Cited by 41Natural Language Processing TechniquesAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Women’s Syntactic Resilience and Men’s Grammatical Luck: Gender-Bias in Part-of-Speech Tagging and Dependency Parsing

Open access
Garimella, Aparna, Banea, Carmen, Hovy, Dirk, Mihalcea, Rada·2019·Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

Several linguistic studies have shown the prevalence of various lexical and grammatical patterns in texts authored by a person of a particular gender, but models for part-of-speech tagging and dependency parsing have still not adapted to account for these differences.To address this, we annotate the Wall Street Journal part of the Penn Treebank with the gender information of the articles' authors, and build taggers and parsers trained on this data that show performance differences in text written by men and women.Further analyses reveal numerous part-of-speech tags and syntactic relations whose prediction performances benefit from the prevalence of a specific gender in the training data.The results underscore the importance of accounting for gendered differences in syntactic tasks, and outline future venues for developing more accurate taggers and parsers.We release our data to the research community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/p19-1339

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hannah E. Cornett. 2014. Gender differences in syn- tactic development among english speaking adoles- cents. Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse, 6(3):1-6.
  2. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accu- rate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Compu- tational Linguistics (Volume 1), ACL 2003, pages 423-430, Sapporo, Japan.
  3. Karo Moilanen and Stephen Pulman. 2007. Senti- ment composition. In Proceedings of the Confer- ence on Recent Advances in Natural Language Pro- cessing, volume 7 of RANLP 2007, pages 378-382, Borovets, Bulgaria.
  4. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher D. Man- ning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of- speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics on Human Language Technology- Volume 1, NAACL-HLT 2003, pages 173-180, Ed- monton, Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garimella, A., Banea, C., Hovy, D., & Mihalcea, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Bocconi University (IT)
Venue
Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2019
Pages
3493-3498
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952638532
Cited by
41
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1815291)
  • John Templeton Foundation (61156)
  • Michigan Institute for Data Science, University of Michigan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Keywords
gender bias, part-of-speech tagging, dependency parsing, gendered language, author gender, Penn Treebank, Wall Street Journal, syntactic relations, training data bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review