From LLM to Conversational Agent: A Memory Enhanced Architecture with Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
This paper introduces RAISE (Reasoning and Acting through Scratchpad and Examples), an advanced architecture enhancing the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 into conversational agents. RAISE, an enhancement of the ReAct framework, incorporates a dual-component memory system, mirroring human short-term and long-term memory, to maintain context and continuity in conversations. It entails a comprehensive agent construction scenario, including phases like Conversation Selection, Scene Extraction, CoT Completion, and Scene Augmentation, leading to the LLMs Training phase. This approach appears to enhance agent controllability and adaptability in complex, multi-turn dialogues. Our preliminary evaluations in a real estate sales context suggest that RAISE has some advantages over traditional agents, indicating its potential for broader applications. This work contributes to the AI field by providing a robust framework for developing more context-aware and versatile conversational agents.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Systems like AllenAI's OLMo Instruct, BloomZ and LLM360's AmberChat are approaching full openness status and top the openness leaderboard.
“One is the broad open source approach seen in systems like AllenAI's OLMo Instruct [20], BloomZ [61] and LLM360's AmberChat [33], which are approaching full openness status and top the openness leaderboard.”
From Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation [33] is attached to LLM360's AmberChat, but our copy does not identify AmberChat or assess its openness. The LLMs and §2.2 LLMs passages discuss other models, and searches for OLMo Instruct, BloomZ, AmberChat, and an openness leaderboard found no relevant passage (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Xabier E Barandiaran, Eze- quiel Di Paolo, and Marieke Rohde. 2009. Defin- ing agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behav- ior, 17(5):367-386.
- Chen et al.2023b] Zehui Chen, Weihua Du, Wenwei Zhang, Kuikun Liu, Jiangning Liu, Miao Zheng, Jingming Zhuo, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen, and Feng Zhao. 2023b. T-eval: Evaluating the tool utilization capability step by step. [Chen et al.2023c] Zhipeng Chen, Kun Zhou, Beichen Zhang, Zheng Gong, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023c. Chatcot: Tool-augmented chain-of- thought reasoning on\\chat-based large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14323. · arXiv
- Nicholas Crispino, Kyle Mont- gomery, Fankun Zeng, Dawn Song, and Chen- guang Wang. 2023. Agent instructs large language models to be general zero-shot reasoners. ArXiv, abs/2310.03710. · arXiv
- Li et al.2023b] Minghao Li, Feifan Song, Bowen Yu, Haiyang Yu, Zhoujun Li, Fei Huang, and Yong- bin Li. 2023b. Apibank: A benchmark for tool- augmented llms. arXiv preprint.
- Nakano et al.2022] Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, Xu Jiang, Karl Cobbe, Tyna Eloundou, Gretchen Krueger, Kevin Button, Matthew Knight, Benjamin Chess, and John Schul- man. 2022. Webgpt: Browser-assisted question- answering with human feedback. arXiv preprint.
- Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Kata- rina Slama, Alex Ray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe. 2022. Training lan- guage models to follow instructions with human feedback. [Pan et al.2023] Haojie Pan, Zepeng Zhai, Hao Yuan, Yaojia Lv, Ruiji Fu, Ming Liu, Zhongyuan Wang, and Bing Qin. 2023. Kwaiagents: Generalized information-seeking agent system with large lan- guage models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04889. · arXiv
- Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. 2023. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. arXiv preprint.
- Wang et al.2023b] Lei Wang, Chengbang Ma, Xueyang Feng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao ran Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhi-Yang Chen, Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, Wayne Xin Zhao, Zhewei Wei, and Ji rong Wen. 2023b. A survey on large lan- guage model based autonomous agents. ArXiv, abs/2308.11432. · arXiv
- Wang et al.2023c] Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V Le, Ed H. Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, and Denny Zhou. 2023c. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reason- ing in language models. In Proceedings of ICLR.
- Wei et al.2022a] J. Wei, Y. Tay, R. Bommasani, et al. 2022a. Emergent abilities of large language models. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res.
- Wei et al.2022b] Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schu- urmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022b. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In Proceedings of NeurIPS.
- Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. 2023. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. arXiv preprint.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act
Liesenfeld, A., & Dingemanse, M. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659005 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey
Masterman, T., Besen, S., Sawtell, M., & Chao, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.11584 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Figure 3: A diagram showing the RAISE method [16] specific and relevant feedback to the agent.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPotential application of artificial intelligence in cancer therapy
Riaz, I. B., Khan, M. A., & Haddad, T. C. (2024) · Current Opinion in Oncology · doi:10.1097/cco.0000000000001068 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
A vision of human–AI collaboration for enhanced biological collection curation and research
Stenhouse, A., Fisher, N., Lepschi, B. J., Schmidt‐Lebuhn, A. N., Rodríguez, J., Turco, F., Reeson, A. F., Paris, C. L., & Thrall, P. H. (2025) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaf021 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Visual Environment-Interactive Planning for Embodied Complex-Question Answering
Lan, N., Ou, B., Xie, X., & Shi, G. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2025.3538860 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
An LLM Framework for Inferring Household Energy Consumption Through Behaviour Simulation
Chetty, S., Vu, H. L., Wang, H., & Smyth, R. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation (BuildSys) · doi:10.1145/3736425.3770093 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Lawson, J. R., Trujillo-Falcón, J. E., Schultz, D. M., Flora, M. L., Goebbert, K. H., Lyman, S. N., Potvin, C. K., & Stepanek, A. J. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems · doi:10.1175/aies-d-24-0029.1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Seeing, Listening, Remembering, and Reasoning: A Multimodal Agent with Long-Term Memory
Long, L., He, Y., Ye, W., Pan, Y., Lin, Y., Li, H., Zhao, J., & Li, W. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.09736 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“A common approach is to append entire agent trajectories, such as dialogues [27, 31, 44, 59] or execution trajectories [14, 27, 29, 35, 36, 46], directly to memory.”
A State-Aware Dual-Tool Architecture for Improved Tool Use in Multi-Turn LLM Dialogue
Pałgan, B., Wawryszczuk, M., Chwał, J., Tkacz, E., & Dzik, R. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16094329 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Simulating phenomenal consciousness using generative agents based on large language models
Zhang, H., Yin, J., Wang, H., & Xiang, Z. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113922 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, N., Chen, L., Tian, X., Zou, W., Chen, K., & Cui, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2401.02777
- OpenAlex
- W4390721568
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Keywords
- large language models, chatbots, ReAct framework, short-term and long-term memory, fine-tuning, multi-turn dialogue, real estate sales, context-aware agents, RAISE
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
