PreprintCited by 2Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Quantum state tomography of photon's polarization and path degrees of freedom

Open access
Ferreira, J. L. Montenegro, Bernardo, B. de Lima·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Quantum state tomography (QST), the process through which the density matrix of a quantum system is characterized from measurements of specific observables, is a fundamental pillar in the fields of quantum information and computation. In this work, we propose a simple QST method to reconstruct the density matrix of two qubits encoded in the polarization and path degrees of freedom of a single photon, which can be realized with a single linear-optical setup. We demonstrate that the density matrix can be fully described in terms of the Stokes parameters related to the two possibles paths of the photon, together with a quantum version of the two-point Stokes parameters introduced here. Our findings put forward photonic circuits for the investigation of the dynamics of open quantum systems.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper proposes a quantum state tomography method to reconstruct an arbitrary two-qubit density matrix encoded in the polarization and path degrees of freedom of a single photon using a single linear-optical setup. It shows the density matrix can be fully expressed through one-path Stokes parameters (OPSP) and newly introduced quantum two-path Stokes parameters (TPSP).

Key findings

  • The polarization-path density matrix can be fully reconstructed from the OPSP, which are real, and the TPSP, which are generally complex and contain information about both polarization and coherence.
  • Eight out of the sixteen entries of the polarization-path density matrix are sufficient to characterize the polarization in each path via OPSP.
  • The TPSP can be assessed by measuring interference patterns of the OPSP as a controllable phase shift \(\phi\) is varied; specifically, real and imaginary parts require OPSP measurements at \(\phi=0\) and \(\phi=\pi/2\).
  • The protocol is realizable with a single arrangement of linear optical devices, without needing to modify the setup to measure all observables, and can be adapted to avoid inserting/removing wave plates by adding beam splitters and detectors.

Methods

  • Theoretical proposal: defines quantum OPSP from ensemble averages of Pauli operators and introduces quantum TPSP as a generalization of classical two-point Stokes parameters.
  • Uses a two-path interferometer with 1:1 beam splitters, a controllable phase shift, polarizing beam splitters, half- and quarter-wave plates, and photodetectors to measure OPSP and TPSP.
  • Derives relations showing how OPSP at the interferometer output vary with \(\phi\), enabling reconstruction of the full density matrix from measured counts.

Limitations

  • The paper states that experimental sources of error, such as uncertainties in wave-plate angles, can yield a density matrix that is not physical, e.g., failing unit trace or non-negativity; maximum likelihood estimation or Bayesian inference is suggested to correct this.
  • Evident from the text: the work is a theoretical proposal with no experimental demonstration or data reported.
  • Evident from the text: the scheme assumes ideal lossless 1:1 beam splitters and ideal optical components.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2308.12813

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 13 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    Eight out of the sixteen entries of the polarization-path density matrix are sufficient to fully characterize the polarization of the photons propagating in each path.

    “From Eqs. (2a) to (3d) we observe that eight out of the sixteen entries of the polarization-path density matrix of Eq. ( 1) are sufficient to fully characterize the polarization of the photons propagating in each path.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The polarization-path density matrix of a single photon can be fully reconstructed from the one-path Stokes parameters (OPSP) for each path and the two-path Stokes parameters (TPSP).

    “We demonstrate that the density matrix can be fully described in terms of the Stokes parameters related to the two possibles paths of the photon, together with a quantum version of the two-point Stokes parameters introduced here.”
    • Also stated in: § III. POLARIZATION-PATH STATE TOMOGRAPHY · plain
      “This equation tells us that, given an ensemble of photons described by an unknown polarization-path density matrix, if we are able to measure the OPSP and TPSP we can fully reconstruct the state.”
    • Also stated in: § IV. CONCLUSION · plain
      “we observed that the polarization-path density matrix can be completely characterized in terms of the OPSP related to each of the two possible paths taken by the photon, which are real numbers, and the TPSP, which are complex numbers that contain information about both the polarization and coherence of the photon.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The real and imaginary parts of the TPSP can be determined from OPSP measurements at φ=0 and φ=π/2 along one path.

