The DOI matches its DataCite record; 76 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
Open accessAbstract
We release Code Llama, a family of large language models for code based on Llama 2 providing state-of-the-art performance among open models, infilling capabilities, support for large input contexts, and zero-shot instruction following ability for programming tasks. We provide multiple flavors to cover a wide range of applications: foundation models (Code Llama), Python specializations (Code Llama - Python), and instruction-following models (Code Llama - Instruct) with 7B, 13B, 34B and 70B parameters each. All models are trained on sequences of 16k tokens and show improvements on inputs with up to 100k tokens. 7B, 13B and 70B Code Llama and Code Llama - Instruct variants support infilling based on surrounding content. Code Llama reaches state-of-the-art performance among open models on several code benchmarks, with scores of up to 67% and 65% on HumanEval and MBPP, respectively. Notably, Code Llama - Python 7B outperforms Llama 2 70B on HumanEval and MBPP, and all our models outperform every other publicly available model on MultiPL-E. We release Code Llama under a permissive license that allows for both research and commercial use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Given a new task, current LLMs consume and learn from the task data 'as-is' via finetuning or in-context learning [9, 10, 11, 12].”
From Self-Adapting Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Code-based LLMs (e.g., CodeLlama(Roziere etal. 2023) and StarCoder(Li etal. 2023d; Lozhkov et al. 2024)) are particularly well suited to address this demand.”
From When LLMs meet cybersecurity: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Roziere et al. 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“At the time of writing, only the CodeLlama models (Rozi` ere et al., 2023) are able to handle the very long contexts necessary.”
From SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues? (2023) · cites this paper as Rozière et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Code Llama family are based upon Llama 2. It is pre-trained on a 500B token corpus with both code and natural language texts using the infilling objective.”
From Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Code-Change-Related Tasks (2025) · cites this paper as [67]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which is a 7B decoder-only model trained on code synthesis.”
From Does Few-Shot Learning Help LLM Performance in Code Synthesis? (2024) · cites this paper as Roziere et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“LLMs have achieved remarkable proficiency at generating code in mainstream programming languages such as Python and JavaScript, yet this proficiency does not transfer to logic programming.”
From From Reasoning to Code: GRPO Optimization for Underrepresented Languages (2026) · cites this paper as Rozière et al. (2023)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“CodeLLaMA-34B [42] is an aligned version of LLaMA-234B, which is fine-tuned with 500B tokens of code data.”
From Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“At the same time, different LLMs possess unique strengths and specialize in various tasks aspects.”
From Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities (2024) · cites this paper as Roziere et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There have been many previous works that have confirmed that LLMs do have good code comprehension capabilities (He et al. 2024; Luo et al. 2024; Roziere et al. 2023; Li et al. 2023d).”
From When LLMs meet cybersecurity: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Roziere et al. 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, while numerous LMs have been implemented with a primary focus on code generation, most tend to underperform the best generalist LMs (Li et al., 2022; Le et al., 2022; Roziere et al., 2023; Austin et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022).”
From Self-Taught Optimizer (STOP): Recursively Self-Improving Code Generation (2023) · cites this paper as Roziere et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Utilizing SWE-bench-train, we release two fine-tuned models, SWE-Llama 7 b and 13 b, based on the CodeLlama (Rozi` ere et al., 2023) model.”
From SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues? (2023) · cites this paper as Rozière et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Prior studies showed that within the same LLM family, larger models are associated with better performance [59, 67, 73].”
From Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Code-Change-Related Tasks (2025) · cites this paper as [67]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The main experiments are performed on CODELLAMA (Roziere et al., 2023).”
From Does Few-Shot Learning Help LLM Performance in Code Synthesis? (2024) · cites this paper as Roziere et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore CODELLAMA is more specialized in coding tasks thus yielding slightly lower PERPLEX-ITY (TARGET) score compared to MISTRAL despite their comparable sizes.”
From Does Few-Shot Learning Help LLM Performance in Code Synthesis? (2024) · cites this paper as Roziere et al., 2023
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Among the LLMs tested, CODELLAMA (Roziere et al., 2023) benefits the most from good test case selection, hence we focus this work around CODELLAMA.”
From Does Few-Shot Learning Help LLM Performance in Code Synthesis? (2024) · cites this paper as Roziere et al., 2023
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, both of these tools aim to maximise the acceptance rate of the shown completions”
From A Transformer-Based Approach for Smart Invocation of Automatic Code Completion (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Specifically, optimising only acceptance rate results in worse completions [32, 49].”
From A Transformer-Based Approach for Smart Invocation of Automatic Code Completion (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Consistent with earlier research [32, 49], we acknowledge that these proxy metrics might not fully capture the usability of the interaction without potentially compromising it in some other way.”
From A Transformer-Based Approach for Smart Invocation of Automatic Code Completion (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“and contains most of the significant features found in previous work [32].”
From A Transformer-Based Approach for Smart Invocation of Automatic Code Completion (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 2×
“Effective handling of long sequences is a major topic of research in transformer-based language modeling (Vaswani et al., 2017).”
BackgroundBLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., & Zhu, W.-J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02 · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073135 · Cited by 21,344 · cited 3×
“( b) Difference in BLEU scores for single line code completion of long context models compared to their respective base models before fine-tuning.”
MethodInfluentialRoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515 · cited 1×
“To measure the toxicity of the generated outputs from each of the LLMs, we employ the default ToxiGen classifier, tuned on RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019).”
MethodExploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929 · cited 1×
“…2023; Nguyen et al., 2023), many tasks related to code understanding or synthesis have been addressed since the early 2020s with NLP models adapted for code (Raffel et al., 2020; Feng et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Ahmad et al., 2021), also see the survey by Xu & Zhu (2022).”
VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text
Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550 · Cited by 6,087 · cited 2×
“The VADER produces sentiment scores between -1 and 1, where a positive (negative) score indicates a positive (negative) sentiment towards the population mentioned in the prompt.”
MethodLLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602 · cited 11×
“ChatGPT and GPT-4 (OpenAI, 2023), PaLM (Chowdhery et al., 2022) and Chinchilla (Hoffmann et al., 2022) are closed source, while BLOOM (Scao et al., 2022), OPT (Zhang et al., 2022b), and the seminal work of Llama are public (Touvron et al., 2023a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationKudo, T., & Richardson, J. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-2012 · Cited by 4,454 · cited 1×
“� 500B 20B 20B”
Transformer-XL: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context
Dai, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Le, Q., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1285 · Cited by 3,169 · cited 1×
“Long sequences in LLMs. Scaling Transformers and LLMs to long input sequences has attracted much recent interest (Dai et al., 2019; Beltagy et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2023; Ding et al., 2023).”
BackgroundTraining Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2011 · Cited by 3,117 · cited 3×
“Collecting supervised data from human annotators or training from human feedback (Ouyang et al., 2022) is expensive for coding tasks as it requires input from professional developers.”
BackgroundMethodModel Cards for Model Reporting
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 · Cited by 2,681
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Rohan Anil, Andrew M. Dai, Orhan Firat, Melvin Johnson, Dmitry Lepikhin, Alexandre Passos, Siamak Shakeri, Emanuel Taropa, Paige Bailey, Zhifeng Chen, Eric Chu, Jonathan H. Clark, Laurent El Shafey, Yanping Huang, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Gaurav Mishra, Erica Moreira, Mark Omernick, Kevin Robinson, Sebastian Ruder, Yi Tay, Kefan Xiao, Yuanzhong Xu, Yujing Zhang, Gustavo Hernandez Abrego, Junwhan Ahn, Jacob Austin, Paul Barham, Jan Botha, James Bradbury, Siddhartha Brahma, Kevin Brooks, Michele Catasta, Yong Cheng, Colin Cherry, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Clément Crepy, Shachi Dave, Mostafa Dehghani, Sunipa Dev, Jacob Devlin, Mark Díaz, Nan Du, Ethan Dyer, Vlad Feinberg, Fangxiaoyu Feng, Vlad Fienber, Markus Freitag, Xavier Garcia, Sebastian Gehrmann, Lucas Gonzalez, Guy Gur-Ari, Steven Hand, Hadi Hashemi, Le Hou, Joshua Howland, Andrea Hu, Jeffrey Hui, Jeremy Hurwitz, Michael Isard, Abe Ittycheriah, Matthew Jagielski, Wenhao Jia, Kathleen Kenealy, Maxim Krikun, Sneha Kudugunta, Chang Lan, Katherine Lee, Benjamin Lee, Eric Li, Music Li, Wei Li, YaGuang Li, Jian Li, Hyeontaek Lim, Hanzhao Lin, Zhongtao Liu, Frederick Liu, Marcello Maggioni, Aroma Mahendru, Joshua Maynez, Vedant Misra, Maysam Moussalem, Zachary Nado, John Nham, Eric Ni, Andrew Nystrom, Alicia Parrish, Marie Pellat, Martin Polacek, Alex Polozov, Reiner Pope, Siyuan Qiao, Emily Reif, Bryan Richter, Parker Riley, Alex Castro Ros, Aurko Roy, Brennan Saeta, Rajkumar Samuel, Renee Shelby, Ambrose Slone, Daniel Smilkov, David R. So, Daniel Sohn, Simon Tokumine, Dasha Valter, Vijay Vasudevan, Kiran Vodrahalli, Xuezhi Wang, Pidong Wang, Zirui Wang, Tao Wang, John Wieting, Yuhuai Wu, Kelvin Xu, Yunhan Xu, Linting Xue, Pengcheng Yin, Jiahui Yu, Qiao Zhang, Steven Zheng, Ce Zheng, Weikang Zhou, Denny Zhou, Slav Petrov, and Yonghui Wu. PaLM 2 Technical Report. arXiv:abs/2305.10403, 2023.
- Jaehun Jung, Peter West, Liwei Jiang, Faeze Brahman, Ximing Lu, Jillian Fisher, Taylor Sorensen, and Yejin Choi. Impossible distillation: From low-quality model to high-quality dataset & model for summarization and paraphrasing. arXiv:abs/2305.16635, 2023.
- Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In ICLR, 2019.
- Han Peng, Ge Li, Wenhan Wang, Yunfei Zhao, and Zhi Jin. Integrating tree path in transformer for code representation. In NeurIPS, pp. 9343-9354, 2021.
- Vighnesh Leonardo Shiv and Chris Quirk. Novel positional encodings to enable tree-based transformers. In NeurIPS, pp. 12058-12068, 2019.
