NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Models
Open accessAbstract
Design biases in NLP systems, such as performance differences for different populations, often stem from their creator's positionality, i.e., views and lived experiences shaped by identity and background. Despite the prevalence and risks of design biases, they are hard to quantify because researcher, system, and dataset positionality is often unobserved. We introduce NLPositionality, a framework for characterizing design biases and quantifying the positionality of NLP datasets and models. Our framework continuously collects annotations from a diverse pool of volunteer participants on LabintheWild, and statistically quantifies alignment with dataset labels and model predictions. We apply NLPositionality to existing datasets and models for two tasks -- social acceptability and hate speech detection. To date, we have collected 16,299 annotations in over a year for 600 instances from 1,096 annotators across 87 countries. We find that datasets and models align predominantly with Western, White, college-educated, and younger populations. Additionally, certain groups, such as non-binary people and non-native English speakers, are further marginalized by datasets and models as they rank least in alignment across all tasks. Finally, we draw from prior literature to discuss how researchers can examine their own positionality and that of their datasets and models, opening the door for more inclusive NLP systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Humans exhibit variation in their ethical expectations towards machines, both within and across cultures.
“Furthermore, humans exhibit variation in their ethical expectations towards machines, both within and across cultures 182 .”
From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [182]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 4× · see citing works
“We echo prior work in recommending methods to center the perspectives of communities who are harmed by design biases (Blodgett et al., 2020; Hanna et al., 2020; Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialModel Cards for Model Reporting
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 · Cited by 2,681 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The challenge is that design biases arise from the myriad of design choices made; in the context of creating datasets and models, only some of these choices may be documented (e.g., through model cards and data sheets; Bender and Friedman, 2018; Mitchell et al., 2019; Gebru et al., 2021).”
BackgroundGebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., III, H. D., & Crawford, K. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3458723 · Cited by 2,469 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The challenge is that design biases arise from the myriad of design choices made; in the context of creating datasets and models, only some of these choices may be documented (e.g., through model cards and data sheets; Bender and Friedman, 2018; Mitchell et al., 2019; Gebru et al., 2021).”
BackgroundDesign and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook
Morgan, J. (2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s329 · Cited by 2,365 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We then apply the Bonferroni correction to account for multiple hypotheses testing (Wickens and Keppel, 2004).”
MethodWinner, L. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315259697-21 · Cited by 2,325 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This raises the question of whether there are any value-neutral language technologies (Birhane et al., 2022; Winner, 2017).”
BackgroundAwad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6 · Cited by 1,859 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Social acceptability is likely to vary by background, as morality (Atari et al., 2022), values (Haerpfer and Kizilova, 2012), and moral decision-making (Awad et al., 2018, 2020) vary by culture.”
BackgroundMan is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615 · cited 1× · see citing works
“‘Gender bias’ in computing systems means that the system does not perform well for some genders; “man is to doctor as woman is to nurse” (Bolukbasi et al., 2016) is a social bias, while captioning systems that fail to understand women’s voices (Tatman, 2017) is a design bias.”
BackgroundDarwin Holmes, A. G. (2020) · Shanlax International Journal of Education · doi:10.34293/education.v8i4.3232 · Cited by 1,341 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Others, such as political views and life history, are more subjective (Holmes, 2020; Foote and Gau Bartell, 2011).”
BackgroundFriedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/230538.230561 · Cited by 1,203 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Based on Friedman and Nissenbaum (1996)’s framework on bias, social biases are pre-existing biases in society, whereas design biases are emergent biases that originate from the computing system itself.”
MethodLanguage (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP
Blodgett, S. L., Barocas, S., Daumé III, H., & Wallach, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.485 · Cited by 1,050 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We echo prior work in recommending methods to center the perspectives of communities who are harmed by design biases (Blodgett et al., 2020; Hanna et al., 2020; Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodReliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations.
Krippendorff, K. (2004) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/30.3.411 · Cited by 1,027 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, we report the total number of annotators and inter-annotator agreements for each demographic using Krippendorff’s α (Krippendorff, 2006).”
