The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
This survey paper examines the recent advancements in AI agent implementations, with a focus on their ability to achieve complex goals that require enhanced reasoning, planning, and tool execution capabilities. The primary objectives of this work are to a) communicate the current capabilities and limitations of existing AI agent implementations, b) share insights gained from our observations of these systems in action, and c) suggest important considerations for future developments in AI agent design. We achieve this by providing overviews of single-agent and multi-agent architectures, identifying key patterns and divergences in design choices, and evaluating their overall impact on accomplishing a provided goal. Our contribution outlines key themes when selecting an agentic architecture, the impact of leadership on agent systems, agent communication styles, and key phases for planning, execution, and reflection that enable robust AI agent systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multi-Agent Systems are designed to overcome limitations of single-agent systems in context capacity, insufficient exploration, and inefficient serial execution through specialized collaboration.
“Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are designed to overcome the limitations of single-agent systems in context capacity (Yu et al., 2026), insufficient exploration (Gurjar et al., 2026), and inefficient serial execution (Masterman et al., 2024), through specialized collaboration (Guo et al., 2024).”
From MS-Eval: Benchmarking Sub-Agent Delegation and Orchestration in MCP-Intensive Working Scenarios (2026) · cites this paper as Masterman et al., 2024
LLMs are often used to help an agent plan its actions despite evidence they may not be capable of reliably planning.
“In these works, LLMs are often used to help an agent plan its actions [4], [13], [14], despite evidence that they may not be capable of reliably planning [15].”
From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
There is growing interest in developing AI agents that take actions affecting the world.
“There is simultaneously a growing interest in developing AI agents , models that are trained and equipped to take actions that affect the world [4], [5].”
From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Solutions that use multiple agent personas to solve problems also show significant improvements compared to Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting where the model is asked to break down its plans step by step [28, 29].”
BackgroundMethodChain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263 · see citing works
Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models
Yao, S., Yu, D., Zhao, J., Shafran, I., Griffiths, T. L., Cao, Y., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10601 · Cited by 1,158 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, Plan Like a Graph (PLaG) is an approach that represents plans as directed graphs, with multiple steps being executed in parallel [15, 33].”
BackgroundReflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning
Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Berman, E., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, K., & Yao, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.11366 · Cited by 1,087 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Reflexion is a single-agent pattern that uses self-reflection through linguistic feedback [23].”
BackgroundMethodThe Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this paper, we follow the definition of agent that consists of “brain, perception, and action” [31].”
MethodInfluentialBias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., & Ahmed, N. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00524 · Cited by 665 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Language Models have been known to exhibit bias both in terms of evaluation as well as in social or fairness terms [5].”
BackgroundReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608 · cited 6× · see citing works
“We find that successful goal execution by agents is contingent upon proper planning and self-correction [32, 16, 23, 1].”
InfluentialTraining Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
Cobbe, K., Kosaraju, V., Bavarian, M., Chen, M., Jun, H., Kaiser, L., Plappert, M., Tworek, J., Hilton, J., Nakano, R., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.14168 · Cited by 575 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many language model benchmarks are designed to be solved in a single iteration, with no tool calls, such as MMLU or GSM8K [3, 10].”
BackgroundA Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent CollaborationPreprint
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, P., Liu, Y., & Yang, D.-Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.02170 · Cited by 385 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Many multi-agent architectures work in stages where teams of agents are created and reorganized dynamically for each planning, execution, and evaluation phase [2, 9, 18].”
BackgroundMeasuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding
Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Basart, S., Zou, A., Mazeika, M., Song, D., & Steinhardt, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.03300 · Cited by 291 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many language model benchmarks are designed to be solved in a single iteration, with no tool calls, such as MMLU or GSM8K [3, 10].”
BackgroundAI deception: A survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions
Park, P. S., Goldstein, S., O’Gara, A., Chen, M., & Hendrycks, D. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.100988 · Cited by 243 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Language models also exhibit sycophantic behavior, where they “tend to mirror the user’s stance, even if it means forgoing the presentation of an impartial or balanced viewpoint” [20].”
BackgroundRethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key?Preprint
Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Su, Y., Tong, H.-H., & Song, Y.-Q. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.18272 · Cited by 243 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Crucially, Wang et. al finds that multi-agent patterns perform better than single agents in scenarios when no examples are provided [26].”
BackgroundAI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutions
Park, P. S., Goldstein, S., O'Gara, A., Chen, M., & Hendrycks, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.14752 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
<i>Did Aristotle Use a Laptop?</i> A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies
Geva, M., Khashabi, D., Segal, E., Khot, T., Roth, D., & Berant, J. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00370 · Cited by 242 · cited 1× · see citing works
“StrategyQA improves upon this by assessing models’ reasoning abilities over multiple steps, but the answers are limited to Yes/No responses [7].”
BackgroundMetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework
Hong, S., Zhuge, M., Chen, J., Zheng, X., Cheng, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Yau, S. K. S., Lin, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.00352 · Cited by 214 · cited 1× · see citing works
“MetaGPT addresses the issue of unproductive chatter amongst agents by requiring agents to generate structured outputs like documents and diagrams instead of sharing unstructured chat messages [11].”
BackgroundPersonality Traits in Large Language Models
Serapio-García, G., Safdari, M., Crepy, C., Sun, L., Fitz, S., Romero, P., Abdulhai, M., Faust, A., & Matarić, M. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 137 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Researchers have found that “shaped personality verifiably influences Large Language Model (LLM) behavior in common downstream (i.e. subsequent) tasks, such as writing social media posts” [21].”
BackgroundDyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks
Zhu, K., Chen, J., Wang, J.-D., Gong, N., Yang, D., & Xie, X. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.17167 · Cited by 127 · cited 2×
“Emerging research indicates that there is significant data contamination in the model’s training data, supported by the observation that a model’s performance significantly worsens when benchmark questions are modified [8, 38, 37].”
BackgroundBenchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM EvaluationPreprint
Wang, S., Long, Z.-H., Fan, Z., Wei, Z.-Y., & Huang, X.-J. (2024) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.11443 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Researchers have also explored the idea of generating an entirely synthetic benchmark based on a user’s specific environment or use case [14, 27].”
BackgroundAgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents
Liu, X., Yu, H., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Lei, X., Lai, H., Gu, Y., Ding, H., Men, K., Yang, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.03688 · Cited by 79 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Benchmarks like AgentBench and SmartPlay introduce objective evaluation metrics designed to evaluate the implementation’s success rate, output similarity to human responses, and overall efficiency [17, 30].”
BackgroundHow Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowball
Zhang, M., Press, O., Merrill, W., Liu, A., & Smith, N. A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13534 · Cited by 77 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is partially because language models tend to commit to an answer earlier in their response, which can cause a ‘snowball effect’ of increasing diversion from their goal state [34] .”
BackgroundWang, Z., Mao, S., Wu, W., Ge, T., Wei, F., & Ji, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.15 · Cited by 74 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Solutions that use multiple agent personas to solve problems also show significant improvements compared to Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting where the model is asked to break down its plans step by step [28, 29].”
BackgroundLearning to Use Tools via Cooperative and Interactive AgentsPreprint
Shi, Z., Gao, S., Chen, X., Feng, Y., Yan, L., Shi, H.-B., Yin, D.-W., Ren, P., Verberne, S., & Ren, Z.-C. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.03031 · Cited by 74 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Other works focused on advancing agent patterns highlight that while breaking a larger problem into smaller subproblems can be effective at solving complex tasks, single agent patterns often struggle to complete the long sequence required [22, 6].”
BackgroundSWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Jimenez, C. E., Yang, J., Wettig, A., Yao, S., Pei, K., Press, O., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06770 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, SWE-bench is a benchmark that uses a set of real-world issues raised on GitHub for software engineering tasks in Python [13].”
MethodDyVal 2: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models by Meta Probing Agents
Zhu, K., Wang, J.-D., Zhao, Q.-L., Xu, R., & Xie, X. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14865 · Cited by 70 · cited 3×
“Emerging research indicates that there is significant data contamination in the model’s training data, supported by the observation that a model’s performance significantly worsens when benchmark questions are modified [8, 38, 37].”
BackgroundDid Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning StrategiesPreprint
Geva, M., Khashabi, D., Segal, E., Khot, T., Roth, D., & Berant, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.02235 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Large Language Model-based Human-Agent Collaboration for Complex Task Solving
Feng, X.-Y., Chen, Z.-Y., Qin, Y., Lin, Y., Chen, X., Liu, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.12914 · Cited by 69 · cited 1×
“As of today, including human validation and feedback in the agent architecture yields more reliable and trustworthy results [4, 9].”
BackgroundBias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A SurveyPreprint
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.00770 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Graph-enhanced Large Language Models in Asynchronous Plan ReasoningPreprint
Lin, F., Malfa, E. L., Hofmann, V., Yang, E. M., Cohn, A. G., & Pierrehumbert, J. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.02805 · Cited by 49 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, Plan Like a Graph (PLaG) is an approach that represents plans as directed graphs, with multiple steps being executed in parallel [15, 33].”
BackgroundUnderstanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey
Huang, X., Liu, W., Chen, X., Wang, X., Wang, H., Lian, D., Wang, Y., Tang, R., & Chen, E. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.02716 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Planning, which requires strong reasoning abilities, commonly falls into one of five major approaches: task decomposition, multi-plan selection, external module-aided planning, reflection and refinement and memory-augmented planning [12].”
BackgroundSystematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates
Taubenfeld, A., Dover, Y., Reichart, R., & Goldstein, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.16 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other research has found “a tendency for LLM agents to conform to the model’s inherent social biases despite being directed to debate from certain political perspectives” [24].”
BackgroundEmbodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teams
Guo, X., Huang, K., Liu, J., Fan, W., Vélez, N., Wu, Q., Wang, H., Griffiths, T. L., & Wang, M. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2025.3637527 · Cited by 44 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Beyond team structure, the paper emphasizes the importance of employing a “criticize-reflect” step for generating plans, evaluating performance, providing feedback, and re-organizing the team [9].”
BackgroundInfluentialAgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors
Chen, W., Su, Y., Zuo, J., Yang, C., Yuan, C., Chan, C.-M., Yu, H., Lu, Y., Hung, Y.-H., Qian, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.10848 · Cited by 39 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Horizontal architectures are generally used for tasks where collaboration, feedback and group discussion are key to the overall success of the task [2].”
InfluentialAutoGPT+P: Affordance-based Task Planning using Large Language Models
Birr, T., Pohl, C., Younes, A., & Asfour, T. (2024) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.112 · Cited by 33 · cited 4× · see citing works
“AUTOGPT + P. AutoGPT + P (Planning) is a method that addresses reasoning limitations for agents that command robots in natural language [1].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTime Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language Models
Golchin, S., & Surdeanu, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08493 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Emerging research indicates that there is significant data contamination in the model’s training data, supported by the observation that a model’s performance significantly worsens when benchmark questions are modified [8, 38, 37].”
BackgroundS3Eval: A Synthetic, Scalable, Systematic Evaluation Suite for Large Language ModelPreprint
Lei, F., Liu, Q., Huang, Y., He, S.-Z., Zhao, J., & Liu, K. (2023) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.15147 · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Researchers have also explored the idea of generating an entirely synthetic benchmark based on a user’s specific environment or use case [14, 27].”
BackgroundLanguage Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models
Zhou, A., Yan, K., Shlapentokh-Rothman, M., Wang, H., & Wang, Y.-X. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.04406 · Cited by 18 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Language Agent Tree Search (LATS) is a single-agent method that synergizes planning, acting, and reasoning by using trees [36].”
BackgroundMethodWang, Z., Mao, S., Wu, W., Ge, T., Wei, F., & Ji, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.05300 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Evil Geniuses: Delving into the Safety of LLM-based Agents
Tian, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, J., Dong, Y., & Su, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.11855 · Cited by 10 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, agents have specifically been shown to be “less robust, prone to more harmful behaviors, and capable of generating stealthier content than LLMs, highlighting significant safety challenges” [25].”
