CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 257Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningImage and Signal Denoising Methods

Consistency Models

Open access
Song, Yang, Dhariwal, Prafulla, Chen, Mark, Sutskever, Ilya·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2303.01469arXiv 2303.01469
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Diffusion models have significantly advanced the fields of image, audio, and video generation, but they depend on an iterative sampling process that causes slow generation. To overcome this limitation, we propose consistency models, a new family of models that generate high quality samples by directly mapping noise to data. They support fast one-step generation by design, while still allowing multistep sampling to trade compute for sample quality. They also support zero-shot data editing, such as image inpainting, colorization, and super-resolution, without requiring explicit training on these tasks. Consistency models can be trained either by distilling pre-trained diffusion models, or as standalone generative models altogether. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that they outperform existing distillation techniques for diffusion models in one- and few-step sampling, achieving the new state-of-the-art FID of 3.55 on CIFAR-10 and 6.20 on ImageNet 64x64 for one-step generation. When trained in isolation, consistency models become a new family of generative models that can outperform existing one-step, non-adversarial generative models on standard benchmarks such as CIFAR-10, ImageNet 64x64 and LSUN 256x256.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2303.01469

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a rich literature on optimizing inference speed for diffusion models and large transformers.

    “More broadly, there is a rich literature on optimizing inference speed, both for diffusion models [52, 38, 56, 17] and large transformers in general [32, 25, 35].”

    From Real-Time Execution of Action Chunking Flow Policies (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

  • The training-free image inpainting algorithm from Pokle et al. is based on pseudoinverse guidance (ΠGDM).

    “We build on the training-free image inpainting algorithm from Pokle et al. [48], which is itself based on pseudoinverse guidance ( Π GDM; [55]).”

    From Real-Time Execution of Action Chunking Flow Policies (2025) · cites this paper as [55]

