Scaling Instructable Agents Across Many Simulated Worlds
Open accessAbstract
Building embodied AI systems that can follow arbitrary language instructions in any 3D environment is a key challenge for creating general AI. Accomplishing this goal requires learning to ground language in perception and embodied actions, in order to accomplish complex tasks. The Scalable, Instructable, Multiworld Agent (SIMA) project tackles this by training agents to follow free-form instructions across a diverse range of virtual 3D environments, including curated research environments as well as open-ended, commercial video games. Our goal is to develop an instructable agent that can accomplish anything a human can do in any simulated 3D environment. Our approach focuses on language-driven generality while imposing minimal assumptions. Our agents interact with environments in real-time using a generic, human-like interface: the inputs are image observations and language instructions and the outputs are keyboard-and-mouse actions. This general approach is challenging, but it allows agents to ground language across many visually complex and semantically rich environments while also allowing us to readily run agents in new environments. In this paper we describe our motivation and goal, the initial progress we have made, and promising preliminary results on several diverse research environments and a variety of commercial video games.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
27 of 41 cited sources checked · 21 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Using a broad data distribution is the best way to advance general AI.
“In SIMA, however, we are drawing inspiration from the lesson of large language models that training on a broad distribution of data is the most effective way to make progress in general AI (e.g., Brown et al., 2020;Hoffmann et al., 2022;OpenAI, 2023;Anil et al., 2023;Gemini Team et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Brown et al., 2020 source
Related Work (p. 40) says large-scale text pre-training offers a natural, broad distribution of tasks, supporting the value of breadth for language-model generality. It does not establish that broad data is the most effective route to progress in general AI; Limitations (p. 33) says language-model pre-training is likely to hit limits and may need other approaches. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Hoffmann et al., 2022 source
The Discussion & Conclusion (p. 16) calls for greater dataset scaling, while qualifying that larger datasets may help only when the data is high-quality. The paper does not establish that a broader data distribution, rather than more high-quality training data, is the most effective way to advance general AI; its analysis concerns compute-optimal language-model training. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites OpenAI, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
So far in SIMA, the team has built an agent that carries out short-horizon tasks from user-provided language instructions.
“In the SIMA project thus far, we have created an agent that performs short-horizon tasks based on language instructions produced by a user; though instructions could also be produced by a language model (e.g., Jiang et al., 2019;Driess et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2023b;Hu et al., 2023;Ajay et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
When language is tied to rich environments, a system's grasp of language can become more systematic and generalizable.
“In turn, grounding language in rich environments can make a system's understanding of the language itself more systematic and generalizable (Hill et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hill et al., 2019 source
- Premisecitation
Language abstractions can support efficient learning and generalization.
“Language abstractions can enable efficient learning and generalization (Hill et al., 2020;Colas et al., 2020;Lampinen et al., 2022;Tam et al., 2022;Hu and Clune, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Language abstractions can speed up grounded learning, for instance by improving state abstractions for novelty-based exploration or by composing known goals into new ones.
“Language abstractions can accelerate grounded learning, for example accelerating novelty-based exploration in reinforcement learning by providing better state abstractions (Tam et al., 2022;Mu et al., 2022), or composing known goals into new ones (Colas et al., 2020;Nottingham et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
- Findingcitation
Consistent with prior findings, agent action log-probabilities on evaluation data show at most a weak correlation with agent performance beyond the most basic skills.
“However, consistent with prior findings (Abramson et al., 2022b;Baker et al., 2022), we observed that agent action log-probabilities on evaluation data show at most a weak correlation with agent performance beyond the most basic skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Abramson et al., 2022b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Baker et al., 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Richly grounded learning can also support language learning.
“Conversely, richly grounded learning can also support language learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites McClelland et al., 2020 source
- Premisecitation
Because human language use is deeply tied to understanding grounded situations, grasping language subtleties likely benefits from grounding.
“Since human language use is deeply integrated with our understanding of grounded situations (McClelland et al., 2020), understanding the subtleties of human language will likely benefit from this grounding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites McClelland et al., 2020 source
- Findingown data
In preliminary experiments, the pretrained models SPARC and Phenaki offer complementary benefits.
“In preliminary experiments, we found that these models offer complementary benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Bica et al., 2024 source
The Experiments section compares SPARC with other image-text training methods, but does not discuss Phenaki or complementary benefits between SPARC and Phenaki. Searches for “Phenaki” and “complementary benefits” found no passage addressing that comparison in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Villegas et al., 2022 source
- Findingown data
The project has a portfolio of more than ten 3D environments, including research environments and commercial video games.
“We have a portfolio of over ten 3D environments, consisting of research environments and commercial video games.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Performance is better for Playhouse and WorldLab, which are comparatively simpler research environments.
“Performance is better for Playhouse and WorldLab, which are comparatively simpler research environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The SIMA dataset contains a wide range of text instructions that can be roughly grouped into a hierarchy.
“The SIMA dataset includes a broad range of text instructions that can be roughly clustered into a hierarchy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
A main effort is collecting and incorporating gameplay data from human experts.
“Thus, a major focus of our effort is on collecting and incorporating gameplay data from human experts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For the more complex commercial video game environments, performance is somewhat lower.
“For the more complex commercial video game environments, we see that performance is, understandably, somewhat lower.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The datasets cover a broad range of instructed tasks.
“These datasets cover a broad range of instructed tasks: Figure 3 shows instruction clusters derived from hierarchically clustering the text instructions present in the data within a fixed, pretrained word embedding space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Comparing the SIMA agent to an ablation without classifier-free guidance (CFG), CFG substantially improves language conditionality.
“Comparing the SIMA agent to an ablation without classifier-free guidance (CFG), CFG substantially improves language conditionality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Humans only achieve 60% success on this evaluation.
“Yet, humans only achieve 60% success on this evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The SIMA agent achieves a notable level of success in the evaluated environments.
“Agents achieve notable success, but are far from perfect; their success rates vary by environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SIMA performs much better than the baselines.
“Furthermore, SIMA performs much better than the baselines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The SIMA agent performs some evaluated skills reliably.
“Agents exhibit varying degrees of performance across the diverse skills that we evaluate, performing some skills reliably and others with more limited success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The SIMA agent's performance varies across the different skill categories evaluated.
“Agents exhibit varying degrees of performance across the diverse skills that we evaluate, performing some skills reliably and others with more limited success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Evaluating on a subset of tasks from No Man's Sky, human game experts outperform all agents.
“Evaluating on a subset of tasks from No Man's Sky, human game experts outperform all agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The SIMA agent's success rate differs across environments.
“Agents achieve notable success, but are far from perfect; their success rates vary by environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The SIMA agent's performance is far from perfect.
“Agents achieve notable success, but are far from perfect; their success rates vary by environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The SIMA agent outperforms ablations that lack internet pretraining.
“The SIMA agent outperforms ablations that do not incorporate internet pretraining and substantially outperforms an ablation without language.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The SIMA agent substantially outperforms an ablation that lacks language.
“The SIMA agent outperforms ablations that do not incorporate internet pretraining and substantially outperforms an ablation without language.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The SIMA agent has limited success on other evaluated skills.
“Agents exhibit varying degrees of performance across the diverse skills that we evaluate, performing some skills reliably and others with more limited success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The zero-shot evaluations are promising.
“The zero-shot evaluations are also promising.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Without CFG (λ = 0), the SIMA agent performs noticeably worse.
“Without CFG (𝜆 = 0), the SIMA agent performs noticeably worse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A permutation test on the mean difference across per-task performance shows that in every case SIMA significantly outperforms the environment-specialized agent (p-values: 0.001, 0.002, 0.036, 0.0002, 0.008, 0.004, and 0.0002).
“We statistically quantify this benefit by using a permutation test on the mean difference across the per-task performance of the SIMA agent and the environment-specialized agent within each domain; in every case SIMA significantly outperforms the environment-specialized agent (𝑝-values on each environment respectively: 0.001, 0.002, 0.036, 0.0002, 0.008, 0.004, and 0.0002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The no-language ablation performs very poorly (all permutation tests p < 0.001).
“Finally, the no-language ablation performs very poorly (all permutation tests 𝑝 < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A common language-to-action interface can allow agents to move previously learned skills to unseen games without additional training.
“This general interface from language instructions to embodied behavior can also enable agents to transfer previously learned skills zero-shot to never-before-seen games.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
SIMA trains on a diverse set of games to cover more content, rather than focusing on one game or environment.
“Instead of focusing on a single game or environment, however, SIMA considers a range of diverse games to train agents on a larger variety of content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For AI, skill with language by itself is less difficult than perceiving and acting in grounded settings.
“Competence in language alone is easier for AI than grounded perception and behavior, underscoring the well-known paradox that what is easier for AI is harder for humans, and vice versa (Moravec, 1988).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moravec, 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Even when language is not needed for a task, learning it can help agents acquire generalizable representations and abstractions or learn more efficiently.
“A variety of studies have found that even when language is not necessary for solving a task, learning language can help agents to learn generalizable representations and abstractions, or to learn more efficiently.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Learning language and learning about environments reinforce each other.
“A key motivation of SIMA is the idea that learning language and learning about environments are mutually reinforcing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This can pose challenges for the timely execution of agent-generated actions.
“This can pose challenges for the timely execution of agent-generated actions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Latencies or delays are introduced by the computation of actions and the transmission of observations and actions over the network.
“Latencies or delays (Bratko et al., 1995) are introduced by the computation of actions and the transmission of observations and actions over the network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bratko et al., 1995 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Evaluating agents in commercial video games poses substantial additional challenges.
“Evaluating agents in commercial video games poses substantial additional challenges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Language could be a strong means of shaping what agents can do.
“Language may be a powerful tool for shaping agent capabilities (Colas et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colas et al., 2022 source
- Premiseown data
The approach trains agents at scale by behavioral cloning, which is supervised learning from human-generated observations to actions.
“Our approach relies on training agents at scale via behavioral cloning, i.e., supervised learning of the mapping from observations to actions on data generated by humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Combining pre-trained models with fine-tuning and from-scratch training allows the agent to utilize internet-scale pretraining while still specializing to particular aspects of the environments and control tasks.
“Combining these pre-trained models with fine-tuning and from-scratch training allows the agent to utilize internet-scale pretraining while still specializing to particular aspects of the environments and the control tasks that it encounters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Many commercial video game environments provide on-screen text signalling the completion of tasks or quests, or the results of lower-level actions like collecting resources or entering certain areas of a game.
“Many of our commercial video game environments provide on-screen text signalling the completion of tasks or quests, or even the results of lower-level actions like collecting resources or entering certain areas of a game.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Online evaluations, in which the agent interacts with the environment, are needed to understand agent performance in detail.