BackgroundLiu, N., Chen, L., Tian, X., Zou, W., Chen, K., & Cui, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.02777 · Cited by 7 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Figure 3: A diagram showing the RAISE method [16] specific and relevant feedback to the agent.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSmartPlay: A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent Agents
Wu, Y., Tang, X., Mitchell, T. M., & Li, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.01557 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Benchmarks like AgentBench and SmartPlay introduce objective evaluation metrics designed to evaluate the implementation’s success rate, output similarity to human responses, and overall efficiency [17, 30].”
BackgroundEfficient Tool Use with Chain-of-Abstraction ReasoningPreprint
Gao, S., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Yu, P., Tan, X. E., Pasunuru, R., Golovneva, O., Sinha, K., Çelikyılmaz, A., Bosselut, A., & Wang, T. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.17464 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other works focused on advancing agent patterns highlight that while breaking a larger problem into smaller subproblems can be effective at solving complex tasks, single agent patterns often struggle to complete the long sequence required [22, 6].”
BackgroundEmbodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized TeamsPreprint
Guo, X., Huang, K., Liu, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.12482 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates
Taubenfeld, A., Dover, Y., Reichart, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.04049
AutoGPT+P: Affordance-based Task Planning with Large Language Models
Birr, T., Pohl, C., Younes, A., & Asfour, T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.10778
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wenting Zhao et al. "(InThe)WildChat: 570K ChatGPT Interaction Logs In The Wild". In: The Twelfth In- ternational Conference on Learning Representations. 2024. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id= Bl8u7ZRlbM.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of architectures, applications, and future directions
Ali, M. A., Dornaika, F., & Charafeddine, J. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11422-4 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
“This dual-axis taxonomy provides the unified lens necessary to rigorously analyze the field’s theoretical underpinnings, architectural innovations, and practical deployments.”
AI agents under threat: A survey of key security challenges and future pathways
Deng, Z., Guo, Y., Han, C., Ma, W., Xiong, J., Wen, S., & Xiang, Y. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3716628 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
“The literature [105] summarized the current AI agent architecture.”
AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?Preprint
Zhang, G., Wang, J., Chen, J., Zhou, W., Wang, K., & Yan, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.03312 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…faculties, encompassing perception (Driess et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024; Zheng et al., 2023; Wei et al., 2024), planning (Zhu et al., 2024; Erdogan et al., 2025; Huang et al., 2024), reasoning (Putta et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024), and action (Li et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024).”
AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoMLPreprint
Trirat, P., Jeong, W., & Hwang, S. J. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.02958 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“An example of prompt parsing process of an instruction-response pair { ( I i , R i ) } .”
G-Memory: Tracing Hierarchical Memory for Multi-Agent Systems
Zhang, G.-M., Fu, M., Wan, G.-C., Yu, M., Wang, K., & Yan, S.-C. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.07398 · Cited by 124
“…of artificial intelligence, LLM-driven agents have exhibited unprecedented prowess in perception [2, 3, 4, 5], planning [6, 7, 8], reasoning [9, 10], and action [11, 12], which have catalyzed remarkable progress across diverse downstream domains, including code generation [13, 14], data…”
MedRAX: Medical Reasoning Agent for Chest X-rayPreprint
Fallahpour, A., Ma, J., Munim, A., Lyu, H., & Wang, B. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.02673 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
“Recent surveys on LLM-based agents (Xi et al., 2025; Zhao et al., 2023; Masterman et al., 2024) have outlined a generalizable agent framework comprising three core components: (1) a reasoning engine driven by LLMs, (2) perceptual modules that process multimodal inputs, and (3) action mechanisms…”
A Survey on (M)LLM-Based GUI AgentsPreprint
Tang, F., Xu, H., Zhang, H., Chen, S.-Q., Wu, X.-Y., Shen, Y.-L., Zhang, W., Hou, G.-Y., Tan, Z., Yan, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.13865 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“The successful execution of GUI Agents relies on two critical components: precise planning and robust verification mechanisms [33, 61, 162].”
Magentic-UI: Towards Human-in-the-loop Agentic Systems
Mozannar, H., Bansal, G., Tan, C., Fourney, A., Dibia, V. C., Chen, J., Gerrits, J., Payne, T., Maldaner, M. K., Grunde-McLaughlin, M., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.22358 · Cited by 63
“We use the multi-agent paradigm for the design of our agent system to allow for an easily extendable and modular system [80, 46, 26, 82, 70, 93, 81, 27, 43, 96, 45, 11, 90, 111, 67, 37, 39, 18, 5, 30].”
FIRE: Fact-checking with Iterative Retrieval and Verification
Xie, Z.-H., Xing, R., Wang, Y.-X., Geng, J.-H., Iqbal, H., Sahnan, D., Gurevych, I., & Nakov, P. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00784 · Cited by 61
“These agent frameworks typically consist of several components, including reasoning, tool usage, memory, and multi-agent debate (Masterman et al., 2024), many of which can be seamlessly integrated into fact-checking pipelines to enhance the performance of traditional fact-checking systems.”
Measuring Agents in Production
Pan, M. Z., Arabzadeh, N., Cogo, R., Zhu, Y., Xiong, A., Agrawal, L. A., Mao, H.-Z., Shen, E., Pallerla, S., Patel, L., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.04123 · Cited by 54
Characterizing AI Agents for Alignment and GovernancePreprint
Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.21848 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A Survey of Data Agents: Emerging Paradigm or Overstated Hype?
Zhu, Y., Wang, L.-W., Yang, C.-Y., Lin, X.-T., Li, B., Zhou, W., Liu, X.-Y., Peng, Z.-Y., Luo, T.-Q., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.23587 · Cited by 48
“Second, these systems heavily depend on a predefined set of tools or APIs and cannot access additional tools or functions on demand, limiting their ability to address unforeseen problems requiring operations beyond those anticipated by their designers [198].”
Intent-Based Infrastructure and Service Orchestration Using Agentic-AI
Brodimas, D., Birbas, A. N., Kapolos, D., & Denazis, S. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3600706 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“These architectures range from simple single-agent setups, which work well for clearly defined tasks but struggle with flexibility, to more complex multi-agent systems that can scale better but require sophisticated coordination mechanisms [20], [21].”