    Algorithm 4 (p. 27) describes inpainting with a consistency model, but does not identify it as Pokle et al.'s algorithm or say it uses pseudoinverse guidance. Searches for Pokle, ΠGDM, and pseudoinverse guidance found no passage in our copy establishing the relationship attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Balaji, Y., Nah, S., Huang, X., Vahdat, A., Song, J., Kreis, K., Aittala, M., Aila, T., Laine, S., Catanzaro, B., Karras, T., and Liu, M.-Y. ediff-i: Text-to-image diffusion models with ensemble of expert denoisers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01324 , 2022. · arXiv
  2. Biloˇ s, M., Sommer, J., Rangapuram, S. S., Januschowski, T., and G¨ unnemann, S. Neural flows: Efficient alternative to neural odes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34:21325-21337, 2021.
  3. Brock, A., Donahue, J., and Simonyan, K. Large scale GANtraining for high fidelity natural image synthesis. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019. URL https://openreview.net/forum? id=B1xsqj09Fm .
  4. Chen, N., Zhang, Y., Zen, H., Weiss, R. J., Norouzi, M., and Chan, W. Wavegrad: Estimating gradients for waveform generation. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2021.
  5. Chen, R. T., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J., and Duvenaud, D. K. Neural Ordinary Differential Equations. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 6571-6583, 2018.
  6. Chen, R. T., Behrmann, J., Duvenaud, D. K., and Jacobsen, J.-H. Residual flows for invertible generative modeling. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 9916-9926, 2019.
  7. Chung, H., Kim, J., Mccann, M. T., Klasky, M. L., and Ye, J. C. Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023. URL https://openreview. net/forum?id=OnD9zGAGT0k .
  8. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. 248-255. Ieee, 2009.
  9. Dhariwal, P. and Nichol, A. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , 2021.
  10. Dinh, L., Krueger, D., and Bengio, Y. NICE: Non-linear independent components estimation. International Conference in Learning Representations Workshop Track , 2015.
  11. Dinh, L., Sohl-Dickstein, J., and Bengio, S. Density estimation using real NVP. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings .
  12. OpenReview.net, 2017. URL https://openreview. net/forum?id=HkpbnH9lx . https://openreview.net/forum?id=HkpbnH9lx
  13. Dockhorn, T., Vahdat, A., and Kreis, K. Genie: Higherorder denoising diffusion solvers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05475 , 2022. · arXiv
  14. Gong, X., Chang, S., Jiang, Y., and Wang, Z. Autogan: Neural architecture search for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 3224-3234, 2019.
  15. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 2672-2680, 2014.
  16. Grci´ c, M., Grubiˇ si´ c, I., and ˇ Segvi´ c, S. Densely connected normalizing flows. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34:23968-23982, 2021.
  17. Grill, J.-B., Strub, F., Altch´ e, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P., Buchatskaya, E., Doersch, C., Avila Pires, B., Guo, Z., Gheshlaghi Azar, M., et al. Bootstrap your own latent-a new approach to self-supervised learning. Advances in neural information processing systems , 33:21271-21284, 2020.
  18. He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., and Girshick, R. Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. 9729-9738, 2020.
  19. Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., and Hochreiter, S. GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local Nash equilibrium. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 6626-6637, 2017.
  20. Ho, J., Jain, A., and Abbeel, P. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33, 2020.
  21. Ho, J., Chan, W., Saharia, C., Whang, J., Gao, R., Gritsenko, A., Kingma, D. P., Poole, B., Norouzi, M., Fleet, D. J., et al. Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303 , 2022a. · arXiv
  22. Ho, J., Salimans, T., Gritsenko, A. A., Chan, W., Norouzi, M., and Fleet, D. J. Video diffusion models. In ICLR Workshop on Deep Generative Models for Highly Structured Data , 2022b. URL https://openreview. net/forum?id=BBelR2NdDZ5 .
  23. Hyv¨ arinen, A. and Dayan, P. Estimation of non-normalized statistical models by score matching. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) , 6(4), 2005.
  24. Jiang, Y., Chang, S., and Wang, Z. Transgan: Two pure transformers can make one strong gan, and that can scale up. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34:14745-14758, 2021.
  25. Karras, T., Aila, T., Laine, S., and Lehtinen, J. Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018. URL https://openreview. net/forum?id=Hk99zCeAb .
  26. Karras, T., Aittala, M., Aila, T., and Laine, S. Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models. In Proc. NeurIPS , 2022.
  27. Kawar, B., Vaksman, G., and Elad, M. Snips: Solving noisy inverse problems stochastically. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14951 , 2021. · arXiv
  28. Kawar, B., Elad, M., Ermon, S., and Song, J. Denoising diffusion restoration models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2022.
  29. Kingma, D. P. and Dhariwal, P. Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions. In Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., Cesa-Bianchi, N., and Garnett, R. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 , pp. 10215-10224. 2018.
  30. Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M. Auto-encoding variational bayes. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2014.
  31. Kong, Z., Ping, W., Huang, J., Zhao, K., and Catanzaro, B. DiffWave: A Versatile Diffusion Model for Audio Synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09761 , 2020. · arXiv
  32. Kynk¨ a¨ anniemi, T., Karras, T., Laine, S., Lehtinen, J., and Aila, T. Improved precision and recall metric for assessing generative models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 32, 2019.
  33. Lee, K., Chang, H., Jiang, L., Zhang, H., Tu, Z., and Liu, C. Vitgan: Training gans with vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.04589 , 2021. · arXiv
  34. Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., and Wierstra, D. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971 , 2015. · arXiv
  35. Liu, L., Jiang, H., He, P., Chen, W., Liu, X., Gao, J., and Han, J. On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.03265 , 2019. · arXiv
  36. Liu, X., Gong, C., and Liu, Q. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003 , 2022. · arXiv
  37. Lu, C., Zhou, Y., Bao, F., Chen, J., Li, C., and Zhu, J. Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00927 , 2022. · arXiv
  38. Luhman, E. and Luhman, T. Knowledge distillation in iterative generative models for improved sampling speed. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.02388 , 2021. · arXiv