“Thus, online evaluations, in which the agent interacts with the environment, are needed to understand agent performance in detail.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because the environments share a common 3D embodied nature, many generic tasks appear in multiple environments.
“Due to the common 3D embodied nature of the environments that we consider, many generic tasks, such as navigation and object manipulation, are present in multiple environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Basic elements of embodied 3D interaction, like navigation, are common to all these environments.
- Interpretationreasoning
The focus on generality in SIMA introduces challenges for evaluation.
“Our focus on generality in SIMA introduces challenges for evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
OCR evaluations are restricted to tasks that signal completion with game-specific text rather than arbitrary tasks that can be specified with language instructions and which a general agent would be expected to solve.
“In general, however, OCR evaluations are restricted to tasks that signal completion with game-specific text rather than arbitrary tasks that can be specified with language instructions and which we would expect a general agent to be able to solve.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
By detecting on-screen text using OCR in pre-defined evaluation scenarios, sometimes in combination with detecting specific keyboard-and-mouse actions, the agent's successful performance of particular tasks can be cheaply assessed.
“By detecting on-screen text using OCR in pre-defined evaluation scenarios, sometimes in combination with detecting specific keyboard-andmouse actions, we can cheaply assess whether the agent has successfully performed particular tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Given the diversity and coverage of the current evaluations, they provide a reasonable assessment of the fundamental language-conditional skills expected from the agent.
“Given the diversity and coverage of our current evaluations, they provide a reasonable assessment of the fundamental language-conditional skills that we expect from our agent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The internally-developed research environments Construction Lab, Playhouse, and WorldLab are capable of providing ground-truth assessments of whether language-following tasks have been successfully completed.
“Our internally-developed research environments (Construction Lab, Playhouse, and WorldLab) are capable of providing ground-truth assessments of whether language-following tasks have been successfully completed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Achieving fast, stable, and reliable evaluations comparable across environments is challenging.
“Achieving fast, stable, and reliable evaluations comparable across environments is thus challenging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Zero-shot performance is especially strong on the WorldLab environment because its evaluation tasks contain a relatively larger proportion of domain-general skills, such as recognizing objects by color, because they are used as rapid tests of agent capabilities.
“Note that zero-shot performance is especially strong on the WorldLab environment for three reasons.First, the evaluation tasks for this environment contain a relatively larger proportion of domain-general skills, such as recognizing objects by color, because we use them as rapid tests of agent capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is still considerable progress needed to match human performance.
“Nevertheless, there is still considerable progress needed to match human performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The biased selection of the Goat Simulator 3 environment-specialized baseline can only lead to underestimating the advantage of SIMA.
“Although this is a biased selection process, because we are using the environment-specialized agent as a baseline, it will only lead to underestimating the advantage of SIMA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 56
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 72
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAfter being learned, language can enable planning, reasoning, and communication about grounded situations and tasks.
“Once learned, language can unlock planning, reasoning (e.g., Huang et al., 2022;Brohan et al., 2023b;Driess et al., 2023;Kim et al., 2023), and communication (Zeng et al., 2022) about grounded situations and tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLearning to predict natural-language explanations, descriptions, or plans can help agents learn more efficiently and generalize better out of distribution.
“Moreover, learning to predict natural-language explanations (Lampinen et al., 2022), descriptions (Kumar et al., 2022), or plans (Hu and Clune, 2023) can help agents to learn more efficiently, and to generalize better out of distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Lampinen et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kumar et al., 2022 source
Section 3.4 (p. 8) reports that co-training agents to predict embeddings of human-generated descriptions improved performance on held-out human-generated boards. It does not establish greater learning efficiency or better out-of-distribution generalization: the improved test boards came from the training distribution, while performance on the separate machine-generated control distribution declined. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Hu and Clune, 2023 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSIMA tries to solve the problem across many simulated environments in a general and scalable manner, assuming little beyond human-like interaction with those environments.
“Thus, in contrast to prior works (e.g., Abramson et al., 2020;Vinyals et al., 2019;Berner et al., 2019;Lifshitz et al., 2023), we are attempting to tackle this problem across many simulated environments, in the most general and scalable way possible, by making few assumptions beyond interacting with the environments in the same way as humans do.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationModern AI can write programs and play chess at superhuman levels, but its capacity to perceive and act in the world is much lower than that of humans.
“Modern AI can write computer programs (Li et al., 2022) or play chess at super-human level (Silver et al., 2018), but the ability of AI to perceive and act in the world remains far below human level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Silver et al., 2018 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTheir data can augment existing training data or fine-tune pretrained models to give them more situated understanding.
“Our data can be used to augment and leverage existing training data (e.g., Abramson et al., 2020), or to fine-tune pretrained models to endow them with more situated understanding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Abramson et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmpirical evidence indicates that grounding supports even basic generalization; Hill et al. (2019) found that agents in richer, more embodied environments show more systematic compositional generalization.
“Beyond this theoretical argument, empirical evidence shows that grounding can support even fundamental kinds of generalization- Hill et al. (2019) show that agents grounded in richer, more-embodied environments exhibit more systematic compositional generalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hill et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMineDojo (Fan et al., 2022) used 1,581 unique tasks spanning 4 skill categories: survival, harvest, tech-free, and combat.
“(For reference, MineDojo (Fan et al., 2022), a related work investigating language-conditional agents in MineCraft, used 1,581 unique tasks spanning 4 skill categories: survival, harvest, tech-free, and combat).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Fan et al., 2022 source
Section 2.1 reports 1,581 template-generated goals across four programmatic-task categories. Section C.1 names them Survival, Harvest, Tech Tree, and Combat—not “tech-free.” The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe agent architecture builds on prior related work (Abramson et al., 2020, 2022a), but with various changes and adaptations to more general goals.
“Our agent architecture builds on prior related work (Abramson et al., 2020(Abramson et al., , 2022a)), but with various changes and adaptations to our more general goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Abramson et al., 2020 source
- cites Abramson et al., 2022a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCFG was originally proposed for strengthening text-conditioning in diffusion models, but has also proven useful for similar purposes with language models and language-conditioned agents.
“CFG was originally proposed for strengthening text-conditioning in diffusion models (Ho and Salimans, 2022), but has also proven useful for similar purposes with language models (Sanchez et al., 2023) and languageconditioned agents (Lifshitz et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Ho and Salimans, 2022 source
Section 3.2 (p. 4) introduces classifier-free guidance for conditional diffusion models, and Section 4.1 (p. 6) tests it on class-conditional ImageNet generation. This supports the claim that the paper proposed CFG for diffusion models, but not that it was originally proposed specifically to strengthen text-conditioning. The later uses cited to other papers are outside this citation's scope. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Sanchez et al., 2023 source
- cites Lifshitz et al., 2023 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThey introduce a new environment called the Construction Lab.
“In addition, we introduce a new environment, called the Construction Lab.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe results in this work use Playhouse, WorldLab, and ProcTHOR.
“For the results in this work, we also use Playhouse, WorldLab, and ProcTHOR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, the results show that the SIMA agent is able to complete a range of tasks across many environments, but there remains substantial room for improvement.
“Overall, the results show that the SIMA agent is able to complete a range of tasks across many environments, but there remains substantial room for improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenStatic visual input evaluations can be a useful early signal, but they do not reliably predict success on prolonged tasks.
“While these evaluations can be a useful early signal, they do not reliably predict success on prolonged tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite the visual diversity of the environments, the agent is capable of performing these tasks, demonstrating basic navigation and tool use skills.
“Despite the visual diversity of the environments, the agent is capable of performing these tasks, demonstrating basic navigation and tool use skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenConstruction Lab focuses on cognitive abilities like object manipulation and intuitive physical understanding.
“Construction Lab focuses on cognitive capabilities such as object manipulation and an intuitive understanding of the physical world.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPerformance on Construction Lab is lower as well, highlighting the relative difficulty of this research environment and its evaluation tasks.
“Notably, performance on Construction Lab is lower as well, highlighting the relative difficulty of this research environment and its evaluation tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe data form a rich, multi-modal dataset of embodied interaction across more than 10 simulated environments, with more planned.
“These data constitute a rich, multi-modal dataset of embodied interaction within over 10 simulated environments, with more to come.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningEven where the numerical performance of the zero-shot and environment-specialized agents is similar, they are generally good at different skills-with the environment-specialized agent performing well on game-specific interactions, but performing more weakly on common skills that are supported across many games, and that the zero-shot agent therefore can execute.
“Note that even where the numerical performance of the zero-shot and environment-specialized agents is similar, they are generally good at different skills-with the environment-specialized agent performing well on game-specific interactions, but performing more weakly on common skills that are supported across many games, and that the zero-shot agent therefore can execute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEven on the Goat Simulator 3 environment, where the agents have not even received visual finetuning, the zero-shot agent still performs comparably to the environment-specialized one, showing transfer is not driven by the visual components alone.
“Importantly, even on the Goat Simulator 3 environment, where the agents have not even received visual finetuning, the zero-shot agent still performs comparably to the environmentspecialized one-thus showing transfer is not driven by the visual components alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEven without CFG, the agent still exhibits language-conditional behavior, outperforming the No Language ablation.
“However, even without CFG, the agent still exhibits language-conditional behavior, outperforming the No Language ablation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn this tech report, the authors have described their goal and philosophy, and presented some preliminary results showing the agent's ability to ground language instructions in behavior across a variety of rich 3D environments.
“In this tech report, we have described our goal and philosophy, and presented some preliminary results showing our agent's ability to ground language instructions in behavior across a variety of rich 3D environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEven when tested in an environment on which it has not been trained to act, the agent demonstrates strong performance on general tasks, though it falls short in achieving environment-specific skills.
“Even when tested in an environment on which it has not been trained to act the agent demonstrates strong performance on general tasks, though of course it falls short in achieving environment-specific skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe No CFG agent still exhibits a high degree of language conditionality, significantly outperforming the No Language baseline.
“However, the No CFG agent still exhibits a high degree of language conditionality, significantly outperforming the No Language baseline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe human players achieved a success rate of only 60% on these tasks, demonstrating the difficulty of the tasks considered in this project and the stringency of the evaluation criteria.
“The human players achieved a success rate of only 60% on these tasks, demonstrating the difficulty of the tasks we considered in this project and the stringency of our evaluation criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSIMA substantially outperforms the no-pretraining baseline overall (permutation test p < 0.001), showing that internet-scale knowledge supports grounded learning, though the magnitude and significance of the benefit varies across environments (p-values: 0.0002, 0.14, 0.041, 0.0002, 0.244, 0.052, 0.032).
