The DOI matches its DataCite record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
This survey paper examines the recent advancements in AI agent implementations, with a focus on their ability to achieve complex goals that require enhanced reasoning, planning, and tool execution capabilities. The primary objectives of this work are to a) communicate the current capabilities and limitations of existing AI agent implementations, b) share insights gained from our observations of these systems in action, and c) suggest important considerations for future developments in AI agent design. We achieve this by providing overviews of single-agent and multi-agent architectures, identifying key patterns and divergences in design choices, and evaluating their overall impact on accomplishing a provided goal. Our contribution outlines key themes when selecting an agentic architecture, the impact of leadership on agent systems, agent communication styles, and key phases for planning, execution, and reflection that enable robust AI agent systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are designed to overcome the limitations of single-agent systems in context capacity (Yu et al., 2026), insufficient exploration (Gurjar et al., 2026), and inefficient serial execution (Masterman et al., 2024), through specialized collaboration (Guo et al., 2024).”
From MS-Eval: Benchmarking Sub-Agent Delegation and Orchestration in MCP-Intensive Working Scenarios (2026) · cites this paper as Masterman et al., 2024
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In these works, LLMs are often used to help an agent plan its actions [4], [13], [14], despite evidence that they may not be capable of reliably planning [15].”
From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There is simultaneously a growing interest in developing AI agents , models that are trained and equipped to take actions that affect the world [4], [5].”
From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505 · cited 2×
“Solutions that use multiple agent personas to solve problems also show significant improvements compared to Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting where the model is asked to break down its plans step by step [28, 29].”
BackgroundMethodChain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., & Ahmed, N. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00524 · Cited by 1,245 · cited 1×
“Language Models have been known to exhibit bias both in terms of evaluation as well as in social or fairness terms [5].”
BackgroundTree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models
Yao, S., Yu, D., Zhao, J., Shafran, I., Griffiths, T. L., Cao, Y., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10601 · Cited by 1,158 · cited 1×
“For example, Plan Like a Graph (PLaG) is an approach that represents plans as directed graphs, with multiple steps being executed in parallel [15, 33].”
BackgroundReflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning
Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Berman, E., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, K., & Yao, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.11366 · Cited by 1,087 · cited 3×
“Reflexion is a single-agent pattern that uses self-reflection through linguistic feedback [23].”
BackgroundMethodThe Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972 · cited 1×
“In this paper, we follow the definition of agent that consists of “brain, perception, and action” [31].”
MethodInfluentialThe rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608 · cited 6×
“We find that successful goal execution by agents is contingent upon proper planning and self-correction [32, 16, 23, 1].”
InfluentialTraining Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
Cobbe, K., Kosaraju, V., Bavarian, M., Chen, M., Jun, H., Kaiser, L., Plappert, M., Tworek, J., Hilton, J., Nakano, R., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.14168 · Cited by 575 · cited 1×
“Many language model benchmarks are designed to be solved in a single iteration, with no tool calls, such as MMLU or GSM8K [3, 10].”
BackgroundA Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent CollaborationPreprint
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, P., Liu, Y., & Yang, D. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.02170 · Cited by 320 · cited 2×
“Many multi-agent architectures work in stages where teams of agents are created and reorganized dynamically for each planning, execution, and evaluation phase [2, 9, 18].”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wenting Zhao et al. "(InThe)WildChat: 570K ChatGPT Interaction Logs In The Wild". In: The Twelfth In- ternational Conference on Learning Representations. 2024. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id= Bl8u7ZRlbM.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models
Mei, L., Yao, J., Ge, Y., Wang, Y., Bi, B., Cai, Y., Liu, J., Li, M., Li, Z.-Z., Zhang, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13334 · Cited by 281
Agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of architectures, applications, and future directions
Ali, M. A., Dornaika, F., & Charafeddine, J. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11422-4 · Cited by 291
“This dual-axis taxonomy provides the unified lens necessary to rigorously analyze the field’s theoretical underpinnings, architectural innovations, and practical deployments.”
AI agents under threat: A survey of key security challenges and future pathways
Deng, Z., Guo, Y., Han, C., Ma, W., Xiong, J., Wen, S., & Xiang, Y. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3716628 · Cited by 210
“The literature [105] summarized the current AI agent architecture.”
AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?Preprint
Zhang, G.-M., Wang, J., Chen, J., Zhou, W., Wang, K., & Yan, S.-C. (2025) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.03312 · Cited by 145
“…faculties, encompassing perception (Driess et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024; Zheng et al., 2023; Wei et al., 2024), planning (Zhu et al., 2024; Erdogan et al., 2025; Huang et al., 2024), reasoning (Putta et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024), and action (Li et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024).”
AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoMLPreprint
Trirat, P., Jeong, W., & Hwang, S. J. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.02958 · Cited by 91
“An example of prompt parsing process of an instruction-response pair { ( I i , R i ) } .”
