The DOI matches its DataCite record; 57 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OASIS: Open Agent Social Interaction Simulations with One Million Agents
Open accessAbstract
There has been a growing interest in enhancing rule-based agent-based models (ABMs) for social media platforms (i.e., X, Reddit) with more realistic large language model (LLM) agents, thereby allowing for a more nuanced study of complex systems. As a result, several LLM-based ABMs have been proposed in the past year. While they hold promise, each simulator is specifically designed to study a particular scenario, making it time-consuming and resource-intensive to explore other phenomena using the same ABM. Additionally, these models simulate only a limited number of agents, whereas real-world social media platforms involve millions of users. To this end, we propose OASIS, a generalizable and scalable social media simulator. OASIS is designed based on real-world social media platforms, incorporating dynamically updated environments (i.e., dynamic social networks and post information), diverse action spaces (i.e., following, commenting), and recommendation systems (i.e., interest-based and hot-score-based). Additionally, OASIS supports large-scale user simulations, capable of modeling up to one million users. With these features, OASIS can be easily extended to different social media platforms to study large-scale group phenomena and behaviors. We replicate various social phenomena, including information spreading, group polarization, and herd effects across X and Reddit platforms. Moreover, we provide observations of social phenomena at different agent group scales. We observe that the larger agent group scale leads to more enhanced group dynamics and more diverse and helpful agents' opinions. These findings demonstrate OASIS's potential as a powerful tool for studying complex systems in digital environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“these efforts continue to grapple with critical limitations, including computational inefficiencies and inaccurate user behaviors.”
From AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Society (2025) · cites this paper as [113]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
McInnes, B., McBride, J. S., Evans, N., Lambert, D. D., & Andrew, A. (1999) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400841356.349 · Cited by 32,424 · cited 1×
“To address these challenges, we employ a relationship network generation algorithm that combines a small amount of real user data to create a social network of up to one million users, while preserving the scale-free nature of social networks (Barab´asi & Albert, 1999).”
Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks
Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1410 · Cited by 12,778 · cited 1×
“Testing different models such as MiniLM v6 (Reimers & Gurevych, 2019), BERT (Devlin, 2018), and TwHIN-BERT.”
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.08361 · Cited by 9,550 · cited 1×
“In this section, we describe the workflow and critical internal mechanisms of OASIS , which enable it to be easily generalized and scaled to support the simulation of millions of LLM-based agents.”
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · cited 3×
“Specifically, we simulate information propagation (Vosoughi et al., 2018) and the resulting group polarization (Lindesmith et al., 1999) on rapid information exchange platforms like X and the herd effect (Muchnik et al., 2013) on topic-based community-oriented platforms like Reddit.”
Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263 · cited 1×
“Chain-of-Thought (CoT, Wei et al. (2022)) reasoning is incorporated,”
Hitlin, S., & Andersson, M. A. (2019) · Definitions · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-7694-5_10 · Cited by 3,928 · cited 1×
“Specifically, we simulate information propagation (Vosoughi et al., 2018) and the resulting group polarization (Lindesmith et al., 1999) on rapid information exchange platforms like X and the herd effect (Muchnik et al., 2013) on topic-based community-oriented platforms like Reddit.”
Kasarda, J. (2011) · doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00496.x · Cited by 2,296
Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
Park, J. S., O'Brien, J., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606763 · Cited by 2,187 · cited 1×
“There have been numerous related studies, such as the exploration of multi-agent behavior patterns (Park et al., 2023), simulations of social networks (Gao et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2023b), and the study of society’s response to misinformation (Chen & Shu, 2023).”
Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention
Kwon, W., Li, Z., Zhuang, S., Sheng, Y., Zheng, L., Yu, C. H., Gonzalez, J., Zhang, H., & Stoica, I. (2023) · Proceedings of the 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles · doi:10.1145/3600006.3613165 · Cited by 1,817 · cited 1×
“Moreover, OASIS supports large-scale user interactions, accommodating up to 1 million users.”
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Nigel Gilbert. Agent-based models. Sage Publications, 2019.
- Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Prasenjit Mitra, Sejeong Kwon, Bernard J. Jansen, Kam-Fai Wong, and Meey- oung Cha. Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. In Subbarao Kamb- hampati (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intel- ligence, IJCAI 2016, New York, NY, USA, 9-15 July 2016, pp. 3818-3824. IJCAI/AAAI Press, 2016. URL http://www.ijcai.org/Abstract/16/537.
- Nature Reviews Psychology. Social media needs science-based guidelines. Nature Reviews Psy- chology, 3(6):367-367, Jun 2024. ISSN 2731-0574. doi: 10.1038/s44159-024-00327-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00327-8. · DOI
- Thomas C Schelling. Models of segregation. The American economic review, 59(2):488-493, 1969.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LLM Generated Persona is a Promise with a Catch
Li, A., Chen, H.-Z., Namkoong, H., & Peng, T.-Y. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16527 · Cited by 123
“…2023] and role-playing of famous characters [Wang et al., 2023, Shao et al., 2023, Chen et al., 2024] or specific personalities [Caron and Srivastava, 2022], to society simulations [Argyle et al., 2023, Chuang et al., 2024, Yang et al., 2024, AL et al., 2024, Zhou et al., 2023, Pang et al., 2024].”