“SIMA substantially outperforms the no-pretraining baseline overall (permutation test 𝑝 < 0.001), thus showing that internet-scale knowledge supports grounded learning-though the magnitude and significance of the benefit varies across the environments (permutation test 𝑝-values respectively 0.0002, 0.14, 0.041, 0.0002, 0.244, 0.052, 0.032).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe authors see notable performance and early signs of transfer across environments, as well as zero-shot transfer of basic skills to held-out environments.
“We see notable performance and early signs of transfer across environments, as well as zero-shot transfer of basic skills to held-out environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSIMA outperforms environment-specialized agents overall (67% average improvement over environment-specialized agent performance), thus demonstrating positive transfer across environments.
“SIMA outperforms environment-specialized agents overall (67% average improvement over environmentspecialized agent performance), thus demonstrating positive transfer across environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite these challenging evaluations, the SIMA agent achieved non-trivial performance (34% success), far exceeding that of the No Language baseline (11% success).
“Despite these challenging evaluations, the SIMA agent achieved non-trivial performance (34% success), far exceeding that of the No Language baseline (11% success), for example.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenFor research environments, agent evaluation uses ground-truth state.
“For research environments we evaluate agents using the ground truth state, but commercial video games are not designed to report on the completion of arbitrary language tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningResearch in generic virtual environments lets agents be tested across broad, challenging situations, and lessons learned are likely more applicable to real-world robotics, without real-world risks and costs.
“Doing research in generic virtual environments allows us to test our agents in a broad and challenging range of situations-where the lessons learned are likely to be more applicable to real-world applications with visually rich perception and control such as robotics-without the risks and costs of real-world testing: if the agent crashes a spaceship in a video game, we can just restart the game.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThey created several evaluation methods for video games, such as OCR to read on-screen task-completion text and human review of recorded agent behavior.
“We have therefore developed a variety of methods for evaluation in video games, including using optical character recognition (OCR) to detect onscreen text describing task completion, and using human evaluation of recorded videos of agent behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Commercial video games do not report completion of arbitrary language tasks.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAgents use one interface across environments, so no custom control and observation spaces are needed for each new game.
“These design choices make the learning problem harder, but their generality makes expanding to new environments easier: agents use the same interface across environments without requiring a custom design of control and observation spaces for each new game.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause the agent-environment interface matches human capabilities, agents could potentially do anything a human can and can learn directly by imitating human behavior.
“Furthermore, since the agent-environment interface is human compatible, it allows agents the potential to achieve anything that a human could, and allows direct imitation learning from human behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSIMA sidesteps the costly hardware, resource-intensive data collection, and limited diversity of real-world evaluation settings.
“SIMA, however, avoids the additional challenges of costly hardware requirements, resource-intensive data collection, and the practical limitations on diversity of real-world evaluation settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe design choices increase learning difficulty, but their generality simplifies expansion to new environments.
“These design choices make the learning problem harder, but their generality makes expanding to new environments easier: agents use the same interface across environments without requiring a custom design of control and observation spaces for each new game.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenSIMA is a cutting-edge research initiative which focuses on how to develop instructable agents in simulated environments.
“SIMA is a cutting-edge research initiative which focuses on how to develop instructable agents in simulated environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningGiven the careful training data selection and constrained deployment environment of SIMA, the benefits can be maximized while minimising the ethical risks.
“Ultimately, given the careful training data selection and constrained deployment environment of SIMA, we are confident we can maximize the benefits while minimising the ethical risks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenTraining on video game data includes risks associated with violent, explicit or otherwise harmful behaviors.
“These include risks associated with training an agent on games that include violent, explicit or otherwise harmful behaviors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis enables the SIMA platform to serve as a useful testbed for further development of agents that can connect language to perception and action.
“This enables the SIMA platform to serve as a useful testbed for further development of agents that can connect language to perception and action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSuch tasks enable robust testing of a range of particular skills, with a highly reliable signal of task success.
“Such tasks enable robust testing of a range of particular skills, with a highly reliable signal of task success.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThere remains ongoing work in developing more scalable, general, and reliable evaluations, particularly as the field moves toward more complex and open-ended tasks.
“Yet, there remains ongoing work in developing more scalable, general, and reliable evaluations, particularly as we move toward more complex and open-ended tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSIMA was carefully assessed and reviewed to ensure that its societal benefits outweigh the risks, and that appropriate risk mitigations are incorporated.
“SIMA was carefully assessed and reviewed to ensure that its societal benefits outweigh the risks, and that appropriate risk mitigations are incorporated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis form of automated evaluation avoids the subjectivity of human evaluations.
“This form of automated evaluation also avoids the subjectivity of human evaluations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe task settings and evaluation are designed to be strong tests of precision; many tasks include distractor objects, for which the episode is marked as an immediate failure if the agent interacts with the distractors rather than the instruction target.
“Moreover, we design the task settings and evaluation to be strong tests of precision; for example, many tasks include distractor objects, for which the episode is marked as an immediate failure if the agent interacts with the distractors rather than the instruction target-even if the agent might have completed the actual task later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThey carefully engineer data collections, including preprocessing and filtering raw data, to emphasize important skills and train agents effectively.
“We take care to engineer our data collections, including preprocessing and filtering the raw data, to highlight important skills and effectively train our agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBreaking tasks into simpler sub-tasks enables their reuse across different settings and entirely different environments, given an appropriate sequence of instructions from the user.
“Breaking tasks into simpler sub-tasks enables their reuse across different settings and entirely different environments, given an appropriate sequence of instructions from the user.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningMultiple ratings of the same video from different judges (typically 5) are collected to ensure reliable assessments.
“We ask them to review recorded agent videos, collecting multiple ratings of the same video from different judges (typically 5) to ensure reliable assessments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe agent is evaluated in several environments that run in real-time, asynchronously to the agent.
“Our agent is evaluated in several environments that run in real-time, asynchronously to the agent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOther video games have significantly less on-screen text, which makes the range of behaviors that can be evaluated in these games with OCR very narrow.
“Other video games also have significantly less on-screen text, which makes the range of behaviors that can be evaluated in these games with OCR very narrow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenError bars denote the 95% confidence intervals across the tasks within that environment and the three training runs with different random seeds.
“Error bars denote the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) across the tasks within that environment and the three training runs with different random seeds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAn independent Human Behavioral Research Committee for ethics and privacy reviewed and approved the full data collection protocols, including compensation rates.
“The full details of our data collection protocols, including compensation rates, were reviewed and approved by an independent Human Behavioral Research Committee for ethics and privacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe study follows a structured approach to responsible model development, to identify, measure, and manage foreseeable ethics and safety challenges.
“We follow a structured approach to responsible model development, to identify, measure, and manage foreseeable ethics and safety challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThese are informed by academic literature reviews, engaging with internal ethics teams, and developing comprehensive ethical assessments that document key risks with mitigation strategies.
“These are informed by academic literature reviews, engaging with internal ethics teams, and developing comprehensive ethical assessments that document key risks with mitigation strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningTask settings need to afford a diversity of actions, ideally testing multiple instructions from a single initial state, to properly evaluate whether the agent's actions are driven by language.
“Thus, task settings need to afford a diversity of actions, ideally testing multiple instructions from a single initial state, to properly evaluate whether the agent's actions are driven by language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningEnsuring that evaluations truly assess language conditionality, rather than environmental affordances, requires care.
“Moreover, ensuring that our evaluations truly assess language conditionality, rather than environmental affordances, requires care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCategories came from a data-driven hierarchical clustering analysis of human-written instructions in a fixed pretrained word embedding space.
“Categories were derived from a data-driven hierarchical clustering analysis of the human-generated text instructions within a fixed, pretrained word embedding space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThere are implications on representational harms, as the agent may learn from stereotyped depictions or actions in game settings.
“We have also reflected on the implications on representational harms, as the agent may learn from stereotyped depictions or actions in game settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenDeveloping informative evaluation tasks is in itself an ongoing effort, and the quantitative results reflect only the range of particular behaviors that are evaluated at this point in time.
“We note that developing informative evaluation tasks is in itself an ongoing effort, and the quantitative results in this work reflect only the range of particular behaviors that are evaluated at this point in time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHuman evaluation is the most general evaluation method, but it is also the slowest and most expensive.
“While this is our most general evaluation method, it is also the slowest and most expensive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenVideo game evaluations cannot rely on access to privileged information about the state of an environment.
“Video game evaluations cannot rely on access to privileged information about the state of an environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenLatencies are additionally minimized with appropriate scheduling of action computation on TPU accelerators, on-device caching of neural-network state across timesteps, and careful choices of batch size and other implementation details.
“We additionally minimize latencies with appropriate scheduling of action computation on TPU accelerators, on-device caching of neural-network state across timesteps, and by careful choices of batch size and other implementation details.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAll data collections involved participants under contract with Google.
“All our data collections were performed with participants contracting with Google.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIt is difficult to reinstate agents in precisely the same state in environments that are not designed as reproducible benchmarks, and loading each task in commercial video games is considerably slower and more costly than those in research environments.
“Additionally, it is difficult to reinstate agents in precisely the same state in environments that are not designed as reproducible benchmarks, and loading each task in commercial video games is considerably slower and more costly than those in research environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe skill clusters are derived from the evaluation tasks rather than the training data, and are similar to, yet distinct from, those in Figure 3.
“As these skill clusters are derived from our evaluation tasks rather than the training data, they are similar to, yet distinct from, those in Figure 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenUnlike LLMs, SIMA is able to both understand natural language instructions and dynamic, interactive 3D environments.
“This research presents interesting opportunities for the future of humans and AI collaborating together; unlike LLMs, SIMA is able to both understand natural language instructions and dynamic, interactive 3D environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenContinuous evaluations of SIMA's safety performance are conducted.
“Continuous evaluations of SIMA's safety performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenHuman judges are game experts who have played the specific games for at least 16 hours, often over several weeks.
“We use human judges who are game experts, i.e., they have played these specific games for at least 16 hours, and often over the course of several weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBefore training, they run offline preprocessing steps such as resizing inputs, filtering low-quality data with heuristics, and reweighting data across environments and collections to prioritize effective learning.
“Before training, we perform a variety of offline preprocessing steps, including resizing data for agent input, filtering out low-quality data using a variety of heuristics, and remixing and weighting data across environments and collections to prioritize the most effective learning experiences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll participants gave informed consent before tasks and were paid for their time.
“All participants provided informed consent prior to completing tasks and were reimbursed for their time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataAverages are calculated across multiple episodes per task, multiple tasks per environment, and across three training runs with different random seeds.