G-Memory: Tracing Hierarchical Memory for Multi-Agent Systems
Zhang, G.-M., Fu, M., Wan, G.-C., Yu, M., Wang, K., & Yan, S.-C. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.07398 · Cited by 124
“…of artificial intelligence, LLM-driven agents have exhibited unprecedented prowess in perception [2, 3, 4, 5], planning [6, 7, 8], reasoning [9, 10], and action [11, 12], which have catalyzed remarkable progress across diverse downstream domains, including code generation [13, 14], data…”
MedRAX: Medical Reasoning Agent for Chest X-rayPreprint
Fallahpour, A., Ma, J., Munim, A., Lyu, H., & Wang, B. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.02673 · Cited by 86
“Recent surveys on LLM-based agents (Xi et al., 2025; Zhao et al., 2023; Masterman et al., 2024) have outlined a generalizable agent framework comprising three core components: (1) a reasoning engine driven by LLMs, (2) perceptual modules that process multimodal inputs, and (3) action mechanisms…”
A Survey on (M)LLM-Based GUI AgentsPreprint
Tang, F., Xu, H., Zhang, H., Chen, S., Wu, X., Shen, Y., Zhang, W., Hou, G., Tan, Z., Yan, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.13865 · Cited by 87
“The successful execution of GUI Agents relies on two critical components: precise planning and robust verification mechanisms [33, 61, 162].”
Magentic-UI: Towards Human-in-the-loop Agentic SystemsPreprint
Mozannar, H., Bansal, G., Tan, C., Fourney, A., Dibia, V. C., Chen, J., Gerrits, J., Payne, T., Maldaner, M. K., Grunde-McLaughlin, M., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.22358 · Cited by 74
“We use the multi-agent paradigm for the design of our agent system to allow for an easily extendable and modular system [80, 46, 26, 82, 70, 93, 81, 27, 43, 96, 45, 11, 90, 111, 67, 37, 39, 18, 5, 30].”
FIRE: Fact-checking with Iterative Retrieval and Verification
Xie, Z.-H., Xing, R., Wang, Y.-X., Geng, J.-H., Iqbal, H., Sahnan, D., Gurevych, I., & Nakov, P. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00784 · Cited by 61
“These agent frameworks typically consist of several components, including reasoning, tool usage, memory, and multi-agent debate (Masterman et al., 2024), many of which can be seamlessly integrated into fact-checking pipelines to enhance the performance of traditional fact-checking systems.”
Measuring Agents in ProductionPreprint
Pan, M. Z., Arabzadeh, N., Cogo, R., Zhu, Y., Xiong, A., Agrawal, L. A., Mao, H., Shen, E., Pallerla, S., Patel, L., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.04123 · Cited by 79
Characterizing AI Agents for Alignment and GovernancePreprint
Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.21848 · Cited by 7
A Survey of Data Agents: Emerging Paradigm or Overstated Hype?
Zhu, Y., Wang, L.-W., Yang, C.-Y., Lin, X.-T., Li, B., Zhou, W., Liu, X.-Y., Peng, Z.-Y., Luo, T.-Q., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.23587 · Cited by 48
“Second, these systems heavily depend on a predefined set of tools or APIs and cannot access additional tools or functions on demand, limiting their ability to address unforeseen problems requiring operations beyond those anticipated by their designers [198].”
Intent-Based Infrastructure and Service Orchestration Using Agentic-AI
Brodimas, D., Birbas, A. N., Kapolos, D., & Denazis, S. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3600706 · Cited by 34
“These architectures range from simple single-agent setups, which work well for clearly defined tasks but struggle with flexibility, to more complex multi-agent systems that can scale better but require sophisticated coordination mechanisms [20], [21].”
Integrating ESG and AI: a comprehensive responsible AI assessment framework
Lee, S. U., Perera, H., Liu, Y., Xia, B., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Cairns, J., & Nottage, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00741-5 · Cited by 78
LLM-Powered AI Agent Systems and Their Applications in Industry
Liang, G., & Tong, Q. (2025) · IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT) · doi:10.1109/aiiot65859.2025.11105299 · Cited by 49
“Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has significantly changed the AI agent system, driving advances in automation and human-AI collaboration [3]–[9].”
Yan, Y., Wang, S., Huo, J., Yu, P. S., Hu, X.-M., & Wen, Q. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.18132 · Cited by 42
“Despite these efforts, the development of o1-like multimodal systems is still in its stages (Chen et al., 2025c; Masterman et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2025), with significant problems such as overthinking (Cuadron et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2025a), safety (Chen et al., 2025a; Huo et al., 2025; Zhao et…”
Simple Prompt Injection Attacks Can Leak Personal Data Observed by LLM Agents During Task ExecutionPreprint
Alizadeh, M., Samei, Z., Stetsenko, D., & Gilardi, F. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01055 · Cited by 40
“AI agents are entities powered by language models that can plan and perform actions across multiple steps to achieve a goal [29].”
