PreprintCited by 11Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Scaling Instructable Agents Across Many Simulated Worlds

Open access
SIMA Team, Raad, Maria Abi, Ahuja, Arun, Barros, Catarina, Besse, Frederic, Bolt, Andrew, Bolton, Adrian, Brownfield, Bethanie +86 more·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Building embodied AI systems that can follow arbitrary language instructions in any 3D environment is a key challenge for creating general AI. Accomplishing this goal requires learning to ground language in perception and embodied actions, in order to accomplish complex tasks. The Scalable, Instructable, Multiworld Agent (SIMA) project tackles this by training agents to follow free-form instructions across a diverse range of virtual 3D environments, including curated research environments as well as open-ended, commercial video games. Our goal is to develop an instructable agent that can accomplish anything a human can do in any simulated 3D environment. Our approach focuses on language-driven generality while imposing minimal assumptions. Our agents interact with environments in real-time using a generic, human-like interface: the inputs are image observations and language instructions and the outputs are keyboard-and-mouse actions. This general approach is challenging, but it allows agents to ground language across many visually complex and semantically rich environments while also allowing us to readily run agents in new environments. In this paper we describe our motivation and goal, the initial progress we have made, and promising preliminary results on several diverse research environments and a variety of commercial video games.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2404.10179

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

27 of 41 cited sources checked · 21 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Using a broad data distribution is the best way to advance general AI.

    “In SIMA, however, we are drawing inspiration from the lesson of large language models that training on a broad distribution of data is the most effective way to make progress in general AI (e.g., Brown et al., 2020;Hoffmann et al., 2022;OpenAI, 2023;Anil et al., 2023;Gemini Team et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brown et al., 2020 source

      Related Work (p. 40) says large-scale text pre-training offers a natural, broad distribution of tasks, supporting the value of breadth for language-model generality. It does not establish that broad data is the most effective route to progress in general AI; Limitations (p. 33) says language-model pre-training is likely to hit limits and may need other approaches. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hoffmann et al., 2022 source

      The Discussion & Conclusion (p. 16) calls for greater dataset scaling, while qualifying that larger datasets may help only when the data is high-quality. The paper does not establish that a broader data distribution, rather than more high-quality training data, is the most effective way to advance general AI; its analysis concerns compute-optimal language-model training. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites OpenAI, 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingown data

    So far in SIMA, the team has built an agent that carries out short-horizon tasks from user-provided language instructions.

    “In the SIMA project thus far, we have created an agent that performs short-horizon tasks based on language instructions produced by a user; though instructions could also be produced by a language model (e.g., Jiang et al., 2019;Driess et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2023b;Hu et al., 2023;Ajay et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jiang et al., 2019 source
    • cites Driess et al., 2023 source
    • cites Wang et al., 2023b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    When language is tied to rich environments, a system's grasp of language can become more systematic and generalizable.

    “In turn, grounding language in rich environments can make a system's understanding of the language itself more systematic and generalizable (Hill et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hill et al., 2019 source
  • Premisecitation

    Language abstractions can support efficient learning and generalization.

    “Language abstractions can enable efficient learning and generalization (Hill et al., 2020;Colas et al., 2020;Lampinen et al., 2022;Tam et al., 2022;Hu and Clune, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hill et al., 2020 source
    • cites Colas et al., 2020 source
    • cites Lampinen et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    Language abstractions can speed up grounded learning, for instance by improving state abstractions for novelty-based exploration or by composing known goals into new ones.

    “Language abstractions can accelerate grounded learning, for example accelerating novelty-based exploration in reinforcement learning by providing better state abstractions (Tam et al., 2022;Mu et al., 2022), or composing known goals into new ones (Colas et al., 2020;Nottingham et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Tam et al., 2022 source
    • cites Mu et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Colas et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims. 56
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 72
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    After being learned, language can enable planning, reasoning, and communication about grounded situations and tasks.

    “Once learned, language can unlock planning, reasoning (e.g., Huang et al., 2022;Brohan et al., 2023b;Driess et al., 2023;Kim et al., 2023), and communication (Zeng et al., 2022) about grounded situations and tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al., 2022 source
    • cites Brohan et al., 2023b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Driess et al., 2023 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Learning to predict natural-language explanations, descriptions, or plans can help agents learn more efficiently and generalize better out of distribution.