- Michele Tufano, Dawn Drain, Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Shao Kun Deng, and Neel Sundaresan. Unit test case generation with transformers. arXiv:abs/2009.05617, 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large language models for software engineering: survey and open problems
Fan, A., Gokkaya, B., Harman, M., Lyubarskiy, M., Sengupta, S., Yoo, S., & Zhang, J. M. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Future of Software Engineering (ICSE-FoSE) · doi:10.1109/icse-fose59343.2023.00008 · Cited by 650
“On the 24 th. August 2023, Meta released open-sourced Code Llama [29], a state-of-the-art for publicly available LLMs on coding tasks.”
BackgroundJiang, A. Q., Sablayrolles, A., Mensch, A., Bamford, C., Chaplot, D. S., Casas, D. D. L., Bressand, F., Lengyel, G., Lample, G., Saulnier, L., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06825 · Cited by 340
A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4
Kalyan, K. S. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100048 · Cited by 335
Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation
Gao, D., Wang, H., Li, Y., Sun, X., Qian, Y., Ding, B., & Zhou, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3641204.3641221 · Cited by 342
Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries
Chao, P., Robey, A., Dobriban, E., Hassani, H., Pappas, G. J., & Wong, E. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml64287.2025.00010 · Cited by 1,298
“Although still at its infancy, the field of study surrounding large language models (LLMs) has shown significant promise in advancing numerous fields, including code generation [28], business analytics [38], and medicine [32].”
When LLMs meet cybersecurity: a systematic literature review
Zhang, J., Bu, H., Wen, H., Liu, Y., Fei, H., Xi, R., Li, L., Yang, Y., Zhu, H., & Meng, D. (2025) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-025-00361-w · Cited by 383
“…select a dataset that can appropriately represent the characteristics of the target domain; second, determine the strategy for continuous pre-training; and finally, perform pre-training and adjust the model architecture or optimization algorithm as needed to adapt to the new training objectives.”
ChatEDA: A Large Language Model Powered Autonomous Agent for EDA
Wu, H., He, Z., Zhang, X., Yao, X., Zheng, S., Zheng, H., & Yu, B. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2024.3383347 · Cited by 213
“It is worth noting that CodeLlama [33] models achieve strong performance in coding ability, which are incrementally pretrained on code resources based on Llama2 models.”
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v4 · Cited by 193
Zhang, K., Li, J., Li, G., Shi, X., & Jin, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.737 · Cited by 138
Ullah, S., Han, M., Pujar, S., Pearce, H. A., Coskun, A. K., & Stringhini, G. (2024) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp54263.2024.00210 · Cited by 208
“Large Language Models (LLMs), such as OpenAI’s Codex [1], Google’s PaLM2 [2], Meta’s Codellama [3], and StarCoder [4], etc., have demonstrated great potential in performing programming-language related tasks such as code generation, code documentation , and debugging.”
MethodIntent-Based Management of Next-Generation Networks: an LLM-Centric Approach
Mekrache, A., Ksentini, A., & Verikoukis, C. V. (2024) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2024.3420120 · Cited by 131
“• Real-World Deployment and Testing: Our proposed framework is implemented and tested in real-world scenarios using a single NVIDIA A100 GPU with 40GB of vRAM, leveraging the Code Llama LLM [7].”
NeuPIMs: NPU-PIM Heterogeneous Acceleration for Batched LLM Inferencing
Heo, G., Lee, S., Cho, J., Choi, H., Lee, S., Ham, H., Kim, G., Mahajan, D., & Park, J. (2024) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/3620666.3651380 · Cited by 162
LLM-Based Test-Driven Interactive Code Generation: User Study and Empirical Evaluation
Fakhoury, S., Naik, A., Sakkas, G., Chakraborty, S., & Lahiri, S. K. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3428972 · Cited by 120
“Following [1], [45], [46] for all models we settle on a temperature of 0.8, as it maximizes the number of examples for which at least one correct code is produced within 100 suggestions for k > 1 in pass @ k .”
MethodInfluentialFine-tuning and prompt engineering for large language models-based code review automation
Pornprasit, C., & Tantithamthavorn, C. K. (2024) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107523 · Cited by 151
“For example, the open-source community-developed large language models such as Code-LLaMa [27], StarCoder [28], and Magicoder [21]; and the commercial large language models such as GPT-3.”
MethodMaharjan, J., Garikipati, A., Singh, N. P., Cyrus, L., Sharma, M., Ciobanu, M., Barnes, G., Thapa, R., Mao, Q., & Das, R. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-64827-6 · Cited by 128
LLM Hallucinations in Practical Code Generation: Phenomena, Mechanism, and Mitigation
Zhang, Z., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Shi, E., Ma, Y., Zhong, W., Chen, J., Mao, M., & Zheng, Z. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3728894 · Cited by 198
“We use the CodeLlama-7b-Python-hf model.”