Integrating ESG and AI: a comprehensive responsible AI assessment framework
Lee, S. U., Perera, H., Liu, Y., Xia, B., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Cairns, J., & Nottage, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00741-5 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
LLM-Powered AI Agent Systems and Their Applications in Industry
Liang, G., & Tong, Q. (2025) · IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT) · doi:10.1109/aiiot65859.2025.11105299 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has significantly changed the AI agent system, driving advances in automation and human-AI collaboration [3]–[9].”
Yan, Y., Wang, S., Huo, J., Yu, P. S., Hu, X.-M., & Wen, Q. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.18132 · Cited by 42
“Despite these efforts, the development of o1-like multimodal systems is still in its stages (Chen et al., 2025c; Masterman et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2025), with significant problems such as overthinking (Cuadron et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2025a), safety (Chen et al., 2025a; Huo et al., 2025; Zhao et…”
Simple Prompt Injection Attacks Can Leak Personal Data Observed by LLM Agents During Task ExecutionPreprint
Alizadeh, M., Samei, Z., Stetsenko, D., & Gilardi, F. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01055 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“AI agents are entities powered by language models that can plan and perform actions across multiple steps to achieve a goal [29].”
Planning with Multi-Constraints via Collaborative Language AgentsPreprint
Zhang, C., Deik, D. G. X., Li, D., Zhang, H., & Liu, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.16510
“The emergence of LLMs introduces new paradigms for agents (Chu et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024a; Masterman et al., 2024), demonstrating significant intelligence in reasoning (Kojima et al., 2022; Wei et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023b), planning (Yao et al., 2023b,a; Besta et al., 2024),…”
TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Kavathekar, I., Jain, H., Rathod, A., Kumaraguru, P., & Ganu, T. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.05269 · Cited by 34
“LLMs have demonstrated great capabilities in reasoning, tool usage, coding, multi-step planning and decision making (Masterman et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2023a).”
ShapefileGPT: a multi-agent large language model framework for automated shapefile processing
Lin, Q., Hu, R., Li, H., Wu, S., Li, Y., Fang, K., Feng, H., Du, Z., & Xu, L. (2025) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2025.2577884 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“LLM-Geo [21] has shown great potential in the study of autonomous GIS.”
Leveraging large language models for automating water distribution network optimization
Wang, J., Fu, G., & Savic, D. A. (2025) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2025.124536 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“The profile module defines the agent ’ s role, personality, and social context through tailored prompts (Masterman et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024a).”
Yüksel, K., Ferreira, T. C., Al-Badrashiny, M., & Sawaf, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the 1st Workshop for Research on Agent Language Models (REALM 2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.17149 · Cited by 31
“Masterman et al. (2024) reviewed emerging AI agent architectures, focusing on modularity and scalability, which are central to this framework’s refinement approach.”
AutoData: A Multi-Agent System for Open Web Data Collection
Ma, T.-Y., Qian, Y.-Y., Zhang, Z.-Y., Wang, Z.-H., Qian, X., Bai, F., Ding, Y.-F., Luo, X.-W., Zhang, S.-N., Murugesan, K., et al. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.15859 · Cited by 29
“To make the study more challenging and account for the fact that surveys often contain more references than regular papers, we selected five surveys in the MAS field [61–65].”
A Survey on Agent Workflow – Status and Future
Yu, C., Cheng, Z., Cui, H., Gao, Y., Luo, Z., Wang, Y., Zheng, H., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd64986.2025.11082076 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“…tools like vector search engines, web searcher, computation and reasoning tools like calculators, code interpreters, knowledge and query tools like databases, Q&A systems, APIs and function calling Interfaces like OpenAI function calling, toolbox Interface (e.g., AutoGPT ToolManager) [11].”
CoMAL: Collaborative Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Mixed-Autonomy Traffic
Yao, H.-Y., Da, L., Nandam, V., Turnau, J., Liu, Z.-W., Pang, L., & Wei, H. (2024) · SDM · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.14368 · Cited by 27
“The communication structure of LLM-based multi-agent systems varies across different studies to address specific challenges [23, 34, 24].”
BackgroundAl-Bashrawi, M. A., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Elgendy, I. A., Helal, M. Y. I., Anbalagan, M. K., Chae, I., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2026) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-026-01164-2 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Intermediate results are shared among agents to refine outputs, ensuring coherence and accuracy (Masterman et al., 2024 ).”
Agentic AI Framework for End-to-End Medical Data Inference
Shimgekar, S. R., Vassef, S., Goyal, A., Saha, K., Zonooz, P., & Kumar, N. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm66473.2025.11356498 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Han, C., Zheng, W.-Z., & Tang, X.-J. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18596 · Cited by 24
“Moreover, existing MAD frameworks lack the structured process of fact-checking, where claims are systematically examined through evidence collection, counterargument analysis, and multi-dimensional evaluation conducted by domain experts (Masterman et al., 2024; Slonim et al., 2021).”
AI for Service: Proactive Assistance with AI Glasses
Wen, Z., Wang, Y.-Y., Liao, C., Yang, B.-X., Li, J., Liu, W.-F., He, H., Feng, B., Liu, X.-Y., Lyu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.14359 · Cited by 22
“Frameworks like the Model-Controller-Program (MCP) approach (Krishnan, 2025; Hou et al., 2025; Ray, 2025) provide a structured way for agents to leverage external tools (Masterman et al., 2024), enabling them to interact with the environment and access specialized functionalities.”
TableMind: An Autonomous Programmatic Agent for Tool-Augmented Table Reasoning
Jiang, C., Cheng, M.-Y., Tao, X.-Y., Mao, Q.-Y., Ouyang, J., & Liu, Q. (2025) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.06278 · Cited by 22
“On the other hand, the few methods that do incorporate tool interaction [24] are heavily reliant on massive, proprietary models.”
A Vision for Auto Research with LLM AgentsPreprint
Liu, C., Wang, C., Cao, J., Ge, J., Wang, K., Zhang, L., Cheng, M., Zhao, P., Li, T., Jia, X., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.18765
“This design follows a “plan-and-execute” paradigm [9], [10], [11], in which the planner explicitly “thinks through” all required steps in advance and the executor focuses on carrying them out.”