Planning with Multi-Constraints via Collaborative Language AgentsPreprint
Zhang, C., Deik, D. G. X., Li, D., Zhang, H., & Liu, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.16510 · Cited by 11
“The emergence of LLMs introduces new paradigms for agents (Chu et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024a; Masterman et al., 2024), demonstrating significant intelligence in reasoning (Kojima et al., 2022; Wei et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023b), planning (Yao et al., 2023b,a; Besta et al., 2024),…”
TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Kavathekar, I., Jain, H., Rathod, A., Kumaraguru, P., & Ganu, T. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.05269 · Cited by 34
“LLMs have demonstrated great capabilities in reasoning, tool usage, coding, multi-step planning and decision making (Masterman et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2023a).”
ShapefileGPT: a multi-agent large language model framework for automated shapefile processing
Lin, Q., Hu, R., Li, H., Wu, S., Li, Y., Fang, K., Feng, H., Du, Z., & Xu, L. (2025) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2025.2577884 · Cited by 37
“LLM-Geo [21] has shown great potential in the study of autonomous GIS.”
Leveraging large language models for automating water distribution network optimization
Wang, J., Fu, G., & Savic, D. A. (2025) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2025.124536 · Cited by 29
“The profile module defines the agent ’ s role, personality, and social context through tailored prompts (Masterman et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024a).”
Yüksel, K., Ferreira, T. C., Al-Badrashiny, M., & Sawaf, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the 1st Workshop for Research on Agent Language Models (REALM 2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.17149 · Cited by 31
“Masterman et al. (2024) reviewed emerging AI agent architectures, focusing on modularity and scalability, which are central to this framework’s refinement approach.”
AutoData: A Multi-Agent System for Open Web Data Collection
Ma, T.-Y., Qian, Y.-Y., Zhang, Z.-Y., Wang, Z.-H., Qian, X., Bai, F., Ding, Y.-F., Luo, X.-W., Zhang, S.-N., Murugesan, K., et al. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.15859 · Cited by 29
“To make the study more challenging and account for the fact that surveys often contain more references than regular papers, we selected five surveys in the MAS field [61–65].”
A Survey on Agent Workflow – Status and Future
Yu, C., Cheng, Z., Cui, H., Gao, Y., Luo, Z., Wang, Y., Zheng, H., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd64986.2025.11082076 · Cited by 35
“…tools like vector search engines, web searcher, computation and reasoning tools like calculators, code interpreters, knowledge and query tools like databases, Q&A systems, APIs and function calling Interfaces like OpenAI function calling, toolbox Interface (e.g., AutoGPT ToolManager) [11].”
CoMAL: Collaborative Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Mixed-Autonomy Traffic
Yao, H.-Y., Da, L., Nandam, V., Turnau, J., Liu, Z.-W., Pang, L., & Wei, H. (2024) · SDM · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.14368 · Cited by 27
“The communication structure of LLM-based multi-agent systems varies across different studies to address specific challenges [23, 34, 24].”
BackgroundAl-Bashrawi, M. A., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Elgendy, I. A., Helal, M. Y. I., Anbalagan, M. K., Chae, I., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2026) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-026-01164-2 · Cited by 18
“Intermediate results are shared among agents to refine outputs, ensuring coherence and accuracy (Masterman et al., 2024 ).”
Agentic AI Framework for End-to-End Medical Data Inference
Shimgekar, S. R., Vassef, S., Goyal, A., Saha, K., Zonooz, P., & Kumar, N. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm66473.2025.11356498 · Cited by 24
Han, C., Zheng, W.-Z., & Tang, X.-J. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18596 · Cited by 24
“Moreover, existing MAD frameworks lack the structured process of fact-checking, where claims are systematically examined through evidence collection, counterargument analysis, and multi-dimensional evaluation conducted by domain experts (Masterman et al., 2024; Slonim et al., 2021).”
AI for Service: Proactive Assistance with AI Glasses
Wen, Z., Wang, Y.-Y., Liao, C., Yang, B.-X., Li, J., Liu, W.-F., He, H., Feng, B., Liu, X.-Y., Lyu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.14359 · Cited by 22
“Frameworks like the Model-Controller-Program (MCP) approach (Krishnan, 2025; Hou et al., 2025; Ray, 2025) provide a structured way for agents to leverage external tools (Masterman et al., 2024), enabling them to interact with the environment and access specialized functionalities.”
TableMind: An Autonomous Programmatic Agent for Tool-Augmented Table Reasoning
Jiang, C., Cheng, M.-Y., Tao, X.-Y., Mao, Q.-Y., Ouyang, J., & Liu, Q. (2025) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.06278 · Cited by 22
“On the other hand, the few methods that do incorporate tool interaction [24] are heavily reliant on massive, proprietary models.”
A Vision for Auto Research with LLM AgentsPreprint
Liu, C., Wang, C., Cao, J., Ge, J., Wang, K., Zhang, L., Cheng, M., Zhao, P., Li, T., Jia, X., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.18765 · Cited by 28
“This design follows a “plan-and-execute” paradigm [9], [10], [11], in which the planner explicitly “thinks through” all required steps in advance and the executor focuses on carrying them out.”