InfluentialNi, B., & Buehler, M. J. (2024) · Extreme Mechanics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.eml.2024.102131 · Cited by 113
Wang, F., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Wu, Z., Mo, T., Lu, Q., Wang, W., Li, R., Xu, J., Tang, X., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3768165 · Cited by 106
LLMs in e-commerce: A comparative analysis of GPT and LLaMA models in product review evaluation
Roumeliotis, K. I., Tselikas, N. D., & Nasiopoulos, D. Κ. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100056 · Cited by 127
LLM for SoC Security: A Paradigm Shift
Saha, D., Tarek, S., Yahyaei, K., Saha, S. K., Zhou, J., Tehranipoor, M. M., & Farahmandi, F. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3427369 · Cited by 128
“Code LLama-Instruct [177] Decoder-Only 7, 13 & 34 IT Code LLama No Code Open Code generation and understanding”
BackgroundWhen Software Security Meets Large Language Models: A Survey
Zhu, X., Zhou, W., Han, Q., Ma, W., Wen, S., & Xiang, Y. (2025) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2024.124971 · Cited by 110
Reducing hallucination in structured outputs via Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Ayala, O., & Bechard, P. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 6: Industry Track) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-industry.19 · Cited by 97
“Thus we also fine-tune other pretrained LLMs of this size: CodeLlama-7B (Roziere et al., 2023) and Mistral-7B-v0.”
BackgroundMethodAn AI Agent for Fully Automated Multi‐Omic Analyses
Zhou, J., Zhang, B., Li, G., Chen, X., Li, H., Xu, X., Chen, S., He, W., Xu, C., Liu, L., et al. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202407094 · Cited by 104
A Performance Study of LLM-Generated Code on Leetcode
Coignion, T., Quinton, C., & Rouvoy, R. (2024) · International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) · doi:10.1145/3661167.3661221 · Cited by 88
“The ranking of the functional correctness of the LLMs is consistent with the previous evaluations of the LLMs on HumanEval [1, 4, 10, 21, 24, 27, 32].”
The Dawn of Natural Language to SQL: Are We Fully Ready?
Li, B., Luo, Y., Chai, C., Li, G., & Tang, N. (2024) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3681954.3682003 · Cited by 179
“+”
Using LLMs in Software Requirements Specifications: An Empirical Evaluation
Krishna, M., Gaur, B., Verma, A., & Jalote, P. (2024) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re59067.2024.00056 · Cited by 114
“In this paper, we evaluate the proficiency of LLMs like GPT-4 [11] (ChatGPT) [1] and CodeLlama [2] in formulating the SRS for a software project.”
MethodFakih, M., Dharmaji, R., Moghaddas, Y., Quirós, G., Ogundare, O., & Faruque, M. A. A. (2024) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1145/3639477.3639743 · Cited by 108
Assessing LLMs in malicious code deobfuscation of real-world malware campaigns
Patsakis, C., Casino, F., & Lykousas, N. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124912 · Cited by 92
Multitask-Based Evaluation of Open-Source LLM on Software Vulnerability
Yin, X., Ni, C., & Wang, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3470333 · Cited by 99
“For the code-related LLMs, we select the top four models released recently (in 2023), namely DeepSeek-Coder [9], CodeLlama [11], StarCoder [10], and WizardCoder [68].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCognitive Architectures for Language Agents
Sumers, T. R., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.02427 · Cited by 72
“Unexpectedly, training these models on internet-scale text also made them useful for many tasks beyond generating text, such as writing code (Li et al., 2022; Rozière et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023), modeling proteins (Meier et al.”
Look Before You Leap: An Exploratory Study of Uncertainty Analysis for Large Language Models
Huang, Y., Song, J., Wang, Z., Zhao, S., Chen, H., Juefei-Xu, F., & Ma, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3519464 · Cited by 275
“LLMs have revolutionized various aspects of software engineering [31], [32], including but not limited to automated code generation [2], [33], [34], [35], software testing [36], [37], [38], [39], debugging [40], program repair [41], [42], and document generation [43].”
How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science?
Binz, M., Alaniz, S., Roskies, A., Aczel, B., Bergstrom, C. T., Allen, C., Schad, D., Wulff, D., West, J. D., Zhang, Q., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2401227121 · Cited by 74
On the use of large language models in model-driven engineering
Rocco, J. D., Ruscio, D. D., Sipio, C. D., Nguyen, P. T., & Rubei, R. (2025) · Software & Systems Modeling · doi:10.1007/s10270-025-01263-8 · Cited by 73
“Recently, different language models have been released for targeting specific purposes, e.g., Code Llama [72] for coding, Llama and GPT models [79,67] for chatbot, to name a few.”
LLM4Decompile: Decompiling Binary Code with Large Language Models
Tan, H., Luo, Q., Li, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.203 · Cited by 67
“…training corpus (Hosseini and Dolan-Gavitt, 2022; Armengol-Estapé et al., 2023; Jiang et al., 2023), In contrast, utilizing larger models trained on broader datasets has proven to substantially improve the performance (Hoffmann et al., 2024; Kaplan et al., 2020; Rozière et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023).”
InfluentialSource Code Summarization in the Era of Large Language Models
Sun, W., Miao, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, H., Fang, C., Liu, Y., Deng, G., Liu, Y., & Chen, Z. (2025) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse55347.2025.00034 · Cited by 157
A review of LLMs and their applications in the architecture, engineering and construction industry
Kampelopoulos, D., Tsanousa, A., Vrochidis, S., & Kompatsiaris, I. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11241-7 · Cited by 69
LLaFS: When Large Language Models Meet Few-Shot Segmentation
Zhu, L., Chen, T., Ji, D., Ye, J., & Liu, J. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00296 · Cited by 65
“For the LLM, we employ CodeL-lama [42] with 7 billion parameters that have been fine-tuned through instruction tuning.”