    “Moreover, learning to predict natural-language explanations (Lampinen et al., 2022), descriptions (Kumar et al., 2022), or plans (Hu and Clune, 2023) can help agents to learn more efficiently, and to generalize better out of distribution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lampinen et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kumar et al., 2022 source

      Section 3.4 (p. 8) reports that co-training agents to predict embeddings of human-generated descriptions improved performance on held-out human-generated boards. It does not establish greater learning efficiency or better out-of-distribution generalization: the improved test boards came from the training distribution, while performance on the separate machine-generated control distribution declined. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hu and Clune, 2023 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    SIMA tries to solve the problem across many simulated environments in a general and scalable manner, assuming little beyond human-like interaction with those environments.

    “Thus, in contrast to prior works (e.g., Abramson et al., 2020;Vinyals et al., 2019;Berner et al., 2019;Lifshitz et al., 2023), we are attempting to tackle this problem across many simulated environments, in the most general and scalable way possible, by making few assumptions beyond interacting with the environments in the same way as humans do.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Abramson et al., 2020 source
    • cites Vinyals et al., 2019 source
    • cites Berner et al., 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Modern AI can write programs and play chess at superhuman levels, but its capacity to perceive and act in the world is much lower than that of humans.

    “Modern AI can write computer programs (Li et al., 2022) or play chess at super-human level (Silver et al., 2018), but the ability of AI to perceive and act in the world remains far below human level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Li et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Silver et al., 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Their data can augment existing training data or fine-tune pretrained models to give them more situated understanding.

    “Our data can be used to augment and leverage existing training data (e.g., Abramson et al., 2020), or to fine-tune pretrained models to endow them with more situated understanding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Abramson et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Empirical evidence indicates that grounding supports even basic generalization; Hill et al. (2019) found that agents in richer, more embodied environments show more systematic compositional generalization.

    “Beyond this theoretical argument, empirical evidence shows that grounding can support even fundamental kinds of generalization- Hill et al. (2019) show that agents grounded in richer, more-embodied environments exhibit more systematic compositional generalization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hill et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    MineDojo (Fan et al., 2022) used 1,581 unique tasks spanning 4 skill categories: survival, harvest, tech-free, and combat.

    “(For reference, MineDojo (Fan et al., 2022), a related work investigating language-conditional agents in MineCraft, used 1,581 unique tasks spanning 4 skill categories: survival, harvest, tech-free, and combat).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fan et al., 2022 source

      Section 2.1 reports 1,581 template-generated goals across four programmatic-task categories. Section C.1 names them Survival, Harvest, Tech Tree, and Combat—not “tech-free.” The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The agent architecture builds on prior related work (Abramson et al., 2020, 2022a), but with various changes and adaptations to more general goals.

    “Our agent architecture builds on prior related work (Abramson et al., 2020(Abramson et al., , 2022a)), but with various changes and adaptations to our more general goals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Abramson et al., 2020 source
    • cites Abramson et al., 2022a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CFG was originally proposed for strengthening text-conditioning in diffusion models, but has also proven useful for similar purposes with language models and language-conditioned agents.

    “CFG was originally proposed for strengthening text-conditioning in diffusion models (Ho and Salimans, 2022), but has also proven useful for similar purposes with language models (Sanchez et al., 2023) and languageconditioned agents (Lifshitz et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ho and Salimans, 2022 source

      Section 3.2 (p. 4) introduces classifier-free guidance for conditional diffusion models, and Section 4.1 (p. 6) tests it on class-conditional ImageNet generation. This supports the claim that the paper proposed CFG for diffusion models, but not that it was originally proposed specifically to strengthen text-conditioning. The later uses cited to other papers are outside this citation's scope. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Sanchez et al., 2023 source
    • cites Lifshitz et al., 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    They introduce a new environment called the Construction Lab.

    “In addition, we introduce a new environment, called the Construction Lab.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The results in this work use Playhouse, WorldLab, and ProcTHOR.

    “For the results in this work, we also use Playhouse, WorldLab, and ProcTHOR.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall, the results show that the SIMA agent is able to complete a range of tasks across many environments, but there remains substantial room for improvement.

    “Overall, the results show that the SIMA agent is able to complete a range of tasks across many environments, but there remains substantial room for improvement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Static visual input evaluations can be a useful early signal, but they do not reliably predict success on prolonged tasks.

