CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 42Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Demonstration of logical qubits and repeated error correction with better-than-physical error rates

Open access
Paetznick, A., da Silva, M. P., Ryan-Anderson, C., Bello-Rivas, J. M., Campora, J. P., Chernoguzov, A., Dreiling, J. M., Foltz, C., Frachon, F., Gaebler, J. P., Gatterman, T. M., Grans-Samuelsson, L., Gresh, D., Hayes, D., Hewitt, N., Holliman, C., Horst, C. V., Johansen, J., Lucchetti, D., Matsuoka, Y., Mills, M., Moses, S. A., Neyenhuis, B., Paz, A., Pino, J., Siegfried, P., Sundaram, A., Tom, D., Wernli, S. J., Zanner, M., Stutz, R. P., Svore, K. M.·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2404.02280arXiv 2404.02280
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The promise of quantum computers hinges on the ability to scale to large system sizes, e.g., to run quantum computations consisting of more than 100 million operations fault-tolerantly. This in turn requires suppressing errors to levels inversely proportional to the size of the computation. As a step towards this ambitious goal, we present experiments on a trapped-ion QCCD processor where, through the use of fault-tolerant encoding and error correction, we are able to suppress logical error rates to levels below the physical error rates. In particular, we entangled logical qubits encoded in the [[7,1,3]] code with error rates 9.8 times to 500 times lower than at the physical level, and entangled logical qubits encoded in a [[12,2,4]] code based on Knill's C4/C6 scheme with error rates 4.7 times to 800 times lower than at the physical level, depending on the judicious use of post-selection. Moreover, we demonstrate repeated error correction with the [[12,2,4]] code, with logical error rates below physical circuit baselines corresponding to repeated CNOTs, and show evidence that the error rate per error correction cycle, which consists of over 100 physical CNOTs, approaches the error rate of two physical CNOTs. These results signify a transition from noisy intermediate scale quantum computing to reliable quantum computing, and demonstrate advanced capabilities toward large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2404.02280

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No quantum processor has definitively shown below-threshold performance.

    “Although many platforms have demonstrated different features of quantum error correction14–20, no quantum processor has definitively shown below-threshold performance.”

    From Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Abstract says that, to the authors’ knowledge, earlier experiments had not convincingly shown logical error rates better than physical error rates. But Reference note 19 updates that account, explicitly noting that definitive sub-threshold performance had since been demonstrated. That contradicts the unqualified claim that no processor has shown it. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Over the past several years, there has been vast progress in both theory and experiment, including early demonstrations of logical error suppression below threshold and small fault-tolerant primitives.

    “Over the past several years, there has been vast progress made in both theory, with the introduction of novel code constructions, improvements in code parameters, and decoding algorithms, and experiment, with advancements in the quality of qubits, coherence times, and gate fidelities, and even some early demonstrations of logical error suppression below threshold and small fault-tolerant primitiv”

    From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Summary and Outlook reports small fault-tolerant circuits with logical error rates below their physical counterparts, supporting the experimental-demonstration part of the claim. The Abstract also describes progress across experimental platforms, but the cited passages do not establish the claimed recent advances in code parameters, decoding algorithms, coherence times, or gate fidelities. The paper demonstrates better-than-physical error rates; it does not describe that result as logical error suppression below threshold. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Error suppression by increasing the colour code size had not been demonstrated on any experimental platform.

    “As a result, error suppression by increasing the colour code size has not yet been demonstrated, to our knowledge, on any experimental platform.”

    From Scaling and logic in the colour code on a superconducting quantum processor (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Steane code section identifies it as a distance-three colour code, while “Scaling to larger sizes” discusses increasing the distance of the distinct Carbon code. Neither section says whether error suppression from increasing colour-code size had been demonstrated on any experimental platform (searched: colour-code size, distance and experimental demonstrations). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Alliance

    Flückiger, C. (2022) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.013 · Cited by 9 · cited 1×

    “All experiments in Sections III B and IV were submitted through the Azure Quantum software stack using the Quantum Intermediate Representation (QIR) [30].”

