The DOI matches its DataCite record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
This survey paper examines the recent advancements in AI agent implementations, with a focus on their ability to achieve complex goals that require enhanced reasoning, planning, and tool execution capabilities. The primary objectives of this work are to a) communicate the current capabilities and limitations of existing AI agent implementations, b) share insights gained from our observations of these systems in action, and c) suggest important considerations for future developments in AI agent design. We achieve this by providing overviews of single-agent and multi-agent architectures, identifying key patterns and divergences in design choices, and evaluating their overall impact on accomplishing a provided goal. Our contribution outlines key themes when selecting an agentic architecture, the impact of leadership on agent systems, agent communication styles, and key phases for planning, execution, and reflection that enable robust AI agent systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are designed to overcome the limitations of single-agent systems in context capacity (Yu et al., 2026), insufficient exploration (Gurjar et al., 2026), and inefficient serial execution (Masterman et al., 2024), through specialized collaboration (Guo et al., 2024).”
From MS-Eval: Benchmarking Sub-Agent Delegation and Orchestration in MCP-Intensive Working Scenarios (2026) · cites this paper as Masterman et al., 2024
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In these works, LLMs are often used to help an agent plan its actions [4], [13], [14], despite evidence that they may not be capable of reliably planning [15].”
From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There is simultaneously a growing interest in developing AI agents , models that are trained and equipped to take actions that affect the world [4], [5].”
From Episodic Memory in AI Agents Poses Risks that Should be Studied and Mitigated (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505 · cited 2×
“Solutions that use multiple agent personas to solve problems also show significant improvements compared to Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting where the model is asked to break down its plans step by step [28, 29].”
BackgroundMethodChain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., & Ahmed, N. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00524 · Cited by 1,245 · cited 1×
“Language Models have been known to exhibit bias both in terms of evaluation as well as in social or fairness terms [5].”
BackgroundTree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models
Yao, S., Yu, D., Zhao, J., Shafran, I., Griffiths, T. L., Cao, Y., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10601 · Cited by 1,158 · cited 1×
“For example, Plan Like a Graph (PLaG) is an approach that represents plans as directed graphs, with multiple steps being executed in parallel [15, 33].”
BackgroundReflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning
Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Berman, E., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, K., & Yao, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.11366 · Cited by 1,087 · cited 3×
“Reflexion is a single-agent pattern that uses self-reflection through linguistic feedback [23].”
BackgroundMethodThe Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972 · cited 1×
“In this paper, we follow the definition of agent that consists of “brain, perception, and action” [31].”
MethodInfluentialThe rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608 · cited 6×
“We find that successful goal execution by agents is contingent upon proper planning and self-correction [32, 16, 23, 1].”
InfluentialTraining Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
Cobbe, K., Kosaraju, V., Bavarian, M., Chen, M., Jun, H., Kaiser, L., Plappert, M., Tworek, J., Hilton, J., Nakano, R., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.14168 · Cited by 575 · cited 1×
“Many language model benchmarks are designed to be solved in a single iteration, with no tool calls, such as MMLU or GSM8K [3, 10].”
BackgroundA Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent CollaborationPreprint
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, P., Liu, Y., & Yang, D. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.02170 · Cited by 320 · cited 2×
“Many multi-agent architectures work in stages where teams of agents are created and reorganized dynamically for each planning, execution, and evaluation phase [2, 9, 18].”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wenting Zhao et al. "(InThe)WildChat: 570K ChatGPT Interaction Logs In The Wild". In: The Twelfth In- ternational Conference on Learning Representations. 2024. URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id= Bl8u7ZRlbM.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–262 of 262
Liao, J., Chen, Q., Zheng, J., Tang, X., Hu, F., & Huang, H.-W. (2026) · International Congress on Blockchain and Applications · doi:10.55092/blockchain20260005
“First, prior studies on AI agents reveal challenges related to accountability, reliable tool use, semantic correctness, multi-agent coordination, and economic or strategic instability [8,54–56].”
Ali, M. A., & Dornaika, F. (2026) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc10070235
Orchestration of Methods of Scientific Data Analysis in the Review Processes
Ataeva, O., & Tuchkova, N. (2026) · Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics · doi:10.3103/s0005105526700524
“An agent that has only the ontology of the subject area “knows” what is being discussed, but does not know how to act and by what method to respond to a specific information request [21].”