Mou, X., Ding, X., He, Q., Wang, L., Liang, J., Zhang, X., Sun, L., Lin, J., Zhou, J., Huang, X., et al. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3800683 · Cited by 130
“However, the influence of the group on individuals often drives them to align their behavior with the group, leading to the emergence of the herd effect [33].”
InfluentialSelf-citationZhang, X., Lin, J., Mou, X., Yang, S., Liu, X., Sun, L., Lyu, H., Yang, Y., Qi, W., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.10157 · Cited by 96
“Recent studies have explored social simulation across various levels and scenarios, from mimicking well-known individuals and mirroring specific situations to modeling large-scale social dynamics [4, 29, 34, 36, 49, 60].”
Self-citationAgentic Large Language Models, a Survey
Plaat, A., Van Duijn, M., Van Stein, N., Preuss, M., Van der Putten, P., & Batenburg, K. J. (2025) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.18675 · Cited by 75
TwinMarket: A Scalable Behavioral and Social Simulation for Financial Markets
Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, M., Zhang, K.-D., Zhang, Y.-M., Yu, H., Hu, Y., & Wang, B.-Y. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.01506 · Cited by 72
“In our TwinMarket framework that leverages LLM-based agents to simulate complex human behaviors, we include rational decision-making, technical analysis, and behavioral biases such as herding and overconfidence [22, 23].”
Toward LLM-Agent-Based Modeling of Transportation Systems: A Conceptual FrameworkPreprint
Liu, T., Yang, J., & Yin, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.06681 · Cited by 10
“…of these studies include social media platform simulations (Gao et al., 2023; Papachristou and Yuan, 2024; Mou et al., 2024; Tang et al., 2024a; Yang et al., 2024), where LLM agents replicate human posting behaviors; financial markets (Yang et al., 2025), where they model investor trading…”
Larooij, M., & Törnberg, P. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.03274 · Cited by 57
“Gao et al [23], Mou et al [86], Yang et al [87], Gu et al [90] and Ferraro et al [93] all based their validation on social media datasets on comparison with data collected from platforms such as Twitter or Reddit.”
InfluentialPiao, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Li, N., Yan, J., Lan, X., Lu, Z., Zheng, Z., Wang, J. Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08691 · Cited by 43
“For social behaviors, we assess whether the agents merely engage in basic interactions [75] or demonstrate organized social relationships, reflecting more human-like group dynamics [109, 77, 6, 72].”
Self-citationAgentsNet: Coordination and Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMsPreprint
Grötschla, F., Müller, L., Tönshoff, J., Galkin, M., & Perozzi, B. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.08616 · Cited by 46
“Experiments show different topologies perform best for specific tasks [9, 53] and large-scale LLM agent networks exhibiting known social phenomena [48, 12].”
AgentMisalignment: Measuring the Propensity for Misaligned Behaviour in LLM-Based AgentsPreprint
Naik, A., Gouné, E., Quinn, P., Bosch, G., Zabala, F. J. C., Brown, J. R., & Young, E. J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.04018 · Cited by 34
“Additionally, with the last generation of agents, we can evaluate long horizon tasks that are realistic and offer scalable testbeds for exploring coordination failures and emergent risks [Yang et al., 2024, Rossetti et al., 2024].”
CoMAS: Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems via Interaction RewardsPreprint
Xue, X., Zhou, Y., Zhang, G., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Zhang, C., Yin, Z., Torr, P. H. S., Ouyang, W., & Bai, L. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.08529 · Cited by 27
“Notice that f(x) is monotonically increasing, so...”
Self-citationJiang, X., Li, G., Chen, B., & Zhang, J. (2026) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-026-02792-5 · Cited by 27
“Some works [47, 74, 86] simulate sociological dynamics utilizing multiple agents, further expanding their capabilities.”
Self-citationSynthesizing Post-Training Data for LLMs through Multi-Agent Simulation
Tang, S., Pang, X., Liu, Z.-X., Tang, B.-H., Ye, R., Jin, T., Dong, X., Wang, Y.-F., & Chen, S.-H. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.14251 · Cited by 31
“We compare the performance of Llama3-8B-Instruct fine-tuned using MATRIX-Gen-Coding dataset against those SFT datasets in the coding domain or in the general domain, all in 10K data samples.”
RecoWorld: Building Simulated Environments for Agentic Recommender Systems
Liu, F., Lin, X., Yu, H., Wu, M., Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Zhao, Z., Xia, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, W., et al. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774905.3794661 · Cited by 29
“Recent advances in multi-agent simulations have substantially enhanced our ability to model the dynamics of individuals making decisions and interacting over time [1, 17, 21, 31, 35, 36, 40, 44, 57].”
Coupling Macro Dynamics and Micro States for Long-Horizon Social SimulationPreprint
Zhang, Y.-Y., Ai, Y.-H., Ying, Z.-C., Mi, Q., Yu, J.-Q., Yang, W., & Song, Z.-K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05516 · Cited by 27
“…models (LLMs) (Guo et al., 2025; Wei et al., 2025; Hu et al., 2025) can endow social agents with reasoning, perception, and interaction capabilities, enabling simulations from small-scale communities (Park et al., 2023; 2024) to multi-scene social systems (Wang et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025b).”