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. P. W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  2. A. M. Steane, Simple quantum error-correcting codes, Phys. Rev. A 54, 4741 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  3. D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or, Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant error, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC '97 (Association for Computing Ma- chinery, New York, NY, USA, 1997) p. 176-188. · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum error correction with imperfect gates, in Quantum Communication, Computing, and Mea- surement (Springer, 1997) pp. 181-188.
  5. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and W. H. Zurek, Resilient quan- tum computation, Science 279, 342 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  6. B. M. Terhal and G. Burkard, Fault-tolerant quantum computation for local non-markovian noise, Phys. Rev. A FIG. 8. Incremental error rate obtained from maximum like- lihood linear fits to the data in Fig. 7 (see Appendix B for details). 71, 012336 (2005). · DOI
  7. P. Aliferis, D. Gottesman, and J. Preskill, Quantum accuracy threshold for concatenated distance-3 codes, Quantum Info. Comput. 6, 97-165 (2006), arXiv:quant- ph/0504218.
  8. M. Reiher, N. Wiebe, K. M. Svore, D. Wecker, and M. Troyer, Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quan- tum computers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 7555 (2017), arXiv:1605.03590 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  9. M. E. Beverland, P. Murali, M. Troyer, K. M. Svore, T. Hoefler, V. Kliuchnikov, G. H. Low, M. Soeken, A. Sun- daram, and A. Vaschillo, Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantage, arXiv:2211.07629 [quant- ph] (2022). · arXiv
  10. R. Raussendorf and J. Harrington, Fault-tolerant quan- tum computation with high threshold in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190504 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  11. L. Egan, D. M. Debroy, C. Noel, A. Risinger, D. Zhu, D. Biswas, M. Newman, M. Li, K. R. Brown, M. Cetina, and C. Monroe, Fault-tolerant control of an error- corrected qubit, Nature 598, 281 (2021).
  12. C. Ryan-Anderson, J. G. Bohnet, K. Lee, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, J. P. Gaebler, D. Francois, A. Chernoguzov, D. Lucchetti, N. C. Brown, T. M. Gatterman, S. K. Halit, K. Gilmore, J. A. Gerber, B. Neyenhuis, D. Hayes, and R. P. Stutz, Realization of real-time fault-tolerant quan- tum error correction, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041058 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  13. R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, R. Allen, T. I. Andersen, M. Ans- mann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, R. Bab- bush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, S. Boixo, G. Bortoli, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, L. Brill, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, T. Burger, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, J. Cogan, R. Collins, P. Conner, W. Courtney, A. L. Crook, B. Curtin, D. M. Debroy, A. D. T. Barba, S. De- mura, A. Dunsworth, D. Eppens, C. Erickson, L. Faoro, E. Farhi, R. Fatemi, L. F. Burgos, E. Forati, A. G. Fowler, B. Foxen, W. Giang, C. Gidney, D. Gilboa, M. Giustina, A. G. Dau, J. A. Gross, S. Habegger, M. C. Hamilton, M. P. Harrigan, S. D. Harrington, O. Higgott, J. Hilton, M. Hoffmann, S. Hong, T. Huang, A. Huff, W. J. Hug- gins, L. B. Ioffe, S. V. Isakov, J. Iveland, E. Jeffrey, Z. Jiang, C. Jones, P. Juhas, D. Kafri, K. Kechedzhi, J. Kelly, T. Khattar, M. Khezri, M. Kieferová, S. Kim, A. Kitaev, P. V. Klimov, A. R. Klots, A. N. Korotkov, F. Kostritsa, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. Landhuis, P. Laptev, K.