Lin, Y., Zhang, Z., & Li, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.24598
“…[5, 7, 15, 22] to our agent’s own decision boundary); agent frameworks (ReAct, Reflexion [18], AutoGen [25], Planner–Executor, Toolformer [17]) are greenfield [8, 14, 23, 27]; legacy migration (Strangler Fig, modernization surveys) [1, 2] addresses traditional software, not LLM+script workflows.”
Zhang, Y., Hu, L., Liu, D., Liu, J., Luo, Y., Gao, Z., & Wang, Z. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.12817
“Multi-agent and planning-oriented systems such as AutoGPT (Yang et al., 2023), MetaGPT (Hong et al., 2024), and related agent surveys (Masterman et al., 2024) further explore online decision making and procedural decomposition.”
Rajarajeswari, S., Darshan, C. S., & Siddaraju, C. (2026) · International Conference on Secure Cyber Computing and Communications (ICSCCC) · doi:10.1109/icsccc69031.2026.11600210
“To prevent catastrophic forgetting during Meta-LoRA updates, we impose a stability constraint on the generated adapters ∆ W : Intuition: Eq.”
Rouf, N., Kashyap, P., Chatterjee, S., Dutta, S., Cheng, C., & Franzon, P. D. (2026) · Electronic Components and Technology Conference · doi:10.1109/ectc51846.2026.00321
Configuração de Redes Baseada em Intenções com Modelos de Linguagem
Lacerda, P. N., & Souza, A. M. D. (2026) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Redes de Computadores e Sistemas Distribuídos (SBRC) · doi:10.5753/sbrc_estendido.2026.23383
“Em paralelo, uma linha mais ampla de pesquisa discute o uso de planeja-mento, grounding externo e avaliação funcional em aplicações técnicas de LLMs [Sumers et al. 2024, Masterman et al. 2024, Zhu et al. 2023, Chen et al. 2021].”
Bhave, C., Simon, P., Icenhour, C. T., Yang, L., Permann, C., Schwen, D., & Ritter, C. S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.17675
GRAFT: Graph-Tokenized LLMs for Tool PlanningPreprint
Gao, X., Ren, X., Yu, J., Chen, T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., & Yin, H. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.11706 · Cited by 1
“More recently, agentic tool-use methods [18] formulate planning as a closed-loop decision process, where the LLM selects the next tool action based on the previous context, and execution observations, e.g., ReAct [19], AgentGym [20], and AgentFlow [21].”
Agentic Symbolic Learning for Deterministic and Granular Clinical Data Normalization
de Urries, B. J., Gómez-Ortiz, D., & Menasalvas, E. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai68641.2026.11536386
“Therefore, the shift to Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) [8] is the current prevailing architectural paradigm [5], [6], [14], [15], as it provides the functional decomposition and role specialization required to manage complex, multi-stage tasks [16].”
Zhou, L., Yan, S., & He, N. (2026) · Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC) · doi:10.1109/yac71005.2026.11615908
Human-in-the-Loop Learning Systems for High-Risk Decision Domains
Durairaj, S., Kumar, V., & Padmavathy, E. K. (2026) · International Conference on Educational Technology Management (ICETM) · doi:10.1109/icetm68138.2026.11648111
“Nevertheless, the critics also claim that these "top-down" solutions can still have issues with the so-called semantic gap, i.e.-the gap between a principle of language (e.g. - be helpful) and its concrete, interactive implementation in a subtle context [20].”
Co-evolving Agent Architectures and Interpretable Reasoning for Automated Optimization
Huang, J., Xu, P.-L., Nan, X.-Y., & Luo, W.-J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.17708
“At the execution level, modern agents increasingly rely on tool use and environment interaction [35].”
An Agentic-Inspired Approach to the Recycling Environmental Challenge
Parker, L., & Allison, M. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability · doi:10.1109/sustech67720.2026.11536484
“Architecturally, Masterman et al. [15] reviewed contemporary agent frameworks, identifying design trends such as reflection loops, tool use pipelines, and agent persona modeling.”
