CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 40Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDigital Media Forensic Detection

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

VideoCrafter1: Open Diffusion Models for High-Quality Video Generation

Open access
Chen, Haoxin, Xia, Menghan, He, Yingqing, Zhang, Yong, Cun, Xiaodong, Yang, Shaoshu, Xing, Jinbo, Liu, Yaofang, Chen, Qifeng, Wang, Xintao, Weng, Chao, Shan, Ying·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2310.19512arXiv 2310.19512
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Video generation has increasingly gained interest in both academia and industry. Although commercial tools can generate plausible videos, there is a limited number of open-source models available for researchers and engineers. In this work, we introduce two diffusion models for high-quality video generation, namely text-to-video (T2V) and image-to-video (I2V) models. T2V models synthesize a video based on a given text input, while I2V models incorporate an additional image input. Our proposed T2V model can generate realistic and cinematic-quality videos with a resolution of $1024 \times 576$, outperforming other open-source T2V models in terms of quality. The I2V model is designed to produce videos that strictly adhere to the content of the provided reference image, preserving its content, structure, and style. This model is the first open-source I2V foundation model capable of transforming a given image into a video clip while maintaining content preservation constraints. We believe that these open-source video generation models will contribute significantly to the technological advancements within the community.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2310.19512

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing video foundation models such as SoRA, Pika, Luma, Hailuo, and Kling primarily generate characters with limited speech capabilities, simplified mouth movements, and emotional expressions detached from meaningful dialogue, lacking control over spoken content.

    “Despite significant advancements in visually compelling content and dynamic environments, models such as SoRA, Pika, Luma, Hailuo, and Kling [2, 3, 5-7, 19, 27, 42] primarily generate characters with limited speech capabilities. Typically, these models exhibit simplified mouth movements and emotional expressions detached from meaningful dialogue, lacking control over actual spoken content.”

    From MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Chen, H., Xia, M., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Cun, X., Yang, S., Xing, J., Liu, Y., Chen, Q., Wang, X., Weng, C., & Shan, Y.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2310.19512
arXiv
2310.19512
OpenAlex
W4388093548
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
video generation, diffusion models, text-to-video generation, image-to-video synthesis, open-source models, content preservation, video foundation models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review