CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 36Embodied and Extended CognitionPsychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceArtificial Intelligence Applications

Toward Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence: Catalyzing the NeuroAI Revolution

Open access
Zador, Anthony, Escola, Sean, Richards, Blake, Ölveczky, Bence, Bengio, Yoshua, Boahen, Kwabena, Botvinick, Matthew, Chklovskii, Dmitri +19 more·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2210.08340arXiv 2210.08340
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Neuroscience has long been an essential driver of progress in artificial intelligence (AI). We propose that to accelerate progress in AI, we must invest in fundamental research in NeuroAI. A core component of this is the embodied Turing test, which challenges AI animal models to interact with the sensorimotor world at skill levels akin to their living counterparts. The embodied Turing test shifts the focus from those capabilities like game playing and language that are especially well-developed or uniquely human to those capabilities, inherited from over 500 million years of evolution, that are shared with all animals. Building models that can pass the embodied Turing test will provide a roadmap for the next generation of AI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2210.08340

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These are examples of a widespread and long-established practice in AI of drawing on insights from the cognitive sciences.

    “These are examples of a widespread and long-established practice in AI of drawing on insights from the cognitive sciences (Hassabis et al. 2017, Zador et al. 2022).”

    From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Zador et al. 2022

    The discussion on pp. 1–2 describes several major AI advances inspired by neuroscience, supporting the claim that drawing on related scientific insights is long-established. But it says such cross-pollination is now “far less common than in the past,” so it does not support calling the practice currently widespread across AI or the cognitive sciences more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [18]18. [Reed, S. et al. A Generalist Agent. arXiv (2022) doi:10.48550/arXiv.2205.06175.](http://paperpile.com/b/p67udW/m9ud) · DOI
  2. [20]20. [Itti, L., Koch, C. & Niebur, E. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20 , 1254-1259 (1998).](http://paperpile.com/b/p67udW/wBjZv)
  3. [21]21. Larochelle, H. & Hinton, G. Learning to combine foveal glimpses with a third-order Boltzmann machine. Advances in neural information processing systems 23 , (2010).
  4. [22]22. [Xu, K. et al. Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attention. in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (eds. Bach, F. & Blei, D.) vol. 37 2048-2057 (PMLR, 2015).](http://paperpile.com/b/p67udW/26EK)
  5. [23]23. Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30 , (2017).
  6. [24]24. Moravec, H. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence . (Harvard University Press, 1988).
  7. [26]26. Brown, T. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33 , 1877-1901 (2020).
  8. [27]27. Sejnowski, T. Large Language Models and the Reverse Turing Test. arXiv [cs.CL] (2022).
  9. [29]29. Meyer, J.-A. & Wilson, S. W. From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior . (Bradford Books, 1991).
  10. [30]30. [Pfeifer, R. & Scheier, C. Understanding Intelligence. Preprint at](http://paperpile.com/b/p67udW/hCU3)
  11. [31]31. Pfeifer, R. & Bongard, J. How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence . (MIT Press, 2006).
  12. [35]35. Huang, S., Papernot, N., Goodfellow, I., Duan, Y. & Abbeel, P. Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policies. arXiv [cs.LG] (2017).
  13. [37]37. Bommasani, R. et al. On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arXiv [cs.LG] (2021).
  14. [40]40. [Doya, K. & Taniguchi, T. Toward evolutionary and developmental intelligence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences vol. 29 91-96 Preprint at](http://paperpile.com/b/p67udW/Uifu)
  15. [41]41. Pehlevan, C. & Chklovskii, D. B. Neuroscience-Inspired Online Unsupervised Learning Algorithms: Artificial Neural Networks. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 36 , 88-96 (2019).
  16. [46]46. Patterson, D. et al. Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training. arXiv [cs.LG] (2021).
  17. [52]52. [Davies, M. et al. Advancing neuromorphic computing with loihi: A survey of results and outlook. Proc. IEEE Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng. 109 , 911-934 (2021).](http://paperpile.com/b/p67udW/cPBR)
  18. [53]53. Cisek, P. & Hayden, B. Y. Neuroscience needs evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 377 , 20200518 (2022).
  19. [55]55. Wu, A. et al. Deep Graph Pose: a semi-supervised deep graphical model for improved animal pose tracking. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33 , 6040-6052 (2020).
  20. [58]58. Merel, J. et al. Deep neuroethology of a virtual rodent. in International Conference on Learning Representations (2020).
  21. [60]60. [Brockman, G. et al. OpenAI Gym. (2016) doi:10.48550/arXiv.1606.01540.](http://paperpile.com/b/p67udW/YkKG) · DOI
  22. [61]61. [Kitano, H., Asada, M., Kuniyoshi, Y., Noda, I. & Osawa, E. RoboCup: The Robot World Cup Initiative. in Proceedings of the first international conference on Autonomous agents 340-347 (Association for Computing Machinery, 1997).](http://paperpile.com/b/p67udW/KKZa)
  23. [64]64. Liu, S. et al. From Motor Control to Team Play in Simulated Humanoid Football. arXiv [cs.AI] (2021).
  24. [67]67. Culick, F. What the Wright Brothers did and did not understand about flight mechanics - In modern terms. in 37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Zador, A., Escola, S., Richards, B., Ölveczky, B., Bengio, Y., Boahen, K., Botvinick, M., Chklovskii, D., Churchland, A., Clopath, C., DiCarlo, J., Ganguli, S., Hawkins, J., Koerding, K., Koulakov, A., LeCun, Y., Lillicrap, T., Marblestone, A., Olshausen, B., Pouget, A., Savin, C., Sejnowski, T., Simoncelli, E., Solla, S., Sussillo, D., Tolias, A. S., & Tsao, D.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2210.08340
arXiv
2210.08340
OpenAlex
W4306818281
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2223827, 2124136, 1922658, CAREER, 1707400, 1231216, 1718991)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Semiconductor Research Corporation
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Lourie Foundation
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  • National Institutes of Health (1922658, 00031)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011, HR0011-18-2-0025, N00014-21-1-2801)
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (D16PC00003)
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN 2020, 00031)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-21-1-2801, MURI-114407, N00014-20-1-2589, N00014-20, N00014)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS099323, U19NS104649, #NS053603, U19NS123716)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
NeuroAI, embodied AI, sensorimotor interaction, animal models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review