Agent Data Protocol: Unifying Datasets for Diverse, Effective Fine-tuning of LLM Agents
Song, Y.-Q., Ramaneti, K., Sheikh, Z., Chen, Z.-R., Gou, B., Xie, T.-B., Xu, Y., Zhang, D., Gandhi, A., Yang, F., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.24702 · Cited by 21
“The development of effective LLM-based agents critically depends on high-quality training data that could capture the complexity of multi-step reasoning, tool usage, and environmental interaction (Yao et al., 2022b; Schick et al., 2023; Deng et al., 2023; Masterman et al., 2024).”
Multi-Agent Deep Research: Training Multi-Agent Systems with M-GRPO
Hong, H.-Y., Yin, J., Wang, Y., Liu, J.-N., Chen, Z., Yu, A.-L., Li, J., Ye, Z.-L., Xiao, H., Chen, Y.-F., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.13288 · Cited by 20
“Studies show that multi-agent systems with a leader complete tasks nearly 10% faster than those without [Masterman et al., 2024].”
A Practical Guide for Designing, Developing, and Deploying Production-Grade Agentic AI Workflows
Bandara, E., Gore, R., Foytik, P. B., Shetty, S., Mukkamala, R., Rahman, A., Liang, X.-P., Bouk, S., Hass, A., Rajapakse, S., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.08769 · Cited by 19
“By keeping workflow logic minimal and delegating most cognitive tasks to LLMs and agents, the system remains adaptable to new models, new tools, and new runtime environments without requiring architectural rewrites [26].”
InfluentialLarge Model Agents: State-of-the-Art, Cooperation Paradigms, Security and Privacy, and Future Trends
Wang, Y., Pan, Y., Zhao, Q., Deng, Y., Su, Z., Du, L.-K., & Luan, T. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.14457 · Cited by 19
“Masterman et al. [8] provide an overview of single-agent and multi-agent architectures in industrial projects and present the insights and limitations of existing research.”
InfluentialDhanorkar, S., Passi, S., & Vorvoreanu, M. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812402 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“(3) We outline future sociotechnical research directions, provide design implications to address developers’ immediate oversight challenges, and highlight broader implications for the software engineering practice.”
EvoRoute: Experience-Driven Self-Routing LLM Agent Systems
Zhang, G.-B., Yu, H., Yang, K., Wu, B., Huang, F., Li, Y.-B., & Yan, S.-C. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.02695 · Cited by 18
“…(Driess et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2023; Wei et al., 2024), planning (Zhu et al., 2024; Erdogan et al., 2025), reasoning (Putta et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024), and action (Li et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024), LLM-driven agentic AI systems have achieved remarkable performance across a…”
Generalizability of Large Language Model-Based Agents: A Comprehensive Survey
Zhang, M., Yang, Y., Xie, R., Dhingra, B., ZHOU, S., & Pei, J. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3794858 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“While several recent surveys have addressed aspects of LLM-based agents [46, 50, 65, 69, 104, 122, 148], they fall short in several key areas.”
A Survey of Large Language Models in Mental Health Disorder Detection on Social Media
Ge, Z., Hu, N., Li, D., Wang, Y., Qi, S., Xu, Y., Han, S., & Zhang, J. Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW) · doi:10.1109/icdew67478.2025.00027 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Furthermore, agentic systems possess planning capabilities [77], [78], enabling them to decompose complex user goals or queries into a series of manageable subtasks.”
Watson: A Cognitive Observability Framework for the Reasoning of LLM-Powered Agents
Rombaut, B., Masoumzadeh, S., Vasilevski, K., Lin, D., & Hassan, A. E. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase63991.2025.00067 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Agentic software powered by large language models (LLMs) [6, 23, 36] (i.e., Agentware [19]) is increasingly being adopted across a variety of domains such as autonomous software engineering [26, 51], customer support [18], and data analytics [17].”
SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behavior
Li, J.-J., Pyatkin, V., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Jiang, L.-W., Dziri, N., Collins, A. G. E., Borg, J. S., Sap, M., Choi, Y.-J., & Levine, S. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.16665 · Cited by 18
“The safety of AI behavior is particularly important as the Internet of Ev-erything becomes reality (Han, 2024), especially with recent developments in AI agents that can interact with the world through actions (Masterman et al., 2024).”
AI Agent Systems: Architectures, Applications, and Evaluation
Xu, B. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.01743 · Cited by 19
“AI agents address this gap by coupling a foundation model with an execution loop that can observe an environment, plan, call tools, update memory, and verify outcomes [10, 31].”
Pysklo, H. M., Zhuravel, A., & Watson, P. D. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817555
BackdoorAgent: A Unified Framework for Backdoor Attacks on LLM-based Agents
Feng, Y.-H., Li, Y.-G., Wu, Y.-T., Tan, Y.-S., Guo, Y.-M., Ding, Y.-F., Zhai, K., Ma, X.-J., & Jiang, Y. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.04566 · Cited by 16
“Such isolated evaluations fail to capture the operational reality of modern agents, whose behaviors emerge from iterative workflows that tightly couple three functional stages: Planning for action orchestration, Memory for context retrieval, and Tools for environmental interaction [26, 33, 45].”
Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey
Qi, C., Wang, W., Jiang, S., Liu, Q., Song, X., Fang, H., & Wei, Z. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag075 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
An Empirical Study of Agent Developer Practices in AI Agent Frameworks
Wang, Y.-L., Xu, X., Chen, J.-C., Bi, T.-T., Gu, W., & Zheng, Z.-B. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.01939 · Cited by 16
“The tools component enables the agent to interact with external systems, thereby performing operations that extend beyond text generation [57].”
Blueprint First, Model Second: A Framework for Deterministic LLM Workflow
Qiu, L.-B., Ye, Y., Gao, Z., Zou, X., Chen, J., Gui, Z., Huang, W., Xue, X., Qiu, W., & Zhao, K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.02721 · Cited by 15
“The power of these agents is greatly amplified by their ability to use external tools (Masterman et al. 2024).”