MethodFriedman, B. (1996) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/242485.242493 · Cited by 966 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This shows how common design biases are in NLP, as language is a social construct (Burr, 2015) and technologies are imbued with their creator’s values (Friedman, 1996).”
BackgroundBender, E. M., & Friedman, B. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00041 · Cited by 854 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The challenge is that design biases arise from the myriad of design choices made; in the context of creating datasets and models, only some of these choices may be documented (e.g., through model cards and data sheets; Bender and Friedman, 2018; Mitchell et al., 2019; Gebru et al., 2021).”
BackgroundThe Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection
Sap, M., Card, D., Gabriel, S., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1163 · Cited by 817 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…has also reported various biases against these populations in datasets and models: people who are non-binary (e.g., Dev et al., 2021), Black (e.g., Sap et al., 2019; Davidson et al., 2019), Latinx (e.g., Dodge et al., 2021), Native American (e.g., Mager et al., 2018); and people who are not…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPostcolonial computing: a lens on design and development
Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., & Grinter, R. E. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753522 · Cited by 780 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Not addressing these biases risks imposing Western standards on non-Western populations, potentially resulting in a new kind of colonialism in the digital age (Irani et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThe State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP World
Joshi, P., Santy, S., Budhiraja, A., Bali, K., & Choudhury, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.560 · Cited by 766 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Currently, these systems exhibit many design biases that negatively impact minoritized or underserved communities in NLP (Joshi et al., 2020; Blodgett et al., 2020; Bender et al., 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBeyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A., Rastogi, A., Rao, A., Shoeb, A. A. M., Abid, A., Fisch, A., Brown, A. R., Santoro, A., Gupta, A., Garriga-Alonso, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.04615 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Self-citationDemographics and Dynamics of Mechanical Turk Workers
Difallah, D. E., Filatova, E., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3159652.3159661 · Cited by 512 · cited 5× · see citing works
“This can cause the tool to work poorly for other populations (e.g., not detect offensive terms like “ presstitute ” in Indian contexts; see Figure 1).”
BackgroundInfluentialAnnotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection
Sap, M., Swayamdipta, S., Vianna, L., Zhou, X., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2021) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.431 · Cited by 463 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Also, annotators rate the toxicity of tweets with African American English (AAE) differently by background, such as political affiliation (Sap et al., 2022).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationRacial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets
Davidson, T., Bhattacharya, D., & Weber, I. (2019) · Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3504 · Cited by 414 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…various biases against these populations in datasets and models: people who are non-binary (e.g., Dev et al., 2021), Black (e.g., Sap et al., 2019; Davidson et al., 2019), Latinx (e.g., Dodge et al., 2021), Native American (e.g., Mager et al., 2018); and people who are not native English speakers…”
BackgroundStonefish, T., & Kwantes, C. T. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118785317.weom060215 · Cited by 385 · cited 2×
“We instead adopt cultural spheres as used in World Values Survey (Haerpfer and Kizilova, 2012), which clusters the countries in terms of the values they uphold and norms they follow.”
BackgroundMethodBurr, V. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_57-1 · Cited by 358 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This shows how common design biases are in NLP, as language is a social construct (Burr, 2015) and technologies are imbued with their creator’s values (Friedman, 1996).”
BackgroundMorality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures.
Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S. P., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2023) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000470 · Cited by 349 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Social acceptability is likely to vary by background, as morality (Atari et al., 2022), values (Haerpfer and Kizilova, 2012), and moral decision-making (Awad et al.”
BackgroundGender and Dialect Bias in YouTube’s Automatic Captions
Tatman, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-1606 · Cited by 338 · cited 2× · see citing works
“‘Gender bias’ in computing systems means that the system does not perform well for some genders; “man is to doctor as woman is to nurse” (Bolukbasi et al., 2016) is a social bias, while captioning systems that fail to understand women’s voices (Tatman, 2017) is a design bias.”
BackgroundChallenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP
Hershcovich, D., Frank, S., Lent, H., et al. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.10020 · Cited by 330
The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research
Birhane, A., Kalluri, P., Card, D., Agnew, W., Dotan, R., & Bao, M. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533083 · Cited by 317 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This raises the question of whether there are any valueneutral language technologies (Birhane et al., 2022; Winner, 2017).”
BackgroundDocumenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus
Dodge, J., Sap, M., Marasović, A., Agnew, W., Ilharco, G., Groeneveld, D., Mitchell, M., & Gardner, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.98 · Cited by 306 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…populations in datasets and models: people who are non-binary (e.g., Dev et al., 2021), Black (e.g., Sap et al., 2019; Davidson et al., 2019), Latinx (e.g., Dodge et al., 2021), Native American (e.g., Mager et al., 2018); and people who are not native English speakers (e.g., Joshi et al., 2020).”
BackgroundTowards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness
Hanna, A., Denton, R., Smart, A., & Smith-Loud, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372826 · Cited by 295 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We echo prior work in recommending methods to center the perspectives of communities who are harmed by design biases (Blodgett et al., 2020; Hanna et al., 2020; Bender et al., 2021).”
Method(2020) · Human Resource Management International Digest · doi:10.1108/hrmid-11-2020-0251 · Cited by 288 · cited 1×
“In toxicity modeling, men and women value speaking freely versus feeling safe online differently (Duggan et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMasakhaNER: Named Entity Recognition for African Languages
Adelani, D. I., Abbott, J., Neubig, G., D’souza, D., Kreutzer, J., Lignos, C., Palen-Michel, C., Buzaaba, H., Rijhwani, S., Ruder, S., et al. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00416 · Cited by 277 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Specialized datasets and models are immensely valuable when the data collection process and other design choices are intentional and made to uplift minority voices or historically underrepresented cultures and languages, such as Masakhane-NER (Adelani et al., 2021) and AfroLM (Dossou et al., 2022).”
BackgroundUniversals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1911517117 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Improving performance, perceived usability, and aesthetics with culturally adaptive user interfaces
Reinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1970378.1970382 · Cited by 255 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There have also been efforts to localize the design of technologies, including applications that adapt their design and functionality to the needs of different cultures (e.g., Oyibo, 2016; Reinecke and Bernstein, 2011, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationTruth Is a Lie: Crowd Truth and the Seven Myths of Human Annotation
Aroyo, L. M., & Welty, C. (2015) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v36i1.2564 · Cited by 248 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To account for annotator subjectivity (Aroyo and Welty, 2015), researchers should make concerted efforts to recruit annotators from diverse backgrounds.”
BackgroundDealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotations
Davani, A. M., Díaz, M., & Prabhakaran, V. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00449 · Cited by 237 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This allows our framework to continuously collect new annotations and reflect more up-to-date measurements of design biases for free over long periods of time, compared to one-time paid studies such as in previous works (Sap et al., 2022; Davani et al., 2022).”
BackgroundResultReinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.06 · Cited by 236 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There have also been efforts to localize the design of technologies, including applications that adapt their design and functionality to the needs of different cultures (e.g., Oyibo, 2016; Reinecke and Bernstein, 2011, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationScaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher
Rae, J. W., Borgeaud, S., Cai, T., Millican, K., Hoffmann, J., Song, F., Aslanides, J., Henderson, S., Ring, R., Young, S., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.11446 · Cited by 235 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In order to evaluate GPT-4, we combine Delphi’s GPT-3 zero-shot evaluation setup from Jiang et al. (2021) with the template used by Rae et al. (2021): Text:”
MethodThe Sage encyclopedia of action research
Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2014) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446294406 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Sanyal, R. (2020) · Research Ethics for Human Geography: A Handbook for Students · doi:10.2307/j.ctt21pxkvh.7 · Cited by 211 · cited 2×
“The authors take inspiration from fields outside of NLP by studying po-sitionality (Rowe, 2014) and acknowledge cross-disciplinary research as crucial to building inclusive AI systems.”