    “While these evaluations can be a useful early signal, they do not reliably predict success on prolonged tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Despite the visual diversity of the environments, the agent is capable of performing these tasks, demonstrating basic navigation and tool use skills.

    “Despite the visual diversity of the environments, the agent is capable of performing these tasks, demonstrating basic navigation and tool use skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Construction Lab focuses on cognitive abilities like object manipulation and intuitive physical understanding.

    “Construction Lab focuses on cognitive capabilities such as object manipulation and an intuitive understanding of the physical world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Performance on Construction Lab is lower as well, highlighting the relative difficulty of this research environment and its evaluation tasks.

    “Notably, performance on Construction Lab is lower as well, highlighting the relative difficulty of this research environment and its evaluation tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The data form a rich, multi-modal dataset of embodied interaction across more than 10 simulated environments, with more planned.

    “These data constitute a rich, multi-modal dataset of embodied interaction within over 10 simulated environments, with more to come.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Even where the numerical performance of the zero-shot and environment-specialized agents is similar, they are generally good at different skills-with the environment-specialized agent performing well on game-specific interactions, but performing more weakly on common skills that are supported across many games, and that the zero-shot agent therefore can execute.

    “Note that even where the numerical performance of the zero-shot and environment-specialized agents is similar, they are generally good at different skills-with the environment-specialized agent performing well on game-specific interactions, but performing more weakly on common skills that are supported across many games, and that the zero-shot agent therefore can execute.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Even on the Goat Simulator 3 environment, where the agents have not even received visual finetuning, the zero-shot agent still performs comparably to the environment-specialized one, showing transfer is not driven by the visual components alone.

    “Importantly, even on the Goat Simulator 3 environment, where the agents have not even received visual finetuning, the zero-shot agent still performs comparably to the environmentspecialized one-thus showing transfer is not driven by the visual components alone.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Even without CFG, the agent still exhibits language-conditional behavior, outperforming the No Language ablation.

    “However, even without CFG, the agent still exhibits language-conditional behavior, outperforming the No Language ablation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In this tech report, the authors have described their goal and philosophy, and presented some preliminary results showing the agent's ability to ground language instructions in behavior across a variety of rich 3D environments.

    “In this tech report, we have described our goal and philosophy, and presented some preliminary results showing our agent's ability to ground language instructions in behavior across a variety of rich 3D environments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Even when tested in an environment on which it has not been trained to act, the agent demonstrates strong performance on general tasks, though it falls short in achieving environment-specific skills.

    “Even when tested in an environment on which it has not been trained to act the agent demonstrates strong performance on general tasks, though of course it falls short in achieving environment-specific skills.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The No CFG agent still exhibits a high degree of language conditionality, significantly outperforming the No Language baseline.

    “However, the No CFG agent still exhibits a high degree of language conditionality, significantly outperforming the No Language baseline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The human players achieved a success rate of only 60% on these tasks, demonstrating the difficulty of the tasks considered in this project and the stringency of the evaluation criteria.

    “The human players achieved a success rate of only 60% on these tasks, demonstrating the difficulty of the tasks we considered in this project and the stringency of our evaluation criteria.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SIMA substantially outperforms the no-pretraining baseline overall (permutation test p < 0.001), showing that internet-scale knowledge supports grounded learning, though the magnitude and significance of the benefit varies across environments (p-values: 0.0002, 0.14, 0.041, 0.0002, 0.244, 0.052, 0.032).

    “SIMA substantially outperforms the no-pretraining baseline overall (permutation test 𝑝 < 0.001), thus showing that internet-scale knowledge supports grounded learning-though the magnitude and significance of the benefit varies across the environments (permutation test 𝑝-values respectively 0.0002, 0.14, 0.041, 0.0002, 0.244, 0.052, 0.032).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The authors see notable performance and early signs of transfer across environments, as well as zero-shot transfer of basic skills to held-out environments.

    “We see notable performance and early signs of transfer across environments, as well as zero-shot transfer of basic skills to held-out environments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SIMA outperforms environment-specialized agents overall (67% average improvement over environment-specialized agent performance), thus demonstrating positive transfer across environments.

    “SIMA outperforms environment-specialized agents overall (67% average improvement over environmentspecialized agent performance), thus demonstrating positive transfer across environments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Despite these challenging evaluations, the SIMA agent achieved non-trivial performance (34% success), far exceeding that of the No Language baseline (11% success).