InfluentialGroup size effects and collective misalignment in LLM multi-agent systems
Flint, A., Aiello, L. M., Pastor‐Satorras, R., & Baronchelli, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2531697123 · Cited by 26
“These applications are expected to expand rapidly, as reflected in growing market interest, with valuations projected to increase from USD 5.4 billion in 2024 to USD 236 billion by 2034, and a surge in startups and enterprise features focused on interacting LLM agents (7, 8).”
InfluentialLLM Economist: Large Population Models and Mechanism Design in Multi-Agent Generative Simulacra
Karten, S., Li, W., Ding, Z.-H., Kleiner, S. A., Bai, Y., & Jin, C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.15815 · Cited by 26
“Earlier studies on sequential social dilemmas [36] and concurrent studies with our work on the limits of large-population models [9, 72] further underscore the role of heterogeneity and bounded rationality in shaping collective behavior.”
The PIMMUR Principles: Ensuring Validity in Collective Behavior of LLM Societies
Zhou, J., Huang, J.-T., Zhou, X.-H., Lam, M. H., Wang, X., Zhu, H., Wang, W.-X., & Sap, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.18052 · Cited by 23
GATSim: Urban Mobility Simulation with Generative Agents
Liu, Q., Li, C., & Ma, W.-J. (2025) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.23306 · Cited by 23
Wang, Z., Wang, D., Xu, Y., Zhou, L., & Zhou, Y. (2025) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-025-09917-6 · Cited by 27
“They represent a groundbreaking technological advancement that enables direct analysis and computation of non-numerical data, including language and images.”
Self-citationLLM-Based Social Simulations Require a BoundaryPreprint
Wu, Z., Peng, R., Itō, T., Onizuka, M., & Xiao, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.19806 · Cited by 26
“Existing studies have applied LLM agents to domains such as economics [52, 69], education [148], game theory [117], and social networks [126, 140, 145], with claimed advantages like handling natural language, enabling flexible behaviors, and showing human-like reasoning.”
SOTOPIA-S4: a user-friendly system for flexible, customizable, and large-scale social simulationPreprint
Zhou, X.-H., Su, Z., Feng, S., Zhou, J., Huang, J.-T., Kao, H.-T., Lynch, S., Volkova, S., Wu, S., Woolley, A., et al. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.16122 · Cited by 21
“With the advancement of role-playing abilities of large language models (LLMs), we can now simulate realistic social interactions at scale (Zhou et al., 2024c; Li et al., 2023; Pang et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024).”
Can We Fix Social Media? Testing Prosocial Interventions using Generative Social Simulation
Larooij, M., & Törnberg, P. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.03385 · Cited by 19
MF-LLM: Simulating Population Decision Dynamics via a Mean-Field Large Language Model Framework
Mi, Q., Yang, M., Yu, X., Zhao, Z.-Y., Deng, C., An, B., Zhang, H.-F., Chen, X., & Wang, J. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/085713-2610 · Cited by 19
“State-of-the-art simulations such as OASIS [43] and AgentSociety [32] excel at environment modeling but remain prompt-centric in agent decision-making—relying on manually crafted role templates, heuristic memory-retrieval rules, and fixed interaction schedules.”
InfluentialStop Drawing Scientific Claims from LLM Social Simulations Without Robustness AuditsPreprint
Ye, J., Cao, L., Chen, D., & Ferrara, E. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.18890 · Cited by 14
“Macro-level patterns emerge from micro-level agent behavior and meso-level interaction, as in social media discussion [70, 45], opinion dynamics and mobilization [37], polarization and echo chambers [19, 43, 62, 70], information or misinformation spread [31, 30, 40], conformity and herd effects…”
InfluentialPolicySim: An LLM-Based Agent Social Simulation Sandbox for Proactive Policy Optimization
Huang, R. L., Tang, N., Xu, J., Cao, Y., Tu, Q., Guo, S., Zheng, B., Liu, H. J., & Yang, Y. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792555 · Cited by 7
“where 𝜙 ( 𝑢 ) is the user profile and { 𝑚 } represents the user’s recent user commonly used evaluation metrics [46, 60, 67], the reward 𝑟 𝑡𝑖 𝑥 𝑡𝑖 Formally, given a post-user arm 𝑥 𝑡𝑖 and the reaction 𝑜 𝑡 + 1 𝑖 the reward for arm 𝑥 𝑡𝑖 where mis ( 𝑢 ) indicates whether user 𝑢 is…”
Environment Scaling for Interactive Agentic Experience Collection: A Survey
Huang, Y.-C., Li, S., Liu, M., Liu, W., Huang, S.-J., Fan, Z.-Y., Chan, H.-P., & Fung, Y. R. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.09586 · Cited by 17
“More recent advances explore to automatically construct agentic environments from either pre-defined (Shi et al., 2025; Andrews et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2025a; Jain et al., 2025) or continuously refined (Hu et al., 2025c; Zhang et al., 2025b) tool and application suites.”