Agent Data Protocol: Unifying Datasets for Diverse, Effective Fine-tuning of LLM Agents
Song, Y.-Q., Ramaneti, K., Sheikh, Z., Chen, Z.-R., Gou, B., Xie, T.-B., Xu, Y., Zhang, D., Gandhi, A., Yang, F., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.24702 · Cited by 21
“The development of effective LLM-based agents critically depends on high-quality training data that could capture the complexity of multi-step reasoning, tool usage, and environmental interaction (Yao et al., 2022b; Schick et al., 2023; Deng et al., 2023; Masterman et al., 2024).”
Multi-Agent Deep Research: Training Multi-Agent Systems with M-GRPOPreprint
Hong, H., Yin, J., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Chen, Z., Yu, A., Li, J., Ye, Z., Xiao, H., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.13288 · Cited by 24
“Studies show that multi-agent systems with a leader complete tasks nearly 10% faster than those without [Masterman et al., 2024].”
A Practical Guide for Designing, Developing, and Deploying Production-Grade Agentic AI Workflows
Bandara, E., Gore, R., Foytik, P. B., Shetty, S., Mukkamala, R., Rahman, A., Liang, X.-P., Bouk, S., Hass, A., Rajapakse, S., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.08769 · Cited by 19
“By keeping workflow logic minimal and delegating most cognitive tasks to LLMs and agents, the system remains adaptable to new models, new tools, and new runtime environments without requiring architectural rewrites [26].”
InfluentialLarge Model Agents: State-of-the-Art, Cooperation Paradigms, Security and Privacy, and Future Trends
Wang, Y., Pan, Y., Zhao, Q., Deng, Y., Su, Z., Du, L.-K., & Luan, T. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.14457 · Cited by 19
“Masterman et al. [8] provide an overview of single-agent and multi-agent architectures in industrial projects and present the insights and limitations of existing research.”
InfluentialDhanorkar, S., Passi, S., & Vorvoreanu, M. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812402 · Cited by 20
“(3) We outline future sociotechnical research directions, provide design implications to address developers’ immediate oversight challenges, and highlight broader implications for the software engineering practice.”
EvoRoute: Experience-Driven Self-Routing LLM Agent Systems
Zhang, G.-B., Yu, H., Yang, K., Wu, B., Huang, F., Li, Y.-B., & Yan, S.-C. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.02695 · Cited by 18
“…(Driess et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2023; Wei et al., 2024), planning (Zhu et al., 2024; Erdogan et al., 2025), reasoning (Putta et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024), and action (Li et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024), LLM-driven agentic AI systems have achieved remarkable performance across a…”
Generalizability of Large Language Model-Based Agents: A Comprehensive Survey
Zhang, M., Yang, Y., Xie, R., Dhingra, B., ZHOU, S., & Pei, J. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3794858 · Cited by 15
“While several recent surveys have addressed aspects of LLM-based agents [46, 50, 65, 69, 104, 122, 148], they fall short in several key areas.”
A Survey of Large Language Models in Mental Health Disorder Detection on Social Media
Ge, Z., Hu, N., Li, D., Wang, Y., Qi, S., Xu, Y., Han, S., & Zhang, J. Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW) · doi:10.1109/icdew67478.2025.00027 · Cited by 15
“Furthermore, agentic systems possess planning capabilities [77], [78], enabling them to decompose complex user goals or queries into a series of manageable subtasks.”
Watson: A Cognitive Observability Framework for the Reasoning of LLM-Powered Agents
Rombaut, B., Masoumzadeh, S., Vasilevski, K., Lin, D., & Hassan, A. E. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase63991.2025.00067 · Cited by 17
“Agentic software powered by large language models (LLMs) [6, 23, 36] (i.e., Agentware [19]) is increasingly being adopted across a variety of domains such as autonomous software engineering [26, 51], customer support [18], and data analytics [17].”
SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behavior
Li, J.-J., Pyatkin, V., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Jiang, L.-W., Dziri, N., Collins, A. G. E., Borg, J. S., Sap, M., Choi, Y.-J., & Levine, S. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.16665 · Cited by 18
“The safety of AI behavior is particularly important as the Internet of Ev-erything becomes reality (Han, 2024), especially with recent developments in AI agents that can interact with the world through actions (Masterman et al., 2024).”
AI Agent Systems: Architectures, Applications, and EvaluationPreprint
Xu, B. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.01743 · Cited by 20
“AI agents address this gap by coupling a foundation model with an execution loop that can observe an environment, plan, call tools, update memory, and verify outcomes [10, 31].”