A Framework for Testing and Adapting REST APIs as LLM Tools
Bandlamudi, J., Chaudhuri, R., Gantayat, N., Ghosh, S., Mukherjee, K., Agarwal, P., Sindhgatta, R., & Mehta, S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.15546 · Cited by 14
“However, REST APIs are typically not designed with LLM agents in mind, creating challenges for seamless integration due to complex input schema and verbose responses.”
iDesignGPT enhances conceptual design via large language model agentic workflows
Liu, S., Shen, Y., Zhang, Y., Hou, Z., Wang, X., Luo, J., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-68672-1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Beyond these intrinsic strengths,LLMscan serve asthe cognitivecoreof agenticsystemsthat integratememory, planning, toolkits, andexecutablework fl ows 27 .”
GTM: Simulating the World of Tools for AI Agents
Ren, Z.-Z., Zhang, X.-P., Qian, Z.-X., Gao, Y., Shi, Y., Zheng, S.-X., & He, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.04535 · Cited by 13
“Tools, which can be regarded as functions that take specific inputs and produce corresponding outputs through predefined operations, offer a promising solution by bridging this gap (Masterman et al., 2024; Yao et al., 2023).”
Agentic AI in Hospitality and Tourism: Opportunities, Risks, and Research Pathways
Ali, F., & Ali, L. (2025) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875251392915 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Traditional AI systems in hospitality and tourism can be broadly classified as reflexive, goal-driven, or utility-based agents (Masterman et al., 2024; Wooldridge & Jennings, 1995).”
A vision of human–AI collaboration for enhanced biological collection curation and research
Stenhouse, A., Fisher, N., Lepschi, B. J., Schmidt‐Lebuhn, A. N., Rodríguez, J., Turco, F., Reeson, A. F., Paris, C. L., & Thrall, P. H. (2025) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaf021 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Agentic AI in Healthcare: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions
Gridach, M., Nanavati, J., Zine El Abidine, K., Yacoubian, C., & Mack, C. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3809164 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Metrics such as scores (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1) and success rates across tasks, output similarity to human responses, memory persistence, efficiency (e.g., response time or resource usage) and cost are commonly used [52, 71].”
ToolDreamer: Instilling LLM Reasoning Into Tool Retrievers
Sengupta, S., Zhou, Z., Araki, J., Wang, X.-B., Wang, B.-Q., Wang, S.-H., & Feng, Z. (2025) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.19791 · Cited by 12
“LLM-based tool calling (generating text as parsable function calls) (Masterman et al., 2024; Qu et al., 2025) has emerged as a viable solution to real-world environment interaction, allowing them to solve a variety of complex tasks from mathematics (Das et al., 2024) to molecular structure…”
ToPolyAgent: AI agents for coarse-grained bead-spring topological polymer simulations
Ding, L., Carrillo, J.-M., & Do, C. (2026) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d5dd00471c · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“LLMs, with their ability to process and generate natural language, can interpret user instructions, orchestrate tasks, and integrate domain-specific tools to perform specialized computations[45, 46].”
A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents
Su, H., Luo, J., Liu, C., Yang, X., Zhang, Y., Dong, Y., & Zhu, J. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2026.3688650 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Large-model AI agents—autonomous systems built around large-scale models such as LLMs—introduce qualitatively new security risks compared to both traditional AI systems and standalone language models [53], [67], [68].”
Zhu, S., Sun, J., Nian, Y., South, T., Pentland, A., & Pei, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.00073 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Recently, large language model (LLM) powered AI agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities and are increasingly adopted for real-world tasks (Xu et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024).”
Distributional AGI SafetyPreprint
Tomasev, N., Franklin, M., Jacobs, J., Krier, S., & Osindero, S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.16856 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…can range from fairly simple prompting strategies (Arora et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023), to highly complex control-flows that involve tool use (Masterman et al., 2024; Qin et al., 2024; Ruan et al., 2023), coding and code execution (Guo et al., 2024; Huang et al., 2023; Islam et al., 2024;…”
Ma, X., & Wang, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Education Conference · doi:10.1109/fie61694.2024.10892925 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“In particular, multi-agent systems have demonstrated superior performance in scenarios requiring collaboration and multiple execution paths [10], making them well-suited for addressing the intricate and complex challenges in technical education, which normally requires nuanced solutions and…”
A Taxonomy of Architecture Options for Foundation Model-based Agents: Analysis and Decision ModelPreprint
Zhou, J., Lu, Q., Chen, J., Zhu, L., Xu, X., Xing, Z., & Harrer, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.02920 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“These foundation-model-based agent systems have the potential to revolutionize industries by enhancing efficiencies, enabling automation, and facilitating complex decision-making processes [5].”
BackgroundHow Agents Ask for Permission: User Permissions for AI Agents, from Interfaces to Enforcement
Michael, A. E., & Roesner, F. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.13718 · Cited by 10
“Such permissions systems have traditionally been built on foundational security principles like least privilege (grant each entity only the minimum necessary permissions) and failing closed (when in doubt, deny permission) [47, 51].”
Haidemariam, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1728738 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Li, X.-Q., Kuang, H.-L., Li, W.-K., Li, Z.-W., & Ye, S.-P. (2025) · NIER@ICSE · doi:10.1145/3786582.3786817 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“As described in Algorithm 1, It first identifies public or external entry functions, then verifies the presence of access-control checks (e.g., Modifiers ), and finally retains variables relevant to authority (e.g., owner ).”
Traditional RAG vs. Agentic RAG: A Comparative Study of Retrieval-Augmented Systems
Neha, F., & Bhati, D. (2025) · 2025 IEEE International Conference on Future Machine Learning and Data Science (FMLDS) · doi:10.1109/fmlds67896.2025.00073 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web
Guo, Z., Zhou, Y.-J., Wang, C., You, L., Bian, M.-J., & Zhang, W. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.13787 · Cited by 10
“Beyond the fundamental operation of agents, this module involves container scheduling (Xiao et al., 2024), hybrid on-chain and off-chain data storage (Tsang et al., 2024), invocation of various tools (Masterman et al., 2024), and generation of proofs (Čapko et al., 2022).”