MethodSelf-citationEvolving code with a large language model
Hemberg, E., Moskal, S., & O’Reilly, U.-M. (2024) · Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines · doi:10.1007/s10710-024-09494-2 · Cited by 80
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Jimenez, C. E., Yang, J., Wettig, A., Yao, S., Pei, K., Press, O., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06770 · Cited by 72
“Following precedent in code generation for evaluation in Pass@1 (Chen et al., 2021; Rozière et al., 2023), we simply use greedy decoding for all models.”
MethodInfluentialFormal requirements engineering and large language models: A two-way roadmap
Ferrari, A., & Spoletini, P. (2025) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107697 · Cited by 71
Large language models for drug discovery and development
Zheng, Y., Koh, H. Y., Ju, J., Yang, M., May, L. T., Webb, G. I., Li, L., Pan, S., & Church, G. M. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101346 · Cited by 121
“General LLMs such as GPT-4 13 and CodeLlama, 80 trained on extensive code datasets, are well-suited for generating these plans.”
Chain-of-Thought in Neural Code Generation: From and for Lightweight Language Models
Yang, G., Zhou, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, X., Zhuo, T. Y., & Chen, T. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3440503 · Cited by 75
“Additional models include CodeGen [19], [101], StarCoder [40], WizardCoder [67], OctoCoder [102] and CodeLlama [27], which have demonstrated their potential to solve complex programming problems and assist developers in various settings.”
BackgroundMethodHadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v3 · Cited by 71
TelecomGPT: A Framework to Build Telecom-Specific Large Language Models
Zou, H., Zhao, Q., Tian, Y., Bariah, L., Bader, F., Lestable, T., & Debbah, M. A. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tmlcn.2025.3593184 · Cited by 109
“Other examples of domain-specific LLMs include MedPalM2 in the medical domain, ChatLaw [23] and SaulLM [24] in the legal domain, and Code-Llama [25] in the code generation domain, are among the several examples that motivates the need for domain-specific LLMs in order to ensure reliable integration…”
Dong, Y., Jiang, X., Liu, H., Jin, Z., Gu, B., Yang, M., & Li, G. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.15938 · Cited by 52
“For code generation tasks, we use CodeLlama-7B (Rozière et al., 2023) and CodeGen-6.”
HPC-Coder: Modeling Parallel Programs using Large Language Models
Nichols, D., Marathe, A., Menon, H., Gamblin, T., & Bhatele, A. S. (2024) · ISC High Performance (ISC) · doi:10.23919/isc.2024.10528929 · Cited by 72
“In addition to being used for natural language, such models have recently been applied to many programming language related tasks [2]– [4].”
BackgroundVisEval: A Benchmark for Data Visualization in the Era of Large Language Models
Chen, N., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Ren, K., & Yang, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3456320 · Cited by 53
“5 [48], Gemini-Pro [61] and CodeLlama-7B [53].”
Adapting Language Models to Compress Contexts
Chevalier, A., Wettig, A., Ajith, A., & Chen, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.232 · Cited by 59
Dong, Y., Jiang, X., Liu, H., Jin, Z., Gu, B., Yang, M., & Li, G. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.716 · Cited by 52
LLM4VV: Developing LLM-driven testsuite for compiler validation
Munley, C., Jarmusch, A., & Chandrasekaran, S. (2024) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2024.05.034 · Cited by 55
RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program Repair
Silva, A., Fang, S., & Monperrus, M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2025.3581062 · Cited by 128
“For instance, state-of-the-art models such as LLaMA [19] and CodeLLaMA [24] range from 7B to 70B parameters.”
InfluentialDreamCodeVR: Towards Democratizing Behavior Design in Virtual Reality with Speech-Driven Programming
Giunchi, D., Numan, N., Gatti, E., & Steed, A. J. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr58804.2024.00078 · Cited by 57
“Using LLMs [14,66], our approach leverages the generation of procedural code, aligning with the principles of low-code programming [35].”
Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report
Hui, B., Yang, J., Cui, Z., Yang, J., Liu, D., Zhang, L., Liu, T., Zhang, J., Yu, B., Lu, K., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12186 · Cited by 65
“Built upon pretrained LLMs, code LLMs such as the StarCoder series (Li et al., 2023; Lozhkov et al., 2024), CodeLlama series (Roziere et al., 2023), DeepSeek-Coder series (Guo et al., 2024), CodeQwen1.”