InfluentialBookWorld: From Novels to Interactive Agent Societies for Creative Story Generation
Ran, Y.-T., Wang, X., Qiu, T., Liang, J.-Q., Xiao, Y., & Yang, D.-Q. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.14538 · Cited by 17
MatrAIx: Simulating the World with 8.3 Billion Persona AgentsPreprint
Li, X., Hao, Y., Hou, J., Huang, J., Wen, Q., Huang, S., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Fan, Y., Wang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.04205 · Cited by 18
“Two designs could address this gap using logs that already exist (Zhao et al., 2024; Zheng et al., 2024; Kirk et al., 2024; Paruchuri et al., 2025) and telemetry MatrAIx already stores.”
Self-citationMoloch's Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for AudiencesPreprint
El, B., & Zou, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.06105 · Cited by 15
“(see Table 1, Table 2, and Section 4).”
Modeling Earth-Scale Human-Like Societies with One Billion AgentsPreprint
Guan, H., He, J., Fan, L., Ren, Z., He, S., Yu, X., Chen, Y., Xu, X., Zheng, S., Gao, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.12078 · Cited by 16
“For instance, many existing studies require dozens of GPUs and weeks of computation to simulate up to a million agents in social scenarios [29; 32; 28; 33; 36; 37; 38].”
InfluentialSimWorld: An Open-ended Realistic Simulator for Autonomous Agents in Physical and Social WorldsPreprint
Ren, J.-W., Zhuang, Y., Ye, X.-K., Mao, L.-J., He, X., Shen, J.-Z., Dogra, M., Liang, Y.-M., Zhang, R.-X., Yue, T., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.01078 · Cited by 14
IntervenSim: Intervention-Aware Social Network Simulation for Opinion DynamicsPreprint
Zhang, Y., Ying, Z., Zhang, X., Yu, J., Fang, P., Chen, X., Yang, W., & Song, Z. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.06600 · Cited by 15
“Subsequent frameworks such as SocioVerse [90], AgentSociety [61], Yulan-OneSim [80], and OA-SIS [87] further pushed this line toward more scalable infrastructures, richer agent coordination, and larger social environments, including simulations with up to one million agents.”
Chimera: Harnessing Multi-Agent LLMs for Automatic Insider Threat Simulation
Yu, J., Xie, X.-F., Hu, Q., Ma, Y.-H., & Zhao, Z. (2025) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.07745 · Cited by 13
“Building on prior work [44], [52], we employ multiple collaborative LLM agents per employee, forming an “agent bundle” for greater behavioral realism.”
When Autonomy Goes Rogue: Preparing for Risks of Multi-Agent Collusion in Social Systems
Ren, Q.-B., Xie, S.-T., Wei, L., Yin, Z.-F., Yan, J.-C., Ma, L.-Z., & Shao, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.14660 · Cited by 10
“This framework is built on OASIS, a social simulator that can support up to one million users [24].”
Self-citationAgentSocialBench: Evaluating Privacy Risks in Human-Centered Agentic Social Networks
Wang, P., & Jiang, S.-L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.01487 · Cited by 9
“Simulation platforms such as OASIS (Yang et al., 2024b), S 3 (Gao et al., 2023), and AgentSociety (Piao et al., 2025) study agent social dynamics at scales of up to one million agents, while Generative Agents (Park et al., 2023) demonstrates human-like social behavior in sandbox environments.”
PhysiAgent: An Embodied Agent Framework in Physical World
Wang, Z., Li, J., Zheng, J., Zhang, W., Liu, D.-X., Zheng, Y.-N., Niu, H., Yu, J., & Zhan, X. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.24524 · Cited by 9
“…under the guidance of high-level rules, resulting in organically cooperative behaviors and impressive performance in virtual tasks such as gaming (Wang et al., 2023a;b; 2024b; Qin et al., 2024), human simulation (Yang et al., 2024; Park et al., 2023), and disease diagnosis (Li et al., 2024a).”
Self-citationXu, B.-X., Li, C.-Y., Wang, W., Fan, W., ZHENG, T., Shi, H.-C., Fan, T., Song, Y.-Q., & Yang, Q. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.07313 · Cited by 9
The collective turing test: large language models can generate realistic multi-user discussions
Bouleimen, A., Marzo, G. D., Kim, T., Pagan, N., Metzler, H., Giordano, S., Hannák, A., & García, D. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-62286-9 · Cited by 9
G-UBS: Towards Robust Understanding of Implicit Feedback via Group-Aware User Behavior Simulation
Chen, B.-Y., Chen, S.-R., Yue, Z.-R., Yan, K., Yu, C.-Y., Kong, B.-B., Cheng, L., Zhuo, C.-X., Li, Z., & Wang, Y.-L. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.05709 · Cited by 8
“The other category is large-scale, LLM-driven multi-agent simulations (Yang et al. 2024b; Piao et al. 2025; Liu et al. 2025), designed to reproduce emergent behaviors in open-ended social settings and offer insights into collective dynamics.”
