CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 423D Shape Modeling and AnalysisGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Vision and Imaging

DriveDreamer4D: World Models Are Effective Data Machines for 4D Driving Scene Representation

Open access
Zhao, Guosheng, Ni, Chaojun, Wang, Xiaofeng, Zhu, Zheng, Zhang, Xueyang, Wang, Yida, Huang, Guan, Chen, Xinze +4 more·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2410.13571arXiv 2410.13571
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Closed-loop simulation is essential for advancing end-to-end autonomous driving systems. Contemporary sensor simulation methods, such as NeRF and 3DGS, rely predominantly on conditions closely aligned with training data distributions, which are largely confined to forward-driving scenarios. Consequently, these methods face limitations when rendering complex maneuvers (e.g., lane change, acceleration, deceleration). Recent advancements in autonomous-driving world models have demonstrated the potential to generate diverse driving videos. However, these approaches remain constrained to 2D video generation, inherently lacking the spatiotemporal coherence required to capture intricacies of dynamic driving environments. In this paper, we introduce DriveDreamer4D, which enhances 4D driving scene representation leveraging world model priors. Specifically, we utilize the world model as a data machine to synthesize novel trajectory videos, where structured conditions are explicitly leveraged to control the spatial-temporal consistency of traffic elements. Besides, the cousin data training strategy is proposed to facilitate merging real and synthetic data for optimizing 4DGS. To our knowledge, DriveDreamer4D is the first to utilize video generation models for improving 4D reconstruction in driving scenarios. Experimental results reveal that DriveDreamer4D significantly enhances generation quality under novel trajectory views, achieving a relative improvement in FID by 32.1%, 46.4%, and 16.3% compared to PVG, S3Gaussian, and Deformable-GS. Moreover, DriveDreamer4D markedly enhances the spatiotemporal coherence of driving agents, which is verified by a comprehensive user study and the relative increases of 22.6%, 43.5%, and 15.6% in the NTA-IoU metric.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2410.13571

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing generative models for autonomous driving typically support only a subset of the required capabilities, such as limited conditioning types, lack of multi-camera generation, or poor spatial-temporal coherence.

    “However, existing models typically support only a subset of the required capabilities, such as limited conditioning types, lack of multi-camera generation, or poor spatial-temporal coherence.”

    From GAIA-2: A Controllable Multi-View Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Zhao, G., Ni, C., Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Huang, G., Chen, X., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., Mei, W., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
12015-12026
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2410.13571
arXiv
2410.13571
OpenAlex
W4413157439
Cited by
41
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 12
FWCI
39.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
world models, autonomous driving, 4D Gaussian Splatting, 4D reconstruction, video generation, closed-loop simulation, spatiotemporal coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review