MethodLarge scale foundation models for intelligent manufacturing applications: a survey
Zhang, H., Semujju, S. D., Wang, Z., Lv, X., Xu, K., Wu, L., Jia, Y., Wu, J., Liang, W., Zhuang, R., et al. (2025) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-024-02536-7 · Cited by 61
Feng, Y., Zhou, L., Ma, C., Zheng, Y., He, R., & Li, Y. (2024) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giae082 · Cited by 53
ReposVul: A Repository-Level High-Quality Vulnerability Dataset
Wang, X., Hu, R., Gao, C., Wen, X.-C., Chen, Y., & Liao, Q. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3639478.3647634 · Cited by 76
GeoCode-GPT: A large language model for geospatial code generation
Hou, S., Shen, Z., Zhao, A., Liang, J., Gui, Z., Guan, X., Li, R., & Wu, H. (2025) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104456 · Cited by 53
Enhanced automated code vulnerability repair using large language models
de-Fitero-Dominguez, D., Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A., & Martinez-Herraiz, J.-J. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109291 · Cited by 43
“Code Llama (Rozière et al., 2023) and Mistral (A. Q. Jiang et al., 2023) have a foundational understanding of various programming languages, such as C. Fine-tuning them on a dataset focused on C code vulnerabilities sharpens and emphasizes their inherent knowledge, improving their ability to…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialShi, H. H., Fang, L., Chen, X., Gu, C., Ma, K., Zhang, X., Zhang, Z., Gu, J., & Lim, E. G. (2024) · IET Smart Grid · doi:10.1049/stg2.12191 · Cited by 52
“Applying LLMs to generate and prompt code showcases [175] their adaptability and expertise within professional domains.”
Hajipour, H., Haßler, K., Holz, T., Schönherr, L., & Fritz, M. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml59370.2024.00040 · Cited by 87
“We provide the details of these models in Appendix A.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLLM-enabled Intent-driven Service Configuration for Next Generation Networks
Mekrache, A., & Ksentini, A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft) · doi:10.1109/netsoft60951.2024.10588881 · Cited by 50
“Pre-trained open-source LLMs, like Code Llama [7], lack training on network-specific data, making them challenging to employ for network management purposes without further training.”
MethodInfluentialTeaching Code LLMs to Use Autocompletion Tools in Repository-Level Code Generation
Wang, C., Zhang, J., Feng, Y., Li, T., Sun, W., Liu, Y., & Peng, X. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3714462 · Cited by 40
“Recent developments have introduced a range of LLMs for code (code LLMs), including Codex [15], CodeT5 [54], CodeT5 + [53], InCoder [21], AlphaCode [29], CodeGen [33], and CodeLlama [37], built upon the Transformer model architecture [45].”
InfluentialExploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Code-Change-Related Tasks
Fan, L., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Lo, D., Xia, X., & Li, S. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3709358 · Cited by 41
“1 For example, Meta released the Code Llama models [67], which are initialized from the Llama 2 models [73] and trained on 500B tokens from a code-heavy dataset.”
InfluentialSelf-citationDeploying and Evaluating LLMs to Program Service Mobile Robots
Hu, Z., Lucchetti, F., Schlesinger, C., Saxena, Y., Freeman, A., Modak, S., Guha, A., & Biswas, J. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3360020 · Cited by 51
“5 [33] ( text-davinci-003 ), and 3) PaLM2 [34] ( text-bison-001 ) as state-of-the-art API-only proprietary models; and 4) CodeL-lama [35] ( Python-34b-hf ) and 5) StarCoder [36] as open-access models.”
Bias Testing and Mitigation in LLM-based Code Generation
Huang, D., Zhang, J. M., Bu, Q., Xie, X., Chen, J., & Cui, H. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3724117 · Cited by 128
“Protected attributes are highlighted in bold.”
CREF: An LLM-Based Conversational Software Repair Framework for Programming Tutors
Yang, B., Tian, H., Pian, W., Yu, H., Wang, H., Klein, J., Bissyandé, T. F., & Jin, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the 33rd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis · doi:10.1145/3650212.3680328 · Cited by 41
LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Models
Li, Q., Hong, J., Xie, C., Tan, J., Xin, R., Hou, J., Yin, X., Wang, Z., Hendrycks, D., Wang, Z., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3681954.3681994 · Cited by 42
“The results of using DEAs on Github are presented in Table 11, where we also evaluate CodeLlama [95], which is an LLM for code based on Llama-2.”
MethodFighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformation
Lucas, J., Uchendu, A., Yamashita, M., Lee, J., Rohatgi, S., & Lee, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.883 · Cited by 37
Unveiling Code Pre-Trained Models: Investigating Syntax and Semantics Capacities
Ma, W., Liu, S., Zhao, M., Xie, X., Wang, W., Hu, Q., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3664606 · Cited by 57
“Next, we also study 3 LLMs, CodeLlama-7b (CL) [ 58 ], StarCoder (SC) [ 34 ], and CodeT5+ [ 70 ] (CodeT5p-770m) (CT5+) using the Java dataset.”
InfluentialAre LLMs ready for Visualization?
Vázquez, P. (2024) · IEEE Pacific Visualization Conference (PacificVis) · doi:10.1109/pacificvis60374.2024.00049 · Cited by 54
“Before starting the analysis, we performed some tests with different LLMs, including ChatGPT3 [6], ChatGPT4 [14], CodeLlama [17], Mixtral, etc.”
MethodOpenEMMA: Open-Source Multimodal Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
Xing, S., Qian, C., Wang, Y., Hua, H., Tian, K., Zhou, Y., & Tu, Z. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw65960.2025.00113 · Cited by 37
“MLLM for AD Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) [4, 23, 25, 26, 31, 34, 57] extend the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) [6, 15, 39, 40, 42, 49, 50, 54, 55, 62] into the visual realm.”