Multi-Agent Reasoning for Cardiovascular Imaging Phenotype Analysis
Zhang, W., Qiao, M., Zang, C.-Q., Niederer, S., Matthews, P. M., Bai, W., & Kainz, B. (2025) · International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.03460 · Cited by 8
“…discussion: (i) it reduces mutual influence during initial assessment, allowing each expert to form an unbiased domain-specific opinion [35], (ii) it enables integration and update of previous insights through H t − 1 while avoiding false consensus [13], and (iii) it provides…”
SoMe: A Realistic Benchmark for LLM-based Social Media AgentsPreprint
Xue, D., Cui, J., Qian, S., Hu, C., & Xu, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.14720 · Cited by 2
“…prosperity of social media agents (Mou, Wei, and Huang 2024; Zhang et al. 2025a), which can potentially take on various tasks such as social event analysis (Qian, Zhang, and Xu 2016), post and user recommendation (Tang, Tang, and Liu 2014), and social behavior simulation (Yang et al. 2024).”
RoboTron-Sim: Improving Real-World Driving via Simulated Hard-Case
Xiao, B., Feng, C., Huang, Z., Yan, F., Zhong, Y., & Ma, L. (2025) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.02542 · Cited by 5
“0 [2] leverages AI-powered traffic flow simulation with reinforcement learning and synthetic data to establish high-27381 fidelity closed-loop environments, rigorously validating self-driving systems’ rare scenario handling capabilities.”
Cai, J., Zhang, M., Ishimizu, Y., Li, M., Li, J., & Tei, K. (2026) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-026-00481-4 · Cited by 8
“Similarly, [24] takes this further by introducing OASIS, a scalable and extensible social media simulator.”
Building Social World Models with Large Language Models
Yu, H.-F., Zhao, Y.-N., Lin, G., & You, J.-X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.11482 · Cited by 6
“…agent-based modeling to derive emergent macro-patterns from individual micro-decisions (Gao et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2025b; Lorig et al., 2021; Piao et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2024), often emphasizing theory-of-mind modeling (Zhou et al., 2025a) or resource distribution (Zhang et al., 2025a).”
PTCBENCH: Benchmarking Contextual Stability of Personality Traits in LLM Systems
Yu, J., Ma, Y.-H., Zhang, X., Wang, J., Hu, Q., Shen, C., & Xie, X.-F. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.00016 · Cited by 6
Multimodal Safety Evaluation in Generative Agent Social Simulations
Vera, A., Sanchez, K., Hinojosa, C., Hamid, H. B., Kim, D., & Ghanem, B. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.07709 · Cited by 6
“Several benchmarks broaden evaluation: MultiTrust (Zhang et al., 2024) measures truthfulness, robustness, safety, fairness, and privacy, while other work emphasizes transparency and bias reduction in multi-modal systems (Saleh and Tabatabaei, 2025).”
Self-citationSimulating Human Memory with Language ModelsPreprint
Wang, Q., Tomlin, N., Hu, M., Dillon, B., & Linzen, T. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.25680 · Cited by 5
“Another deploys LLM agents in social environments, from social-network simulations [50] to agent societies [51, 52], modeling phenomena such as information diffusion [53] and negotiation [54].”
Javadi, V. S., Róg, F., Aksa, A., Trippas, J. R., Vakulenko, S., & Flek, L. (2026) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3786304.3787921 · Cited by 5
Towards a foundational platform for generative agents in simulated city environment
Xu, F., Zhang, J., Gao, C., Liu, P., Feng, J., & Li, Y. (2026) · PLOS complex systems. · doi:10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000093 · Cited by 5
AI Agents Alone Are Not (Yet) Sufficient for Social Simulation
Li, Y.-M., & Tao, D.-C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.00113 · Cited by 5
“Second, it induces fragility and hidden confounding: because behavior is prompt-and interface-mediated, small changes in persona wording, memory format, tools, or interaction protocol can shift conclusions later interpreted as substantive policy or social-mechanism effects [49, 33, 80].”
InfluentialOverstating Attitudes, Ignoring Networks: LLM Biases in Simulating Misinformation Susceptibility
Choi, E., Young, L. E., & Ferrara, E. (2026) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.04674 · Cited by 5
Social Simulations with Large Language Model Risk Utopian Illusion
Bian, N., Han, X.-P., Lin, H.-Y., Wu, B.-L., & Wang, J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.21180 · Cited by 5
“As a result, these models are being adopted as “promising” [18] tools in computational social science to create human-like agents [26, 27] and to analyze multi-agent interactions in complex social systems [28, 29, 30, 31, 32].”
Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science
Mao, R., Liu, Q., Li, X., Cambria, E., & Hussain, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20674 · Cited by 5
“Recent LLM research leverages role-play to simulate individuals with different cultural backgrounds for social simulations [172–174] with population-level scalability [175].”
AI-Driven Automation Can Become the Foundation of Next-Era Science of Science ResearchPreprint
Chen, R., Su, H., Tang, S., Yin, Z., Wu, Q., Li, H., Sun, Y., Dong, N., Ouyang, W., & Torr, P. H. S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.12039 · Cited by 5
“Scalable Simulation To better replicate the phenomenon of free collaboration in real scientific cooperation, we implement an adaptive concurrent distributed system based on the OASIS [23].”
