PreprintCited by 261AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationArtificial Intelligence Applications

The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey

Open access
Masterman, Tula, Besen, Sandi, Sawtell, Mason, Chao, Alex·2024·arXiv

Abstract

This survey paper examines the recent advancements in AI agent implementations, with a focus on their ability to achieve complex goals that require enhanced reasoning, planning, and tool execution capabilities. The primary objectives of this work are to a) communicate the current capabilities and limitations of existing AI agent implementations, b) share insights gained from our observations of these systems in action, and c) suggest important considerations for future developments in AI agent design. We achieve this by providing overviews of single-agent and multi-agent architectures, identifying key patterns and divergences in design choices, and evaluating their overall impact on accomplishing a provided goal. Our contribution outlines key themes when selecting an agentic architecture, the impact of leadership on agent systems, agent communication styles, and key phases for planning, execution, and reflection that enable robust AI agent systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2404.11584

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multi-Agent Systems are designed to overcome limitations of single-agent systems in context capacity, insufficient exploration, and inefficient serial execution through specialized collaboration.

    “Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are designed to overcome the limitations of single-agent systems in context capacity (Yu et al., 2026), insufficient exploration (Gurjar et al., 2026), and inefficient serial execution (Masterman et al., 2024), through specialized collaboration (Guo et al., 2024).”
  • LLMs are often used to help an agent plan its actions despite evidence they may not be capable of reliably planning.

    “In these works, LLMs are often used to help an agent plan its actions [4], [13], [14], despite evidence that they may not be capable of reliably planning [15].”
  • There is growing interest in developing AI agents that take actions affecting the world.

    “There is simultaneously a growing interest in developing AI agents , models that are trained and equipped to take actions that affect the world [4], [5].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wenting Zhao et al. "(InThe)WildChat: 570K ChatGPT Interaction Logs In The Wild". In: The Twelfth In- ternational Conference on Learning Representations. 2024. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id= Bl8u7ZRlbM.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masterman, T., Besen, S., Sawtell, M., & Chao, A.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394948161
Cited by
35
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
AI agents, agent architecture, multi-agent systems, single-agent systems, reasoning, planning, tool calling, agent communication, reflection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review