Pysklo, H. M., Zhuravel, A., & Watson, P. D. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817555 · Cited by 2
BackdoorAgent: A Unified Framework for Backdoor Attacks on LLM-based Agents
Feng, Y.-H., Li, Y.-G., Wu, Y.-T., Tan, Y.-S., Guo, Y.-M., Ding, Y.-F., Zhai, K., Ma, X.-J., & Jiang, Y. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.04566 · Cited by 16
“Such isolated evaluations fail to capture the operational reality of modern agents, whose behaviors emerge from iterative workflows that tightly couple three functional stages: Planning for action orchestration, Memory for context retrieval, and Tools for environmental interaction [26, 33, 45].”
Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey
Qi, C., Wang, W., Jiang, S., Liu, Q., Song, X., Fang, H., & Wei, Z. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag075 · Cited by 11
An Empirical Study of Agent Developer Practices in AI Agent Frameworks
Wang, Y.-L., Xu, X., Chen, J.-C., Bi, T.-T., Gu, W., & Zheng, Z.-B. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.01939 · Cited by 16
“The tools component enables the agent to interact with external systems, thereby performing operations that extend beyond text generation [57].”
Blueprint First, Model Second: A Framework for Deterministic LLM Workflow
Qiu, L.-B., Ye, Y., Gao, Z., Zou, X., Chen, J., Gui, Z., Huang, W., Xue, X., Qiu, W., & Zhao, K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.02721 · Cited by 15
“The power of these agents is greatly amplified by their ability to use external tools (Masterman et al. 2024).”
A Framework for Testing and Adapting REST APIs as LLM Tools
Bandlamudi, J., Chaudhuri, R., Gantayat, N., Ghosh, S., Mukherjee, K., Agarwal, P., Sindhgatta, R., & Mehta, S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.15546 · Cited by 14
“However, REST APIs are typically not designed with LLM agents in mind, creating challenges for seamless integration due to complex input schema and verbose responses.”
iDesignGPT enhances conceptual design via large language model agentic workflows
Liu, S., Shen, Y., Zhang, Y., Hou, Z., Wang, X., Luo, J., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-68672-1 · Cited by 21
“Beyond these intrinsic strengths,LLMscan serve asthe cognitivecoreof agenticsystemsthat integratememory, planning, toolkits, andexecutablework fl ows 27 .”
GTM: Simulating the World of Tools for AI AgentsPreprint
Ren, Z., Zhang, X., Qian, Z., Gao, Y., Shi, Y., Zheng, S., & He, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.04535 · Cited by 12
“Tools, which can be regarded as functions that take specific inputs and produce corresponding outputs through predefined operations, offer a promising solution by bridging this gap (Masterman et al., 2024; Yao et al., 2023).”
Agentic AI in Hospitality and Tourism: Opportunities, Risks, and Research Pathways
Ali, F., & Ali, L. (2025) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875251392915 · Cited by 24
“Traditional AI systems in hospitality and tourism can be broadly classified as reflexive, goal-driven, or utility-based agents (Masterman et al., 2024; Wooldridge & Jennings, 1995).”
A vision of human–AI collaboration for enhanced biological collection curation and research
Stenhouse, A., Fisher, N., Lepschi, B. J., Schmidt‐Lebuhn, A. N., Rodríguez, J., Turco, F., Reeson, A. F., Paris, C. L., & Thrall, P. H. (2025) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaf021 · Cited by 12
Agentic AI in Healthcare: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions
Gridach, M., Nanavati, J., Zine El Abidine, K., Yacoubian, C., & Mack, C. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3809164 · Cited by 8
“Metrics such as scores (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1) and success rates across tasks, output similarity to human responses, memory persistence, efficiency (e.g., response time or resource usage) and cost are commonly used [52, 71].”
ToolDreamer: Instilling LLM Reasoning Into Tool Retrievers
Sengupta, S., Zhou, Z., Araki, J., Wang, X.-B., Wang, B.-Q., Wang, S.-H., & Feng, Z. (2025) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.19791 · Cited by 12
“LLM-based tool calling (generating text as parsable function calls) (Masterman et al., 2024; Qu et al., 2025) has emerged as a viable solution to real-world environment interaction, allowing them to solve a variety of complex tasks from mathematics (Das et al., 2024) to molecular structure…”
ToPolyAgent: AI agents for coarse-grained bead-spring topological polymer simulations
Ding, L., Carrillo, J.-M., & Do, C. (2026) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d5dd00471c · Cited by 11
“LLMs, with their ability to process and generate natural language, can interpret user instructions, orchestrate tasks, and integrate domain-specific tools to perform specialized computations[45, 46].”
A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents
Su, H., Luo, J., Liu, C., Yang, X., Zhang, Y., Dong, Y., & Zhu, J. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2026.3688650 · Cited by 11
“Large-model AI agents—autonomous systems built around large-scale models such as LLMs—introduce qualitatively new security risks compared to both traditional AI systems and standalone language models [53], [67], [68].”
Zhu, S., Sun, J., Nian, Y., South, T., Pentland, A., & Pei, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.00073 · Cited by 4
“Recently, large language model (LLM) powered AI agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities and are increasingly adopted for real-world tasks (Xu et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024).”