InfluentialSelf-citationMF-LLM: Simulating Collective Decision Dynamics via a Mean-Field Large Language Model Framework
Mi, Q., Yang, M., Yu, X., Zhao, Z.-Y., Deng, C., An, B., Zhang, H.-F., Chen, X., & Wang, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.21582 · Cited by 5
“State-of-the-art simulations such as OASIS [43] and AgentSociety [32] excel at environment modeling but remain prompt-centric in agent decision-making—relying on manually crafted role templates, heuristic memory-retrieval rules, and fixed interaction schedules.”
InfluentialWhat is Left for Us? Second Scholarship Against the Degradation of Research by AI
Novelli, C., & Floridi, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.04049 · Cited by 4
“…imagine a complex multi-agent system made of models trained on scientific texts and assigned synthetic deliberative personas (Chapuis et al. 2022; Yang et al. 2025), capable of engaging with abstract and concrete research questions alike, generating solutions and objections in indefinite…”
Agent-based simulation of online social networks and disinformation
López, A., Pastor, A. O., Aguilera, D. M., Tárraga, M. F., Chac'on, J. V., Pastor-Galindo, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.22082 · Cited by 4
“Each simulation ran for 90 minutes, a duration aligned with recent work in the domain of synthetic OSNs simulations (e.g., [9]) and su ffi cient to allow meaningful interaction dynamics, content propagation, and behavioral di ff erentiation to emerge.”
InfluentialLove First, Know Later: Persona-Based Romantic Compatibility Through LLM Text World Engines
Shang, H.-Y., Yan, Z.-Y., & Liu, X. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.11844 · Cited by 4
GGBond: Growing Graph-Based AI-Agent Society for Socially-Aware Recommender SimulationPreprint
Zhong, H., Wang, H., Ye, Y., Zhang, M., & Zhu, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.21154 · Cited by 4
“Recent work on large–scale social simulators like OASIS demonstrates that dynamic social graphs coupled with recommendation mechanisms reproduce realistic adoption patterns at scale [48].”
Recalibrating the Compass: Integrating Large Language Models into Classical Research MethodsPreprint
Peng, T., & Yang, X. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.19402 · Cited by 9
Zhang, L.-Y., Chu, Y.-J., Wang, J.-L., Li, B.-B., & Krishnan, R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.00518 · Cited by 4
“…extends this interactive view to role-playing, coordination, and social simulation, showing that agent behavior depends on role structure, protocol, and the surrounding social setting (Park et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2024; Gao et al., 2023; Piao et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2024).”
KITE: Scaling Jev Population Experiments with Sparse Flagship Calibration
Li, H.-Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27535 · Cited by 3
PersonaEval: Persona-Based User Simulation for Evaluating Interactive ApplicationsPreprint
Liu, Y. S., Wen, Q., Fan, Y., Huang, S., Gao, R., Hou, J., Mohsin, M. A., Di, Z., Joshi, B., Tan, X., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.15838 · Cited by 3
“…work has developed richer persona representations (Zhang et al., 2018; Ge et al., 2024; NVIDIA, 2025; Wang et al., 2025b), while LLM-based agent frameworks make it easier to deploy these personas as interactive agents (Park et al., 2023; Vezhnevets et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2024; Microsoft, 2025).”
Self-citationNormAct: Benchmarking Embodied Agents'Proactive Compliance with Unspoken Social Norms
Zhao, S., Song, X., Guo, T.-Y., Gao, X.-M., Liu, M.-Y., Han, X., Zhang, Y.-Y., Zhang, Z.-L., Feng, X., & Dai, B. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.27826 · Cited by 3
“…simulation studies examine multi-agent interaction and social behavior in modeled societies (Park et al. 2023; Piao et al. 2025; Jiang et al. 2024; Yang et al. 2024; Song et al. 2025), while social-navigation, human–robot interaction, privacy-aware, and interactive-safety evaluations focus on…”
Self-citationChen, J.-J., Sun, B.-Y., Lu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, D.-K., & Yao, B. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.06399 · Cited by 3
“The framework supports multiple LLM backends, including OpenAI and Anthropic APIs as well as self-hosted models via SGLang (Zheng et al., 2024), allowing experiments to be run with both proprietary and open-source models.”
Self-citationHow Well Can LLM Agents Simulate End-User Security and Privacy Attitudes and Behaviors?
Li, Y., Li, L.-Y., Lee, H.-P., & Das, S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.18464 · Cited by 3
“Early work showed that agents equipped with memory, planning, and communication capabilities can coordinate activities, form social relationships, and exhibit emergent collective behavior [14,23,66,93,100].”
Farhadighalati, N., Estrada-Jimenez, L. A., Kalateh, S., Nikghadam-Hojjati, S., & Barata, J. (2025) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics13010001 · Cited by 3
“These population sizes reflect document healthcare IT environments, covering the staffing levels of small community hospitals up through large academic medical centers and multi-site health systems [58,59].”
Communication and Verification in LLM Agents towards Collaboration under Information AsymmetryPreprint
Peng, R., Ma, Z., Pang, A., Li, S., Zhang, X.-J., Yu, Y., Bara, C.-P., & Chai, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25595 · Cited by 3
“They can also each reach the two corner bins on either side of the area in front of them, totaling four destination bins.”