  39. Meng, C., Song, Y., Song, J., Wu, J., Zhu, J.-Y., and Ermon, S. Sdedit: Image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073 , 2021. · arXiv
  40. Meng, C., Gao, R., Kingma, D. P., Ermon, S., Ho, J., and Salimans, T. On distillation of guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03142 , 2022. · arXiv
  41. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Graves, A., Antonoglou, I., Wierstra, D., and Riedmiller, M. Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602 , 2013. · arXiv
  42. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. nature , 518(7540): 529-533, 2015.
  43. Nichol, A., Dhariwal, P., Ramesh, A., Shyam, P., Mishkin, P., McGrew, B., Sutskever, I., and Chen, M. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741 , 2021. · arXiv
  44. Parmar, G., Li, D., Lee, K., and Tu, Z. Dual contradistinctive generative autoencoder. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 823-832, 2021.
  45. Popov, V., Vovk, I., Gogoryan, V., Sadekova, T., and Kudinov, M. Grad-TTS: A diffusion probabilistic model for text-to-speech. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.06337 , 2021. · arXiv
  46. Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., and Chen, M. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 , 2022. · arXiv
  47. Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., and Wierstra, D. Stochastic backpropagation and approximate inference in deep generative models. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 1278-1286, 2014.
  48. Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., and Ommer, B. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 10684-10695, 2022.
  49. Saharia, C., Chan, W., Saxena, S., Li, L., Whang, J., Denton, E., Ghasemipour, S. K. S., Ayan, B. K., Mahdavi, S. S., Lopes, R. G., et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11487 , 2022. · arXiv
  50. Salimans, T. and Ho, J. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=TIdIXIpzhoI .
  51. Salimans, T., Goodfellow, I., Zaremba, W., Cheung, V., Radford, A., and Chen, X. Improved techniques for training gans. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 2234-2242, 2016.
  52. Sauer, A., Schwarz, K., and Geiger, A. Stylegan-xl: Scaling stylegan to large diverse datasets. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 conference proceedings , pp. 1-10, 2022.
  53. Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E., Maheswaranathan, N., and Ganguli, S. Deep Unsupervised Learning Using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 2256-2265, 2015.
  54. Song, J., Meng, C., and Ermon, S. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502 , 2020. · arXiv
  55. Song, J., Vahdat, A., Mardani, M., and Kautz, J. Pseudoinverse-guided diffusion models for inverse problems. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023. URL https://openreview.net/ forum?id=9\_gsMA8MRKQ .
  56. Song, Y. and Ermon, S. Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 11918-11930, 2019.
  57. Song, Y. and Ermon, S. Improved Techniques for Training Score-Based Generative Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33, 2020.
  58. Song, Y., Garg, S., Shi, J., and Ermon, S. Sliced score matching: A scalable approach to density and score estimation. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2019, Tel Aviv, Israel, July 22-25, 2019 , pp. 204, 2019.
  59. Song, Y., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D. P., Kumar, A., Ermon, S., and Poole, B. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum? id=PxTIG12RRHS . https://openreview.net/forum?id=PxTIG12RRHS
  60. Song, Y., Shen, L., Xing, L., and Ermon, S. Solving inverse problems in medical imaging with score-based generative models. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. URL https://openreview. net/forum?id=vaRCHVj0uGI .
  61. S¨ uli, E. and Mayers, D. F. An introduction to numerical analysis . Cambridge university press, 2003.
  62. Tian, Y., Wang, Q., Huang, Z., Li, W., Dai, D., Yang, M., Wang, J., and Fink, O. Off-policy reinforcement learning for efficient and effective gan architecture search. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part VII 16 , pp. 175-192. Springer, 2020.
  63. Vahdat, A., Kreis, K., and Kautz, J. Score-based generative modeling in latent space. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34:11287-11302, 2021.
  64. Vincent, P. A Connection Between Score Matching and Denoising Autoencoders. Neural Computation , 23(7): 1661-1674, 2011.
  65. Wu, J., Huang, Z., Acharya, D., Li, W., Thoma, J., Paudel, D. P., and Gool, L. V. Sliced wasserstein generative models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 37133722, 2019.
  66. Xiao, Z., Yan, Q., and Amit, Y. Generative latent flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10485 , 2019. · arXiv
  67. Xiao, Z., Kreis, K., and Vahdat, A. Tackling the generative learning trilemma with denoising diffusion GANs. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum? id=JprM0p-q0Co .
  68. Xu, Y., Liu, Z., Tegmark, M., and Jaakkola, T. S. Poisson flow generative models. In Oh, A. H., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., and Cho, K. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2022. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=voV\_TRqcWh .
  69. Yu, F., Seff, A., Zhang, Y., Song, S., Funkhouser, T., and Xiao, J. Lsun: Construction of a large-scale image dataset using deep learning with humans in the loop. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.03365 , 2015. · arXiv
  70. Zhang, Q. and Chen, Y. Fast sampling of diffusion models with exponential integrator. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.13902 , 2022. · arXiv
  71. Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A. A., Shechtman, E., and Wang, O. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In CVPR , 2018.
  72. Zheng, H., Nie, W., Vahdat, A., Azizzadenesheli, K., and Anandkumar, A. Fast sampling of diffusion models via operator learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13449 , 2022. · arXiv
  73. Zheng, H., He, P., Chen, W., and Zhou, M. Truncated diffusion probabilistic models and diffusion-based adversarial auto-encoders. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=HDxgaKk956l .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Song, Y., Dhariwal, P., Chen, M., & Sutskever, I.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2303.01469
arXiv
2303.01469
OpenAlex
W4323076585
Cited by
155
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 11
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
consistency models, diffusion models, image inpainting, image colorization, super-resolution, knowledge distillation, generative models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review