-M. Lau, L. Laws, J. Lee, K. Lee, B. J. Lester, A. Lill, W. Liu, A. Locharla, E. Lucero, F. D. Malone, J. Mar- shall, O. Martin, J. R. McClean, T. Mccourt, M. McEwen, A. Megrant, B. M. Costa, X. Mi, K. C. Miao, M. Mohseni, S. Montazeri, A. Morvan, E. Mount, W. Mruczkiewicz, O. Naaman, M. Neeley, C. Neill, A. Nersisyan, H. Neven, M. Newman, J. H. Ng, A. Nguyen, M. Nguyen, M. Y. Niu, T. E. O'Brien, A. Opremcak, J. Platt, A. Petukhov, R. Potter, L. P. Pryadko, C. Quintana, P. Roushan, N. C. Rubin, N. Saei, D. Sank, K. Sankaragomathi, K. J. Satzinger, H. F. Schurkus, C. Schuster, M. J. Shearn, A. Shorter, V. Shvarts, J. Skruzny, V. Smelyanskiy, W. C. Smith, G. Sterling, D. Strain, M. Szalay, A. Torres, G. Vidal, B. Villalonga, C. V. Heidweiller, T. White, C. Xing, Z. J. Yao, P. Yeh, J. Yoo, G. Young, A. Zal- cman, Y. Zhang, and N. Zhu, Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit, Nature 614, 676 (2023), arXiv:2207.06431 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  14. V. V. Sivak, A. Eickbusch, B. Royer, S. Singh, I. Tsiout- sios, S. Ganjam, A. Miano, B. L. Brock, A. Z. Ding, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. De- voret, Real-time quantum error correction beyond break- even, Nature 616, 50-55 (2023), arXiv:2211.09116 [quant- ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  15. C. Ryan-Anderson, N. C. Brown, M. S. Allman, B. Arkin, G. Asa-Attuah, C. Baldwin, J. Berg, J. G. Bohnet, S. Braxton, N. Burdick, J. P. Campora, A. Chernoguzov, J. Esposito, B. Evans, D. Francois, J. P. Gaebler, T. M. Gatterman, J. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hall, A. Hankin, J. Hostetter, D. Lucchetti, K. Mayer, J. My- ers, B. Neyenhuis, J. Santiago, J. Sedlacek, T. Skripka, A. Slattery, R. P. Stutz, J. Tait, R. Tobey, G. Vittorini, J. Walker, and D. Hayes, Implementing fault-tolerant en- tangling gates on the five-qubit code and the color code, arXiv:2208.01863 (2022). · arXiv
  16. A. Erhard, H. P. Nautrup, M. Meth, L. Postler, R. Stricker, M. Ringbauer, P. Schindler, H. J. Briegel, R. Blatt, N. Friis, and T. Monz, Entangling logical qubits with lattice surgery, Nature 589, 220 (2021), arXiv:2006.03071 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  17. L. Postler, S. Heußen, I. Pogorelov, M. Rispler, T. Feld- ker, M. Meth, C. D. Marciniak, R. Stricker, M. Ring- bauer, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, M. Müller, and T. Monz, Demonstration of fault-tolerant universal quantum gate operations, Nature 605, 675 (2022), arXiv:2111.12654 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  18. D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semegh- ini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58-65 (2023), arXiv:2312.03982 [quant-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  19. S. A. Moses, C. H. Baldwin, M. S. Allman, R. An- cona, L. Ascarrunz, C. Barnes, J. Bartolotta, B. Bjork, P. Blanchard, M. Bohn, J. G. Bohnet, N. C. Brown, N. Q. Burdick, W. C. Burton, S. L. Campbell, J. P. Campora, C. Carron, J. Chambers, J. W. Chan, Y. H. Chen, A. Chernoguzov, E. Chertkov, J. Colina, J. P. Curtis, R. Daniel, M. DeCross, D. Deen, C. Delaney, J. M. Dreiling, C. T. Ertsgaard, J. Esposito, B. Estey, M. Fabrikant, C. Figgatt, C. Foltz, M. Foss-Feig, D. Fran- cois, J. P. Gaebler, T. M. Gatterman, C. N. Gilbreth, J. Giles, E. Glynn, A. Hall, A. M. Hankin, A. Hansen, D. Hayes, B. Higashi, I. M. Hoffman, B. Horning, J. J. Hout, R. Jacobs, J. Johansen, L. Jones, J. Karcz, T. Klein, P. Lauria, P. Lee, D. Liefer, S. T. Lu, D. Luc- chetti, C. Lytle, A. Malm, M. Matheny, B. Mathew- son, K. Mayer, D. B. Miller, M. Mills, B. Neyenhuis, L. Nugent, S. Olson, J. Parks, G. N. Price, Z. Price, M. Pugh, A. Ransford, A. P. Reed, C. Roman, M. Rowe, C. Ryan-Anderson, S. Sanders, J. Sedlacek, P. Shevchuk, P. Siegfried, T. Skripka, B. Spaun, R. T. Sprenkle, R. P. Stutz, M. Swallows, R. I. Tobey, A. Tran, T. Tran, E. Vogt, C. Volin, J. Walker, A. M. Zolot, and J. M. Pino, A race- track trapped-ion quantum processor, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041052 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  20. D. Gottesman, Quantum fault-tolerance in small experi- ments, arXiv:1610.03507 [quant-ph] (2016). · arXiv