“Averages are calculated across multiple episodes per task (in research environments, one episode per task in video games), multiple tasks per environment, and across three training runs with different random seeds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenJudges are instructed to mark an episode as a failure in cases where the agent performs irrelevant actions first, even if the agent successfully completes the instructed task afterward.
“We also encourage strict evaluations: we instruct judges to mark an episode as a failure in cases where the agent performs irrelevant actions first, even if the agent successfully completes the instructed task afterward.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThese findings suggest that learning both language and its grounding will improve grounded actions and also a system's knowledge of language.
“These findings motivate the possibility that learning both language and its grounding will not only improve grounded actions, but improve a system's knowledge of language itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe research projects uphold Google's AI Principles.
“We ensure that our research projects uphold Google's AI Principles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile research environments may provide automated methods for assessing whether language-following tasks have been successfully completed, such success criteria may not be generally available.
“While research environments may provide automated methods for assessing whether language-following tasks have been successfully completed, such success criteria may not be generally available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study accounts for latency during behavioral cloning by predicting actions that are offset in time relative to the visual input, and mirrors this offset during evaluation by buffering observations and actions during neural-network inference.
“We account for this latency during behavioral cloning by predicting actions that are offset in time relative to the visual input to the agent, and mirror this offset during evaluation by appropriate buffering of observations and actions during neural-network inference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe evaluations include assessments where the agent is instructed to complete one goal, then interrupted with another goal to evaluate whether it switches appropriately, ensuring responsiveness to changes in commands.
“We also include other types of assessments, such as instructing the agent to complete one goal, and then interrupting with another goal to evaluate whether it switches appropriately-this ensures that agents are sufficiently responsive to changes in commands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere are downstream risks associated with the future hypothetical deployments of SIMA, through either intentional misuse or benign action.
“Besides these risks, there are also down stream risks associated with the future hypothetical deployments of SIMA, through either intentional misuse or benign action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSIMA's deployments and agreements are transparent, and for now remain in a controlled, closed environment.
“Ensuring SIMA's deployments and agreements are transparent, and for now remain in a controlled, closed environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGrounding the evaluation framework in the distribution of natural language allows testing agents in both common and adversarial scenarios, and thereby measuring progress towards the long-term goal of developing an instructable agent that can accomplish anything a human can do in any simulated 3D environment.
“Grounding our evaluation framework in the distribution of natural language allows us to test our agents in both common and adversarial scenarios, and thereby to measure our progress towards our long-term goal of developing an instructable agent that can accomplish anything a human can do in any simulated 3D environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningComparing to the no-pretraining agent tests the benefits of pretrained models for agent performance.
“Comparing to this agent tests the benefits of pretrained models for agent performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAn environment-specialized expert agent is trained on each environment, trained only on data corresponding to that environment, but still includes the more broadly pretrained encoders.
“Environment-specialized: We additionally train an expert agent on each environment, which is trained only on data corresponding to that environment, but still includes the more broadly pretrained encoders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning100% success may not necessarily be achievable, due to disagreement between human judges on more ambiguous tasks.
“We note that 100% success may not necessarily be achievable, due to disagreement between human judges on more ambiguous tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThis evaluation was performed only on a subset of research environments: Construction Lab, Playhouse, and WorldLab.
“Note that this evaluation was performed only on a subset of our research environments: Construction Lab, Playhouse, and WorldLab.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataFor Goat Simulator 3, because relatively little data was available, the environment-specialized baseline was chosen by evaluating every 200,000 training steps and selecting the best-performing checkpoint at 400,000 steps to avoid overfitting.
“With one exception: as we had a relatively small quantity of data for Goat Simulator 3, we attempted to prevent the environment-specialized baseline from overfitting by evaluating it every 200,000 training steps, then selecting the best performing number of steps, which was 400,000 steps, as our environment-specialized baseline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese results show the benefit of CFG, highlighting the impact that inference-time interventions can have on agent controllability.
“These results show the benefit of CFG, highlighting the impact that inference-time interventions can have on agent controllability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningDue to the number of comparison agents, only a single seed was run for each, rather than the three seeds used for the main SIMA agent.
“Note that due to the number of comparison agents, we only ran a single seed for each, rather than the three seeds used for the main SIMA agent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThese zero-shot agents assess the transfer ability of the agent in a controlled setting.
“These agents assess the transfer ability of our agent in a controlled setting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataBecause of limited collected data and/or evaluations, the agent evaluation results are reported on only 7 of the environments.
“Due to a limited amount of collected data and/or evaluations, we present agent evaluation results (Section 4) on a subset of 7 of these environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEnvironment-specialized agent performance may be slightly weaker on WorldLab because there is a non-trivial distribution shift from training to test, because some data comes from earlier versions of the environment with differences in dynamics and task distributions.
“Furthermore, environment-specialized agent performance may be slightly weaker on this environment because there is a non-trivial distribution shift from training to test.This is because some of our data comes from earlier versions of the environment with differences in dynamics, and task distributions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe humans who performed the tasks were players who participated in the data collection and had experience with the game.
“The humans who performed the tasks were players who participated in our data collection and had experience with the game.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningComparing to the no-language agent shows the degree to which the agent's performance can be explained by simple language-agnostic behavioral priors.
“Comparing to this agent shows the degree to which our agent's performance can be explained by simple language-agnostic behavioral priors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe no-language ablation lacks language inputs during training as well as evaluation.
“No language ablation: An agent that lacks language inputs, during training as well as evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSome of the evaluated tasks are challenging for humans, so human-level performance on them would not reach 100%.
“(Note that humans would also find some of these tasks challenging, and thus human-level performance would not be 100%, see Section 4.3.)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis demonstrates not only that the agent is in fact using language, but also that the evaluation tasks are effectively designed to test this capability, rather than being solvable by simply executing plausible behaviors.
“Importantly, this demonstrates not only that our agent is in fact using language, but also that our evaluation tasks are effectively designed to test this capability, rather than being solvable by simply executing plausible behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenStill, many skills and tasks remain out of reach.
“Still, many skills and tasks remain out of reach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe main SIMA agent is trained across all environments except for Hydroneer and Wobbly Life, which are used for qualitative zero-shot evaluation.
“SIMA: Our main SIMA agent, which is trained across all environments except for Hydroneer and Wobbly Life, which we use for qualitative zero-shot evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenEach agent is evaluated after 1.2 million training steps.
“Each agent is evaluated after 1.2 million training steps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThis highlights the difficulty of the tasks considered in this project.
“This highlights the difficulty of the tasks considered in this project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe bars in Figure 8 and Figure 9 represent average performance (normalized relative to the environment-specialist); the errorbars are parametric 95%-CIs across tasks and seeds (where multiple seeds are available).
“The bars in Figure 8 and Figure 9 represent average performance (normalized relative to the environment-specialist); the errorbars are parametric 95%-CIs across tasks and seeds (where multiple seeds are available).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWorldLab uses the same underlying engine and shares some implementation details with the other internal research environments, which may support behavioral transfer despite their varied visual styles, asset libraries, physical mechanics, and environment affordances.
“Second, this environment uses the same underlying engine and shares some implementation details with the other internal research environments, which may support behavioral transfer despite their varied visual styles, asset libraries, physical mechanics, and environment affordances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAgents trained across multiple environments may be more robust to distribution shift.
“Agents trained across multiple environments may be more robust to this distribution shift.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataZero-shot agents are separate SIMA agents trained like the main agent, but only on N-1 of the environments, and evaluated zero-shot on the held-out environment without any BC training on it.
“Zero-shot: Separate SIMA agents trained like the main agent, but only on 𝑁 -1 of our environments, and evaluated zero-shot on the held-out environment-that is, without any BC training on it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataHuman performance was evaluated using the same judges and evaluation setup that was used for the agents; the judges were not told that they were evaluating human performance rather than agents.
“We evaluated human performance using the same judges and evaluation setup that was used for our agents; the judges were not told that they were evaluating human performance rather than agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThis underscores the utility of the entire SIMA setup for providing a challenging, yet informative, metric for assessing grounded language interactions in embodied agents.
“This underscores the utility of the entire SIMA setup for providing a challenging, yet informative, metric for assessing grounded language interactions in embodied agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Commercial video games do not report completion of arbitrary language tasks.
“For research environments we evaluate agents using the ground truth state, but commercial video games are not designed to report on the completion of arbitrary language tasks.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Commercial video games provide richer interactions and higher visual fidelity, while research environments are useful testbeds for probing agent capabilities.
“Commercial video games offer a higher degree of rich interactions and visual fidelity, while research environments serve as a useful testbed for probing agent capabilities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI research environments are usually more controllable, allow particular skills to be instilled and assessed, and permit faster and more reliable task-completion evaluations.
“In contrast to commercial video games, AI research environments are typically more controllable, offering the ability to instill and carefully assess particular skills, and more rapid and reliable evaluations of task completion.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Several research environments tend to include more real-world analogous physical interactions, though still simplified.
“Unlike many of the games in our portfolio, several of these research environments also tend to feature more real-world analogous-if still simplified-physical interactions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Collecting data at scale is not enough to train successful agents.
“Yet, collecting data at scale is not sufficient for training successful agents.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Basic elements of embodied 3D interaction, like navigation, are common to all these environments.
“Yet, because these are all 3D environments, basic aspects of 3D embodied interaction, such as navigation, are shared.”
Cites
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14236 · Cited by 30,357 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is a long history of research in creating agents that can interact with video games or simulated 3D environments (e.g., Mnih et al., 2015; Berner et al., 2019; Vinyals et al., 2019; Baker et al., 2022) and even follow language instructions in a limited range of environments (e.g., Abramson et…”
Self-citationLanguage Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Despite the impressive capabilities of large language models (Brown et al., 2020; Hoffmann et al., 2022; OpenAI, 2023; Anil et al., 2023; Gemini Team et al., 2023), connecting them to the embodied world that we inhabit remains challenging.”
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, backgammon provided the initial proving ground for early deep reinforcement learning methods (Tesauro et al., 1995), and later works have achieved superhuman performance even in complex board games like Go (Silver et al., 2016, 2018).”
MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control
Todorov, E., Erez, T., & Tassa, Y. (2012) · 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6386109 · Cited by 4,767 · cited 1× · see citing works
“MuJoCo (Todorov et al., 2012), PyBullet (Coumans and Bai, 2016), and Isaac Gym (Makoviychuk et al., 2021) provide high quality physics simulators for learning low-level control and are used by benchmarks for robotic manipulation such as Meta-World (Yu et al., 2020) and Ravens (Zeng et al., 2021).”