    “Despite these challenging evaluations, the SIMA agent achieved non-trivial performance (34% success), far exceeding that of the No Language baseline (11% success), for example.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    For research environments, agent evaluation uses ground-truth state.

    “For research environments we evaluate agents using the ground truth state, but commercial video games are not designed to report on the completion of arbitrary language tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Research in generic virtual environments lets agents be tested across broad, challenging situations, and lessons learned are likely more applicable to real-world robotics, without real-world risks and costs.

    “Doing research in generic virtual environments allows us to test our agents in a broad and challenging range of situations-where the lessons learned are likely to be more applicable to real-world applications with visually rich perception and control such as robotics-without the risks and costs of real-world testing: if the agent crashes a spaceship in a video game, we can just restart the game.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    They created several evaluation methods for video games, such as OCR to read on-screen task-completion text and human review of recorded agent behavior.

    “We have therefore developed a variety of methods for evaluation in video games, including using optical character recognition (OCR) to detect onscreen text describing task completion, and using human evaluation of recorded videos of agent behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Commercial video games do not report completion of arbitrary language tasks.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Agents use one interface across environments, so no custom control and observation spaces are needed for each new game.

    “These design choices make the learning problem harder, but their generality makes expanding to new environments easier: agents use the same interface across environments without requiring a custom design of control and observation spaces for each new game.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because the agent-environment interface matches human capabilities, agents could potentially do anything a human can and can learn directly by imitating human behavior.

    “Furthermore, since the agent-environment interface is human compatible, it allows agents the potential to achieve anything that a human could, and allows direct imitation learning from human behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    SIMA sidesteps the costly hardware, resource-intensive data collection, and limited diversity of real-world evaluation settings.

    “SIMA, however, avoids the additional challenges of costly hardware requirements, resource-intensive data collection, and the practical limitations on diversity of real-world evaluation settings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The design choices increase learning difficulty, but their generality simplifies expansion to new environments.

    “These design choices make the learning problem harder, but their generality makes expanding to new environments easier: agents use the same interface across environments without requiring a custom design of control and observation spaces for each new game.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    SIMA is a cutting-edge research initiative which focuses on how to develop instructable agents in simulated environments.

    “SIMA is a cutting-edge research initiative which focuses on how to develop instructable agents in simulated environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given the careful training data selection and constrained deployment environment of SIMA, the benefits can be maximized while minimising the ethical risks.

    “Ultimately, given the careful training data selection and constrained deployment environment of SIMA, we are confident we can maximize the benefits while minimising the ethical risks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Training on video game data includes risks associated with violent, explicit or otherwise harmful behaviors.

    “These include risks associated with training an agent on games that include violent, explicit or otherwise harmful behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This enables the SIMA platform to serve as a useful testbed for further development of agents that can connect language to perception and action.

    “This enables the SIMA platform to serve as a useful testbed for further development of agents that can connect language to perception and action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Such tasks enable robust testing of a range of particular skills, with a highly reliable signal of task success.

    “Such tasks enable robust testing of a range of particular skills, with a highly reliable signal of task success.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    There remains ongoing work in developing more scalable, general, and reliable evaluations, particularly as the field moves toward more complex and open-ended tasks.

    “Yet, there remains ongoing work in developing more scalable, general, and reliable evaluations, particularly as we move toward more complex and open-ended tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    SIMA was carefully assessed and reviewed to ensure that its societal benefits outweigh the risks, and that appropriate risk mitigations are incorporated.

    “SIMA was carefully assessed and reviewed to ensure that its societal benefits outweigh the risks, and that appropriate risk mitigations are incorporated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This form of automated evaluation avoids the subjectivity of human evaluations.

    “This form of automated evaluation also avoids the subjectivity of human evaluations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The task settings and evaluation are designed to be strong tests of precision; many tasks include distractor objects, for which the episode is marked as an immediate failure if the agent interacts with the distractors rather than the instruction target.

    “Moreover, we design the task settings and evaluation to be strong tests of precision; for example, many tasks include distractor objects, for which the episode is marked as an immediate failure if the agent interacts with the distractors rather than the instruction target-even if the agent might have completed the actual task later.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    They carefully engineer data collections, including preprocessing and filtering raw data, to emphasize important skills and train agents effectively.