  21. S. T. Flammia and Y.-K. Liu, Direct fidelity estima- tion from few pauli measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230501 (2011), arXiv:1104.4695 [quant-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. M. P. da Silva, O. Landon-Cardinal, and D. Poulin, Practi- cal characterization of quantum devices without tomogra- phy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 210404 (2011), arXiv:1104.3835 [quant-ph]. · DOI
  23. D. J. Wineland, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, B. E. King, and D. M. Meekhof, Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 103, 259 (1998), arXiv:quant- ph/9710025.
  24. J. M. Pino, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, M. S. Allman, C. H. Baldwin, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer, C. Ryan-Anderson, and B. Neyenhuis, Demonstration of the trapped-ion quantum-ccd computer architecture, Nature 10.1038/s41586-021-03318-4 (2020), arXiv:2003.01293 [quant-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  25. D. Nigg, M. Mueller, E. A. Martinez, P. Schindler, M. Hen- nrich, T. Monz, M. A. Martin-Delgado, and R. Blatt, Quantum computations on a topologically encoded qubit, Science 345, 302 (2014), arXiv:1403.5426 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  26. J. Hilder, D. Pijn, O. Onishchenko, A. Stahl, M. Orth, B. Lekitsch, A. Rodriguez-Blanco, M. Müller, F. Schmidt- Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger, Fault-tolerant parity read- out on a shuttling-based trapped-ion quantum computer, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011032 (2022). · DOI
  27. H. Goto, Minimizing resource overheads for fault-tolerant preparation of encoded states of the steane code, Scientific reports 6, 1 (2016).
  28. R. Chao and B. W. Reichardt, Fault-tolerant quantum computation with few qubits, npj Quantum Information 4, 1 (2018), arXiv:1705.05365 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  29. J. Preskill, Reliable quantum computers, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 454, 385 (1998).
  30. S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).
  31. D. Bacon, S. T. Flammia, A. W. Harrow, and J. Shi, Sparse quantum codes from quantum circuits, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 63, 2464 (2017), arXiv:1411.3334 [quant-ph]. · DOI
  32. D. Gottesman, Opportunities and challenges in fault- tolerant quantum computation (2022), arXiv:2210.15844 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  33. N. Delfosse and A. Paetznick, Spacetime codes of clifford circuits (2023), arXiv:2304.05943 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  34. E. Knill, Scalable quantum computation in the presence of large detected-error rates (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0312190 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  35. E. Knill, Quantum computing with realistically noisy de- vices, Nature 434, 39-44 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0410199 [quant-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  36. P. Prabhu and B. W. Reichardt, Distance-four quantum codes with combined postselection and error correction, arXiv:2112.03785 [quant-ph] (2021). · arXiv
  37. E. H. Chen, T. J. Yoder, Y. Kim, N. Sundaresan, S. Srini- vasan, M. Li, A. D. Córcoles, A. W. Cross, and M. Takita, Calibrated decoders for experimental quantum error correction, Physical Review Letters 128, 10.1103/phys- revlett.128.110504 (2022), arXiv:2110.04285 [quant-ph]. · DOI
  38. C. K. Andersen, A. Remm, S. Lazar, S. Krinner, N. Lacroix, G. J. Norris, M. Gabureac, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Repeated quantum error detection in a surface code, Nature Physics 16, 875-880 (2020), arXiv:1912.09410 [quant-ph]. · DOI