Distributional AGI SafetyPreprint
Tomašev, N., Franklin, M., Jacobs, J., Krier, S., & Osindero, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.16856 · Cited by 33
“…can range from fairly simple prompting strategies (Arora et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023), to highly complex control-flows that involve tool use (Masterman et al., 2024; Qin et al., 2024; Ruan et al., 2023), coding and code execution (Guo et al., 2024; Huang et al., 2023; Islam et al., 2024;…”
Ma, X., & Wang, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Education Conference · doi:10.1109/fie61694.2024.10892925 · Cited by 11
“In particular, multi-agent systems have demonstrated superior performance in scenarios requiring collaboration and multiple execution paths [10], making them well-suited for addressing the intricate and complex challenges in technical education, which normally requires nuanced solutions and…”
A Taxonomy of Architecture Options for Foundation Model-based Agents: Analysis and Decision ModelPreprint
Zhou, J., Lu, Q.-H., Chen, J.-S., Zhu, L.-M., Xu, X.-W., Xing, Z.-C., & Harrer, S. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.02920 · Cited by 11
“These foundation-model-based agent systems have the potential to revolutionize industries by enhancing efficiencies, enabling automation, and facilitating complex decision-making processes [5].”
BackgroundHow Agents Ask for Permission: User Permissions for AI Agents, from Interfaces to Enforcement
Michael, A. E., & Roesner, F. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.13718 · Cited by 10
“Such permissions systems have traditionally been built on foundational security principles like least privilege (grant each entity only the minimum necessary permissions) and failing closed (when in doubt, deny permission) [47, 51].”
Haidemariam, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1728738 · Cited by 8
Li, X.-Q., Kuang, H.-L., Li, W.-K., Li, Z.-W., & Ye, S.-P. (2025) · NIER@ICSE · doi:10.1145/3786582.3786817 · Cited by 10
“As described in Algorithm 1, It first identifies public or external entry functions, then verifies the presence of access-control checks (e.g., Modifiers ), and finally retains variables relevant to authority (e.g., owner ).”
Traditional RAG vs. Agentic RAG: A Comparative Study of Retrieval-Augmented Systems
Neha, F., & Bhati, D. (2025) · 2025 IEEE International Conference on Future Machine Learning and Data Science (FMLDS) · doi:10.1109/fmlds67896.2025.00073 · Cited by 10
BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web
Guo, Z., Zhou, Y.-J., Wang, C., You, L., Bian, M.-J., & Zhang, W. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.13787 · Cited by 10
“Beyond the fundamental operation of agents, this module involves container scheduling (Xiao et al., 2024), hybrid on-chain and off-chain data storage (Tsang et al., 2024), invocation of various tools (Masterman et al., 2024), and generation of proofs (Čapko et al., 2022).”
From To-Do to Ta-Da: Transforming Task-Focused IR with Generative AI
Shah, C. S., & White, R. W. (2025) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3726302.3730352 · Cited by 10
“However, these agents were limited by their inability to plan or learn from past experiences, reducing their effectiveness in dynamic environments [13, 48].”
ToolCoder: A Systematic Code-Empowered Tool Learning Framework for Large Language ModelsPreprint
Ding, H., Tao, S., Pang, L., Wei, Z., Gao, J.-Y., Ding, B.-L., Shen, H.-W., & Cheng, X.-Q. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.11404 · Cited by 10
“Recent approaches have focused on enhancing LLMs by integrating external tools to improve their problem-solving capabilities (Masterman et al., 2024; Qu et al., 2024; Qian et al., 2023; Yuan et al., 2024a).”
Shah, C., & White, R. W. (2024) · Computer · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.16241 · Cited by 10
“The 1990s introduced reactive agents [8], which responded to environmental stimuli without internal models.”
Frontiers of Large Language Model-Based Agentic Systems - Construction, Efficacy and Safety
He, J., Ghosh, R., Walia, K., Chen, J., Dhadiwal, T., Hazel, A., & Inguva, C. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3627673.3679105 · Cited by 12
“• Inter-agent collaboration patterns: leader/planner, layered/nested,sequentialhierarchical,dynamic, chainofagents, etc. [9, 29, 35] • Orchestration patterns: planning, critic and/or reflection, group planning, and tool use [35, 44] 3.3.3 Agentic Frameworks.”
InfluentialTRACES: Proactive Safety Auditing for Multi-Turn LLM Agents via Trajectory-State Modeling
Li, J.-Q., Li, Y.-S., Zhang, B.-X., Tang, R.-X., & Huang, K.-H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27690 · Cited by 9
“…users during reasoning (Ma et al., 2024; Li et al., 2025; Guan et al., 2025), and (II) tool use, which allows models to invoke ex-ternal tools to support reasoning and substantially expands their capabilities beyond pure text generation (Wang et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024; Li et al., 2026a).”