    “We take care to engineer our data collections, including preprocessing and filtering the raw data, to highlight important skills and effectively train our agents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Breaking tasks into simpler sub-tasks enables their reuse across different settings and entirely different environments, given an appropriate sequence of instructions from the user.

    “Breaking tasks into simpler sub-tasks enables their reuse across different settings and entirely different environments, given an appropriate sequence of instructions from the user.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Multiple ratings of the same video from different judges (typically 5) are collected to ensure reliable assessments.

    “We ask them to review recorded agent videos, collecting multiple ratings of the same video from different judges (typically 5) to ensure reliable assessments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The agent is evaluated in several environments that run in real-time, asynchronously to the agent.

    “Our agent is evaluated in several environments that run in real-time, asynchronously to the agent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Other video games have significantly less on-screen text, which makes the range of behaviors that can be evaluated in these games with OCR very narrow.

    “Other video games also have significantly less on-screen text, which makes the range of behaviors that can be evaluated in these games with OCR very narrow.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Error bars denote the 95% confidence intervals across the tasks within that environment and the three training runs with different random seeds.

    “Error bars denote the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) across the tasks within that environment and the three training runs with different random seeds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    An independent Human Behavioral Research Committee for ethics and privacy reviewed and approved the full data collection protocols, including compensation rates.

    “The full details of our data collection protocols, including compensation rates, were reviewed and approved by an independent Human Behavioral Research Committee for ethics and privacy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study follows a structured approach to responsible model development, to identify, measure, and manage foreseeable ethics and safety challenges.

    “We follow a structured approach to responsible model development, to identify, measure, and manage foreseeable ethics and safety challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    These are informed by academic literature reviews, engaging with internal ethics teams, and developing comprehensive ethical assessments that document key risks with mitigation strategies.

    “These are informed by academic literature reviews, engaging with internal ethics teams, and developing comprehensive ethical assessments that document key risks with mitigation strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Task settings need to afford a diversity of actions, ideally testing multiple instructions from a single initial state, to properly evaluate whether the agent's actions are driven by language.

    “Thus, task settings need to afford a diversity of actions, ideally testing multiple instructions from a single initial state, to properly evaluate whether the agent's actions are driven by language.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Ensuring that evaluations truly assess language conditionality, rather than environmental affordances, requires care.

    “Moreover, ensuring that our evaluations truly assess language conditionality, rather than environmental affordances, requires care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Categories came from a data-driven hierarchical clustering analysis of human-written instructions in a fixed pretrained word embedding space.

    “Categories were derived from a data-driven hierarchical clustering analysis of the human-generated text instructions within a fixed, pretrained word embedding space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There are implications on representational harms, as the agent may learn from stereotyped depictions or actions in game settings.

    “We have also reflected on the implications on representational harms, as the agent may learn from stereotyped depictions or actions in game settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Developing informative evaluation tasks is in itself an ongoing effort, and the quantitative results reflect only the range of particular behaviors that are evaluated at this point in time.

    “We note that developing informative evaluation tasks is in itself an ongoing effort, and the quantitative results in this work reflect only the range of particular behaviors that are evaluated at this point in time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Human evaluation is the most general evaluation method, but it is also the slowest and most expensive.

    “While this is our most general evaluation method, it is also the slowest and most expensive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Video game evaluations cannot rely on access to privileged information about the state of an environment.

    “Video game evaluations cannot rely on access to privileged information about the state of an environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Latencies are additionally minimized with appropriate scheduling of action computation on TPU accelerators, on-device caching of neural-network state across timesteps, and careful choices of batch size and other implementation details.

    “We additionally minimize latencies with appropriate scheduling of action computation on TPU accelerators, on-device caching of neural-network state across timesteps, and by careful choices of batch size and other implementation details.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    All data collections involved participants under contract with Google.

    “All our data collections were performed with participants contracting with Google.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    It is difficult to reinstate agents in precisely the same state in environments that are not designed as reproducible benchmarks, and loading each task in commercial video games is considerably slower and more costly than those in research environments.

    “Additionally, it is difficult to reinstate agents in precisely the same state in environments that are not designed as reproducible benchmarks, and loading each task in commercial video games is considerably slower and more costly than those in research environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The skill clusters are derived from the evaluation tasks rather than the training data, and are similar to, yet distinct from, those in Figure 3.

