CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 12Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Preserving phase coherence and linearity in cat qubits with exponential bit-flip suppression

Open access
Putterman, Harald, Noh, Kyungjoo, Patel, Rishi N., Peairs, Gregory A., MacCabe, Gregory S., Lee, Menyoung, Aghaeimeibodi, Shahriar, Hann, Connor T., Jarrige, Ignace, Marcaud, Guillaume, He, Yuan, Moradinejad, Hesam, Owens, John Clai, Scaffidi, Thomas, Arrangoiz-Arriola, Patricio, Iverson, Joe, Levine, Harry, Brandão, Fernando G. S. L., Matheny, Matthew H., Painter, Oskar·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2409.17556arXiv 2409.17556

Preprint — published as 10.1103/physrevx.15.011070

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cat qubits, a type of bosonic qubit encoded in a harmonic oscillator, can exhibit an exponential noise bias against bit-flip errors with increasing mean photon number. Here, we focus on cat qubits stabilized by two-photon dissipation, where pairs of photons are added and removed from a harmonic oscillator by an auxiliary, lossy buffer mode. This process requires a large loss rate and strong nonlinearities of the buffer mode that must not degrade the coherence and linearity of the oscillator. In this work, we show how to overcome this challenge by coloring the loss environment of the buffer mode with a multi-pole filter and optimizing the circuit to take into account additional inductances in the buffer mode. Using these techniques, we achieve near-ideal enhancement of cat-qubit bit-flip times with increasing photon number, reaching over $0.1$ seconds with a mean photon number of only $4$. Concurrently, our cat qubit remains highly phase coherent, with phase-flip times corresponding to an effective lifetime of $T_{1,\text{eff}} \simeq 70$ $μ$s, comparable with the bare oscillator lifetime. We achieve this performance even in the presence of an ancilla transmon, used for reading out the cat qubit states, by engineering a tunable oscillator-ancilla dispersive coupling. Furthermore, the low nonlinearity of the harmonic oscillator mode allows us to perform pulsed cat-qubit stabilization, an important control primitive, where the stabilization can remain off for a significant fraction (e.g., two thirds) of a $3~\mathrm{μs}$ cycle without degrading bit-flip times. These advances are important for the realization of scalable error-correction with cat qubits, where large noise bias and low phase-flip error rate enable the use of hardware-efficient outer error-correcting codes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2409.17556

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The buffer mode implementation ensures that the storage-mode lifetime and linearity are not degraded by the coupling to the lossy and nonlinear buffer.

    “Our buffer mode implementation ensures that the storage-mode lifetime and linearity are not degraded by the coupling to the lossy and nonlinear buffer (see ref. 24 and Supplementary Information).”

    From Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    Section IV (p. 6) reports that storage-mode T1 was not degraded when two-photon dissipation was on, supporting the lifetime claim. Section V (p. 8) reports that the buffer-induced nonlinearities were minimized and tolerable, but still measurable; it does not support the categorical claim that linearity was not degraded. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • A stabilizing circuit passively protects cat qubits against bit flips.

    “A stabilizing circuit passively protects cat qubits against bit flips20–24.”

    From Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Owing to the phase-space separation of the |±α⟩ coherent states, bit-flip error rates can be exponentially suppressed with cat size |α|^2.

    “Owing to the phase-space separation of the |±α⟩ coherent states, bit-flip error rates can be exponentially suppressed with cat size ∣α∣2 (refs. 23,24,34,35).”