BackgroundLearning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detection
Vidgen, B., Thrush, T., Waseem, Z., & Kiela, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.132 · Cited by 174 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Similarly, Dynahate exhibits high correlation with their annotator populations, which are mostly women, White, 18-29 years old, native English speakers, and British (Vidgen et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSocial chemistry 101: Learning to reason about social and moral norms
Forbes, M., Hwang, J. D., Shwartz, V., Sap, M., & Choi, Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.48 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationPathways to equity in mathematics education: how life experiences impact researcher positionality
Foote, M. Q., & Bartell, T. G. (2011) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9309-2 · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Others, such as political views and life history, are more subjective (Holmes, 2020; Foote and Gau Bartell, 2011). similar way as models.”
BackgroundSystematic Inequalities in Language Technology Performance across the World’s Languages
Blasí, D. E., Anastasopoulos, A., & Neubig, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.376 · Cited by 140 · cited 3× · see citing works
“One prominent example of design bias in NLP is the overt emphasis on English (Joshi et al., 2020; Blasi et al., 2022).”
BackgroundHarms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language Technologies
Dev, S., Monajatipoor, M., Ovalle, A., Subramonian, A., Phillips, J. M., & Chang, K.-W. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.150 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Prior work has also reported various biases against these populations in datasets and models: people who are non-binary (e.g., Dev et al., 2021), Black (e.g., Sap et al., 2019; Davidson et al., 2019), Latinx (e.g., Dodge et al., 2021), Native American (e.g., Mager et al., 2018); and people who are…”
BackgroundThe “Problem” of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluation
Plank, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.731 · Cited by 121 · cited 1× · see citing works
“being mindful of different perspectives by sharing datasets with disaggregated annotations and finding modeling techniques that can handle inherent disagreements or distributions (Plank, 2022), instead of forcing a single answer in the data (e.”
BackgroundReinecke, K., & Gajos, K. Z. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675246 · Cited by 120 · cited 4× · see citing works
“First, the demographic diversity of participants on LabintheWild is better than on other crowdsourcing platforms (Reinecke and Gajos, 2015) and in traditional laboratory studies.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationToward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computing
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., & Basile, V. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i6.25840 · Cited by 114 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We urge considering research through the lens of perspectivism (Basile et al., 2021), i.e. being mind-ful of different perspectives by sharing datasets with disaggregated annotations and finding modeling techniques that can handle inherent disagreements or distributions (Plank, 2022), instead of…”
Challenges of language technologies for the indigenous languages of the Americas
Mager, M., Gutierrez-Vasques, X., Sierra, G. E., et al. (2018) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.04291 · Cited by 107 · cited 1×
“…populations in datasets and models: people who are non-binary (e.g., Dev et al., 2021), Black (e.g., Sap et al., 2019; Davidson et al., 2019), Latinx (e.g., Dodge et al., 2021), Native American (e.g., Mager et al., 2018); and people who are not native English speakers (e.g., Joshi et al., 2020).”
BackgroundTagging Performance Correlates with Author Age
Hovy, D., & Søgaard, A. (2015) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-2079 · Cited by 106 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Even tasks that are considered purely linguistic have seen design biases: in parsing and tagging, performance differences exist between texts written by people of different genders (Garimella et al., 2019), ages (Hovy and Søgaard, 2015), and races (Johannsen et al., 2015; Jørgensen et al., 2015).”
BackgroundNL-Augmenter: A Framework for Task-Sensitive Natural Language Augmentation
Dhole, K. D., Gangal, V., Gehrmann, S., Gupta, A., Li, Z., Mahamood, S., Mahendiran, A., Mille, S., Srivastava, A., Tan, S., et al. (2021) · NEJLT · doi:10.3384/nejlt.2000-1533.2023.4725 · Cited by 106 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Building datasets and models with large global teams such as BigBench (Srivas-tava et al., 2022) and NL-Augmenter (Dhole et al., 2021) could also reduce design biases by having diverse teams (Li, 2020).”
BackgroundMethodGroenwold, S., Ou, L.-H., Parekh, A., Honnavalli, S., Levy, S., Mirza, D., & Wang, W. Y. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.473 · Cited by 100 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarly, language models could be made in more culturally adaptive ways, because one size does not fit all (Groenwold et al., 2020; Rettberg, 2022).”
