Cited by 217Quantum Information and CryptographySemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing

Open access
Couteau, Christophe, Barz, Stefanie, Durt, Thomas, Gerrits, Thomas, Huwer, Jan, Prevedel, Robert, Rarity, John, Shields, Andrew +1 more·2023·Nature Reviews Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2

Cites

222 of 224 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the experiment to operate in the quantum regime, one would need a single-photon emitter and a single-photon detector.

    “For the experiment to operate in the quantum regime, or, in other words, to be truly quantized , one would need a single-photon emitter and a single-photon detector [3].”

    From Building an analogue simulator of a photonic quantum computer with transparent tape, maple syrup, and cat lasers, and implementing first quantum algorithms in the classroom (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    Section 1.1.1.1 (page unavailable) describes an experiment that uses a single-photon source and single-photon detectors to demonstrate photon antibunching. It does not say that every experiment needs those components to operate in the quantum regime, so the citing sentence overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 226 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. P. Androvitsaneas, A.B. Young, S. Schneider, S. Maier, M. Kamp, S. Höfling, S. Knauer, E. Harbord, C.Y. Hu, J.G. Rarity, R. Oulton (2016) Charged Quantum Dot Micropillar System for Deterministic Light-Matter Interactions. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93 (24), 241409.
  2. G Bonfrate, V. Pruneiri, P. Kazanski, P.R. Tapster and J.G. Rarity, Parametric fluorescence in periodically poled silica fibres, Applied Physics Letts. 75, 2356 (1999).
  3. C. Bonato, F. Haupt, S.S.R. Oemrawsingh, J. Gudat, D. Ding, M.P. van Exter, D. Bouwmeester (2010), CNOT and Bell-State Analysis in the Weak-Coupling Cavity QED Regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (16), 160503.
  4. O Cohen, JS Lundeen, BJ Smith, G Puentes, PJ Mosley, IA Walmsley (2009), Tailored photon-pair generation in optical fibers, Physical review letters 102 (12), 123603.
  5. Dousse, A. et al. Controlled light-matter coupling for a single quantum dot embedded in a pillar microcavity using far-field optical lithography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 267404 (2008).
  6. Łukasz Dusanowski, Soon-Hong Kwon, Christian Schneider, and Sven Höfling, Near-Unity Indistinguishability Single Photon Source for Large-Scale Integrated Quantum Optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 173602 (2019)
  7. Sara Gasparoni, Jian-Wei Pan, Philip Walther, Terry Rudolph, and Anton Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020504 (2004).
  8. Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field. Glauber, R. Physical Review 131, 2766 (1963).
  9. Observation of Cavity-Enhanced Single-Atom Spontaneous Emission. P. Goy, J. M. Raimond, M. Gross, & S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1903 (1983).
  10. K. De Greve, D. Press, P.L. McMahon and Y. Yamamoto 2013, Ultrafast optical control of individual quantum dot spin qubits, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76 092501
  11. Experimental realization of a localized one-photon state. C. K. Hong & L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 58 (1986).
  12. Single defect centres in diamond: A review. F. Jelezko and J. Wrachtrup, phys. stat. sol. (a) 203, 3207 (2006).
  13. CT Nguyen, DD Sukachev, MK Bhaskar, B Machielse, DS Levonian, EN Knall, P Stroganov, R Riedinger, H Park, M Lončar, MD Lukin 2019, Quantum network nodes based on diamond qubits with an efficient nanophotonic interface, Physical review letters 123 (18), 183602.
  14. Stefano Paesani, Yunhong Ding, Raffaele Santagati, Levon Chakhmakhchyan, Caterina Vigliar, Karsten Rottwitt, Leif K Oxenløwe, Jianwei Wang, Mark G Thompson, Anthony Laing. Generation and sampling of quantum states of light in a silicon chip. Nature Physics 15, 925 (2019).
  15. Atomically thin quantum light-emitting diodes. Palacios-Berraquero, C. et al., Nature Communications 7, 12978 (2016).
  16. M Pelton, C Santori, J Vucković, B Zhang, GS Solomon, J Plant, ... Efficient source of single photons: a single quantum dot in a micropost microcavity, Physical review letters 89 (23), 233602
  17. Purcell, E. M. Physical Review 69, 681 (1946).
  18. J.G. Rarity, P.R. Tapster and R. Loudon (1997) Non-classical interference between independent sources, quant-ph/9702032; · arXiv
  19. C Santori, M Pelton, G Solomon, Y Dale, Y Yamamoto 2001, Triggered single photons from a quantum dot, Physical Review Letters 86 (8), 1502
  20. C. Santori; D. Fattal; J. Vucković; G. S. Solomon & Y. Yamamoto (2002). "Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device". Nature. 419 (6907): 594-597.
  21. Quantum Optics. Scully, M. O. & Zubairy, M. S., Cambridge University Press (1997).
  22. Photon wave functions, wave-packet quantization of light, and coherence theory. Smith, B. & Raymer, M. New. J. Phys. 9, 414 (2007).
  23. Density operators for coherent fields. Titulaer, U. & Glauber, R., Phys. Rev. 145,1041 (1966).
  24. Wang, X.-L. et al. Experimental ten-photon entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210502 (2016).
  25. Hui Wang, Jian Qin, Xing Ding, Ming-Cheng Chen , Si Chen, Xiang You, Yu-Ming He, Xiao Jiang, Z. Wang, L. You, J. J. Renema, Sven Höfling , Chao-Yang Lu, Jian-Wei Pan, (2019), Boson sampling with 20 input photons in 60-mode interferometers at 1014 state spaces, arXiv 1910.09930. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Couteau, C., Barz, S., Durt, T., Gerrits, T., Huwer, J., Prevedel, R., Rarity, J., Shields, A., & Weihs, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Stuttgart (DE)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Corresponding author
Couteau, Christophe
Venue
Nature Reviews Physics
Published
2023-05-26
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
326-338
ISSN
2522-5820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378377067
Cited by
216
References
226
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 15
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Physics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-EURE-0013)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R022054/1, EP/J007994/1, EP/F002424/1, EP/E059015/1, EP/R023018/1, EP/M024458/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
single photons, single-photon sources, quantum communication, quantum computing, photon production, photon manipulation, quantum technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review