    From Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. [8]Guillaud, J. & Mirrahimi, M. Error rates and resource overheads of repetition cat qubits. Phys. Rev. A 103 , 042413 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.103.042413 .
  2. [9]Darmawan, A. S., Brown, B. J., Grimsmo, A. L., Tuckett, D. K. & Puri, S. Practical quantum error correction with the xzzx code and kerr-cat qubits. PRX Quantum 2 , 030345 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PRXQuantum.2.030345 .
  3. [10]Bonilla Ataides, J. P., Tuckett, D. K., Bartlett, S. D., Flammia, S. T. & Brown, B. J. The xzzx surface code. Nature Communications 12 , 2172 (2021). URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22274-1 . · DOI · Paper page
  4. [11]Chamberland, C. et al. Building a fault-tolerant quantum computer using concatenated cat codes. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2012.04108 (2020). 2012.04108. · arXiv
  5. [12]R´ egent, F.-M. L., Berdou, C., Leghtas, Z., Guillaud, J. & Mirrahimi, M. High-performance repetition cat code using fast noisy operations. Quantum 7 , 1198 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-12-06-1198 . · DOI · Paper page
  6. [13]Gouzien, E., Ruiz, D., Le R´ egent, F.-M., Guillaud, J. & Sangouard, N. Performance analysis of a repetition cat code architecture: Computing 256-bit elliptic curve logarithm in 9 hours with 126 133 cat qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 , 040602 (2023). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.040602 . · DOI
  7. [14]Ruiz, D., Guillaud, J., Leverrier, A., Mirrahimi, M. & Vuillot, C. LDPC-cat codes for low-overhead quantum computing in 2D. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2401.09541 (2024). 2401.09541. · arXiv
  8. [15]Jeong, H. & Kim, M. S. Efficient quantum computation using coherent states. Phys. Rev. A 65 , 042305 (2002). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.65.042305 .
  9. [16]Lescanne, R. et al. Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator. Nature Physics 16 , 509-513 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-020-0824-x .
  10. [17]Berdou, C. et al. One hundred second bit-flip time in a two-photon dissipative oscillator. PRX Quantum 4 , 020350 (2023). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PRXQuantum.4.020350 .
  11. [18]Marquet, A. et al. Autoparametric resonance extending the bit-flip time of a cat qubit up to 0.3 s. Phys. Rev. X 14 , 021019 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021019 . · DOI
  12. [19]R´ eglade, U. et al. Quantum control of a cat qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds. Nature 629 , 778-783 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-07294-3 .
  13. [20]Mirrahimi, M. et al. Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation. New Journal of Physics 16 , 045014 (2014). URL https:// doi.org/10.1088%2F1367-2630%2F16%2F4%2F045014 . · DOI · Paper page
  14. [22]Touzard, S. et al. Coherent oscillations inside a quantum manifold stabilized by dissipation. Physical Review X 8 , 021005 (2018). 1705.02401.
  15. [23]Ferreira, V. S. et al. Collapse and Revival of an Artificial Atom Coupled to a Structured Photonic Reservoir. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2001.03240 (2020). 2001.03240. · arXiv
  16. [24]Mirhosseini, M. et al. Superconducting metamaterials for waveguide quantum electrodynamics. Nature Communications 9 , 3706 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41467-018-06142-z .
  17. [25]Foxen, B. et al. Qubit compatible superconducting interconnects. Quantum Science and Technology 3 , 014005 (2017). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ aa94fc . · DOI
  18. [26]Das, R. N. et al. Cryogenic qubit integration for quantum computing. In 2018 IEEE 68th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) , 504-514 (2018).
  19. [27]Place, A. P. M. et al. New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds. Nature Communications 12 , 1779 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-021-22030-5 .
  20. [28]Lutterbach, L. G. & Davidovich, L. Method for direct measurement of the wigner function in cavity qed and ion traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 , 25472550 (1997). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.78.2547 .
  21. [29]Schuster, D. I. et al. Resolving photon number states in a superconducting circuit. Nature 445 , 515-518 (2007). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05461 . · DOI
  22. [30]Leghtas, Z. et al. Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum memory protection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 , 120501 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.111.120501 .
  23. [32]Ofek, N. et al. Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits. Nature 536 , 441-445 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature18949 .
  24. [33]Chou, K. S. et al. Demonstrating a superconducting dual-rail cavity qubit with erasure-detected logical measurements. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2307.03169 (2023). 2307.03169. · arXiv
  25. [34]Yan, F. et al. Tunable coupling scheme for implementing high-fidelity two-qubit gates. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 , 054062 (2018). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevApplied.10.054062 .
  26. [35]Sung, Y. et al. Realization of high-fidelity cz and zz -free iswap gates with a tunable coupler. Phys. Rev. X 11 , 021058 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021058 . · DOI
  27. [36]Putterman, H. et al. Stabilizing a bosonic qubit using colored dissipation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 , 110502 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.128.110502 .