  39. N. Sundaresan, T. J. Yoder, Y. Kim, M. Li, E. H. Chen, G. Harper, T. Thorbeck, A. W. Cross, A. D. Córcoles, and M. Takita, Demonstrating multi-round sub- system quantum error correction using matching and maximum likelihood decoders, Nature Communications 14, 10.1038/s41467-023-38247-5 (2023), arXiv:2203.07205 [quant-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  40. A. M. Steane, Active stabilization, quantum computation, and quantum state synthesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2252 (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9611027. · DOI
  41. X. Zhou, D. W. Leung, and I. L. Chuang, Methodology for quantum logic gate construction, Phys. Rev. A 62, 052316 (2000), arXiv:quant-ph/0002039. · DOI · Paper page
  42. J. Leon, Computing automorphism groups of error- correcting codes, IEEE Transactions on Information The- ory 28, 496 (1982). · DOI
  43. M. Grassl and M. Roetteler, Leveraging automorphisms of quantum codes for fault-tolerant quantum computation, in 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (2013) pp. 534-538. · DOI
  44. R. Acharya, L. Aghababaie-Beni, I. Aleiner, T. I. Ander- sen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, N. As- trakhantsev, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, B. Bal- lard, J. C. Bardin, J. Bausch, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, S. Blackwell, S. Boixo, G. Bortoli, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, L. Brill, M. Broughton, D. A. Browne, B. Buchea, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, T. Burger, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, A. Cabrera, J. Campero, H.-S. Chang, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, D. Chik, C. Chou, J. Claes, A. Y. Cleland, J. Cogan, R. Collins, P. Conner, W. Courtney, A. L. Crook, B. Curtin, S. Das, A. Davies, L. D. Lorenzo, D. M. Debroy, S. Demura, M. Devoret, A. D. Paolo, P. Donohoe, I. Drozdov, A. Dunsworth, C. Earle, T. Edlich, A. Eick- busch, A. M. Elbag, M. Elzouka, C. Erickson, L. Faoro, E. Farhi, V. S. Ferreira, L. F. Burgos, E. Forati, A. G. Fowler, B. Foxen, S. Ganjam, G. Garcia, R. Gasca, Élie Genois, W. Giang, C. Gidney, D. Gilboa, R. Gosula, A. G. Dau, D. Graumann, A. Greene, J. A. Gross, S. Habegger, J. Hall, M. C. Hamilton, M. Hansen, M. P. Harrigan, S. D. Harrington, F. J. H. Heras, S. Heslin, P. Heu, O. Hig- gott, G. Hill, J. Hilton, G. Holland, S. Hong, H.-Y. Huang, A. Huff, W. J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, S. V. Isakov, J. Iveland, E. Jeffrey, Z. Jiang, C. Jones, S. Jordan, C. Joshi, P. Juhas, D. Kafri, H. Kang, A. H. Karamlou, K. Kechedzhi, J. Kelly, T. Khaire, T. Khattar, M. Khezri, S. Kim, P. V. Klimov, A. R. Klots, B. Kobrin, P. Kohli, A. N. Korotkov, F. Kostritsa, R. Kothari, B. Kozlovskii, J. M. Kreikebaum, V. D. Kurilovich, N. Lacroix, D. Landhuis, T. Lange-Dei, B. W. Langley, P. Laptev, K.-M. Lau, L. L. Guevel, J. Led- ford, K. Lee, Y. D. Lensky, S. Leon, B. J. Lester, W. Y. Li, Y. Li, A. T. Lill, W. Liu, W. P. Livingston, A. Locharla, E. Lucero, D. Lundahl, A. Lunt, S. Madhuk, F. D. Mal- one, A. Maloney, S. Mandrá, L. S. Martin, S. Martin, O. Martin, C. Maxfield, J. R. McClean, M. McEwen, S. Meeks, A. Megrant, X. Mi, K. C. Miao, A. Mieszala, R. Molavi, S. Molina, S. Montazeri, A. Morvan, R. Movas- sagh, W. Mruczkiewicz, O. Naaman, M. Neeley, C. Neill, A. Nersisyan, H. Neven, M. Newman, J. H. Ng, A. Nguyen, M. Nguyen, C.