    “As these skill clusters are derived from our evaluation tasks rather than the training data, they are similar to, yet distinct from, those in Figure 3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Unlike LLMs, SIMA is able to both understand natural language instructions and dynamic, interactive 3D environments.

    “This research presents interesting opportunities for the future of humans and AI collaborating together; unlike LLMs, SIMA is able to both understand natural language instructions and dynamic, interactive 3D environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Continuous evaluations of SIMA's safety performance are conducted.

    “Continuous evaluations of SIMA's safety performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Human judges are game experts who have played the specific games for at least 16 hours, often over several weeks.

    “We use human judges who are game experts, i.e., they have played these specific games for at least 16 hours, and often over the course of several weeks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Before training, they run offline preprocessing steps such as resizing inputs, filtering low-quality data with heuristics, and reweighting data across environments and collections to prioritize effective learning.

    “Before training, we perform a variety of offline preprocessing steps, including resizing data for agent input, filtering out low-quality data using a variety of heuristics, and remixing and weighting data across environments and collections to prioritize the most effective learning experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    All participants gave informed consent before tasks and were paid for their time.

    “All participants provided informed consent prior to completing tasks and were reimbursed for their time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Averages are calculated across multiple episodes per task, multiple tasks per environment, and across three training runs with different random seeds.

    “Averages are calculated across multiple episodes per task (in research environments, one episode per task in video games), multiple tasks per environment, and across three training runs with different random seeds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Judges are instructed to mark an episode as a failure in cases where the agent performs irrelevant actions first, even if the agent successfully completes the instructed task afterward.

    “We also encourage strict evaluations: we instruct judges to mark an episode as a failure in cases where the agent performs irrelevant actions first, even if the agent successfully completes the instructed task afterward.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    These findings suggest that learning both language and its grounding will improve grounded actions and also a system's knowledge of language.

    “These findings motivate the possibility that learning both language and its grounding will not only improve grounded actions, but improve a system's knowledge of language itself.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The research projects uphold Google's AI Principles.

    “We ensure that our research projects uphold Google's AI Principles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While research environments may provide automated methods for assessing whether language-following tasks have been successfully completed, such success criteria may not be generally available.

    “While research environments may provide automated methods for assessing whether language-following tasks have been successfully completed, such success criteria may not be generally available.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study accounts for latency during behavioral cloning by predicting actions that are offset in time relative to the visual input, and mirrors this offset during evaluation by buffering observations and actions during neural-network inference.

    “We account for this latency during behavioral cloning by predicting actions that are offset in time relative to the visual input to the agent, and mirror this offset during evaluation by appropriate buffering of observations and actions during neural-network inference.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The evaluations include assessments where the agent is instructed to complete one goal, then interrupted with another goal to evaluate whether it switches appropriately, ensuring responsiveness to changes in commands.

    “We also include other types of assessments, such as instructing the agent to complete one goal, and then interrupting with another goal to evaluate whether it switches appropriately-this ensures that agents are sufficiently responsive to changes in commands.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There are downstream risks associated with the future hypothetical deployments of SIMA, through either intentional misuse or benign action.

    “Besides these risks, there are also down stream risks associated with the future hypothetical deployments of SIMA, through either intentional misuse or benign action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    SIMA's deployments and agreements are transparent, and for now remain in a controlled, closed environment.

    “Ensuring SIMA's deployments and agreements are transparent, and for now remain in a controlled, closed environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Grounding the evaluation framework in the distribution of natural language allows testing agents in both common and adversarial scenarios, and thereby measuring progress towards the long-term goal of developing an instructable agent that can accomplish anything a human can do in any simulated 3D environment.

    “Grounding our evaluation framework in the distribution of natural language allows us to test our agents in both common and adversarial scenarios, and thereby to measure our progress towards our long-term goal of developing an instructable agent that can accomplish anything a human can do in any simulated 3D environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Comparing to the no-pretraining agent tests the benefits of pretrained models for agent performance.

    “Comparing to this agent tests the benefits of pretrained models for agent performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    An environment-specialized expert agent is trained on each environment, trained only on data corresponding to that environment, but still includes the more broadly pretrained encoders.

    “Environment-specialized: We additionally train an expert agent on each environment, which is trained only on data corresponding to that environment, but still includes the more broadly pretrained encoders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    100% success may not necessarily be achievable, due to disagreement between human judges on more ambiguous tasks.