DynamiX: Large-Scale Dynamic Social Network Simulator
Sun, Y., Liu, W., Wang, W., Yao, H.-T., Luo, J.-B., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.19929 · Cited by 3
“Some simulators escalate the number of agents to over 100,000 by activating a fixed subset of core agents to engage in human-like interactions with a static hierarchical structure [14], [18], [21].”
InfluentialWatson, E. ‘., Amer, A., Harris, E., Ravindra, P., & Zhang, S. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16080651 · Cited by 5
Parallelized Planning-Acting for Efficient LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
Li, Y., Liu, S., Zheng, T.-Y., & Song, M.-L. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.03505 · Cited by 3
Aegis: Automated Error Generation and Attribution for Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Kong, F., Zhang, R., Yin, H., Zhang, G., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Zhu, S. C., & Feng, X. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.14295 · Cited by 21
Self-citationSafe and Scalable Collaboration in Multiagent LLM Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Hossain, E., Nipu, M. M. H., Mahmood, M. S., Hossen, M. J., & Mridha, M. F. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2026.3704902 · Cited by 3
“Static topologies define fixed communication graphs, as in systems such as MEDCO [37] and Welfare Diplomacy [48], while dynamic topologies adapt in real time using models such as DyLAN [49], GPTSwarm [50], and OASIS [61].”
Ng, S., Joshi, B., Gupta, I., Huang, S., Di, Z.-L., Shen, Y., Wen, Q.-F., Liu, Y., Gao, R.-P., Fan, Y.-M., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.15844 · Cited by 2
Self-citationSocietyBench: Forecasting Counterfactual Social-World Evolution
Wang, Z.-R., Bian, Z.-H., Li, J., & Qi, Z.-Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.04009 · Cited by 2
Self-citationYang, Y.-T., Duan, Y.-Q., Huang, L.-H., Zhu, Y.-Q., Bailo, F., Su, C.-P., & Chen, H.-M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.13725 · Cited by 2
“Generative Agents (Park et al., 2023) demonstrated that memory and reflection can support believable social behaviour, while subsequent systems,including S 3 (Gao et al., 2023), AgentSociety (Piao et al., 2025), and OASIS (Yang et al., 2024), have extended LLM-based social simulation to larger populations.”
Multi-Agent Systems: From Classical Paradigms to Large Foundation Model-Enabled Futures
Wang, Z., Gong, M., Sun, Q., Xu, J., Mao, S., Jin, X., Han, Q., & Tang, Y. (2026) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2026.126113 · Cited by 3
“Recent social simulators such as OASIS [120] scale to one million agents, revealing diverse social dynamics, including group polarization and herd behavior.”
Self-citationXu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhou, Y., Zeng, S., Lakshmanan, L. V. S., & Ma, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.18011 · Cited by 2
Goyal, A., Wang, Y., Chandrasekharan, E., & Sundaram, H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03920 · Cited by 2
“More recent work has pushed this paradigm toward larger-scale and more empirically grounded simulation, including efforts to simulate populations and known human-group dynamics at scale [7–9, 29, 35].”
Agentic Recommender Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
Portugal, I. D. S., Alencar, P., & Cowan, D. D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2026.3657900 · Cited by 3
“The studies are [122], [123], [124], [125], [126], [127], [128].”
Generative AI for climate governance and acceptability-constrained policy design
Manivannan, A., Spaiser, V., Cann, T. J. B., Evans, J., Everall, J., Falkenberg, M., García, D., Guo, W., Herzog, R., Otto, I. M., et al. (2026) · npj Climate Action · doi:10.1038/s44168-026-00362-6 · Cited by 1
“Other GABM frameworks focus only on interaction on social media, like OASIS 51 , capturing verbal interaction within social and algorithmic systems.”
Beyond Self-Interest: Modeling Social-Oriented Motivation for Human-like Multi-Agent Interactions
Lin, J., Zhang, C.-Y., Yang, Y., Wang, Y.-Z., Zhu, S.-C., & Zhong, F. (2026) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.65109/oith7375 · Cited by 2
Liu, Y.-X., Zhu, M., Liu, S.-Y., Hu, B.-X., & Zhang, L. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.01438 · Cited by 2
“The categories of RPLAs span from fiction characters and celebrities to daily life characters, supporting various scenarios, e.g. , sociological studies(Yang et al., 2024; Huang et al., 2024; Tang et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2024b).”
Fan, W., Zhang, S.-R., Wang, X.-L., Yang, H., Chan, T.-W., Chen, X.-Y., Bi, J., Zhou, Z.-R., Liu, J., & Chen, K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10429 · Cited by 2
“To ensure actions are executable, an Action Simulator runs pre-execution rollouts to detect constraint violations and triggers local repair; execution failures invoke a tiered re-planning pipeline from fast Short-Term Memory based fixes to full top-down replanning when necessary.”
Towards efficient optimization of multi-agent social simulation via large language models
Zhang, K., Yu, X., Peng, H., Yang, Z., Tian, Y., Jin, H., Feng, T., & Lin, H. (2026) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-025-02816-5 · Cited by 2
“Other systems such as OASIS [40 ] and SocioVerse [31 ] focus on large-scale simulations, incorporating dynamic contexts, recommendation mechanisms, and reconstructed real-world information to model polarization and misinformation cascades.”