From To-Do to Ta-Da: Transforming Task-Focused IR with Generative AI
Shah, C. S., & White, R. W. (2025) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3726302.3730352 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“However, these agents were limited by their inability to plan or learn from past experiences, reducing their effectiveness in dynamic environments [13, 48].”
ToolCoder: A Systematic Code-Empowered Tool Learning Framework for Large Language ModelsPreprint
Ding, H., Tao, S., Pang, L., Wei, Z., Gao, J.-Y., Ding, B.-L., Shen, H.-W., & Cheng, X.-Q. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.11404 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Recent approaches have focused on enhancing LLMs by integrating external tools to improve their problem-solving capabilities (Masterman et al., 2024; Qu et al., 2024; Qian et al., 2023; Yuan et al., 2024a).”
Shah, C., & White, R. W. (2024) · Computer · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.16241 · Cited by 10
“The 1990s introduced reactive agents [8], which responded to environmental stimuli without internal models.”
Frontiers of Large Language Model-Based Agentic Systems - Construction, Efficacy and Safety
He, J., Ghosh, R., Walia, K., Chen, J., Dhadiwal, T., Hazel, A., & Inguva, C. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3627673.3679105 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“• Inter-agent collaboration patterns: leader/planner, layered/nested,sequentialhierarchical,dynamic, chainofagents, etc. [9, 29, 35] • Orchestration patterns: planning, critic and/or reflection, group planning, and tool use [35, 44] 3.3.3 Agentic Frameworks.”
InfluentialTRACES: Proactive Safety Auditing for Multi-Turn LLM Agents via Trajectory-State Modeling
Li, J.-Q., Li, Y.-S., Zhang, B.-X., Tang, R.-X., & Huang, K.-H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27690 · Cited by 9
“…users during reasoning (Ma et al., 2024; Li et al., 2025; Guan et al., 2025), and (II) tool use, which allows models to invoke ex-ternal tools to support reasoning and substantially expands their capabilities beyond pure text generation (Wang et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024; Li et al., 2026a).”
Do Coding Agents Understand Least-Privilege Authorization?
Yan, Z., Weng, J., Chen, Q., Peng, D.-Y., Qin, E., Guan, J.-N., Liu, J.-H., Yu, Q., Yuan, Y., Meng, F.-Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.14859 · Cited by 9
“Reasoning-and-acting frameworks [2] and surveys of agent architectures and agentic programming [4, 43, 44] show that models can plan tool use across multi-step workflows, while work on long chain-of-thought and reasoning boundaries [19, 45, 46] studies when more inference-time reasoning helps or…”
Ng, L., Cruickshank, I. J., Lim, A. X. W., & Carley, K. M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07069 · Cited by 9
“We have built agents capable of reasoning, planning and negotiation [66, 92, 62], but have largely studied them in terms of individual task completion or as independent units contributing to a collective objective.”
Towards Security-Auditable LLM Agents: A Unified Graph Representation
Li, C.-F., Zhang, L., Zhai, J.-T., Feng, S., Yang, X., Wang, H.-H., Dou, S.-H., Ji, Y., Hu, Y.-T., Wu, Y.-M., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.06812 · Cited by 9
“Modern agent frameworks Corresponding author: Yutao Hu. commonly support goal decomposition, context management, long-term memory, external tool invocation, environment interaction, and multi-agent collaboration [2].”
Quantifying Trust: Financial Risk Management for Trustworthy AI Agents
Hua, W.-Y., Peng, T.-Y., Wang, C., Pei, J.-X., Kaufman, I., Lim, B., & Fang, C. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03976 · Cited by 9
“Large language models enable agentic systems (Masterman et al., 2024) that write and execute code, invoke external tools (Patil et al., 2025), perform multi-step reasoning (Kim et al., 2024; Aksitov et al., 2023), maintain memory (Hu et al., 2025; Kang et al., 2025), and interact with external…”
A self-correcting Agentic Graph RAG for clinical decision support in hepatology
Hu, Y., Xuan, W., Zhou, Q., Li, Z., Li, Y., Hu, J., & Fang, F. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1716327 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Concurrently, using the LangGraph framework (29, 30), we designed a dynamic agentic workflow (31, 32).”
NetMCP: Network-Aware Model Context Protocol Platform for LLM Capability Extension
Li, E., Du, H.-Y., & Huang, K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13467 · Cited by 9
“To overcome this limit, LLMs are increasingly augmented with external tools that provide access to real-time information and domain-specific services, such as APIs, calculators, and Python interpreters [4]–[6].”
SynWorld: Virtual Scenario Synthesis for Agentic Action Knowledge Refinement
Fang, R.-N., Wang, X.-B., Liang, Y., Qiao, S.-F., Wu, J., Xi, Z.-K., Zhang, N.-Y., Jiang, Y., Xie, P.-J., Huang, F., et al. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.03561 · Cited by 9
“…agen-tic workflows of today, where model planning is instrumental in addressing a myriad of complex tasks, including question answering (QA) (Mavi et al., 2022), embodied interaction (Yao et al., 2022), tool invocation (Masterman et al., 2024), and long-form text generation (Jiang et al., 2024).”
Tang, Z.-C., Zhang, Z., Wang, Q., Tang, Z.-H., Li, B., & Chu, X.-W. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.17417 · Cited by 8
“The capabilities of LLMs have transcended simple single-round inference, evolving into sophisticated agentic work-flows that integrate interleaved reasoning with ex-ternal tool execution (Masterman et al., 2024; Plaat et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2024, 2025d; Wang et al.).”
Learning When to Act or Refuse: Guarding Agentic Reasoning Models for Safe Multi-Step Tool Use
Agarwal, A., Siyan, G., Pandya, Y., Singh, J., Nambi, A., & Awadallah, A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.03205 · Cited by 8
“Language models are increasingly deployed as agents that plan, call tools, and interact with external systems over multiple steps (Wang et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024; Lumer et al., 2025).”
