Explanation Selection Using Unlabeled Data for Chain-of-Thought Prompting
Ye, X., & Durrett, G. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.41 · Cited by 11
Image Content Generation with Causal Reasoning
Li, X., Fan, B., Zhang, R., Jin, L., Wang, D., Guo, Z., Zhao, Y., & Li, R. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i12.29269 · Cited by 11
Evaluating the use of GPT-3.5-turbo to provide clinical recommendations in the Emergency DepartmentPreprint
Williams, C. Y. K., Miao, B. Y., & Butte, A. J. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.10.19.23297276 · Cited by 7
Unveiling the Key Factors for Distilling Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Chen, X., Sun, Z., Wenjin, G., Zhang, M., Chen, Y., Sun, Y., Su, H., Pan, Y., Klakow, D., Li, W., et al. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.782 · Cited by 7
Liu, R., Geng, J., Wu, A. J., Sucholutsky, I., Lombrozo, T., & Griffiths, T. L. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.21333 · Cited by 6
“This approach can result in significant performance improvements in language (Zhang et al., 2023) and vision (Zhang et al., 2024) tasks, hypothesized to be a consequence of exploiting local structure in language (Prys-tawski et al., 2024).”
Prompt Engineering Through the Lens of Optimal Control
Luo, Y., Tang, Y., Shen, C., Zhou, Z., & Dong, B. (2023) · Journal of Machine Learning · doi:10.4208/jml.231023 · Cited by 28
Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Sui, D., Cao, L., Zhao, J., & Liu, K. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.331 · Cited by 13
Peasley, D., Kuplicki, R., Sen, S., & Paulus, M. P. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/68135 · Cited by 7
Large language models for biomolecular analysis: From methods to applications
Feng, R., Zhang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2024.117540 · Cited by 7
Get an A in Math: Progressive Rectification Prompting
Wu, Z., Jiang, M., & Shen, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29898 · Cited by 6
Complex QA and language models hybrid architectures, SurveyPreprint
Daull, X., Bellot, P., Bruno, E., Martin, V., & Murisasco, É. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.09051 · Cited by 32
Grimoire is All You Need for Enhancing Large Language ModelsPreprint
Chen, D., Song, S., Yu, Q., Li, Z., Wang, W., Xiong, F., & Tang, B. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3845612/v1 · Cited by 13
Long-Term Memory for Large Language Models Through Topic-Based Vector Database
Zhang, Y., Yu, Z., Jiang, W., Shen, Y., & Li, J. (2023) · 2023 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP) · doi:10.1109/ialp61005.2023.10337079 · Cited by 6
CRT-QA: A Dataset of Complex Reasoning Question Answering over Tabular Data
Zhang, Z., Li, X., Gao, Y., & Lou, J. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.132 · Cited by 10
Self-citationReasoning with financial regulatory texts via Large Language Models
Fazlija, B., Ibraimi, M., Forouzandeh, A., & Fazlija, A. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2025.101067 · Cited by 5
Xia, J., Zhu, X., Jiang, B., & Kan, S. (2025) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2025.112278 · Cited by 6
Hu, H., Wang, L., Chen, L., Lin, H., Huang, L.-T., Wang, Z.-W., & Hou, X. (2026) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c03511 · Cited by 5
McPeak, G., Sautmann, A., George, O. S., Hallal, A., Simal, E. A., Schwartz, A. L., Abaluck, J., Ravi, N., & Pless, R. B. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi61247.2024.00094 · Cited by 6
Time-CoT for Enhancing Time Reasoning Factual Question Answering in Large Language Models
Yin, B., & Hu, N. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10650885 · Cited by 5
Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., Saiyin, J., Wei, B., Lai, M., Shou, J., & Xu, Y. L. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2024.3473745 · Cited by 6
Graph of Logic: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Graphs and Symbolic Logic
Alotaibi, F., Kulkarni, A., & Zhou, D. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825450 · Cited by 5
Universal Information Extraction with Meta-Pretrained Self-Retrieval
Cong, X., Yu, B., Fang, M., Liu, T., Yu, H., Hu, Z., Huang, F., Li, Y., & Wang, B. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.251 · Cited by 6
SEER : A Knapsack approach to Exemplar Selection for In-Context HybridQA
Tonglet, J., Reusens, M., Borchert, P., & Baesens, B. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.837 · Cited by 8
Who Knows the Answer? Finding the Best Model and Prompt for Each Query Using Confidence-Based Search
Gerych, W., Rizk, Y., Isahagian, V., Muthusamy, V., Duesterwald, E., & Venkateswaran, P. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29763 · Cited by 5
Gao, L., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Sheng, N., Feng, H., & Xu, H. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124011 · Cited by 6
Guiding ChatGPT for Better Code Generation: An Empirical Study
Liu, C., Bao, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, N., Hu, H., Zhang, X., & Yan, M. L. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) · doi:10.1109/saner60148.2024.00018 · Cited by 10
Fan, C., Tian, J., Li, Y., Chen, W., He, H., & Jin, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.913 · Cited by 8
Improving cross-task generalization with step-by-step instructions
Wu, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, Z., Qin, B., & Xiong, K. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-023-3911-2 · Cited by 8
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models in Hydrological ApplicationsPreprint
Kadiyala, L., Mermer, O., Samuel, R. D. J., Sermet, Y., & Demir, İ. (2024) · doi:10.31223/x5tq37 · Cited by 5
Rethinking Transformers for Efficiency and ScalabilityPreprint
Huang, J., & Bao, Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5161897 · Cited by 5
Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examples
Vivek, R., Ethayarajh, K., Yang, D., & Kiela, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.08638 · Cited by 4
Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examples
Vivek, R., Ethayarajh, K., Yang, D., & Kiela, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.eacl-long.95 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Zhang, A., Li, M., & Smola, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2210.03493
- OpenAlex
- W4304194220
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- chain-of-thought prompting, large language models, reasoning chains, GPT-3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