Making SDV UX Designable: A Framework for Structuring Scenarios and LLM-Assisted Expansion
Cho, Y., Ha, T., & Lee, S. (2026) · CHI Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3772363.3799070
“Building on the proposed schema, we use an LLM as a constrained expansion tool to generate diverse yet structurally consistent scenario variations for design exploration, aligning with recent perspectives on framework-guided LLM use [7, 8].”
Revealing the Dark Matter: Connecting Tacit and System Knowledge in Human-AI Collaborations
Dearstyne, K. R., Bird, C., Badea, C., & DeLine, R. A. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3786582.3786833
“This convergence of newly available unstructured data with AI’s capacity for rapid reasoning creates a path to integrate system artifacts, team communications, and tacit knowledge within a shared knowledge space, enriching both human and agent understanding of software systems [14, 20, 26].”
Rytilahti, J., Puhtila, P., Weerakoon, O., Kaila, E., & Mäkilä, T. (2026) · International Workshop on Agentic Engineering · doi:10.1145/3786167.3788413
“The idea of an automated agent is to perform autonomous, varied, complex, and often reasoning-related tasks [16, 45].”
LLMs with Tools: Empirical Evaluation of the Thought-Action-Observation Paradigm
Usman, M., Iltaf, N., Shakoori, M. R., & Rana, T. A. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Computing and Machine Intelligence (ICMI) · doi:10.1109/icmi68585.2026.11539909 · Cited by 1
“The landscape of AI agent architectures has been systematically examined to understand the role of reasoning, planning, and tool calling in complex goal achievement [13].”
One Supervisor, Many Modalities: Adaptive Tool Orchestration for Autonomous QueriesPreprint
Saini, M., & Bishwas, A. K. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.11545
“Recent surveys [13, 27] highlight rapid progress in agent reasoning, planning capabilities, and the emergence of increasingly sophisticated coordination protocols.”
Who Knows What? Semantic Negotiation for Human-Supervised RAN Agentic Coordination
Baena, E., Mandal, A., Elango, A., Dinh, P., & Koutsonikolas, D. (2026) · IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA) · doi:10.1145/3789514.3793205
“Recent surveys [12] on AI agent architectures inform our design; we apply this to RAN coordination with MCP for agent interoperability [4].”
Leveraging MCP and Corrective RAG for Scalable and Interoperable Multi-Agent Healthcare Systems
Kalathas, D., Menychtas, A., Tsanakas, P. D., & Maglogiannis, I. G. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15040888 · Cited by 2
“Single-agent systems are often unable to address multi-tasking requirements because they rely on a main agent that focuses on a single objective and is enhanced only with tools to help manage it [6].”
Human Attribution of Causality to AI Across Agency, Misuse, and Misalignment
Carro, M. V., & Lagnado, D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.13236
“…are typically composed of multiple elements, such as a language model, memory, and external tools (e.g., APIs) that extend their capabilities [Masterman et al., 2024, He et al., 2025, Kraprayoon et al., 2025, Xi et al., 2025]; we simplified this architecture in our experiments by decomposing…”
Kundu, S. (2026) · International journal of innovative research and creative technology · doi:10.62970/ijirct.v12.i1.2603028
“[25] Metrics for multi-agent collaboration indicate improved coordination, with fewer conflicts and optimized workload distribution, thereby enhancing the system's overall robustness.”
Zhang, C., Yuan, Z.-H., Zhou, G.-H., Ma, D.-X., Ceng, K., Liu, J.-X., & Chen, X. (2026) · Scientia Sinica Technologica · doi:10.1360/sst-2025-0463
“图 1 AI agent 广义框架 次的任务 [29] , 由此也逐渐被研究者们引入到预测性 维护 [30] 、过程建模与控制 [31] 、人机协同 [32]”
From Single to Multi-Agent Reasoning: Advancing GeneGPT for Genomics QA
Abedini, K., Shami, F., & Silvello, G. (2026) · European Conference on Information Retrieval · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.10581
“GeneGPT operates as a single-agent architecture[15] where an LLM is guided through carefully constructed prompts containing API documentation and examples, with inference managed sequentially through a single forward loop of API calls and result processing.”