Is Agentic RAG worth it? An experimental comparison of RAG approachesPreprint
Ferrazzi, P., Cvjeticanin, M., Piraccini, A., & Giannuzzi, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.07711
“While the definition of the properties that characterize AI agents has evolved (Masterman et al., 2024”
Pan, J.-J., Liu, Y.-X., Miao, R., Ding, K.-Z., Zheng, Y., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Liew, A. W.-C., & Pan, S.-R. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.18733 · Cited by 8
“By incorporating capabilities such as memory (Xu et al., 2025), tool usage (Masterman et al., 2024), and advanced planning (Huang et al., 2024), these agents can solve complex tasks in diverse domains.”
LLMs and AI Life Models for Traditional Chinese Medicine-derived Geroprotector Formulation
Galkin, F., Ren, F., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2025) · Aging and Disease · doi:10.14336/ad.2024.1697 · Cited by 8
“Best practices to create such structures are still actively discussed and the approaches range from “quantity over quality” to elaborate architectures governing agent planning and cooperation [76, 77].”
Li, L., Zhang, Y., Makanda, I. L. D., & Jiang, P. (2025) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2025.103214 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Evaluating Privilege Usage of Agents with Real-World Tools
Zhang, Q., Fu, L., Lian, L., Go, G., Wang, Y.-J., Zhou, C.-J., Jiang, Y., & Pu, G. (2026) · SIGSOFT FSE Companion · doi:10.1145/3803437.3805554 · Cited by 7
Before You Hand Over the Wheel: Evaluating LLMs for Security Incident Analysis
Jajodia, S., Sultana, M., Majumdar, S., Taylor, A., & Vandenberghe, G. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.06422 · Cited by 7
“In our dataset, even all questions are known, asking all the questions simultaneously in a single-state setting may cause the agent to get overly focused on one question while overlooking others [62], [63].”
From Atom to Community: Structured and Evolving Agent Memory for User Behavior Modeling
Liao, Y., Wu, L., Hou, M., Wang, Y., Wu, H., & Wang, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.16872 · Cited by 7
“LLM-based agents [8, 25] have emerged as a powerful paradigm capable of understanding complex contexts and generating human-level intelligent responses.”
An Overview of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing for Information Systems
O’Shaughnessy, D. D. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16021122 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“More recently, AI agents can permit more complex user interactions, using planning, loops, reflection, and other control devices [82].”
InfluentialAI practical wisdom and compassion
Graves, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00877-4 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
ROMAS: A Role-Based Multi-Agent System for Database monitoring and Planning
Huang, Y., Cheng, F., Zhou, F., Li, J.-H., Gong, J., Yang, H.-J., Fan, Z., Jiang, C.-G., Xue, S.-Q., & Chen, F.-Q. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.13520 · Cited by 7
“Structure design User interaction Drag-and-drop workshop emphasizes enhancing agent performance through modules such as profile, memory, planning, and action [Masterman et al., 2024].”
Chen, X.-Y., & Zhang, L.-Z. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.10064 · Cited by 7
“In this section, we describe the methodology for building LLM-based agents ontologies in specialized domains.”
MethodAgentic profiles for effective AI governance
Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10805-z · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“Generative agents wake up, cook breakfast, and head to work; artists paint, while authors write; they form opinions, notice each other, and initiate conversations; they remember and reflect on days past as they plan the next day” D.5: Shavit et al. (2023) 94 “Agentic AI systems are characterized by the ability to take…”
HiLSVA: Design and Evaluation of a Human-in-the-Loop Agentic System for Scientific Visualization
Ai, K., Do, P., & Wang, C.-L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.26614 · Cited by 6
“Recent surveys identify reasoning, planning, tool use, memory, and reflection as core capabilities of such systems [45,77].”
What makes a harness a harness: necessary and sufficient conditions for an agent harnessPreprint
de Macedo, S. O. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.10106 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Surveys of software agents describe components (memory, tools, reasoning loop) without consolidating what constitutes the harness as a unit [17, 24, 29]; work on the agent-computer interface treats one facet, tools, and stops there [55]; context engineering, now a topic of its own, covers another…”
AgentWebBench: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Coordination in Agentic Web
Zhong, S., Shen, K., & Xiong, C.-Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.10938 · Cited by 6
Errico, H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.09433 · Cited by 6
“Large language models (LLMs) have evolved from text generators into autonomous agents capable of executing consequential actions across systems [6], [10].”
Agentic Design Patterns: A System-Theoretic FrameworkPreprint
Dao, M.-D., Le, Q., Lam, H. T., Le, D.-T., Pham, Q., O'Sullivan, B., & Nguyễn, H. L. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.19752 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
He, S.-Q., Cui, Y., Ma, X., Li, Y.-L., Ding, B.-L., & Chowdhury, M. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.19838 · Cited by 6
“…2025; Cui et al., 2025a), web environments pose greater challenges due to their diverse, context-dependent action choices/function calling (e.g., click , type , scroll ) (Masterman et al., 2024; Qu et al., 2025; Cui et al., 2025b) and partial observability (Ning et al., 2025; Gao et al., 2025).”
Machines that halt resolve the undecidability of artificial intelligence alignment
de Melo, G. A., Máximo, M. R. O. A., Soma, N. Y., & de Castro, P. A. L. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99060-2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“As detailed by Masterman et al. 28 , modern AI agent frameworks can be categorized into single-agent and multi-agent systems, with varying levels of autonomy and reasoning capabilities, incorporating planning, execution, and reflection phases to iteratively solve problems, often using complex reasoning loops and tool-…”
OracleAgent: A Multimodal Reasoning Agent for Oracle Bone Script Research
Li, C., Ding, Z., Hu, X.-B., Li, B., Luo, D., Peng, X., Jin, T., Liu, Y., Han, S.-W., Yang, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.26114 · Cited by 5
Tang, Y., Chen, K.-H., Yue, L., Fan, J., Zhou, C., Li, X.-G., Zhang, Y.-Y., Zhao, M.-M., Kai, S.-X., Guo, K., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.17491 · Cited by 5
“[6], [17] propose general agent frameworks and classify existing architectures.”
- Authors
- Masterman, T., Besen, S., Sawtell, M., & Chao, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2404.11584
- OpenAlex
- W4394948161
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- AI agents, agent architecture, multi-agent systems, single-agent systems, reasoning, planning, tool calling, agent communication, reflection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review