BackgroundProbing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Values
Arora, A., Kaffee, L.-A., & Augenstein, I. (2023) · Workshop on Cross-Cultural Considerations in NLP (C3NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.c3nlp-1.12 · Cited by 91 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In NLP, social acceptability models’ behavior have been shown to systematically display certain values (Arora et al., 2023) and biases (Hämmerl et al., 2022), some of which are Western-centric (Jiang et al., 2021; Talat et al., 2022).”
BackgroundCross-lingual syntactic variation over age and gender
Johannsen, A., Hovy, D., & Søgaard, A. (2015) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k15-1011 · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Even tasks that are considered purely linguistic have seen design biases: in parsing and tagging, performance differences exist between texts written by people of different genders (Garimella et al., 2019), ages (Hovy and Søgaard, 2015), and races (Johannsen et al., 2015; Jørgensen et al., 2015).”
BackgroundDetoxifying Language Models Risks Marginalizing Minority Voices
Xu, A., Pathak, E., Wallace, E., Gururangan, S., Sap, M., & Klein, D. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.190 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Others include the use of block lists in dataset creation or toxicity classifiers as a filter, which can marginalize minority voices (Dodge et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEveryone's Voice Matters: Quantifying Annotation Disagreement Using Demographic InformationPreprint
Wan, R., Kim, J., & Kang, D. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.05036 · Cited by 79 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This could be because annotators’ positionalities cause them to make implicit assumptions about the context of subjective annotation tasks, which affects its labels (Wan et al., 2023; Birhane et al., 2022).”
BackgroundAfroLM: A Self-Active Learning-based Multilingual Pretrained Language Model for 23 African Languages
Dossou, B. F. P., Tonja, A., Yousuf, O., et al. (2022) · SUSTAINLP · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.03263 · Cited by 79
Keyes, O., Hutson, J. A., & Durbin, M. (2019) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3290607.3310433 · Cited by 76 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition to making sure that language technologies work for all populations, researchers should also continue to examine whether these systems should exist in the first place (Denton and Gebru, 2020; Keyes et al., 2019).”
BackgroundExperiences using cooperative interactive storyboard prototyping
Madsen, K., & Aiken, P. H. (1993) · CACM · doi:10.1145/153571.163268 · Cited by 69 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This can be done using approaches such as participatory design (Spinuzzi, 2005), including interactive storyboarding (Madsen and Aiken, 1993), as well as value-sensitive design (Friedman, 1996), including panels of experiential experts (Madsen and Aiken, 1993).”
BackgroundWhose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selection
Gururangan, S., Card, D., Dreier, S. K., Gade, E. K., Wang, L. Z., Wang, Z., Zettlemoyer, L., & Smith, N. A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.165 · Cited by 63 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, they can perpetuate systemic inequalities by imposing one group’s standards onto the rest of the world (Ghosh et al., 2021; Gururangan et al., 2022; Blasi et al., 2022).”
BackgroundChallenges of studying and processing dialects in social media
Jørgensen, A., Hovy, D., & Søgaard, A. (2015) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/w15-4302 · Cited by 62 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Even tasks that are considered purely linguistic have seen design biases: in parsing and tagging, performance differences exist between texts written by people of different genders (Garimella et al., 2019), ages (Hovy and Søgaard, 2015), and races (Johannsen et al., 2015; Jørgensen et al., 2015).”
BackgroundChanging the World by Changing the Data
Rogers, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.170 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and Gergle (2022) on model positionality, which quantifies positional-ity by inspecting the content of annotated documents, as well as work from Rogers (2021), who argues that collecting a corpus of speech inherently encodes a particular world view (e.g., via linguistic structures, topic of…”
BackgroundModel Positionality and Computational Reflexivity: Promoting Reflexivity in Data Science
Cambo, S. A., & Gergle, D. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501998 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Speaking Multiple Languages Affects the Moral Bias of Language ModelsPreprint
Hämmerl, K., Deiseroth, B., Schramowski, P., et al. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.07733 · Cited by 46 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In NLP, social acceptability models’ behavior have been shown to systematically display certain values (Arora et al., 2023) and biases (Hämmerl et al., 2022), some of which are Western-centric (Jiang et al., 2021; Talat et al., 2022).”