STELP: Secure Transpilation and Execution of LLM-Generated ProgramsPreprint
Shinde, S., Wadhwa, S., Luo, A., Gupta, A., & Sorower, M. S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.05467
“Currently, a highly active area of research centers around developing multi-agentic system that can understand user queries, reason, generate action plans, and execute them along with function/tool calls (Guo et al. 2024; Masterman et al. 2024; Lu et al. 2023; Hong et al. 2023; Wu et al. 2023).”
Jenius Agent: Towards Experience-Driven Accuracy Optimization in Real-World Scenarios
Xia, D.-F., Pi, B., Zhang, S.-B., Hua, S., Wei, Y.-F., & Zuo, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.01857
“…reasoning and planning, and performing complex tasks, and are widely used in a variety of fields such as research assistants, process automation, retrieval-augmented generation, and code generation and debugging (Dubey et al., 2024; Masterman et al., 2024; Qin et al., 2024; Singh et al., 2025).”
Small Models, Large Impact: An SLM-Centric Playbook for Practical Agents
Hassan, M. (2025) · International Conferences on Computing Advancements · doi:10.1109/icca66035.2025.11430765
“The prevailing operational paradigm involves centralized cloud infrastructure hosting general-purpose LLMs that serve diverse requests through standardized API endpoints [5].”
Zhang, L., Li, W.-K., Huang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2025) · 2025 6th International Conference on Computers and Artificial Intelligence Technology (CAIT) · doi:10.1109/cait68620.2025.11424841
“This role partitioning follows the growing tendency for the research of the multi-agent with an emphasis on the decomposition and partitioning of work [6][7].”
BlkMaC: A Blockchain-based Multi-Agents System with LLM Communication Framework
Yang, R.-L., Hou, T., Zhang, E.-F., & Qi, M.-F. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1145/3788149.3788229
“A LLM AI agent is a system that can design workflows and interact with its environment, collect data, and use that data to perform self-directed tasks that meet predetermined goals [13].”
Chden, Z., Wang, T., Zhou, N., & Chen, D. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11401974
“Our exploration of Portfolio Artifact (PA) Collections demonstrates the feasibility of verifiable, credential-enriched representations of agent behavior and provenance.”
Suwer, S., Bagemihl, K., Baier, S., Dicunta, L., List, M., Baumbach, J., Maier, A., & Delgado-Chaves, F. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.21438
“The server’s response is subsequently evaluated by an interpretation module that decides whether immediate feedback can be returned to the user or whether additional tools need to be engaged [37,38] (4-8).”
AI Agent based SaaS Platform (AIBSP)
MsAnju, Smitha, A. V., Arya.J, Madhav, K., & Skanda, B. (2025) · International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Intelligent Information Systems (ICUIS) · doi:10.1109/icuis67429.2025.11380629 · Cited by 1
“Nevertheless, even with the widespread development of AI technology, the unified and low-cost platforms needed to put together this piecemeal work into an overall product still do not exist, [1],[2].”
Deng, S.-Z. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Education, Arts, Management and Social Science · doi:10.18063/lne.v3i9.1005
“This architecture takes AI Agent [11] as the core technical engine, integrating and reengineering the five key processes—“on-campus theory, enterprise practice, competition verification, certificate certification, and scientific research feedback”—through two interrelated driving mechanisms: the…”
Mind the Workflow: Unmasking the Super Agents of Today
Sriram Sudhir, H., Chawla, M., Zuhaib, Z., & Purwar, A. (2025) · International Conference on AI-ML Systems (AIMLSystems) · doi:10.1109/aimlsystems67835.2025.11331213
“At the core of this transformation are the increasingly sophisticated tool-calling capabilities of LLMs [13].”
Multi-agent Based Content Recommendation for In-vehicle Infotainment System
Ogawa, H., Hagio, Y., Shoji, T., URATA, S., Hoshino, S., Ikeda, Y., Fukushima, T., & Ohmata, H. (2025) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3744335.3758518
“In recent years, the evolution of LLMs has given rise to autonomous LLM agents capable of planning and executing tasks on their own [18], as well as to LLM MAS architectures in which multiple agents collaborate to solve complex problems [11].”
Building crypto portfolios with agentic AI
Giudici, P., Piergallini, A., & Castelli, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1871825
“Rather, it lies in the automated construction and execution of an end-to-end MAS for portfolio management using LLM-based agents.”