Harnad, S. (1990) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6 · Cited by 4,235 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Thus, several questions emerge: How can we bridge the divide between the symbols of language and their external referents (cf., Harnad, 1990)?”
CARLA: An open urban driving simulator
Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.03938 · Cited by 3,718 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CARLA (Dosovitskiy et al., 2017) provides a simulator for autonomous driving.”
A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play
Silver, D., Hubert, T., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Lai, M., Guez, A., Lanctot, M., Sifre, L., Kumaran, D., Graepel, T., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar6404 · Cited by 3,562 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, backgammon provided the initial proving ground for early deep reinforcement learning methods (Tesauro et al., 1995), and later works have achieved superhuman performance even in complex board games like Go (Silver et al., 2016, 2018).”
Grandmaster level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning
Vinyals, O., Babuschkin, I., Czarnecki, W. M., Mathieu, M., Dudzik, A., Chung, J., Choi, D. H., Powell, R., Ewalds, T., Georgiev, P., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z · Cited by 3,455 · cited 6× · see citing works
“• These environments are asynchronous (e.g., Berner et al., 2019; Vinyals et al., 2019); unlike many research environments, they do not stop and wait while the agent computes its next action.”
InfluentialSelf-citationTransformer-XL: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context
Dai, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Le, Q., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1285 · Cited by 3,169 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More specifically, our agent (Figure 4) utilizes trained-from-scratch transformers that cross-attend to the different pretrained vision components, the encoded language instruction, and a Transformer-XL (Dai et al., 2019) that attends to past memory states to construct a state representation.”
The Arcade Learning Environment: An Evaluation Platform for General Agents
Bellemare, M. G., Naddaf, Y., Veness, J., & Bowling, M. (2013) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.3912 · Cited by 2,161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Researchers have used many video game environments, covering a wide spectrum from Atari (Bellemare et al., 2013) to DoTA (Berner et al., 2019) and StarCraft II (Vinyals et al., 2019).”
Temporal difference learning and TD-Gammon
Tesauro, G. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/203330.203343 · Cited by 1,618 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, backgammon provided the initial proving ground for early deep reinforcement learning methods (Tesauro et al., 1995), and later works have achieved superhuman performance even in complex board games like Go (Silver et al., 2016, 2018).”
Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy EvolutionPreprint
Ha, D. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2018) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.01999 · Cited by 1,592 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Learning environment models Some works attempt to leverage learned models of environments to train agents in these learned simulations (e.g., Ha and Schmidhuber, 2018; Hafner et al., 2020, 2023; Yang et al., 2023).”
Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Research
Savva, M., Kadian, A., Maksymets, O., Zhao, Y., Wijmans, E., Jain, B., Straub, J., Liu, J., Koltun, V., Malik, J., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00943 · Cited by 1,237 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, AI2-THOR (Kolve et al., 2017), VirtualHome (Puig et al., 2018), ProcTHOR (Deitke et al., 2022), AI Habitat (Savva et al., 2019; Szot et al., 2021; Puig et al., 2023), ALFRED (Shridhar et al., 2020), and Behavior (Srivastava et al., 2021) simulate embodied agents behaving in naturalistic rendered scenes.”
Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance
Ho, J., & Salimans, T. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.12598 · Cited by 1,126 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We use Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG; Ho and Salimans, 2022; Lifshitz et al., 2023) to improve the language-conditionality of a trained agent when running it in an environment.”
Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learning
OpenAI, :, Berner, C., Brockman, G., Chan, B., Cheung, V., Dębiak, P., Dennison, C., Farhi, D., Fischer, Q., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.06680 · Cited by 1,065 · cited 6× · see citing works
“• These environments are asynchronous (e.g., Berner et al., 2019; Vinyals et al., 2019); unlike many research environments, they do not stop and wait while the agent computes its next action.”
InfluentialCompetition-level code generation with AlphaCode
Li, Y., Choi, D., Chung, J., Kushman, N., Schrittwieser, J., Leblond, R., Eccles, T., Keeling, J., Gimeno, F., Dal Lago, A., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abq1158 · Cited by 1,043 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Modern AI can write computer programs (Li et al., 2022) or play chess at super-human level (Silver et al., 2018), but the ability of AI to perceive and act in the world remains far below human level.”
Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models
Gemini Team, Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., Alayrac, J.-B., Yu, J., Soricut, R., Schalkwyk, J., Dai, A. M., Hauth, A., Millican, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.11805 · Cited by 990 · see citing works
Self-citationTraining Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Casas, D. D. L., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2176 · Cited by 932 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Despite the impressive capabilities of large language models (Brown et al., 2020; Hoffmann et al., 2022; OpenAI, 2023; Anil et al., 2023; Gemini Team et al., 2023), connecting them to the embodied world that we inhabit remains challenging.”
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Casas, D. D. L., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.15556 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner ArchitecturesPreprint
Espeholt, L., Soyer, H., Munos, R., Simonyan, K., Mnih, V., Ward, T., Doron, Y., Firoiu, V., Harley, T., Dunning, I., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.01561 · Cited by 851 · cited 1× · see citing works
“• Each instance of a commercial video game needs to run on a GPU; thus, we cannot run hundreds or thousands of actors per game per experiment as often done in RL (cf., Espeholt et al., 2018).”
Self-citationAnil, R., Dai, A. M., Firat, O., Johnson, M., Lepikhin, D., Passos, A., Shakeri, S., Taropa, E., Bailey, P., Chen, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10403 · Cited by 834 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Despite the impressive capabilities of large language models (Brown et al., 2020; Hoffmann et al., 2022; OpenAI, 2023; Anil et al., 2023; Gemini Team et al., 2023), connecting them to the embodied world that we inhabit remains challenging.”
Self-citationRT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale
Brohan, A., Brown, N., Carbajal, J., Chebotar, Y., Dabis, J., Finn, C., Gopalakrishnan, K., Hausman, K., Herzog, A., Hsu, J., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.06817 · Cited by 727 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More recent work has focused on environment-generality, including scaling robotic learning datasets across multiple tasks and embodiments (Brohan et al., 2022, 2023a; Stone et al., 2023; Padalkar et al., 2023)—thereby creating Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models (Brohan et al., 2023a), similar to…”
Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances
Ahn, M., Brohan, A., Brown, N., Chebotar, Y., Cortes, O., David, B., Finn, C., Fu, C., Gopalakrishnan, K., Hausman, K., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.01691 · Cited by 624 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Moreover, a variety of recent works have applied pretrained (vision-)language models as a planner for a lower-level instruction-conditional robotic control policy (Brohan et al., 2023b; Driess et al., 2023; Vemprala et al., 2023; Hu et al., 2023).”
PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model
Driess, D., Xia, F., Sajjadi, M. S. M., Lynch, C., Chowdhery, A., Ichter, B., Wahid, A., Tompson, J., Vuong, Q., Yu, T., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.03378 · Cited by 591 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Moreover, a range of recent works develop agents that connect language to embodied action, generally as part of a hierarchy controlled by a language model (Jiang et al., 2019; Driess et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023b; Hu et al., 2023; Ajay et al., 2023).”
InfluentialAI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AI
Kolve, E., Mottaghi, R., Han, W., VanderBilt, E., Weihs, L., Herrasti, A., Deitke, M., Ehsani, K., Gordon, D., Zhu, Y., et al. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.05474 · Cited by 578 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, AI2-THOR (Kolve et al., 2017), VirtualHome (Puig et al., 2018), ProcTHOR (Deitke et al., 2022), AI Habitat (Savva et al., 2019; Szot et al., 2021; Puig et al., 2023), ALFRED (Shridhar et al., 2020), and Behavior (Srivastava et al., 2021) simulate embodied agents behaving in naturalistic rendered scenes.”
ChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilities
Vemprala, S. H., Bonatti, R., Bucker, A., & Kapoor, A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3387941 · Cited by 570 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, a variety of recent works have applied pretrained (vision-)language models as a planner for a lower-level instruction-conditional robotic control policy (Brohan et al., 2023b; Driess et al., 2023; Vemprala et al., 2023; Hu et al., 2023).”
ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks
Shridhar, M., Thomason, J., Gordon, D., Bisk, Y., Han, W., Mottaghi, R., Zettlemoyer, L., & Fox, D. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01075 · Cited by 540 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, AI2-THOR (Kolve et al., 2017), VirtualHome (Puig et al., 2018), ProcTHOR (Deitke et al., 2022), AI Habitat (Savva et al., 2019; Szot et al., 2021; Puig et al., 2023), ALFRED (Shridhar et al., 2020), and Behavior (Srivastava et al., 2021) simulate embodied agents behaving in naturalistic rendered scenes.”
Isaac Gym: High Performance GPU-Based Physics Simulation For Robot Learning
Makoviychuk, V., Wawrzyniak, L., Guo, Y., Lu, M., Storey, K., Macklin, M., Hoeller, D., Rudin, N., Allshire, A., Handa, A., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.10470 · Cited by 509 · cited 1× · see citing works
“MuJoCo (Todorov et al., 2012), PyBullet (Coumans and Bai, 2016), and Isaac Gym (Makoviychuk et al., 2021) provide high quality physics simulators for learning low-level control and are used by benchmarks for robotic manipulation such as Meta-World (Yu et al., 2020) and Ravens (Zeng et al., 2021).”
An Embodied Generalist Agent in 3D WorldPreprint
Huang, J., Yong, S.-L., Ma, X., Linghu, X., Li, P.-H., Wang, Y., Li, Q., Zhu, S.-C., Jia, B., & Huang, S.-Y. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.12871 · Cited by 475 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In that sense, SIMA overlaps more with several recent works (Reed et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2023; Durante et al., 2024) that also explore training a single model to perform a broad range of tasks involving actions, vision, and language.”
Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learning
Yu, T., Quillen, D., He, Z., Julian, R., Narayan, A., Shively, H., Bellathur, A., Hausman, K., Finn, C., & Levine, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10897 · Cited by 450 · cited 1× · see citing works
“MuJoCo (Todorov et al., 2012), PyBullet (Coumans and Bai, 2016), and Isaac Gym (Makoviychuk et al., 2021) provide high quality physics simulators for learning low-level control and are used by benchmarks for robotic manipulation such as Meta-World (Yu et al., 2020) and Ravens (Zeng et al., 2021).”
VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities Via Programs
Puig, X., Ra, K., Boben, M., Li, J., Wang, T., Fidler, S., & Torralba, A. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00886 · Cited by 378 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, AI2-THOR (Kolve et al., 2017), VirtualHome (Puig et al., 2018), ProcTHOR (Deitke et al., 2022), AI Habitat (Savva et al., 2019; Szot et al., 2021; Puig et al., 2023), ALFRED (Shridhar et al., 2020), and Behavior (Srivastava et al., 2021) simulate embodied agents behaving in naturalistic rendered scenes.”
Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents
Huang, W., Abbeel, P., Pathak, D., & Mordatch, I. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.07207 · Cited by 304 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Once learned, language can unlock planning, reasoning (e.g., Huang et al., 2022; Brohan et al., 2023b; Driess et al., 2023; Kim et al., 2023), and communication (Zeng et al., 2022) about grounded situations and tasks.”
A Deep Hierarchical Approach to Lifelong Learning in Minecraft
Tessler, C., Givony, S., Zahavy, T., Mankowitz, D. J., & Mannor, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10744 · Cited by 300 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There has however been notable interest in first-person embodied video games as a platform for AI research (Johnson et al., 2016; Tessler et al., 2017; Guss et al., 2019; Pearce and Zhu, 2022; Hafner et al., 2023; Durante et al., 2024; Tan et al., 2024).”
RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control
Brohan, A., Brown, N., Carbajal, J., Chebotar, Y., Chen, X., Choromanski, K., Ding, T., Driess, D., Dubey, A., Finn, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.15818 · Cited by 276 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…has focused on environment-generality, including scaling robotic learning datasets across multiple tasks and embodiments (Brohan et al., 2022, 2023a; Stone et al., 2023; Padalkar et al., 2023)—thereby creating Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models (Brohan et al., 2023a), similar to the SIMA agent.”
Look Before You Leap: Unveiling the Power of GPT-4V in Robotic Vision-Language PlanningPreprint
Hu, Y.-D., Lin, F., Zhang, T., Yi, L., & Gao, Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.17842 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Mastering Atari with Discrete World Models
Hafner, D., Lillicrap, T., Norouzi, M., & Ba, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.02193 · Cited by 247 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Learning environment models Some works attempt to leverage learned models of environments to train agents in these learned simulations (e.g., Ha and Schmidhuber, 2018; Hafner et al., 2020, 2023; Yang et al., 2023).”
Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models
Wang, G., Xie, Y., Jiang, Y., Mandlekar, A., Xiao, C., Zhu, Y., Fan, L., & Anandkumar, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.16291 · Cited by 222 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More recently, games that offer API access to the environment have served as a platform for grounding large language models (Wang et al., 2023a), and some works have even considered grounding a language model in a game through direct perception and action of a lower-level controller (Wang et al.,…”
O’Neill, A., Rehman, A., Maddukuri, A., Gupta, A., Padalkar, A., Lee, A., Pooley, A., Gupta, A., Mandlekar, A., Jain, A., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10611477 · Cited by 210 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…has focused on environment-generality, including scaling robotic learning datasets across multiple tasks and embodiments (Brohan et al., 2022, 2023a; Stone et al., 2023; Padalkar et al., 2023)—thereby creating Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models (Brohan et al., 2023a), similar to the SIMA agent.”
Self-citationSocratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Language
Zeng, A., Attarian, M., Ichter, B., Choromanski, K., Wong, A., Welker, S., Tombari, F., Purohit, A., Ryoo, M., Sindhwani, V., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.00598 · Cited by 205 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Once learned, language can unlock planning, reasoning (e.g., Huang et al., 2022; Brohan et al., 2023b; Driess et al., 2023; Kim et al., 2023), and communication (Zeng et al., 2022) about grounded situations and tasks.”
Transporter Networks: Rearranging the Visual World for Robotic Manipulation
Zeng, A., Florence, P., Tompson, J., Welker, S., Chien, J., Attarian, M., Armstrong, T., Krasin, I., Duong, D., Wahid, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.14406 · Cited by 200 · cited 1× · see citing works
“MuJoCo (Todorov et al., 2012), PyBullet (Coumans and Bai, 2016), and Isaac Gym (Makoviychuk et al., 2021) provide high quality physics simulators for learning low-level control and are used by benchmarks for robotic manipulation such as Meta-World (Yu et al., 2020) and Ravens (Zeng et al., 2021).”
Grounded Language Learning in a Simulated 3D WorldPreprint
Hermann, K. M., Hill, F., Green, S., Wang, F., Faulkner, R., Soyer, H., Szepesvári, D., Czarnecki, W. M., Jaderberg, M., Teplyashin, D., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.06551 · Cited by 179 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…on grounding language in simulated 3D environments, through agents that are trained in controlled settings with semi-natural synthetic language (Hermann et al., 2017; Hill et al., 2019), or by imitating human interactions in a virtual house to learn a broader ability to follow natural…”
Self-citationProcTHOR: Large-Scale Embodied AI Using Procedural Generation
Deitke, M., VanderBilt, E., Herrasti, A., Weihs, L., Salvador, J., Ehsani, K., Han, W., Kolve, E., Farhadi, A., Kembhavi, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.06994 · Cited by 155 · cited 4× · see citing works
“ProcTHOR: An environment consisting of procedurally-generated rooms with realistic contents, such as offices and libraries, introduced by Deitke et al. (2022).”
Influential(2022) · doi:10.52202/068431-0433 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Sim2Real in Robotics and Automation: Applications and Challenges
Hofer, S., Bekris, K., Handa, A., Gamboa, J. C., Mozifian, M., Golemo, F., Atkeson, C., Fox, D., Goldberg, K., Leonard, J., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2021.3064065 · Cited by 154 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A variety of robotics projects have used simulations for training, to transfer efficiently to real-world robotic deployments (Höfer et al., 2021), though generally within a single, constrained setting.”
Habitat 2.0: Training home assistants to rearrange their habitat
Szot, A., Clegg, A., Undersander, E., Wijmans, E., Zhao, Y., Turner, J., Maestre, N., Mukadam, M., Chaplot, D., Maksymets, O., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.14405 · Cited by 143 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, AI2-THOR (Kolve et al., 2017), VirtualHome (Puig et al., 2018), ProcTHOR (Deitke et al., 2022), AI Habitat (Savva et al., 2019; Szot et al., 2021; Puig et al., 2023), ALFRED (Shridhar et al., 2020), and Behavior (Srivastava et al., 2021) simulate embodied agents behaving in…”
Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planning
Ajay, A., Han, S.-J., Du, Y., et al. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.08587 · Cited by 138 · cited 2×
“Moreover, a range of recent works develop agents that connect language to embodied action, generally as part of a hierarchy controlled by a language model (Jiang et al., 2019; Driess et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023b; Hu et al., 2023; Ajay et al., 2023).”
Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks
Kim, G., Baldi, P., & McAleer, S. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-1723 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
A data-driven approach for learning to control computersPreprint
Humphreys, P., Raposo, D., Pohlen, T., et al. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.08137 · Cited by 133 · cited 1× · see citing works
“• To interact with the environments, agents use the same keyboard-and-mouse controls that humans do (e.g., Baker et al., 2022; Humphreys et al., 2022; Lifshitz et al., 2023), rather than handcrafted action spaces or high-level APIs.”
Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models
Hafner, D., Pasukonis, J., Ba, J., & Lillicrap, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.04104 · Cited by 124 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There has however been notable interest in first-person embodied video games as a platform for AI research (Johnson et al., 2016; Tessler et al., 2017; Guss et al., 2019; Pearce and Zhu, 2022; Hafner et al., 2023; Durante et al., 2024; Tan et al., 2024).”
Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models
Embodiment Collaboration, O'Neill, A., Rehman, A., Gupta, A., Maddukuri, A., Gupta, A., Padalkar, A., Lee, A., Pooley, A., Gupta, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.08864 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationLanguage as an Abstraction for Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning
Jiang, Y., Gu, S., Murphy, K., & Finn, C. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.07343 · Cited by 109 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Moreover, a range of recent works develop agents that connect language to embodied action, generally as part of a hierarchy controlled by a language model (Jiang et al., 2019; Driess et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023b; Hu et al., 2023; Ajay et al., 2023).”
Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks
Kim, G., Baldi, P., & McAleer, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.17491 · Cited by 101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Once learned, language can unlock planning, reasoning (e.g., Huang et al., 2022; Brohan et al., 2023b; Driess et al., 2023; Kim et al., 2023), and communication (Zeng et al., 2022) about grounded situations and tasks.”
MineRL: A Large-Scale Dataset of Minecraft Demonstrations
Guss, W. H., Houghton, B., Topin, N., Wang, P., Codel, C., Veloso, M., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/339 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There has however been notable interest in first-person embodied video games as a platform for AI research (Johnson et al., 2016; Tessler et al., 2017; Guss et al., 2019; Pearce and Zhu, 2022; Hafner et al., 2023; Durante et al., 2024; Tan et al., 2024).”
Phenaki: Variable Length Video Generation From Open Domain Textual Description
Villegas, R., Babaeizadeh, M., Kindermans, P.-J., Moraldo, H., Zhang, H., Saffar, M. T., Castro, S., Kunze, J., & Erhan, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.02399 · Cited by 92 · cited 4× · see citing works
“First, our agent incorporates not only trained-from-scratch components, but also several pretrained models—including a model trained on fine-grained image-text alignment, SPARC (Bica et al., 2024), and a video prediction model, Phenaki (Villegas et al., 2022)—which we further fine-tune on our data through behavioral c…”
InfluentialMcClelland, J. L., Hill, F., Rudolph, M., Baldridge, J., & Schütze, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1910416117 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since human language use is deeply integrated with our understanding of grounded situations (McClelland et al., 2020), understanding the subtleties of human language will likely benefit from this grounding.”
Self-citationChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model AbilitiesPreprint
Vemprala, S. H., Bonatti, R., Bucker, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.17582 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Environmental drivers of systematicity and generalization in a situated agent
Hill, F., Lampinen, A., Schneider, R., Clark, S., Botvinick, M., McClelland, J. L., & Santoro, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.00571 · Cited by 81 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In turn, grounding language in rich environments can make a system’s understanding of the language itself more systematic and generalizable (Hill et al., 2019).”
Self-citationImproving Intrinsic Exploration with Language Abstractions
Mu, J., Zhong, V., Raileanu, R., et al. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/068431-2460 · Cited by 81 · cited 1×
“Language abstractions can accelerate grounded learning, for example accelerating novelty-based exploration in reinforcement learning by providing better state abstractions (Tam et al., 2022; Mu et al., 2022), or composing known goals into new ones (Colas et al., 2020; Nottingham et al., 2023).”