AutoVCoder: A Systematic Framework for Automated Verilog Code Generation using LLMs
Mingzhe, G., Zhao, J., Lin, Z., Ding, W., Hou, X., Feng, Y., Li, C., & Guo, M. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors (ICCD) · doi:10.1109/iccd63220.2024.00033 · Cited by 38
“We use some open-source pre-trained LLMs as our base models, including Codellama-7B [25], DeepSeek-Coder-6.”
MethodBTGenBot: Behavior Tree Generation for Robotic Tasks with Lightweight LLMs
Izzo, R. A., Bardaro, G., & Matteucci, M. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10802304 · Cited by 39
“We selected Llama-2-7b [19], the foundation model, Llama-2-7b-chat [19], designed for conversational tasks, and CodeLlama-7b-Instruct [15], with a focus on code-generation.”
CRUXEVAL-X: A Benchmark for Multilingual Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution
Xu, R., Cao, J., Lu, Y., Wen, M., Lin, H., Han, X., He, B., Cheung, S.-C., & Sun, L. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1158 · Cited by 35
Framework for evaluating code generation ability of large language models
Yeo, S., Ma, Y., Kim, S. C., Jun, H., & Kim, T. (2024) · ETRI Journal · doi:10.4218/etrij.2023-0357 · Cited by 34
“Previous studies [4, 9, 17, 20] have often assessed LLMs from a limited perspective, mainly focusing on particular programming languages or difficulty levels.”
BackgroundInfluentialDeep Learning for Code Intelligence: Survey, Benchmark and Toolkit
Wan, Y., Bi, Z., He, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Sui, Y., Xu, G., Jin, H., & Yu, P. S. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3664597 · Cited by 54
“In terms of code embedding, notable advancements have been achieved by employing deep learning and NLP techniques to encode source code.”
InfluentialInteractive Planning Using Large Language Models for Partially Observable Robotic Tasks
Sun, L., Jha, D. K., Hori, C., Jain, S., Corcodel, R., Zhu, X., Tomizuka, M., & Romeres, D. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610981 · Cited by 38
“Researchers have proposed strategies to prompt LLMs to perform high-quality synthetic data by in-context learning[36], task decomposition[24], [37], as well as methods to improve fine-tuning performance [38], [39], and pre-train model for specific tasks like coding [40].”
MethodGong, A., Qiao, Z., Li, X., Lyu, J., & Li, X. (2024) · Progress in Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105474 · Cited by 33
Revisiting the Performance of Deep Learning-Based Vulnerability Detection on Realistic Datasets
Chakraborty, P., Arumugam, K. K., Alfadel, M., Nagappan, M., & McIntosh, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3423712 · Cited by 39
Exploring the Effectiveness of LLMs in Automated Logging Statement Generation: An Empirical Study
Li, Y., Huo, Y., Jiang, Z., Zhong, R., He, P., Su, Y., Briand, L., & Lyu, M. R.-T. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3475375 · Cited by 72
“The process leads to four LLMs as our subjects, i.e., InCoder [18], CodeGeex [39], StarCoder [40], and CodeLlama [41].”
An outline of Prognostics and health management Large Model: Concepts, Paradigms, and challenges
Tao, L., Li, S., Liu, H., Huang, Q., Ma, L., Ning, G., Chen, Y., Wu, Y., Li, B., Zhang, W., et al. (2025) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112683 · Cited by 37
Arafat, M. E., Sourav, S., & Tamás, O. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY) · doi:10.1109/sisy62279.2024.10737601 · Cited by 33
“…via real-time replies and natural language Nowadays, LLMs have also gained significant attention, particularly since OpenAI [5] released its now-popular GPT production have emerged, including Anthropic’s Claude, Facebook’s CodeLlama [6], and OpenAI’s Codex, which powers Github’s Copilot [7].”
BackgroundProject-specific code summarization with in-context learning
Yun, S. M., LIN, S.-J., Gu, X., & Shen, B. (2024) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112149 · Cited by 29
Evaluating Diverse Large Language Models for Automatic and General Bug Reproduction
Kang, S., Yoon, J., Askarbekkyzy, N., & Yoo, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3450837 · Cited by 40
“While some work has evaluated the performance of open-source LLMs [36], since then, multiple open-source LLMs have been introduced thanks to the increased interest in LLMs [12], [30], [37], [38], which to the best of our knowledge have not yet been evaluated in the software engineering literature.”
BackgroundOn the Effectiveness of LLM-as-a-Judge for Code Generation and Summarization
Crupi, G., Tufano, R., Velasco, A., Mastropaolo, A., Poshyvanyk, D., & Bavota, G. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2025.3586082 · Cited by 55
“Furthermore, we asked five LLMs ( i.e., CodeL-lama 7B, 13B, and 34B [10], GPT-3.”
InfluentialBigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions
Zhuo, T. Y., Vu, M. C., Chim, J., Hu, H., Yu, W., Widyasari, R., Yusuf, I. N. B., Zhan, H., He, J., Paul, I., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.15877 · Cited by 29
“Specifically, following prior works [52, 35, 32], we report Pass@1 with greedy decoding for the main experiments in the zero-shot setting.”