    “We note that 100% success may not necessarily be achievable, due to disagreement between human judges on more ambiguous tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    This evaluation was performed only on a subset of research environments: Construction Lab, Playhouse, and WorldLab.

    “Note that this evaluation was performed only on a subset of our research environments: Construction Lab, Playhouse, and WorldLab.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    For Goat Simulator 3, because relatively little data was available, the environment-specialized baseline was chosen by evaluating every 200,000 training steps and selecting the best-performing checkpoint at 400,000 steps to avoid overfitting.

    “With one exception: as we had a relatively small quantity of data for Goat Simulator 3, we attempted to prevent the environment-specialized baseline from overfitting by evaluating it every 200,000 training steps, then selecting the best performing number of steps, which was 400,000 steps, as our environment-specialized baseline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These results show the benefit of CFG, highlighting the impact that inference-time interventions can have on agent controllability.

    “These results show the benefit of CFG, highlighting the impact that inference-time interventions can have on agent controllability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Due to the number of comparison agents, only a single seed was run for each, rather than the three seeds used for the main SIMA agent.

    “Note that due to the number of comparison agents, we only ran a single seed for each, rather than the three seeds used for the main SIMA agent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    These zero-shot agents assess the transfer ability of the agent in a controlled setting.

    “These agents assess the transfer ability of our agent in a controlled setting.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Because of limited collected data and/or evaluations, the agent evaluation results are reported on only 7 of the environments.

    “Due to a limited amount of collected data and/or evaluations, we present agent evaluation results (Section 4) on a subset of 7 of these environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Environment-specialized agent performance may be slightly weaker on WorldLab because there is a non-trivial distribution shift from training to test, because some data comes from earlier versions of the environment with differences in dynamics and task distributions.

    “Furthermore, environment-specialized agent performance may be slightly weaker on this environment because there is a non-trivial distribution shift from training to test.This is because some of our data comes from earlier versions of the environment with differences in dynamics, and task distributions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The humans who performed the tasks were players who participated in the data collection and had experience with the game.

    “The humans who performed the tasks were players who participated in our data collection and had experience with the game.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Comparing to the no-language agent shows the degree to which the agent's performance can be explained by simple language-agnostic behavioral priors.

    “Comparing to this agent shows the degree to which our agent's performance can be explained by simple language-agnostic behavioral priors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The no-language ablation lacks language inputs during training as well as evaluation.

    “No language ablation: An agent that lacks language inputs, during training as well as evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some of the evaluated tasks are challenging for humans, so human-level performance on them would not reach 100%.

    “(Note that humans would also find some of these tasks challenging, and thus human-level performance would not be 100%, see Section 4.3.)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This demonstrates not only that the agent is in fact using language, but also that the evaluation tasks are effectively designed to test this capability, rather than being solvable by simply executing plausible behaviors.

    “Importantly, this demonstrates not only that our agent is in fact using language, but also that our evaluation tasks are effectively designed to test this capability, rather than being solvable by simply executing plausible behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Still, many skills and tasks remain out of reach.

    “Still, many skills and tasks remain out of reach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The main SIMA agent is trained across all environments except for Hydroneer and Wobbly Life, which are used for qualitative zero-shot evaluation.

    “SIMA: Our main SIMA agent, which is trained across all environments except for Hydroneer and Wobbly Life, which we use for qualitative zero-shot evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each agent is evaluated after 1.2 million training steps.

    “Each agent is evaluated after 1.2 million training steps.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    This highlights the difficulty of the tasks considered in this project.

    “This highlights the difficulty of the tasks considered in this project.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The bars in Figure 8 and Figure 9 represent average performance (normalized relative to the environment-specialist); the errorbars are parametric 95%-CIs across tasks and seeds (where multiple seeds are available).

    “The bars in Figure 8 and Figure 9 represent average performance (normalized relative to the environment-specialist); the errorbars are parametric 95%-CIs across tasks and seeds (where multiple seeds are available).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    WorldLab uses the same underlying engine and shares some implementation details with the other internal research environments, which may support behavioral transfer despite their varied visual styles, asset libraries, physical mechanics, and environment affordances.

    “Second, this environment uses the same underlying engine and shares some implementation details with the other internal research environments, which may support behavioral transfer despite their varied visual styles, asset libraries, physical mechanics, and environment affordances.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Agents trained across multiple environments may be more robust to distribution shift.