Video PreTraining (VPT): Learning to Act by Watching Unlabeled Online Videos
Baker, B., Akkaya, I., Zhokhov, P., Huizinga, J., Tang, J., Ecoffet, A., Houghton, B., Sampedro, R., & Clune, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.11795 · Cited by 75 · cited 4× · see citing works
“• To interact with the environments, agents use the same keyboard-and-mouse controls that humans do (e.g., Baker et al., 2022; Humphreys et al., 2022; Lifshitz et al., 2023), rather than handcrafted action spaces or high-level APIs.”
InfluentialSelf-citationVideo PreTraining (VPT): Learning to Act by Watching Unlabeled Online Videos
Baker, B., Akkaya, I., Zhokov, P., Huizinga, J., Tang, J., Ecoffet, A., Houghton, B., Sampedro, R., & Clune, J. (2022) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/068431-1789 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationMineDojo: Building Open-Ended Embodied Agents with Internet-Scale Knowledge
Fan, L., Wang, G., Jiang, Y., Mandlekar, A., Yang, Y., Zhu, H., Tang, A., Huang, D.-A., Zhu, Y., & Anandkumar, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.08853 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(For reference, MineDojo (Fan et al., 2022), a related work investigating language-conditional agents in MineCraft, used 1,581 unique tasks spanning 4 skill categories: survival, harvest, tech-free, and combat).”
Language as a Cognitive Tool to Imagine Goals in Curiosity-Driven Exploration
Colas, C., Karch, T., Lair, N., Dussoux, J.-M., Moulin-Frier, C., Dominey, P. F., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.09253 · Cited by 64 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Language abstractions can enable efficient learning and generalization (Hill et al., 2020; Colas et al., 2020; Lampinen et al., 2022; Tam et al., 2022; Hu and Clune, 2023).”
Reed, S., Zolna, K., Parisotto, E., Colmenarejo, S. G., Novikov, A., Barth-Maron, G., Gimenez, M., Sulsky, Y., Kay, J., Springenberg, J. T., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.06175 · Cited by 63 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In that sense, SIMA overlaps more with several recent works (Reed et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2023; Durante et al., 2024) that also explore training a single model to perform a broad range of tasks involving actions, vision, and language.”
Open-Ended Learning Leads to Generally Capable Agents
Open Ended Learning Team, Stooke, A., Mahajan, A., Barros, C., Deck, C., Bauer, J., Sygnowski, J., Trebacz, M., Jaderberg, M., Mathieu, M., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.12808 · Cited by 56 · cited 6× · see citing works
“…with semi-natural synthetic language (Hermann et al., 2017; Hill et al., 2019), or by imitating human interactions in a virtual house to learn a broader ability to follow natural language instructions (Abramson et al., 2020; DeepMind Interactive Agents Team et al., 2021; Abramson et al., 2022a,b).”
InfluentialSelf-citationSrivastava, S., Li, C., Lingelbach, M., Martín-Martín, R., Xia, F., Vainio, K., Lian, Z., Gokmen, C., Buch, S., Liu, C. K., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.03332 · Cited by 55 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The full details of our data collection protocols, including compensation rates, were reviewed and approved by an independent Human Behavioral Research Committee for ethics and privacy.”
Shaping Belief States with Generative Environment Models for RLPreprint
Gregor, K., Rezende, D. J., Besse, F., Wu, Y. X., Merzić, H., & van den Oord, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.09237 · Cited by 54 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, we only use the internal state representations of the video models rather than explicit rollouts—in keeping with other approaches that use generative modeling as an objective function for learning state representations (e.g., Gregor et al., 2019; Zolna et al., 2024).”
Self-citationCreating Multimodal Interactive Agents with Imitation and Self-Supervised LearningPreprint
Abramson, J., Ahuja, A., Brussee, A., et al. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.03763 · Cited by 53 · cited 6× · see citing works
“…with semi-natural synthetic language (Hermann et al., 2017; Hill et al., 2019), or by imitating human interactions in a virtual house to learn a broader ability to follow natural language instructions (Abramson et al., 2020; DeepMind Interactive Agents Team et al., 2021; Abramson et al., 2022a,b).”
InfluentialSelf-citationMaking Efficient Use of Demonstrations to Solve Hard Exploration ProblemsPreprint
Paine, T. L., Gülçehre, Ç., Shahriari, B., Denil, M., Hoffman, M., Soyer, H., Tanburn, R., Kapturowski, S., Rabinowitz, N. C., Williams, D., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.01387 · Cited by 49 · cited 2× · see citing works
“WorldLab: An environment used in prior work (e.g., Gulcehre et al., 2019), further specialized for testing embodied agents by using a limited set of intuitive mechanics, such as sensors and doors, and relying primarily on the use of simulated physics on a range of objects.”
Self-citationCounter-Strike Deathmatch with Large-Scale Behavioural Cloning
Pearce, T., & Zhu, J. (2022) · IEEE Conference on Games (CoG) · doi:10.1109/cog51982.2022.9893617 · Cited by 47 · cited 2× · see citing works
“There has however been notable interest in first-person embodied video games as a platform for AI research (Johnson et al., 2016; Tessler et al., 2017; Guss et al., 2019; Pearce and Zhu, 2022; Hafner et al., 2023; Durante et al., 2024; Tan et al., 2024).”
Behavioural Cloning: Phenomena, Results and Problems
Bratko, I., Urbančič, T., & Sammut, C. (1995) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)46716-4 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Latencies or delays (Bratko et al., 1995) are introduced by the computation of actions and the transmission of observations and actions over the network.”
Imitating Interactive Intelligence
Abramson, J., Ahuja, A., Barr, I., Brussee, A., Carnevale, F., Cassin, M., Chhaparia, R., Clark, S., Damoc, B., Dudzik, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.05672 · Cited by 43 · cited 16× · see citing works
“Note that this evaluation was performed only on a subset of our research environments: Construction Lab, Playhouse, and WorldLab.”
InfluentialSelf-citationImproving Multimodal Interactive Agents with Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackPreprint
Abramson, J., Ahuja, A., Carnevale, F., et al. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.11602 · Cited by 40 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The Playhouse (Abramson et al., 2020; DeepMind Interactive Agents Team et al., 2021; Abramson et al., 2022a) and WorldLab (e.g., Gulcehre et al., 2019) environments are built using Unity (see Ward et al., 2020).”
Self-citation<b>JARVIS</b> -1: Open-World Multi-Task Agents With Memory-Augmented Multimodal Language Models
Wang, Z., Cai, S., Liu, A., Jin, Y., Hou, J., Zhang, B., Lin, H., He, Z., Zheng, Z., Yang, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3511593 · Cited by 36 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…games that offer API access to the environment have served as a platform for grounding large language models (Wang et al., 2023a), and some works have even considered grounding a language model in a game through direct perception and action of a lower-level controller (Wang et al., 2023b).”
InfluentialSelf-citationGrounded Language Learning Fast and Slow
Hill, F., Tieleman, O., von Glehn, T., Wong, N., Merzic, H., & Clark, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.01719 · Cited by 35 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Language abstractions can enable efficient learning and generalization (Hill et al., 2020; Colas et al., 2020; Lampinen et al., 2022; Tam et al., 2022; Hu and Clune, 2023).”
Self-citationLanguage and culture internalization for human-like autotelic AI
Colas, C., Karch, T., Moulin-Frier, C., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00591-4 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Language may be a powerful tool for shaping agent capabilities (Colas et al., 2022).”
Open-World Object Manipulation using Pre-trained Vision-Language Models
Stone, A., Xiao, T., Lu, Y., Gopalakrishnan, K., Lee, K.-H., Vuong, Q., Wohlhart, P., Kirmani, S., Zitkovich, B., Xia, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.00905 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…has focused on environment-generality, including scaling robotic learning datasets across multiple tasks and embodiments (Brohan et al., 2022, 2023a; Stone et al., 2023; Padalkar et al., 2023)—thereby creating Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models (Brohan et al., 2023a), similar to the SIMA agent.”
Avalon: A Benchmark for RL Generalization Using Procedurally Generated Worlds
Albrecht, J., Fetterman, A., Fogelman, B., Kitanidis, E., Wr'oblewski, B., Seo, N., Rosenthal, M., Knutins, M., Polizzi, Z., Simon, J. B., et al. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13417 · Cited by 30 · cited 1×
“Commercial video games offer a higher degree of rich interactions and visual fidelity, while research environments serve as a useful testbed for probing agent capabilities.”
An Interactive Agent Foundation Model
Durante, Z., Gong, R., Sarkar, B., Wake, N., Taori, R., Tang, P. C., Lakshmikanth, S. K., Schulman, K. A., Milstein, A. S., Vo, H., et al. (2025) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw67362.2025.00350 · Cited by 28 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In that sense, SIMA overlaps more with several recent works (Reed et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2023; Durante et al., 2024) that also explore training a single model to perform a broad range of tasks involving actions, vision, and language.”
Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations
Tam, A. C., Rabinowitz, N. C., Lampinen, A. K., Roy, N. A., Chan, S. C. Y., Strouse, D., Wang, J. X., Banino, A., & Hill, F. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05080 · Cited by 24 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Language abstractions can enable efficient learning and generalization (Hill et al., 2020; Colas et al., 2020; Lampinen et al., 2022; Tam et al., 2022; Hu and Clune, 2023).”
Self-citationSemantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained Representations
Tam, A. C., Rabinowitz, N. C., Lampinen, A. K., et al. (2022) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/068431-1840 · Cited by 24
Self-citationHuman-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space
Adaptive Agent Team, Bauer, J., Baumli, K., Baveja, S., Behbahani, F., Bhoopchand, A., Bradley-Schmieg, N., Chang, M., Clay, N., Collister, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07608 · Cited by 19 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Open Ended Learning Team et al. (2021) and Adaptive Agent Team et al. (2023) also use Unity to instantiate a broad distribution of procedurally generated tasks with shared underlying principles.”
InfluentialSelf-citationHabitat 3.0: A Co-Habitat for Humans, Avatars, and Robots
Puig, X., Undersander, E., Szot, A., Cote, M. D., Yang, T.-Y., Partsey, R., Desai, R., Clegg, A. W., Hlavac, M., Min, S. Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13724 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…AI2-THOR (Kolve et al., 2017), VirtualHome (Puig et al., 2018), ProcTHOR (Deitke et al., 2022), AI Habitat (Savva et al., 2019; Szot et al., 2021; Puig et al., 2023), ALFRED (Shridhar et al., 2020), and Behavior (Srivastava et al., 2021) simulate embodied agents behaving in naturalistic rendered…”
Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structure
Lampinen, A. K., Roy, N. A., Dasgupta, I., Chan, S. C. Y., Tam, A. C., McClelland, J. L., Yan, C., Santoro, A., Rabinowitz, N. C., Wang, J. X., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.03753 · Cited by 14 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Language abstractions can enable efficient learning and generalization (Hill et al., 2020; Colas et al., 2020; Lampinen et al., 2022; Tam et al., 2022; Hu and Clune, 2023).”