BackgroundDesign Justice, AI, and Escape From the Matrix of Domination
Costanza‐Chock, S. (2021) · Against Reduction · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14157.003.0005 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Garimella, A., Banea, C., Hovy, D., & Mihalcea, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1339 · Cited by 41 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Even tasks that are considered purely linguistic have seen design biases: in parsing and tagging, performance differences exist between texts written by people of different genders (Garimella et al., 2019), ages (Hovy and Søgaard, 2015), and races (Johannsen et al., 2015; Jørgensen et al., 2015).”
BackgroundA Systematic Study of Bias Amplification
Hall, M., van der Maaten, L., Gustafson, L., Jones, M., & Adcock, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11706 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When training models, these choices include the type of training data, data pre-processing techniques, or the objective function (Hall et al., 2022).”
BackgroundDisembodied Machine Learning: On the Illusion of Objectivity in NLP
Waseem, Z., Lulz, S., Bingel, J., & Augenstein, I. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.11974 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since the latent choices that result in design biases are fundamental to research itself, some researchers have argued that it is impossible to completely de-bias datasets and models (Waseem et al., 2021).”
BackgroundDesigning Culture-based Persuasive Technology to Promote Physical Activity among University Students
Oyibo, K. (2016) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/2930238.2930372 · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There have also been efforts to localize the design of technologies, including applications that adapt their design and functionality to the needs of different cultures (e.g., Oyibo, 2016; Reinecke and Bernstein, 2011, 2013).”
BackgroundOn the Machine Learning of Ethical Judgments from Natural Language
Talat, Z., Blix, H., Valvoda, J., Ganesh, M. I., Cotterell, R., & Williams, A. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.56 · Cited by 29 · cited 7× · see citing works
“This is because toxicity researchers’ positionalities lead them to make design choices that make toxicity datasets, and thus Perspective API, to have positionalities that are Western-centric. by their positionality , i.e., their views shaped by their lived experience, identity, culture, and background (Savin-Baden and…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDetecting Cross-Geographic Biases in Toxicity Modeling on Social Media
Ghosh, S., Baker, D., Jurgens, D., & Prabhakaran, V. (2021) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.wnut-1.35 · Cited by 29 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Hate speech classifiers also produce errors for instances outside Western contexts (Ghosh et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMohamed, Y., Abdelfattah, M., Alhuwaider, S., et al. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.10780 · Cited by 24 · cited 1×
“However, most socially-aligned tasks may encode design biases due to differences in language use between demographic groups, for example, commonsense reasoning (Shwartz, 2022), question answering (Gor et al., 2021), and sentiment analysis (Mohamed et al., 2022).”
BackgroundCitizen Science Opportunities in Volunteer-Based Online Experiments
Oliveira, N., Jun, E., & Reinecke, K. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025473 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This has been shown to result in higher data quality compared to using paid crowdsourcing platforms (August and Reinecke, 2019), as well as in opportunities for participant learning (Oliveira et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPay Attention, Please: Formal Language Improves Attention in Volunteer and Paid Online Experiments
August, T., & Reinecke, K. (2019) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300478 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This has been shown to result in higher data quality compared to using paid crowdsourcing platforms (August and Reinecke, 2019), as well as in opportunities for participant learning (Oliveira et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGood Night at 4 pm?! Time Expressions in Different Cultures
Shwartz, V. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.224 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, most socially-aligned tasks may encode design biases due to differences in language use between demographic groups, for example, commonsense reasoning (Shwartz, 2022), question answering (Gor et al.”
