Epidemic Modeling with Generative Agents
Open accessAbstract
This study offers a new paradigm of individual-level modeling to address the grand challenge of incorporating human behavior in epidemic models. Using generative artificial intelligence in an agent-based epidemic model, each agent is empowered to make its own reasonings and decisions via connecting to a large language model such as ChatGPT. Through various simulation experiments, we present compelling evidence that generative agents mimic real-world behaviors such as quarantining when sick and self-isolation when cases rise. Collectively, the agents demonstrate patterns akin to multiple waves observed in recent pandemics followed by an endemic period. Moreover, the agents successfully flatten the epidemic curve. This study creates potential to improve dynamic system modeling by offering a way to represent human brain, reasoning, and decision making.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Williams et al. (2023) shows that LLM-based agents can accurately emulate human responses to disease outbreaks, including self-quarantine and isolation, and their collective behavior mirrors multiple waves and stabilizes into an endemic state, contributing to attenuation of the epidemic curve.
“The research showcases through various simulations how these LLM-based agents can accurately emulate human responses to disease outbreaks, including behaviors like self-quarantine and isolation during heightened case numbers.The collective behavior of these agents mirrors the complex patterns of multiple waves typically seen in pandemics, eventually stabilizing into an endemic state.Impressively,”
From Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Williams et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Behaviour fuels, and fights, pandemics. Nature Human Behaviour. 2020;4(5):435-.
- Kraemer MUG, Yang C-H, Gutierrez B, Wu C-H, Klein B, Pigott DM, et al. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science. 2020;368(6490):493-7.
- Rahmandad H, Xu R, Ghaffarzadegan N. A missing behavioural feedback in COVID-19 models is the key to several puzzles. BMJ Global Health. 2022;7(10):e010463.
- Ferguson N. Capturing human behaviour. Nature. 2007;446(7137):733-.
- Bauch C, T., Galvani A, P. Social Factors in Epidemiology. Science. 2013;342(6154):47-9.
- Funk S, Salathé M, Jansen VAA. Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2010;7(50):1247-56.
- Bedson J, Skrip LA, Pedi D, Abramowitz S, Carter S, Jalloh MF, et al. A review and agenda for integrated disease models including social and behavioural factors. Nature Human Behaviour. 2021;5(7):834-46.
- Xu R, Rahmandad H, Gupta M, DiGennaro C, Ghaffarzadegan N, Amini H, et al. Weather, air pollution, and SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a global analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2021;5(10):e671-e80.
- Rahmandad H, Lim TY, Sterman J. Behavioral dynamics of COVID-19: estimating underreporting, multiple waves, and adherence fatigue across 92 nations. System Dynamics Review. 2021;37(1):5-31.
- Rahmandad H. Behavioral Responses to Risk Promote Vaccinating High-contact Individuals First. medRxiv. 2021:2021.02.05.21251215.
- Funk S, Bansal S, Bauch CT, Eames KTD, Edmunds WJ, Galvani AP, et al. Nine challenges in incorporating the dynamics of behaviour in infectious diseases models. Epidemics. 2015;10:21-5.
- Weston D, Ip A, Amlôt R. Examining the application of behaviour change theories in the context of infectious disease outbreaks and emergency response: a review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1483.
- Verelst F, Willem L, Beutels P. Behavioural change models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2010-2015). Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2016;13(125):20160820.
- Cooper G. Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2023;32(3):444-52.
- Mondal S, Das S, Vrana VG. How to Bell the Cat? A Theoretical Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence towards Digital Disruption in All Walks of Life. Technologies. 2023;11(2):44.
- Goldberg LR. An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;59(6):1216-29.
- Ghaffarzadegan N. Simulation-based what-if analysis for controlling the spread of Covid-19 in universities. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0246323.
- Kermack WO, McKendrick AG, Walker GT. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. 1927;115(772):700-21.
- Qiu Z, Espinoza B, Vasconcelos VV, Chen C, Constantino SM, Crabtree SA, et al. Understanding the coevolution of mask wearing and epidemics: A network perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119(26):e2123355119.
- Rahmandad H, Sterman J. Quantifying the COVID-19 endgame: Is a new normal within reach? System Dynamics Review. 2022;38(4):329-53.
- Richardson GP. Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review. 2011;27(3):219-43.
- Kazil J, Masad D, Crooks A, editors. Utilizing Python for Agent-Based Modeling: The Mesa Framework2020; Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey on large language model based autonomous agents
Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., et al. (2024) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Empowering biomedical discovery with AI agents
Gao, S., Fang, A., Huang, Y., Giunchiglia, V., Noori, A., Schwarz, J. R., Ektefaie, Y., Kondic, J., & Zitnik, M. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.022 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges
Guo, T., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Chang, R., Pei, S., Chawla, N. V., Wiest, O., & Zhang, X. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01680 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Xiao, B., Yin, Z., & Shan, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.06957 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Recent advances like chain-of-thought prompting have improved LLM reasoning abilities [46], enabling applications like GABM which embeds GAs into epidemic models [47].”
BackgroundDo as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language Models
Weng, Z., Chen, G., & Wang, W. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.13381 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Williams, R., Hosseinichimeh, N., Majumdar, A., & Ghaffarzadegan, N.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2307.04986
- OpenAlex
- W4384111914
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2229819)
- Division of Social and Economic Sciences (2229819)
- Division of Mathematical Sciences (2229819)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- epidemic modeling, agent-based modeling, generative AI, large language models, ChatGPT, self-isolation, epidemic waves, decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
