The Prompt Report: A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering Techniques
Open accessAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) systems are increasingly being deployed across diverse industries and research domains. Developers and end-users interact with these systems through the use of prompting and prompt engineering. Although prompt engineering is a widely adopted and extensively researched area, it suffers from conflicting terminology and a fragmented ontological understanding of what constitutes an effective prompt due to its relatively recent emergence. We establish a structured understanding of prompt engineering by assembling a taxonomy of prompting techniques and analyzing their applications. We present a detailed vocabulary of 33 vocabulary terms, a taxonomy of 58 LLM prompting techniques, and 40 techniques for other modalities. Additionally, we provide best practices and guidelines for prompt engineering, including advice for prompting state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs such as ChatGPT. We further present a meta-analysis of the entire literature on natural language prefix-prompting. As a culmination of these efforts, this paper presents the most comprehensive survey on prompt engineering to date.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, Y., Lo, S. K., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Zhao, D., Xu, X., Harrer, S., & Whittle, J. (2025) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112278 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Sezgin, E., Jackson, D. I., Kocaballi, A. B., Bibart, M., Zupanec, S., Landier, W., Audino, A., Ranalli, M., & Skeens, M. (2025) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.70554 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Toward Automated Simulation Research Workflow through LLM Prompt Engineering Design
Liu, Z., Chai, Y., & Li, J. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01653 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Darwin Gödel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agents
Zhang, J., Hu, S., Lu, C., Lange, R., & Clune, J. (2025) · SuperIntelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment · doi:10.70777/si.v2i3.15063 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey
Ding, H., Li, Y., Wang, J., Chen, H., Guo, D., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 9th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business · doi:10.1145/3802463.3802475 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomated Design of Agentic Systems
Hu, S., Lu, C., & Clune, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.08435 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“9 et al., 2023a; Schulhoff et al., 2024), chain-of-thought-based planning and reasoning methods (Wei et al., 2022; Yao et al., 2023; Hu & Clune, 2024), reflection (Madaan et al., 2024; Shinn et al., 2023), developing new skills for embodied agents in code (Wang et al., 2023a; Vemprala et al.,…”
Helping LLMs improve code generation using feedback from testing and static analysis
Dolcetti, G., Arceri, V., Iotti, E., Maffeis, S., Cortesi, A., & Zaffanella, E. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01009-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Many of the prompts have been inspired by [11], regarding both the text arrangement and the structure.”
CoachGPT: A Scaffolding-based Academic Writing Assistant
Chen, F., Veng, S., Wilson, J., Li, X., & Fang, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3726302.3730143 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agents
Zhang, J., Hu, S., Lu, C., Lange, R., & Clune, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22954 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Gödel Agent: A Self-Referential Agent Framework for Recursively Self-Improvement
Yin, X., Wang, X., Pan, L., Lin, L., Wan, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1354 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Gödel Agent: A Self-Referential Agent Framework for Recursive Self-Improvement
Yin, X., Wang, X., Pan, L., Lin, L., Wan, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.04444 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“These systems often employ techniques such as prompt engineering (Chen et al., 2023a; Schulhoff et al., 2024), chain-of-thought reasoning and planning (Wei et al., 2022; Yao et al., 2022), as well as reflection (Shinn et al., 2024; Madaan et al., 2024), code generation (Wang et al., 2023a; Vemprala…”
Robeyns, M., Szummer, M., & Aitchison, L. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.15228 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-Harness: Harnesses That Improve Themselves
Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Li, K., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Bai, L., & Hu, S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.09498
“Prompt engineering and context engineering show that fixed models can be steered by instructions, demonstrations, retrieved evidence, memory, tool state, and dynamically constructed inputs [10, 25, 21, 6, 17, 12, 26, 7].”
Helping LLMs Improve Code Generation Using Feedback from Testing and Static Analysis
Dolcetti, G., Arceri, V., Iotti, E., Maffeis, S., Cortesi, A., & Zaffanella, E. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14841 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Schulhoff, S., Ilie, M., Balepur, N., Kahadze, K., Liu, A., Si, C., Li, Y., Gupta, A., Han, H., Schulhoff, S., Dulepet, P. S., Vidyadhara, S., Ki, D., Agrawal, S., Pham, C., Kroiz, G., Li, F., Tao, H., Srivastava, A., Da Costa, H., Gupta, S., Rogers, M. L., Goncearenco, I., Sarli, G., Galynker, I., Peskoff, D., Carpuat, M., White, J., Anadkat, S., Hoyle, A., & Resnik, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Texas State University (US)
- Mount Sinai Beth Israel (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2406.06608
- OpenAlex
- W4399597451
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 17
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- prompt engineering, prompting techniques, large language models, multimodal prompting, ChatGPT, generative AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