MethodSelf-citationLLMs are one-shot URL classifiers and explainers
Rashid, F., Ranaweera, N., Doyle, B., & Seneviratne, S. (2024) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2024.111004 · Cited by 33
Comprehensive Fine-Tuning Large Language Models of Code for Automated Program Repair
Huang, K., Zhang, J., Bao, X., Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2025.3532759 · Cited by 30
“After the initial experimental deployment, we finally choose 3 generalized PEFT techniques (which can be successfully run on the experimental models in this paper), namely LoRA [51], AdaLoRA [52], and IA3 [53].”
Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhancing the Understandability of Generated Unit Tests
Deljouyi, A., Koohestani, R., Izadi, M., & Zaidman, A. (2025) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse55347.2025.00032 · Cited by 28
“The prompt component of UTGen uses the code-llama:7b-instruct model from Meta [44] as provided by Ollama 1 .”
Fagbohun, O., Harrison, R. M., & Dereventsov, A. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning and Data Science · doi:10.51219/jaimld/oluwole-fagbohun/15 · Cited by 61
“To comprehend, generate, and interpret human language, leading to profound impacts across diverse domains from tech-focused areas like finance 14,15 and programming 16,17 to human-centric sectors like education 18,19 and healthcare 20,21 .”
SecureQwen: Leveraging LLMs for vulnerability detection in python codebases
Mechri, A., Ferrag, M. A., & Debbah, M. A. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104151 · Cited by 41
Reasoning Runtime Behavior of a Program with LLM: How Far are We?
Chen, J., Pan, Z., Hu, X., Li, Z., Li, G., & Xia, X. (2025) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse55347.2025.00012 · Cited by 40
“Specifically, we mainly consider these dimensions of them: (1) general or code specified (e.g., GPT-4-Turbo [44] v.s. CodeLlama [6]); (2) scale of parameters; (3) open-source or closed-source (e.g., GPT-3.”
RLCoder: Reinforcement Learning for Repository-Level Code Completion
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Guo, D., Chen, J., Zhang, R., Ma, Y., & Zheng, Z. (2025) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse55347.2025.00014 · Cited by 43
“To evaluate the effectiveness of RLCoder, we compare it with the RawRAG framework [35] and Re-poCoder [13] with five backbone LLMs, i.e., CodeLlama-7B [3], StartCoder-7B [4], StarCoder2-7B, DeepSeekCoder-1B [5], and DeepSeekCoder-7B.”
BackgroundMethodLAAG-RV: LLM Assisted Assertion Generation for RTL Design Verification
Maddala, K., Mali, B., & Karfa, C. (2024) · IEEE International Test Conference India (ITC India) · doi:10.1109/itcindia62949.2024.10651860 · Cited by 30
“Examples of fine-tuned LLMs include Star Coder [16] and CodeLlama [17].”
AgentBoard: An analytical evaluation board of multi-turn LLM agents
Ma, C., Zhang, J., Zhu, Z., Yang, C., Yang, Y., Jin, Y., Lan, Z., Kong, L., & He, J. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-2365 · Cited by 26
Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities
Wang, J., Wang, J., Athiwaratkun, B., Zhang, C., & Zou, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04692 · Cited by 386
“For instance, some models excel at complex instruction following (Xu et al., 2023a) while others may be better suited for code generation (Roziere et al., 2023; Guo et al., 2024).”
BackgroundInfluentialNashaat, M., & Miller, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3428324 · Cited by 30
“In the second phase, the fi ne-tuning dataset is used to fi ne-tune Code Llama [56].”
MethodDelving into Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning in Code Change Learning: An Empirical Study
Liu, S., Keung, J., Yang, Z., Liu, F., Zhou, Q., & Liao, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) · doi:10.1109/saner60148.2024.00055 · Cited by 48
“Decoder-only models of code, like GPT-C [51], CodeGen [40], and Code Llama [47], are on the basis of GPT series [45], which predicts text when given the preceding context.”
MethodStagedVulBERT: Multigranular Vulnerability Detection With a Novel Pretrained Code Model
Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y., Su, X., Treude, C., & Wang, T. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3493245 · Cited by 29
“In comparison, the recently proposed models such as DeepSeek-Coder [23], CodeLlama [24], StarCoder [25], WizardCoder [26], Mis-tral [27], Phi-2 [28], and ChatGPT [29] serve as baselines.”
MethodSearch-Based LLMs for Code Optimization
Gao, S., Gao, C., Gu, W., & Lyu, M. R.-T. (2025) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse55347.2025.00021 · Cited by 64
“We compare SBLLM against four representative prompting methods on four popular open-source and closed-source LLMs including CodeLlama [20], Gem-ini [21], ChatGPT [22], and GPT-4 [23].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Rozière, B., Gehring, J., Gloeckle, F., Sootla, S., Gat, I., Tan, X. E., Adi, Y., Liu, J., Sauvestre, R., Remez, T., Rapin, J., Kozhevnikov, A., Evtimov, I., Bitton, J., Bhatt, M., Ferrer, C. C., Grattafiori, A., Xiong, W., Défossez, A., Copet, J., Azhar, F., Touvron, H., Martin, L., Usunier, N., Scialom, T., & Synnaeve, G.
- Affiliations
- École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2308.12950
- OpenAlex
- W4386185625
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 232 · 2024: 216 · 2023: 18
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- CodeLlama, code large language models, Llama 2, HumanEval, MBPP, code generation benchmarks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