LLMs: A Driving Force in Next Generation Digital Design Automation
Moreira, M. T., Markosyan, A. H., Cummins, C., Hunt, W. A., Synnaeve, G., & Beigné, É. (2025) · ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) · doi:10.1109/dac63849.2025.11132759
A Two-Stage Intent Recognition Framework in Multi-Agent Environments
Yang, W., Xu, P., & Zhang, X. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Engineering and Application (ICCEA) · doi:10.1109/iccea65460.2025.11103313
“…continuous improvement and wide application of the capabilities of large language models, generative artificial intelligence applications have developed rapidly, and the concept of AI agents has gradually become the core idea for building next-generation artificial intelligence applications [1].”
Talk2X -- An Open-Source Toolkit Facilitating Deployment of LLM-Powered Chatbots on the WebPreprint
Krupp, L., Geißler, D., Hevesi, P., Hirsch, M., Lukowicz, P., & Karolus, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.03343
“More complex systems, called agents, use tools or call functions during the LLM execution Masterman et al. [2024].”
Chintalapati, J., Akhil Rajeev, P., Choudhury, B., Bedare, M., & Kumar, Y. (2025) · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · doi:10.1007/s41745-026-00501-2
AI, Society and Environment: a Possible Complex System Framework
da Costa, K., Modenesi, B., Blay, E. A., & Muñoz, C. (2024) · Conferência Latino-Americana de Ética em Inteligência Artificial (LAAI-Ethics) · doi:10.5753/laai-ethics.2024.32473 · Cited by 1
“A recent perspective [Masterman et al. 2024] describes AI agents as language model-driven entities capable of planning and executing actions across multiple iterations to achieve specific goals.”
Improving Performance of Commercially Available AI Products in a Multi-Agent ConfigurationPreprint
Hymel, C., Peng, S., Xu, K., & Ranganathan, C. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.22129
“While single agent architectures excel when problems are well-defined and feedback from other agent-personas or the user is not needed, multi-agent architectures tend to thrive more when collaboration and multiple distinct execution paths are required [11], such as software development.”
BackgroundEvaluating Privilege Usage of Agents on Real-World Tools
Zhang, Q., Fu, L., Lian, L., Go, G., Wang, Y.-J., Zhou, C.-J., Jiang, Y., & Pu, G. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.28166
AI Agents for the Science of Science: A Survey of Tasks, Architectures, Evaluations, and Challenges
Liu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1804
“These capabilities position AI agents, particularly large language model (LLM) based agentic systems, as a well-suited computational framework for orchestrating complex, multi-step, and data-intensive scientific workflows (Masterman et al., 2024; Luo et al., 2025; Xi et al., 2025).”
Training Verifier to Assessing Complex Real-World Tool-Use Trajectories
Sun, L.-Z., Chen, M., Liang, H., Li, T.-P., Zhou, Y.-J., Zhu, C.-Z., Guo, T., Zhang, H., Wei, J.-X., Yu, B.-H., et al. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1647
“Recent research has advanced the design of tool-use agents, where LLMs are augmented to select, invoke, and integrate external tools into their workflows (Masterman et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024).”
Intention Recognition for Digital Forensics: With Agentic AI
Kassa, Y. W., Belay, E. G., & James, J. I. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3727721
“This aligns naturally with the structured and iterative nature of digital forensic investigations and provides a flexible foundation that can evolve alongside emerging cybercrime patterns, forensic techniques, and AI capabilities [60], [61].”
DoubleAgents: Exploring Mechanisms of Building Trust with Proactive AI
Long, T., Zhang, X.-M., Wang, S.-T., Yu, Z., & Chilton, L. B. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.12626
“Generative AI now possesses several key capabilities that could help with coordination, including deep reasoning to evaluate constraints and produce plans [8, 40, 48, 49], and API tool-calling to take concrete actions [23, 43, 47].”
DREAM: Dynamic Red-teaming across Environments for AI ModelsPreprint
Lu, L., Gu, X., Huang, J., Du, J., Zheng, X., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Pang, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.19016 · Cited by 4
“Building on these foundation models [10], [11], [12], [13], a new generation of autonomous AI agents is emerging [14], [15], capable of navigating digital environments, managing tools and APIs, and executing complex multi-step workflows.”