  28. [37]Wang, C. et al. Towards practical quantum computers: transmon qubit with a lifetime approaching 0.5 milliseconds. npj Quantum Information 8 , 3 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-021-00510-2 . · DOI · Paper page
  29. [38]Quintana, C. Superconducting flux qubits for highconnectivity quantum annealing without lossy dielectrics . Ph.D. thesis, UC Santa Barbara (2017). URL https: //escholarship.org/uc/item/9844c3h3 .
  30. [39]Kafri, D. et al. Tunable inductive coupling of superconducting qubits in the strongly nonlinear regime. Phys. Rev. A 95 , 052333 (2017). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.052333 . · DOI
  31. [40]Dubovitskii, K. S. Bit-flip errors in dissipative cat qubits: second-order perturbation theory. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2407.17299 (2024). 2407.17299. · arXiv
  32. [41]Dennis, E., Kitaev, A., Landahl, A. & Preskill, J. Topological quantum memory. Journal of Mathematical Physics 43 , 4452-4505 (2002). URL https://doi. org/10.1063/1.1499754 . · DOI · Paper page
  33. [42]Puri, S. et al. Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits. Science Advances 6 (2020). URL https: //advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/34/eaay5901 .
  34. [43]Gautier, R., Sarlette, A. & Mirrahimi, M. Combined dissipative and hamiltonian confinement of cat qubits. PRX Quantum 3 , 020339 (2022). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020339 . · DOI
  35. [44]Putterman, H. et al. Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits. Nature 638 , 927-934 (2025). URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-025-08642-7 .
  36. [45]McEwen, M. et al. Resolving catastrophic error bursts from cosmic rays in large arrays of superconducting qubits. Nature Physics 18 , 107-111 (2022). URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01432-8 . · DOI · Paper page
  37. [46]Acharya, R. et al. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature 638 , 920-926 (2024). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-08449-y . http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y · DOI · Paper page
  38. [47]Dunsworth, A. et al. Characterization and reduction of capacitive loss induced by sub-micron josephson junction fabrication in superconducting qubits. Applied Physics Letters 111 , 022601 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.4993577 .
  39. [48]Keller, A. J. et al. Al transmon qubits on silicon-oninsulator for quantum device integration. Applied Physics Letters 111 , 042603 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.4994661 .
  40. [49]Crowley, K. D. et al. Disentangling losses in tantalum superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. X 13 , 041005 (2023). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevX.13.041005 .
  41. [50]Negˆ ırneac, V. et al. High-fidelity controlledz gate with maximal intermediate leakage operating at the speed limit in a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 , 220502 (2021). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.220502 . · DOI
  42. [51]Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76 , 042319 (2007). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.76.042319 .
  43. [52]Sambe, H. Steady states and quasienergies of a quantummechanical system in an oscillating field. Phys. Rev. A 7 , 2203-2213 (1973). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.7.2203 . · DOI
  44. [53]Di Paolo, A. et al. Extensible circuit-QED architecture via amplitude- and frequency-variable microwaves. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2204.08098 (2022). 2204.08098. · arXiv
  45. [54]Reiter, F. & Sørensen, A. S. Effective operator formalism for open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 85 , 032111 (2012). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.85.032111 .
  46. [55]Puri, S. et al. Stabilized cat in a driven nonlinear cavity: A fault-tolerant error syndrome detector. Phys. Rev. X 9 , 041009 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevX.9.041009 .
  47. [56]Kirchmair, G. et al. Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon kerr effect. Nature 495 , 205-209 (2013). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature11902 . · DOI
  48. [57]Reinhold, P. Controlling Error-Correctable Bosonic Qubits . Ph.D. thesis, Yale (2019). URL https://rsl.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/ RSL\_Theses/Reinhold-Thesis%20(1).pdf .
  49. [58]You, X., Sauls, J. A. & Koch, J. Circuit quantization in the presence of time-dependent external flux. Phys. Rev. B 99 , 174512 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.174512 . · DOI
  50. [59]Riwar, R.-P. & DiVincenzo, D. P. Circuit quantization with time-dependent magnetic fields for realistic geometries. npj Quantum Information 8 , 36 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-022-00539-x . · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Putterman, H., Noh, K., Patel, R. N., Peairs, G. A., MacCabe, G. S., Lee, M., Aghaeimeibodi, S., Hann, C. T., Jarrige, I., Marcaud, G., He, Y., Moradinejad, H., Owens, J. C., Scaffidi, T., Arrangoiz-Arriola, P., Iverson, J., Levine, H., Brandão, F. G. S. L., Matheny, M. H., & Painter, O.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Volume
15
Issue
1
ISSN
2160-3308 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2409.17556
arXiv
2409.17556
OpenAlex
W4408815740
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Physical Review X (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Amazon Web Services
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
cat qubits, phase coherence, dispersive coupling, error correction, bosonic qubits, harmonic oscillator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review