Self-citationMitigating Social Desirability Bias in Random Silicon SamplingPreprint
Chapala, S., Mironov, M., & Deng, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.22725 · Cited by 3
“…Radford et al. (2018); Kojima et al. (2022) can simulate human emotions and opinions, from subjective labeling of Twitter posts (Törnberg, 2023; Yang et al., 2024) and participation in psychological studies (Aher et al., 2023; Qiu & Lan, 2024) to producing behavior changes consistent with…”
An AI researchers' perspective: At the crossroad of LLMs, agent-based modeling, and complex systems
Ren, S., Gan, Z., Yin, Z., Shao, J. B., & Hu, S. (2025) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2025.03.015 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBeyond the Tragedy of the Commons: Building A Reputation System for Generative Multi-agent Systems
Ren, S.-Y., Fu, W., Zou, X., Shen, C., Cai, Y., Chu, C., Wang, Z., & Hu, S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.05029 · Cited by 2
“Recent studies have leveraged generative agents to simulate complex dynamics within social networks, aiming to explore emergent human-like behaviors [16, 47, 52, 8].”
Self-citationMemory in the Age of AI Agents
Hu, Y., Liu, S., Yue, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, B., Zhu, F., Lin, J., Guo, H., Dou, S., Xi, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.13564 · Cited by 389
Self-citationOn the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agents
Huang, J.-T., Zhou, J., Jin, T., Zhou, X., Chen, Z., Wang, W., Yuan, Y., Lyu, M. R., & Sap, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.00989 · Cited by 1
The Butterfly Effect in LLM Social Simulations: From Architecture Sensitivity to Robustness Audits
Ye, J., Cao, L., Chen, D.-W., & Ferrara, E. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.28981 · Cited by 1
“…resembles the world: whether agents behave plausibly (Park et al., 2023), whether outcomes match empirical patterns (Larooij & T¨ornberg, 2026; Yang et al., 2024; Gu et al., 2025 Cooperation is prevalent in repeated social dilemmas. supportable from PLAIN runs Defection is prevalent in…”
Bouleimen, A., Pagan, N., & Hannák, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.36278
“…on believable generative agents, researchers have rapidly adopted this approach across a range of social simulation studies (Ferraro et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024; Gao et al., 2023; T¨ornberg et al., 2023; Composta et al., 2025; Larooij & T¨ornberg, 2025a; De Marzo et al., 2023; Bouleimen et…”
OranSim: Simulating Consumer Response to Social Media Campaigns Before Launch
Ma, J.-X., Zhang, M.-F., Yang, X., Gao, Y.-C., Huang, J.-Z., & Hou, Y.-S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.28388 · Cited by 1
Jiang, M., Teng, A.-T., Liu, J.-E., Chen, P.-A., & Li, Y.-M. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27639 · Cited by 1
Persona-prompted LLM agents achieve modest but genuine prediction of human social media reactions
Bojić, L., Felfernig, A., Dinić, B. M., Ilić, V., Rettinger, A., Mevorah, V., & Trilling, D. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-66277-8 · Cited by 2
Usman, R. M., & Williamson, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.20438 · Cited by 1
“Subsequent systems study opinion formation, diffusion, polarization, and platform-scale interaction (Chuang et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2025).”
IO Factory: Simulating AI-Enabled Influence Campaigns at Scale
Olejnik, L., Dong, W.-C., Kunst, J. R., Riemer-Sørensen, S., Herb, T., Cha, M., & Schroeder, D. T. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.10920 · Cited by 1
“In the reported implementation, OASIS provides accounts, relations, posts, comments, likes, feeds, traces, and platform-compatible timestamps as part of this environment [4].”
Distributional Alignment for Social Simulation with LLMs: A Mixture Modeling Approach
Xie, Y., Gao, R., & Mei, Q.-Z. (2026) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3770855.3818919 · Cited by 1
“For example, OASIS [39] initializes agents with persona prompts derived from demographic attributes to support large-scale social simulations, while Persona Hub [12] curates extensive per-sona libraries to induce variation in synthetic data generation.”
InfluentialGenerative AI in urban science and practice
Zhang, Y., Xu, F., Wang, Q., Moro, E., Yue, Y., Wang, H., Чэн, Б., Liu, Y., Fang, D., Gong, P., et al. (2026) · Nature Cities · doi:10.1038/s44284-026-00492-2 · Cited by 1
“Recent systems have scaled agentbased simulations to the order of 10 4 LLM agents using distributed orches tration and efficient memory management 60,63,64 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Z., Zhang, Z., Zheng, Z., Jiang, Y., Gan, Z., Wang, Z., Ling, Z., Chen, J., Ma, M., Dong, B., Gupta, P., Hu, S., Yin, Z., Li, G., Jia, X., Wang, L., Ghanem, B., Lu, H., Lu, C., Ouyang, W., Qiao, Y., Torr, P., & Shao, J.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2411.11581
- OpenAlex
- W4404571155
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- agent-based modeling, LLM agents, social media simulation, information dissemination, group polarization, herd effect, recommender systems, dynamic social networks, Twitter, Reddit, complex systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review