Do Coding Agents Understand Least-Privilege Authorization?Preprint
Yan, Z., Weng, J., Chen, C., Peng, D., Qin, E., Guan, J., Liu, J., Yu, Q., Yuan, Y., Meng, F., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.14859 · Cited by 13
“Reasoning-and-acting frameworks [2] and surveys of agent architectures and agentic programming [4, 43, 44] show that models can plan tool use across multi-step workflows, while work on long chain-of-thought and reasoning boundaries [19, 45, 46] studies when more inference-time reasoning helps or…”
Ng, L., Cruickshank, I. J., Lim, A. X. W., & Carley, K. M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07069 · Cited by 9
“We have built agents capable of reasoning, planning and negotiation [66, 92, 62], but have largely studied them in terms of individual task completion or as independent units contributing to a collective objective.”
Towards Security-Auditable LLM Agents: A Unified Graph Representation
Li, C.-F., Zhang, L., Zhai, J.-T., Feng, S., Yang, X., Wang, H.-H., Dou, S.-H., Ji, Y., Hu, Y.-T., Wu, Y.-M., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.06812 · Cited by 9
“Modern agent frameworks Corresponding author: Yutao Hu. commonly support goal decomposition, context management, long-term memory, external tool invocation, environment interaction, and multi-agent collaboration [2].”
Quantifying Trust: Financial Risk Management for Trustworthy AI Agents
Hua, W.-Y., Peng, T.-Y., Wang, C., Pei, J.-X., Kaufman, I., Lim, B., & Fang, C. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03976 · Cited by 9
“Large language models enable agentic systems (Masterman et al., 2024) that write and execute code, invoke external tools (Patil et al., 2025), perform multi-step reasoning (Kim et al., 2024; Aksitov et al., 2023), maintain memory (Hu et al., 2025; Kang et al., 2025), and interact with external…”
A self-correcting Agentic Graph RAG for clinical decision support in hepatology
Hu, Y., Xuan, W., Zhou, Q., Li, Z., Li, Y., Hu, J., & Fang, F. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1716327 · Cited by 18
“Concurrently, using the LangGraph framework (29, 30), we designed a dynamic agentic workflow (31, 32).”
NetMCP: Network-Aware Model Context Protocol Platform for LLM Capability ExtensionPreprint
Li, E., Du, H., & Huang, K. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13467 · Cited by 8
“To overcome this limit, LLMs are increasingly augmented with external tools that provide access to real-time information and domain-specific services, such as APIs, calculators, and Python interpreters [4]–[6].”
SynWorld: Virtual Scenario Synthesis for Agentic Action Knowledge Refinement
Fang, R.-N., Wang, X.-B., Liang, Y., Qiao, S.-F., Wu, J., Xi, Z.-K., Zhang, N.-Y., Jiang, Y., Xie, P.-J., Huang, F., et al. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.03561 · Cited by 9
“…agen-tic workflows of today, where model planning is instrumental in addressing a myriad of complex tasks, including question answering (QA) (Mavi et al., 2022), embodied interaction (Yao et al., 2022), tool invocation (Masterman et al., 2024), and long-form text generation (Jiang et al., 2024).”
Tang, Z., Zhang, Z., Wang, Q., Tang, Z., Li, B., & Chu, X. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.17417 · Cited by 6
“The capabilities of LLMs have transcended simple single-round inference, evolving into sophisticated agentic work-flows that integrate interleaved reasoning with ex-ternal tool execution (Masterman et al., 2024; Plaat et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2024, 2025d; Wang et al.).”
Learning When to Act or Refuse: Guarding Agentic Reasoning Models for Safe Multi-Step Tool UsePreprint
Agarwal, A., Siyan, G., Pandya, Y., Singh, J., Nambi, A., & Awadallah, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.03205 · Cited by 7
“Language models are increasingly deployed as agents that plan, call tools, and interact with external systems over multiple steps (Wang et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024; Lumer et al., 2025).”
Is Agentic RAG worth it? An experimental comparison of RAG approachesPreprint
Ferrazzi, P., Cvjeticanin, M., Piraccini, A., & Giannuzzi, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.07711
“While the definition of the properties that characterize AI agents has evolved (Masterman et al., 2024”
Pan, J.-J., Liu, Y.-X., Miao, R., Ding, K.-Z., Zheng, Y., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Liew, A. W.-C., & Pan, S.-R. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.18733 · Cited by 8
“By incorporating capabilities such as memory (Xu et al., 2025), tool usage (Masterman et al., 2024), and advanced planning (Huang et al., 2024), these agents can solve complex tasks in diverse domains.”
LLMs and AI Life Models for Traditional Chinese Medicine-derived Geroprotector Formulation
Galkin, F., Ren, F., & Zhavoronkov, A. A. (2025) · Aging and Disease · doi:10.14336/ad.2024.1697 · Cited by 8
“Best practices to create such structures are still actively discussed and the approaches range from “quantity over quality” to elaborate architectures governing agent planning and cooperation [76, 77].”
