ReWOO: Decoupling Reasoning from Observations for Efficient Augmented Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Augmented Language Models (ALMs) blend the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) with tools that allow for knowledge retrieval and action execution. Existing ALM systems trigger LLM thought processes while pulling observations from these tools in an interleaved fashion. Specifically, an LLM reasons to call an external tool, gets halted to fetch the tool's response, and then decides the next action based on all preceding response tokens. Such a paradigm, though straightforward and easy to implement, often leads to huge computation complexity from redundant prompts and repeated execution. This study addresses such challenges for the first time, proposing a modular paradigm ReWOO (Reasoning WithOut Observation) that detaches the reasoning process from external observations, thus significantly reducing token consumption. Comprehensive evaluations across six public NLP benchmarks and a curated dataset reveal consistent performance enhancements with our proposed methodology. Notably, ReWOO achieves 5x token efficiency and 4% accuracy improvement on HotpotQA, a multi-step reasoning benchmark. Furthermore, ReWOO demonstrates robustness under tool-failure scenarios. Beyond prompt efficiency, decoupling parametric modules from non-parametric tool calls enables instruction fine-tuning to offload LLMs into smaller language models, thus substantially reducing model parameters. Our illustrative work offloads reasoning ability from 175B GPT3.5 into 7B LLaMA, demonstrating the significant potential for truly efficient and scalable ALM systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ReWOO introduces a paradigm of separating plans from external observations, where agents first generate plans and obtain observations independently, and then combine them together to derive the final results.
“ReWOO [48] introduces a paradigm of separating plans from external observations, where the agents first generate plans and obtain observations independently, and then combine them together to derive the final results.”
From A survey on large language model based autonomous agents (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. Re- act: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
- Anthony Brohan, Yevgen Chebotar, Chelsea Finn, Karol Hausman, Alexander Herzog, Daniel Ho, Julian Ibarz, Alex Irpan, Eric Jang, Ryan Julian, et al. Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 287-318. PMLR, 2023.
- Neil Houlsby, Andrei Giurgiu, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Bruna Morrone, Quentin De Laroussilhe, Andrea Ges- mundo, Mona Attariyan, and Sylvain Gelly. Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2790-2799. PMLR, 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey on large language model based autonomous agents
Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., et al. (2024) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Change-Agent: Toward Interactive Comprehensive Remote Sensing Change Interpretation and Analysis
Liu, C., Chen, K., Zhang, H., Qi, Z., Zou, Z., & Shi, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3425815 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents
Sumers, T. R., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.02427 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Followup work (Yao et al., 2022b; Shinn et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2023b; Lin et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023a; Park et al., 2023) has exploited intermediate reasoning and retrieval to analyze the situation, make and maintain action plans, refine the previous action given the environmental feedback,…”
BackgroundZhang, Z., Yao, Y., Zhang, A., Tang, X., Ma, X., He, Z., Wang, Y., Gerstein, M., Wang, R., Liu, G., et al. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3719341 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Liu, Y., Lo, S. K., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Zhao, D., Xu, X., Harrer, S., & Whittle, J. (2025) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112278 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationDomain-specific chatbots for science using embeddings
Yager, K. G. (2023) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d3dd00112a · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Agentic AI and the rise of in silico team science in biomedical research
Li, B.-L., Saini, A., Hernandez, J. G., & Moore, J. H. (2026) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-026-03035-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
A Survey on Agent Workflow – Status and Future
Yu, C., Cheng, Z., Cui, H., Gao, Y., Luo, Z., Wang, Y., Zheng, H., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd64986.2025.11082076 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Agent Lumos: Unified and Modular Training for Open-Source Language Agents
Yin, D., Brahman, F., Ravichander, A., Chandu, K., Chang, K.-W., Choi, Y., & Lin, B. Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.670 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Borghoff, U. M., Bottoni, P., & Pareschi, R. (2025) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-025-09667-2 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Yager, K. G. (2024) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d4dd00178h · Cited by 12 · see citing works
An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Calling
Kim, S., Moon, S., Tabrizi, R., Lee, N., Mahoney, M. W., Keutzer, K., & Gholami, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.04511 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“A notable work is ReWOO [53] which employs a planner to separate the reasoning process from the execution and observation phases to decrease token usage and cost as compared to ReAct.”
BackgroundMethodLehmann, J., Bhandiwad, D., Gattogi, P., & Vahdati, S. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00671 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
DAWN: Designing Distributed Agents in a Worldwide Network
Aminiranjbar, Z., Tang, J., Wang, Q., Pant, S., & Viswanathan, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.22339 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
DAWN: Designing Distributed Agents in a Worldwide Network
Aminiranjbar, Z., Tang, J., Wang, Q., Pant, S., & Viswanathan, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3588425 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
DrAgent: An Agentic Approach to Fault Analysis in Power Grids Using Large Language Models
Saha, B. K., Aarthi, V., & Naidu, O. D. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC) · doi:10.1109/icaiic64266.2025.10920654 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Gentopia.AI: A Collaborative Platform for Tool-Augmented LLMs
Xu, B., Liu, X., Shen, H., Han, Z., Li, Y., Yue, M., Peng, Z., Liu, Y., Yao, Z., & Xu, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-demo.20 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationTPE: Towards Better Compositional Reasoning over Cognitive Tools via Multi-persona Collaboration
Wang, H., Wang, H., Wang, L., Hu, M., Wang, R., Xue, B., Huang, Y., & Wong, K. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9434-8_22 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Li, X., Xu, W., Ye, Z., & Yuan, H. (2025) · Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics · doi:10.1016/j.birob.2025.100258 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Eliciting problem specifications for LLM-Modulo cognitive systems
Wray, R. E., Kirk, J. R., & Laird, J. E. (2025) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101409 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
ReaComp: Compiling LLM Reasoning into Symbolic Solvers for Efficient Program Synthesis
Naik, A., Mathur, Y., Prakam, Rose, C., & Mortensen, D. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.05485
“ReWOO [Xu et al., 2023] further separates reasoning from observation-heavy execution to reduce tool-calling overhead.”
Enhancing Telecom Operation Support Systems with Multi-Agent Large Language Models
Lee, K.-Y., Tseng, P.-A., & Chen, W.-C. (2025) · International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) · doi:10.1109/iccai66501.2025.00055
- Authors
- Xu, B., Peng, Z., Lei, B., Mukherjee, S., Liu, Y., & Xu, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2305.18323
- OpenAlex
- W4378942217
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- tool calling, token efficiency, multi-step reasoning, knowledge retrieval, model parameter reduction, instruction tuning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