BackgroundAutomating Moral Reasoning (Invited Paper)
Slavkovik, M. (2022) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/oasics.aib.2022.6 · Cited by 5 · cited 7× · see citing works
“This is because toxicity researchers’ positionalities lead them to make design choices that make toxicity datasets, and thus Perspective API, to have positionalities that are Western-centric. by their positionality , i.e., their views shaped by their lived experience, identity, culture, and background (Savin-Baden and…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationToward Deconfounding the Effect of Entity Demographics for Question Answering Accuracy
Gor, M., Webster, K., & Boyd-Graber, J. L. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.444 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, most socially-aligned tasks may encode design biases due to differences in language use between demographic groups, for example, commonsense reasoning (Shwartz, 2022), question answering (Gor et al., 2021), and sentiment analysis (Mohamed et al., 2022).”
BackgroundOpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774
Flagged first, then by citations
16 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- AAAI. 2023. Reproducibility checklist. ACL. 2017. ACL Diversity Statistics.
- PsyArXiv.
- Emily Denton and Timnit Gebru. 2020. Tutorial on fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in computer vision at CVPR 2020.
- Thomas Hartvigsen, Saadia Gabriel, Hamid Palangi, Maarten Sap, Dipankar Ray, and Ece Kamar. 2022. Toxigen: Controlling language models to generate implied and adversarial toxicity. In Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). · DOI · Paper page
- Joseph Henrich, Steven J Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3):61-83.
- Liwei Jiang, Jena D Hwang, Chandra Bhagavatula, Ro- nan Le Bras, Jenny Liang, Jesse Dodge, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Maxwell Forbes, Jon Borchardt, Saadia Gabriel, et al. 2021. Can machines learn morality? the delphi experiment. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv- 2110.
- András Kornai. 2013. Digital language death. PLOS ONE, 8(10):1-11. · DOI · Paper page
- Klaus Krippendorff. 2006. Reliability in content analy- sis: Some common misconceptions and recommenda- tions. Human Communication Research, 30(3):411- 433. · DOI · Paper page
- Michael Li. 2020. To build less-biased AI, hire a more diverse team. Harvard Business Review.
- Maggi Savin-Baden and Claire Howell-Major. 2013. Qualititative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Routledge.
- Clay Spinuzzi. 2005. The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2):163-174.
- William Warner and Julia Hirschberg. 2012. Detecting hate speech on the world wide web. In Workshop on Language in Social Media, pages 19-26.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brinkmann, L., Baumann, F., Bonnefon, J.-F., Derex, M., Müller, T. F., Nussberger, A.-M., Czaplicka, A., Acerbi, A., Griffiths, T. L., Henrich, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01742-2 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“By fostering interactive cultural experiences for learners, these technologies can enhance the comprehension and retention of cultural information 85 .”
BackgroundDolma: an open corpus of three trillion tokens for language model pretraining research
Soldaini, L., Kinney, R., Bhagia, A., Schwenk, D., Atkinson, D., Authur, R., Bogin, B., Chandu, K., Dumas, J., Elazar, Y., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.840 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy makingPreprint
Capraro, V., Lentsch, A., Acemoğlu, D., Akgün, S., Akhmedova, A., Bilancini, E., Bonnefon, J., Brañas‐Garza, P., Butera, L., Douglas, K. M., et al. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6fd2y · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research
Soldaini, L., Kinney, R., Bhagia, A., Schwenk, D., Atkinson, D., Authur, R., Bogin, B., Chandu, K., Dumas, J., Elazar, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.00159 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Kang, D., Han, Z., Tian, J., Zhang, M., & Rzeszotarski, J. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757675 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Recent studies have begun to quantify the positionality of NLP datasets and models [54], offering insights into the types of data informing AI outputs.”
Modern maxims for an AI oracle
Crockett, M. J. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00970-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
NUTMEG: Separating Signal From Noise in Annotator Disagreement
Ivey, J., Gauch, S., & Jurgens, D. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.144
- Authors
- Santy, S., Liang, J. T., Bras, R. L., Reinecke, K., & Sap, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 9080-9102
- ISSN
- 0736-587X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2306.01943
- OpenAlex
- W4385570549
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1745016, 2230466, 2140739)
- University of Washington
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- design bias, researcher positionality, NLP datasets, model bias, social acceptance, hate speech detection, annotator demographics, non-binary people, non-native English speakers, algorithmic fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review