CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 25Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingIoT-based Smart Home Systems

DigiRL: Training In-The-Wild Device-Control Agents with Autonomous Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Bai, Hao, Zhou, Yifei, Cemri, Mert, Pan, Jiayi, Suhr, Alane, Levine, Sergey, Kumar, Aviral·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2406.11896arXiv 2406.11896
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Training corpuses for vision language models (VLMs) typically lack sufficient amounts of decision-centric data. This renders off-the-shelf VLMs sub-optimal for decision-making tasks such as in-the-wild device control through graphical user interfaces (GUIs). While training with static demonstrations has shown some promise, we show that such methods fall short for controlling real GUIs due to their failure to deal with real-world stochasticity and non-stationarity not captured in static observational data. This paper introduces a novel autonomous RL approach, called DigiRL, for training in-the-wild device control agents through fine-tuning a pre-trained VLM in two stages: offline RL to initialize the model, followed by offline-to-online RL. To do this, we build a scalable and parallelizable Android learning environment equipped with a VLM-based evaluator and develop a simple yet effective RL approach for learning in this domain. Our approach runs advantage-weighted RL with advantage estimators enhanced to account for stochasticity along with an automatic curriculum for deriving maximal learning signal. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DigiRL using the Android-in-the-Wild (AitW) dataset, where our 1.3B VLM trained with RL achieves a 49.5% absolute improvement -- from 17.7 to 67.2% success rate -- over supervised fine-tuning with static human demonstration data. These results significantly surpass not only the prior best agents, including AppAgent with GPT-4V (8.3% success rate) and the 17B CogAgent trained with AitW data (38.5%), but also the prior best autonomous RL approach based on filtered behavior cloning (57.8%), thereby establishing a new state-of-the-art for digital agents for in-the-wild device control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2406.11896

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global aggregation is compromised by low signal-to-noise ratios in long-horizon tasks.

    “global aggregation (Bai et al., 2024;Wang et al., 2025b) is compromised by low signal-to-noise ratios in long-horizon tasks”

    From OS-Themis: A Scalable Critic Framework for Generalist GUI Rewards (2026) · cites this paper as Bai et al., 2024

    Section 4.1 (p. 6) says trajectory-based Monte Carlo advantage estimates are likely to have high variance because of device-environment stochasticity, supporting the concern about noisy learning signals. It does not attribute that problem to global aggregation or establish that it worsens in long-horizon tasks. Indeed, the horizon-limit experiment in B.1 (p. 17) reports faster learning with a longer permitted horizon. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Compared with ZeroGUI and DigiRL, OS-Themis exhibits consistently strong performance with superior stability and overall effectiveness across diverse platforms.

    “compared with ZeroGUI (Yang et al., 2025) and DigiRL (Bai et al., 2024), OS-Themis exhibits consistently strong performance with superior stability and overall effectiveness across diverse platforms.”