CODE-GEN: A RAG-Based Agentic AI System for Multiple-choice Question Generation
Duan, X., Nwanganga, F., & Wang, C. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29760-0_10
“Tool Augmentation Augmenting AI agents with external tools is an established strategy for extending capabilities beyond pure language generation [13].”
Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AI
Belcak, P., Heinrich, G., Diao, S., Fu, Y., Dong, X., Muralidharan, S., Lin, Y. C., & Molchanov, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.02153 · Cited by 18
“However, advanced agentic systems are either designed in their entirety or at least actively prompted to perform decompositions of complex problems and inputs [48, 14].”
InfluentialMagentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Tasks
Fourney, A., Bansal, G., Mozannar, H., Tan, C., Salinas, E., Erkang, Zhu, Niedtner, F., Proebsting, G., Bassman, G., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.04468 · Cited by 17
“Common strategies for developing such agents [25, 62, 27, 6] include equipping LLMs with tools such as for code execution and web browsing [40, 41, 46, 29] and prompting strategies for better reasoning and planning such as CoT [58], ReACT [70] and few-shot prompting [79].”
BackgroundLarge Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges
Luo, J., Zhang, W., Yuan, Y., Zhao, Y., Yang, J., Gu, Y., Wu, B., Chen, B., Qiao, Z., Long, Q., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.21460 · Cited by 5
“2) Build-Collaborate-Evolve framework: We analyze three interconnected dimensions of LLM agents - construction, collaboration, and evolution - offering a more holistic understanding than previous approaches [22], [23].”
MCP-Zero: Active Tool Discovery for Autonomous LLM Agents
Fei, X., Zheng, X., & Feng, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01056
“The emergence of function-calling mechanisms has enabled large language models (LLMs) to transcend their parametric boundaries, leveraging external tools, APIs, and execution environments to accomplish complex real-world tasks [14, 18, 21, 26].”
BlindGuard: Safeguarding LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems under Unknown Attacks
Miao, R., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Shen, X., Tan, Y., Dai, Y., Pan, S., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.08127 · Cited by 2
Evolution of AI in Education: Agentic Workflows
Kamalov, F., Calonge, D. S., Smail, L., Azizov, D., Thadani, D. R., Kwong, T., & Atif, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.20082 · Cited by 4
“…them to (1) Define clear objectives/goals/outcomes for the agent's actions; (2) Generate Plans and create a sequence of actions to achieve the goals; and (3) Execute the planned actions, “accomplish a task end-to-end” (Masterman et al., 2024, p.1), monitoring progress and adapting as needed.”
Security Threats in Agentic AI System
Khan, R., Sarkar, S., Mahata, S. K., & Jose, E. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.14728 · Cited by 4
“A systematic literature review was conducted to gather existing research on AI agents [11], database interactions, and associated security vulnerabilities.”
BackgroundGraphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities
Bei, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Chen, W., Zhou, S., Chen, H., Li, Y., Bu, J., Pan, S., Yu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.18019
“AI agents performing complex real-world tasks are often required to possess diverse capabilities [6], [7].”
Inside the Scaffold: A Source-Code Taxonomy of Coding Agent Architectures
Rombaut, B. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03515
“The initial pilot began with six candidate dimensions drawn from the conceptual agent architecture literature [Masterman et al., 2024]: control loop, tool interface, state management, context retrieval, execution isolation, and multi-model routing.”
InfluentialAgent Contracts: A Formal Framework for Resource-Bounded Autonomous AI Systems
Ye, Q., & Tan, J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.08815
“Additional surveys examine architectural patterns [38, 31] and how message-passing architectures affect coordination effectiveness [54].”
Autonomous Computer Vision Development with Agentic AI
Kim, J., Wahi-Anwa, M., Park, S., Shin, S., Hoffman, J. M., & Brown, M. S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.11140
“Architectures vary widely[1], single-agent systems rely on one core LLM[1, 6], while multi-agent systems (MAS) involve collaboration between specialized agents, potentially structured vertically (with a leader) or horizontally[1, 6].”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Masterman, T., Besen, S., Sawtell, M., & Chao, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2404.11584
- OpenAlex
- W4394948161
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- AI agents, agent architecture, multi-agent systems, single-agent systems, reasoning, planning, tool calling, agent communication, reflection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review