Self-citationThought Cloning: Learning to Think while Acting by Imitating Human Thinking
Hu, S., & Clune, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00323 · Cited by 13 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Moreover, a range of recent works develop agents that connect language to embodied action, generally as part of a hierarchy controlled by a language model (Jiang et al., 2019; Driess et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023b; Hu et al., 2023; Ajay et al., 2023).”
InfluentialSelf-citationLearning Interactive Real-World Simulators
Yang, S., Du, Y., Ghasemipour, K., Tompson, J., Kaelbling, L., Schuurmans, D., & Abbeel, P. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06114 · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Learning environment models Some works attempt to leverage learned models of environments to train agents in these learned simulations (e.g., Ha and Schmidhuber, 2018; Hafner et al., 2020, 2023; Yang et al., 2023).”
Nottingham, K., Ammanabrolu, P., Suhr, A., Choi, Y., Hajishirzi, H., Singh, S., & Fox, R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.12050 · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Commercial video games offer a higher degree of rich interactions and visual fidelity, while research environments serve as a useful testbed for probing agent capabilities.”
Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planning
Ajay, A., Han, S., Du, Y., et al. (2023) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/075280-0979 · Cited by 12
STEVE-1: A Generative Model for Text-to-Behavior in Minecraft
Lifshitz, S., Paster, K., Chan, H., Ba, J., & McIlraith, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00937 · Cited by 11 · cited 6× · see citing works
“We use Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG; Ho and Salimans, 2022; Lifshitz et al., 2023) to improve the language-conditionality of a trained agent when running it in an environment.”
InfluentialUsing Natural Language and Program Abstractions to Instill Human Inductive Biases in Machines
Kumar, S., Correa, C. G., Dasgupta, I., Marjieh, R., Hu, M. Y., Hawkins, R. D., Daw, N. D., Cohen, J. D., Narasimhan, K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.11558 · Cited by 9 · cited 1×
“Moreover, learning to predict natural-language explanations (Lampinen et al., 2022), descriptions (Kumar et al., 2022), or plans (Hu and Clune, 2023) can help agents to learn more efficiently, and to generalize better out of distribution.”
Self-citationUsing Natural Language and Program Abstractions to Instill Human Inductive Biases in Machines
Kumar, S., Correa, C. G., Dasgupta, I., et al. (2022) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/068431-0013 · Cited by 9
Self-citationStay on topic with Classifier-Free Guidance
Sanchez, G., Fan, H., Spangher, A., Levi, E., Ammanamanchi, P. S., & Biderman, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.17806 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CFG was originally proposed for strengthening text-conditioning in diffusion models (Ho and Salimans, 2022), but has also proven useful for similar purposes with language models (Sanchez et al., 2023) and language-conditioned agents (Lifshitz et al., 2023).”
Evaluating Multimodal Interactive AgentsPreprint
Abramson, J., Ahuja, A., Carnevale, F., et al. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.13274 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, consistent with prior findings (Abramson et al., 2022b; Baker et al., 2022), we observed that agent action log-probabilities on evaluation data show at most a weak correlation with agent performance beyond the most basic skills.”
Self-citationUsing Unity to Help Solve Intelligence
Ward, T., Bolt, A., Hemmings, N., Carter, S., Sanchez, M., Barreira, R., Noury, S., Anderson, K., Lemmon, J., Coe, J., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.09294 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Playhouse (Abramson et al., 2020; DeepMind Interactive Agents Team et al., 2021; Abramson et al., 2022a) and WorldLab (e.g., Gulcehre et al., 2019) environments are built using Unity (see Ward et al., 2020).”
Self-citationJARVIS-1: Open-World Multi-task Agents with Memory-Augmented Multimodal Language Models
Wang, Z., Cai, S., Liu, A., Jin, Y., Hou, J., Zhang, B., Lin, H., He, Z., Zheng, Z., Yang, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.05997 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationAvalon: A Benchmark for RL Generalization Using Procedurally Generated Worlds
Albrecht, J., Fetterman, A. J., Fogelman, B., et al. (2022) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/068431-0931 · Cited by 5
Improving fine-grained understanding in image-text pre-training
Bica, I., Ilić, A., Bauer, M., Erdogan, G., Bošnjak, M., Kaplanis, C., Gritsenko, A. A., Minderer, M., Blundell, C., Pascanu, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.09865 · Cited by 4 · cited 3× · see citing works
“First, our agent incorporates not only trained-from-scratch components, but also several pretrained models—including a model trained on fine-grained image-text alignment, SPARC (Bica et al., 2024), and a video prediction model, Phenaki (Villegas et al., 2022)—which we further fine-tune on our data through behavioral c…”
An Interactive Agent Foundation ModelPreprint
Durante, Z., Sarkar, B., Gong, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.05929 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Cradle: Empowering Foundation Agents Towards General Computer Control
Tan, W., Zhang, W., Xu, X., Xia, H., Ding, Z., Li, B., Zhou, B., Yue, J., Jiang, J., Li, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.03186 · Cited by 3 · cited 2× · see citing works
“There has however been notable interest in first-person embodied video games as a platform for AI research (Johnson et al., 2016; Tessler et al., 2017; Guss et al., 2019; Pearce and Zhu, 2022; Hafner et al., 2023; Durante et al., 2024; Tan et al., 2024).”
GATS: Gather-Attend-ScatterPreprint
Zolna, K., Cabi, S., Chen, Y.-T., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.08525 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, we only use the internal state representations of the video models rather than explicit rollouts—in keeping with other approaches that use generative modeling as an objective function for learning state representations (e.g., Gregor et al., 2019; Zolna et al., 2024).”
VisualWebArena: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Realistic Visual Web Tasks
Koh, J. Y., Lo, R., Jang, L., Duvvur, V., Lim, M. C., Huang, P.-Y., Neubig, G., Zhou, S., Salakhutdinov, R., & Fried, D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.13649 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
OpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [48]48. Matthew Johnson, Katja Hofmann, Tim Hutton, and David Bignell. The Malmo Platform for Artificial Intelligence Experimentation. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016.
- [59]59. Hans Moravec. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Harvard University Press, 1988.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building machines that learn and think with people
Collins, K. M., Sucholutsky, I., Bhatt, U., Chandra, K., Wong, L., Lee, M., Zhang, C. E., Zhi‐Xuan, T., Ho, M. K., Mansinghka, V. K., et al. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01991-9 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“Rational Speech Acts (RSA) Humans reason about language as an intentional, communicative action to infer a speakers’ underlying goals.”
Agentic AI and the rise of in silico team science in biomedical research
Li, B., Saini, A. K., Hernandez, J. G., & Moore, J. H. (2026) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-026-03035-1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“For example, the SIMA team demonstrates how these AI agents can read graphical interfaces and translate natural-language instructions into mouse and keyboard actions 152 .”
Humanlike Behavior in a Third-Person Shooter with Imitation Learning
Farhang, A., Mulcahy, B., Holden, D., Matthews, I. A., & Yue, Y. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Games (CoG) · doi:10.1109/cog60054.2024.10645651 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“We found performance on a held out validation set to be only weakly informative of the model’s ultimate performance in engine rollouts, consistent with prior observations [7].”
BackgroundResultVerma, D. (2025) · Journal of Urban Design · doi:10.1080/13574809.2025.2514574 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Meta-learning: Data, architecture, and both
Binz, M., Dasgupta, I., Jagadish, A. K., Botvinick, M., Wang, J. X., & Schulz, E. (2024) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x24000311 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge Scale Architectures: A Review of the Architecture of Generative AI
Koehler, D. (2024) · Technology|Architecture + Design · doi:10.1080/24751448.2024.2405419 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
AI Alignment Versus AI Ethical Treatment: 10 Challenges
Bradley, A., & Saad, B. (2025) · Analytic Philosophy · doi:10.1111/phib.12380 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The Illusion of Diminishing Returns: Measuring Long Horizon Execution in LLMs
Sinha, A., Arun, A., Goel, S., Staab, S., & Geiping, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09677 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Scaling up the length of tasks a model can complete would be a major step towards realizing the true potential of general, open-ended agents (Raad et al., 2024).”
General agents contain world models
Richens, J., Abel, D., Bellot, A., & Everitt, T. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01622 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Instruction-Driven Game Engine: A Poker Case StudyPreprint
Wu, H., Liu, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, H. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/ardyd9
Glybovets, M., & Bachynskyi, N. (2025) · NaUKMA Research Papers Computer Science · doi:10.18523/2617-3808.2024.7.70-76
- Authors
- SIMA Team, Raad, M. A., Ahuja, A., Barros, C., Besse, F., Bolt, A., Bolton, A., Brownfield, B., Buttimore, G., Cant, M., Chakera, S., Chan, S. C. Y., Clune, J., Collister, A., Copeman, V., Cullum, A., Dasgupta, I., de Cesare, D., Di Trapani, J., Donchev, Y., Dunleavy, E., Engelcke, M., Faulkner, R., Garcia, F., Gbadamosi, C., Gong, Z., Gonzales, L., Gupta, K., Gregor, K., Hallingstad, A. O., Harley, T., Haves, S., Hill, F., Hirst, E., Hudson, D. A., Hudson, J., Hughes-Fitt, S., Rezende, D. J., Jasarevic, M., Kampis, L., Ke, R., Keck, T., Kim, J., Knagg, O., Kopparapu, K., Lawton, R., Lampinen, A., Legg, S., Lerchner, A., Limont, M., Liu, Y., Loks-Thompson, M., Marino, J., Cussons, K. M., Matthey, L., Mcloughlin, S., Mendolicchio, P., Merzic, H., Mitenkova, A., Moufarek, A., Oliveira, V., Oliveira, Y., Openshaw, H., Pan, R., Pappu, A., Platonov, A., Purkiss, O., Reichert, D., Reid, J., Richemond, P. H., Roberts, T., Ruscoe, G., Elias, J. S., Sandars, T., Sawyer, D. P., Scholtes, T., Simmons, G., Slater, D., Soyer, H., Strathmann, H., Stys, P., Tam, A. C., Teplyashin, D., Terzi, T., Vercelli, D., Vujatovic, B., Wainwright, M., Wang, J. X., Wang, Z., Wierstra, D., Williams, D., Wong, N., York, S., & Young, N.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2404.10179
- OpenAlex
- W4394946817
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- McGill University
- Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- embodied AI, language grounding, instruction following, virtual worlds, video games, artificial general intelligence, SIMA, image observation, cross-environment generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review