    “Agents trained across multiple environments may be more robust to this distribution shift.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Zero-shot agents are separate SIMA agents trained like the main agent, but only on N-1 of the environments, and evaluated zero-shot on the held-out environment without any BC training on it.

    “Zero-shot: Separate SIMA agents trained like the main agent, but only on 𝑁 -1 of our environments, and evaluated zero-shot on the held-out environment-that is, without any BC training on it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Human performance was evaluated using the same judges and evaluation setup that was used for the agents; the judges were not told that they were evaluating human performance rather than agents.

    “We evaluated human performance using the same judges and evaluation setup that was used for our agents; the judges were not told that they were evaluating human performance rather than agents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    This underscores the utility of the entire SIMA setup for providing a challenging, yet informative, metric for assessing grounded language interactions in embodied agents.

    “This underscores the utility of the entire SIMA setup for providing a challenging, yet informative, metric for assessing grounded language interactions in embodied agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
104 of 104
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Commercial video games do not report completion of arbitrary language tasks.

    “For research environments we evaluate agents using the ground truth state, but commercial video games are not designed to report on the completion of arbitrary language tasks.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Commercial video games provide richer interactions and higher visual fidelity, while research environments are useful testbeds for probing agent capabilities.

    “Commercial video games offer a higher degree of rich interactions and visual fidelity, while research environments serve as a useful testbed for probing agent capabilities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI research environments are usually more controllable, allow particular skills to be instilled and assessed, and permit faster and more reliable task-completion evaluations.

    “In contrast to commercial video games, AI research environments are typically more controllable, offering the ability to instill and carefully assess particular skills, and more rapid and reliable evaluations of task completion.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several research environments tend to include more real-world analogous physical interactions, though still simplified.

    “Unlike many of the games in our portfolio, several of these research environments also tend to feature more real-world analogous-if still simplified-physical interactions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Collecting data at scale is not enough to train successful agents.

    “Yet, collecting data at scale is not sufficient for training successful agents.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Basic elements of embodied 3D interaction, like navigation, are common to all these environments.

    “Yet, because these are all 3D environments, basic aspects of 3D embodied interaction, such as navigation, are shared.”
6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [48]48. Matthew Johnson, Katja Hofmann, Tim Hutton, and David Bignell. The Malmo Platform for Artificial Intelligence Experimentation. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016.
  2. [59]59. Hans Moravec. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Harvard University Press, 1988.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SIMA Team, Raad, M. A., Ahuja, A., Barros, C., Besse, F., Bolt, A., Bolton, A., Brownfield, B., Buttimore, G., Cant, M., Chakera, S., Chan, S. C. Y., Clune, J., Collister, A., Copeman, V., Cullum, A., Dasgupta, I., de Cesare, D., Di Trapani, J., Donchev, Y., Dunleavy, E., Engelcke, M., Faulkner, R., Garcia, F., Gbadamosi, C., Gong, Z., Gonzales, L., Gupta, K., Gregor, K., Hallingstad, A. O., Harley, T., Haves, S., Hill, F., Hirst, E., Hudson, D. A., Hudson, J., Hughes-Fitt, S., Rezende, D. J., Jasarevic, M., Kampis, L., Ke, R., Keck, T., Kim, J., Knagg, O., Kopparapu, K., Lawton, R., Lampinen, A., Legg, S., Lerchner, A., Limont, M., Liu, Y., Loks-Thompson, M., Marino, J., Cussons, K. M., Matthey, L., Mcloughlin, S., Mendolicchio, P., Merzic, H., Mitenkova, A., Moufarek, A., Oliveira, V., Oliveira, Y., Openshaw, H., Pan, R., Pappu, A., Platonov, A., Purkiss, O., Reichert, D., Reid, J., Richemond, P. H., Roberts, T., Ruscoe, G., Elias, J. S., Sandars, T., Sawyer, D. P., Scholtes, T., Simmons, G., Slater, D., Soyer, H., Strathmann, H., Stys, P., Tam, A. C., Teplyashin, D., Terzi, T., Vercelli, D., Vujatovic, B., Wainwright, M., Wang, J. X., Wang, Z., Wierstra, D., Williams, D., Wong, N., York, S., & Young, N.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394946817
Cited by
9
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
embodied AI, language grounding, instruction following, virtual worlds, video games, artificial general intelligence, SIMA, image observation, cross-environment generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review