-H. Ni, T. E. O'Brien, W. D. Oliver, A. Opremcak, K. Ottosson, A. Petukhov, A. Pizzuto, J. Platt, R. Potter, O. Pritchard, L. P. Pryadko, C. Quin- tana, G. Ramachandran, M. J. Reagor, D. M. Rhodes, G. Roberts, E. Rosenberg, E. Rosenfeld, P. Roushan, N. C. Rubin, N. Saei, D. Sank, K. Sankaragomathi, K. J. Satzinger, H. F. Schurkus, C. Schuster, A. W. Senior, M. J. Shearn, A. Shorter, N. Shutty, V. Shvarts, S. Singh, V. Sivak, J. Skruzny, S. Small, V. Smelyanskiy, W. C. Smith, R. D. Somma, S. Springer, G. Sterling, D. Strain, J. Suchard, A. Szasz, A. Sztein, D. Thor, A. Torres, M. M. Torunbalci, A. Vaishnav, J. Vargas, S. Vdovichev, G. Vi- dal, B. Villalonga, C. V. Heidweiller, S. Waltman, S. X. Wang, B. Ware, K. Weber, T. White, K. Wong, B. W. K. Woo, C. Xing, Z. J. Yao, P. Yeh, B. Ying, J. Yoo, N. Yosri, G. Young, A. Zalcman, Y. Zhang, N. Zhu, and N. Zo- brist, Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold (2024), arXiv:2408.13687 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  45. B. W. Reichardt, D. Aasen, R. Chao, A. Chernoguzov, W. van Dam, J. P. Gaebler, D. Gresh, D. Lucchetti, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, B. Neyenhuis, A. Paetznick, A. Paz, P. E. Siegfried, M. P. da Silva, K. M. Svore, Z. Wang, and M. Zanner, Demonstration of quantum computa- tion and error correction with a tesseract code (2024), arXiv:2409.04628 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  46. L. Vaidman, L. Goldenberg, and S. Wiesner, Error preven- tion scheme with four particles, Phys. Rev. A 54, R1745 (1996). · DOI
  47. M. Grassl, T. Beth, and T. Pellizzari, Codes for the quantum erasure channel, Phys. Rev. A 56, 33-38 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  48. D. Bacon and A. Casaccino, Quantum error correcting subsystem codes from two classical linear codes (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0610088 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  49. G. Duclos-Cianci and D. Poulin, Reducing the quantum- computing overhead with complex gate distillation, Phys. Rev. A 91, 10.1103/physreva.91.042315 (2015). · DOI
  50. E. T. Campbell and J. O'Gorman, An efficient magic state approach to small angle rotations, Quantum Science and Technology 1, 015007 (2016). · DOI
  51. C. Jones, M. A. Fogarty, A. Morello, M. F. Gyure, A. S. Dzurak, and T. D. Ladd, Logical qubit in a linear ar- ray of semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. X 8, 10.1103/physrevx.8.021058 (2018). · DOI
  52. A. M. Stephens and Z. W. E. Evans, Accuracy threshold for concatenated error detection in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A 80, 10.1103/physreva.80.022313 (2009). · DOI
  53. C. Jones, Multilevel distillation of magic states for quantum computing, Phys. Rev. A 87, 10.1103/phys- reva.87.042305 (2013). · DOI
  54. S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computa- tion with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Phys- ical Review A 71, 10.1103/physreva.71.022316 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0403025. · DOI · Paper page
  55. R. Chao and B. W. Reichardt, Quantum error correc- tion with only two extra qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 10.1103/physrevlett.121.050502 (2018). · DOI
  56. B. W. Reichardt, Fault-tolerant quantum error correc- tion for steane's seven-qubit color code with few or no extra qubits, Quantum Science and Technology 6, 015007 (2020). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Paetznick, A., da Silva, M. P., Ryan-Anderson, C., Bello-Rivas, J. M., Campora, J. P., Chernoguzov, A., Dreiling, J. M., Foltz, C., Frachon, F., Gaebler, J. P., Gatterman, T. M., Grans-Samuelsson, L., Gresh, D., Hayes, D., Hewitt, N., Holliman, C., Horst, C. V., Johansen, J., Lucchetti, D., Matsuoka, Y., Mills, M., Moses, S. A., Neyenhuis, B., Paz, A., Pino, J., Siegfried, P., Sundaram, A., Tom, D., Wernli, S. J., Zanner, M., Stutz, R. P., & Svore, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Azure Quantum
  • Quantinuum (United Kingdom) (GB)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2404.02280
arXiv
2404.02280
OpenAlex
W4394006177
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
logical qubits, fault-tolerant quantum computing, error correction, trapped-ion quantum computing, logical error rate, post-selection, CNOT gate, quantum error suppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review