Li, L., Zhang, Y., Makanda, I. L. D., & Jiang, P. (2025) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2025.103214 · Cited by 9
Evaluating Privilege Usage of Agents with Real-World Tools
Zhang, Q., Fu, L., Lian, L., Go, G., Wang, Y.-J., Zhou, C.-J., Jiang, Y., & Pu, G. (2026) · SIGSOFT FSE Companion · doi:10.1145/3803437.3805554 · Cited by 7
Before You Hand Over the Wheel: Evaluating LLMs for Security Incident Analysis
Jajodia, S., Sultana, M., Majumdar, S., Taylor, A., & Vandenberghe, G. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.06422 · Cited by 7
“In our dataset, even all questions are known, asking all the questions simultaneously in a single-state setting may cause the agent to get overly focused on one question while overlooking others [62], [63].”
From Atom to Community: Structured and Evolving Agent Memory for User Behavior ModelingPreprint
Liao, Y., Wu, L., Hou, M., Wang, Y., Wu, H., & Wang, M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.16872 · Cited by 7
“LLM-based agents [8, 25] have emerged as a powerful paradigm capable of understanding complex contexts and generating human-level intelligent responses.”
An Overview of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing for Information Systems
O’Shaughnessy, D. D. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16021122 · Cited by 9
“More recently, AI agents can permit more complex user interactions, using planning, loops, reflection, and other control devices [82].”
InfluentialAI practical wisdom and compassion
Graves, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00877-4 · Cited by 9
ROMAS: A Role-Based Multi-Agent System for Database monitoring and PlanningPreprint
Huang, Y., Cheng, F., Zhou, F., Li, J., Gong, J., Yang, H., Fan, Z., Jiang, C., Xue, S., & Chen, F. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.13520 · Cited by 7
“Structure design User interaction Drag-and-drop workshop emphasizes enhancing agent performance through modules such as profile, memory, planning, and action [Masterman et al., 2024].”
Xinyu-Chen, & Zhang, L. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.10064 · Cited by 12
“In this section, we describe the methodology for building LLM-based agents ontologies in specialized domains.”
MethodAgentic profiles for effective AI governance
Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10805-z · Cited by 80
“Generative agents wake up, cook breakfast, and head to work; artists paint, while authors write; they form opinions, notice each other, and initiate conversations; they remember and reflect on days past as they plan the next day” D.5: Shavit et al. (2023) 94 “Agentic AI systems are characterized by the ability to take…”
HiLSVA: Design and Evaluation of a Human-in-the-Loop Agentic System for Scientific VisualizationPreprint
Ai, K., Phuoc, P., & Wang, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.26614 · Cited by 3
“Recent surveys identify reasoning, planning, tool use, memory, and reflection as core capabilities of such systems [45,77].”
What makes a harness a harness: necessary and sufficient conditions for an agent harnessPreprint
de Macedo, S. O. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.10106 · Cited by 8
“Surveys of software agents describe components (memory, tools, reasoning loop) without consolidating what constitutes the harness as a unit [17, 24, 29]; work on the agent-computer interface treats one facet, tools, and stops there [55]; context engineering, now a topic of its own, covers another…”
AgentWebBench: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Coordination in Agentic WebPreprint
Zhong, S., Shen, K., & Xiong, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.10938 · Cited by 6
Errico, H. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.09433 · Cited by 9
“Large language models (LLMs) have evolved from text generators into autonomous agents capable of executing consequential actions across systems [6], [10].”
Agentic Design Patterns: A System-Theoretic FrameworkPreprint
Dao, M.-D., Le, Q., Lam, H. T., Le, D.-T., Pham, Q., O'Sullivan, B., & Nguyễn, H. L. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.19752 · Cited by 23
He, S.-Q., Cui, Y., Ma, X., Li, Y.-L., Ding, B.-L., & Chowdhury, M. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.19838 · Cited by 6
“…2025; Cui et al., 2025a), web environments pose greater challenges due to their diverse, context-dependent action choices/function calling (e.g., click , type , scroll ) (Masterman et al., 2024; Qu et al., 2025; Cui et al., 2025b) and partial observability (Ning et al., 2025; Gao et al., 2025).”
Machines that halt resolve the undecidability of artificial intelligence alignment
de Melo, G. A., Máximo, M. R. O. A., Soma, N. Y., & de Castro, P. A. L. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99060-2 · Cited by 5
“As detailed by Masterman et al. 28 , modern AI agent frameworks can be categorized into single-agent and multi-agent systems, with varying levels of autonomy and reasoning capabilities, incorporating planning, execution, and reflection phases to iteratively solve problems, often using complex reasoning loops and tool-…”
OracleAgent: A Multimodal Reasoning Agent for Oracle Bone Script ResearchPreprint
Li, C., Ding, Z., Hu, X., Li, B., Luo, D., Peng, X., Jin, T., Liu, Y., Han, S., Yang, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.26114 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Masterman, T., Besen, S., Sawtell, M., & Chao, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2404.11584
- OpenAlex
- W4394948161
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- AI agents, agent architecture, multi-agent systems, single-agent systems, reasoning, planning, tool calling, agent communication, reflection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review