    “Therefore, to obtain the real and imaginary parts of the TPSP, we only need to obtain the OPSP along one of the path states of ρf for ϕ = 0 and ϕ = π/2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The TPSP quantify the contrast in the interference behavior of the OPSP for the state ρf when the phase φ is varied.

    “The TPSP quantify the contrast in the interference behavior of the OPSP for the state ρf when ϕ is varied.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The OPSP for photons in path 0 vary as a function of φ according to Eqs. (9a)-(9d).

    “After some calculations, we can find that the OPSP for the photons in path |0⟩ (i.e., those collected by SPM 3 ) varies as a function of ϕ according to the relations:”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 3
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The OPSP are real numbers, while the TPSP are generally complex and are obtained from correlations involving photons propagating through both paths.

    “While the OPSP are real numbers, as a consequence of the Hermiticity of the polarization-path density matrix, the TPSP are generally complex and are obtained from correlations that involve photons propagating through both paths.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Creating polarization-path entangled states in a single photon is straightforward.

    “creating polarization-path entangled states in a single photon is straightforward [6,22].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Implementation of entangling gates for two qubits encoded in different photons is difficult because photons do not interact directly and requires nonlinear couplings between photon paths.

    “the implementation of entangling gates for two-qubits encoded in different photons is difficult because they do not interact directly, that is to say that it requires nonlinear couplings between photon paths [24].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Passing a photon with diagonal polarization |D⟩ through a PBS generates the transformation |D⟩ → 1/√2(|H,0⟩+|V,1⟩), resulting in a single-photon maximally entangled state.

    “For example, by passing a photon with diagonal polarization |D⟩ through a PBS one generates the transformation |D⟩ → 1 √ 2 (|H, 0⟩ + |V, 1⟩), which results in a single-photon maximally entangled state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The QST technique can provide an extra tool for a more detailed understanding of nonequilibrium quantum dynamics.

    “In this perspective, our QST technique for the reconstruction of single-photon polarization-path states can provide an extra tool for an even more detailed understanding of such processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The complementary relation reflects that there are no losses in the interferometer and the degree of polarization of the photons is conserved.

    “This relation, which holds for all values of ϕ, reflects the fact that there are no losses in the interferometer, and the degree of polarization of the photons is conserved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The 1:1 beam splitters and mirrors in the interferometer are lossless (there are no losses in the interferometer).
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The QST protocol provides an accessible testbed for studying the dynamics of open two-qubit systems.

    “the QST protocol introduced here provides an acessible testbed for the study of the dynamics of open two-qubit systems [29][30][31].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29][30][31]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    To date, entanglement involving different particles has found more significance in quantum technologies compared to entanglement involving different degrees of freedom of a single particle.

    “Yet, we should note that to date entanglement involving different particles has found more significance in quantum technologies when compared to entanglement involving different DOF of a single particle [25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Optical simulations of quantum thermodynamic processes can describe a qubit system interacting with decohering and thermalizing environments by manipulation of the polarization and path degrees of freedom of the photons.

    “In addition, with optical simulations of quantum thermodynamic processes, it is also possible to describe a qubit system interacting with decohering and thermalizing environments by manipulation of the polarization and path DOF of the photons [32,33].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [32]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [33]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

9 of 9
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The 1:1 beam splitters and mirrors in the interferometer are lossless (there are no losses in the interferometer).

    “two lossless 1:1 beam splitters, BS 0 and BS 1”
    “there are no losses in the interferometer”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Photons from an ensemble propagate one at a time through the two possible paths.

    “Suppose that photons from an ensemble propagate one at a time through two possible paths 0 and 1 whose states are defined as |0⟩ and |1⟩”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure caption mislabels the quarter-wave-plate measurement

    Minor

    The Figure 1 caption says the quarter-wave plate measures s2, while the main text says it measures s3.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J. B. Altepeter, D. F. V. James, and P. G. Kwiat, in Quantum State Estimation (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreira, J. L. M., & Bernardo, B. D. L.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386185451
Cited by
2
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (307876/2022-5)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
quantum state tomography, polarization, two-qubit states, density matrix reconstruction, Stokes parameters, linear optics, open quantum systems, photonic circuits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review