    From OS-Themis: A Scalable Critic Framework for Generalist GUI Rewards (2026) · cites this paper as Bai et al., 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [3][3] Baian Chen, Chang Shu, Ehsan Shareghi, Nigel Collier, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Fireact: Toward language agent fine-tuning. ArXiv , abs/2310.05915, 2023. URL https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:263829338 . - · arXiv
  2. [8][8] Dibya Ghosh, Jad Rahme, Aviral Kumar, Amy Zhang, Ryan P Adams, and Sergey Levine. Why Generalization in RL is Difficult: Epistemic POMDPs and Implicit Partial Observability. NeurIPS , 2021. -
  3. [11][11] Minqi Jiang, Edward Grefenstette, and Tim Rocktäschel. Prioritized level replay. CoRR , abs/2010.03934, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03934 . - · arXiv
  4. [12][12] Yiding Jiang, J Zico Kolter, and Roberta Raileanu. On the importance of exploration for generalization in reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36, 2024. -
  5. [13][13] Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik Narasimhan. Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues?, 2024. -
  6. [14][14] Sham M. Kakade and John Langford. Approximately optimal approximate reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning , 2002. URL https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:31442909 . -
  7. [16][16] Jing Yu Koh, Robert Lo, Lawrence Jang, Vikram Duvvur, Ming Chong Lim, Po-Yu Huang, Graham Neubig, Shuyan Zhou, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Daniel Fried. Visualwebarena: Evaluating multimodal agents on realistic visual web tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13649 , 2024. - · arXiv
  8. [21][21] Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. Roberta: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. CoRR , abs/1907.11692, 2019. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1907. 11692 . - · arXiv
  9. [22][22] Ashvin Nair, Murtaza Dalal, Abhishek Gupta, and Sergey Levine. Accelerating online reinforcement learning with offline datasets. CoRR , abs/2006.09359, 2020. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2006.09359 . - · arXiv
  10. [25][25] Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke E. Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul Francis Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan J. Lowe. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. ArXiv , abs/2203.02155, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:246426909 . - · arXiv
  11. [26][26] Jiayi Pan, Yichi Zhang, Nicholas Tomlin, Yifei Zhou, Sergey Levine, and Alane Suhr. Autonomous evaluation and refinement of digital agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06474 , 2024. - · arXiv
  12. [28][28] Xue Bin Peng, Aviral Kumar, Grace Zhang, and Sergey Levine. Advantage-weighted regression: Simple and scalable off-policy reinforcement learning. CoRR , abs/1910.00177, 2019. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.00177 . - · arXiv
  13. [31][31] Christopher Rawles, Alice Li, Daniel Rodriguez, Oriana Riva, and Timothy Lillicrap. Android in the wild: A large-scale dataset for android device control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10088 , 2023. - · arXiv
  14. [34][34] John Schulman, Sergey Levine, Philipp Moritz, Michael I. Jordan, and Pieter Abbeel. Trust region policy optimization. CoRR , abs/1502.05477, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1502.05477 . - · arXiv
  15. [35][35] John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. CoRR , abs/1707.06347, 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1707.06347 . - · arXiv
  16. [37][37] Tianlin Shi, Andrej Karpathy, Linxi Fan, Jonathan Hernandez, and Percy Liang. World of bits: An open-domain platform for web-based agents. In Doina Precup and Yee Whye Teh, editors, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 3135-3144. PMLR, 06-11 Aug 2017. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/shi17a.html . -
  17. [39][39] Daniel Toyama, Philippe Hamel, Anita Gergely, Gheorghe Comanici, Amelia Glaese, Zafarali Ahmed, Tyler Jackson, Shibl Mourad, and Doina Precup. Androidenv: A reinforcement learning platform for android. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13231 , 2021. - · arXiv
  18. [40][40] Hado van Hasselt, Arthur Guez, and David Silver. Deep reinforcement learning with double q-learning. CoRR , abs/1509.06461, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06461 . - · arXiv
  19. [44][44] Tianbao Xie, Danyang Zhang, Jixuan Chen, Xiaochuan Li, Siheng Zhao, Ruisheng Cao, Toh Jing Hua, Zhoujun Cheng, Dongchan Shin, Fangyu Lei, et al. Osworld: Benchmarking multimodal agents for open-ended tasks in real computer environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07972 , 2024. - · arXiv
  20. [47][47] Zhao Yang, Jiaxuan Liu, Yucheng Han, Xin Chen, Zebiao Huang, Bin Fu, and Gang Yu. Appagent: Multimodal agents as smartphone users. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13771 , 2023. - · arXiv
  21. [50][50] Yuexiang Zhai, Hao Bai, Zipeng Lin, Jiayi Pan, Shengbang Tong, Yifei Zhou, Alane Suhr, Saining Xie, Yann LeCun, Yi Ma, and Sergey Levine. Fine-tuning large vision-language models as decision-making agents via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10292 , 2024. - · arXiv
  22. [51][51] Chaoyun Zhang, Liqun Li, Shilin He, Xu Zhang, Bo Qiao, Si Qin, Minghua Ma, Yu Kang, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, et al. Ufo: A ui-focused agent for windows os interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07939 , 2024. - · arXiv
  23. [54][54] Ziniu Zhang, Shulin Tian, Liangyu Chen, and Ziwei Liu. Mmina: Benchmarking multihop multimodal internet agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09992 , 2024. - · arXiv
  24. [56][56] Shuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Uri Alon, and Graham Neubig. Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents. ArXiv , abs/2307.13854, 2023. URL https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:260164780 . - · arXiv
  25. [57][57] Yifei Zhou, Andrea Zanette, Jiayi Pan, Sergey Levine, and Aviral Kumar. Archer: Training language model agents via hierarchical multi-turn rl. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.19446 , 2024. - · arXiv
  26. [58][58] Daniel M. Ziegler, Nisan Stiennon, Jeffrey Wu, Tom B. Brown, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, Paul F. Christiano, and Geoffrey Irving. Fine-tuning language models from human preferences. CoRR , abs/1909.08593, 2019. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.08593 . · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Bai, H., Zhou, Y., Cemri, M., Pan, J., Suhr, A., Levine, S., & Kumar, A.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
12461-12495
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2406.11896
arXiv
2406.11896
OpenAlex
W4415798734
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT-based Smart Home Systems
Keywords
device control, robot learning from demonstration, human-robot interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review