The DOI matches its DataCite record; 57 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OASIS: Open Agent Social Interaction Simulations with One Million Agents
Open accessAbstract
There has been a growing interest in enhancing rule-based agent-based models (ABMs) for social media platforms (i.e., X, Reddit) with more realistic large language model (LLM) agents, thereby allowing for a more nuanced study of complex systems. As a result, several LLM-based ABMs have been proposed in the past year. While they hold promise, each simulator is specifically designed to study a particular scenario, making it time-consuming and resource-intensive to explore other phenomena using the same ABM. Additionally, these models simulate only a limited number of agents, whereas real-world social media platforms involve millions of users. To this end, we propose OASIS, a generalizable and scalable social media simulator. OASIS is designed based on real-world social media platforms, incorporating dynamically updated environments (i.e., dynamic social networks and post information), diverse action spaces (i.e., following, commenting), and recommendation systems (i.e., interest-based and hot-score-based). Additionally, OASIS supports large-scale user simulations, capable of modeling up to one million users. With these features, OASIS can be easily extended to different social media platforms to study large-scale group phenomena and behaviors. We replicate various social phenomena, including information spreading, group polarization, and herd effects across X and Reddit platforms. Moreover, we provide observations of social phenomena at different agent group scales. We observe that the larger agent group scale leads to more enhanced group dynamics and more diverse and helpful agents' opinions. These findings demonstrate OASIS's potential as a powerful tool for studying complex systems in digital environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“these efforts continue to grapple with critical limitations, including computational inefficiencies and inaccurate user behaviors.”
From AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Society (2025) · cites this paper as [113]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
McInnes, B., McBride, J. S., Evans, N., Lambert, D. D., & Andrew, A. (1999) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400841356.349 · Cited by 32,424 · cited 1×
“To address these challenges, we employ a relationship network generation algorithm that combines a small amount of real user data to create a social network of up to one million users, while preserving the scale-free nature of social networks (Barab´asi & Albert, 1999).”
Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks
Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1410 · Cited by 12,778 · cited 1×
“Testing different models such as MiniLM v6 (Reimers & Gurevych, 2019), BERT (Devlin, 2018), and TwHIN-BERT.”
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.08361 · Cited by 9,550 · cited 1×
“In this section, we describe the workflow and critical internal mechanisms of OASIS , which enable it to be easily generalized and scaled to support the simulation of millions of LLM-based agents.”
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · cited 3×
“Specifically, we simulate information propagation (Vosoughi et al., 2018) and the resulting group polarization (Lindesmith et al., 1999) on rapid information exchange platforms like X and the herd effect (Muchnik et al., 2013) on topic-based community-oriented platforms like Reddit.”
Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263 · cited 1×
“Chain-of-Thought (CoT, Wei et al. (2022)) reasoning is incorporated,”
Hitlin, S., & Andersson, M. A. (2019) · Definitions · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-7694-5_10 · Cited by 3,928 · cited 1×
“Specifically, we simulate information propagation (Vosoughi et al., 2018) and the resulting group polarization (Lindesmith et al., 1999) on rapid information exchange platforms like X and the herd effect (Muchnik et al., 2013) on topic-based community-oriented platforms like Reddit.”
Kasarda, J. (2011) · doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00496.x · Cited by 2,296
Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
Park, J. S., O'Brien, J., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606763 · Cited by 2,187 · cited 1×
“There have been numerous related studies, such as the exploration of multi-agent behavior patterns (Park et al., 2023), simulations of social networks (Gao et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2023b), and the study of society’s response to misinformation (Chen & Shu, 2023).”
Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention
Kwon, W., Li, Z., Zhuang, S., Sheng, Y., Zheng, L., Yu, C. H., Gonzalez, J., Zhang, H., & Stoica, I. (2023) · Proceedings of the 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles · doi:10.1145/3600006.3613165 · Cited by 1,817 · cited 1×
“Moreover, OASIS supports large-scale user interactions, accommodating up to 1 million users.”
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Nigel Gilbert. Agent-based models. Sage Publications, 2019.
- Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Prasenjit Mitra, Sejeong Kwon, Bernard J. Jansen, Kam-Fai Wong, and Meey- oung Cha. Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. In Subbarao Kamb- hampati (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intel- ligence, IJCAI 2016, New York, NY, USA, 9-15 July 2016, pp. 3818-3824. IJCAI/AAAI Press, 2016. URL http://www.ijcai.org/Abstract/16/537.
- Nature Reviews Psychology. Social media needs science-based guidelines. Nature Reviews Psy- chology, 3(6):367-367, Jun 2024. ISSN 2731-0574. doi: 10.1038/s44159-024-00327-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00327-8. · DOI
- Thomas C Schelling. Models of segregation. The American economic review, 59(2):488-493, 1969.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–169 of 169
Will Scaling Improve Social Simulation with LLMs?Preprint
Ziems, C., Held, W., Karaca, S. D., Grusky, D. B., Hashimoto, T., & Yang, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.02464 · Cited by 2
Modeling U.S. Attitudes Toward China via an Event-Steered Multi-Agent Simulator
Zhu, C., Yao, H.-T., Liu, W., Guo, J., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.06971 · Cited by 1
“Recent simulator have drastically scaled these societies; for instance, frameworks like OASIS [29] and AgentSociety [30] achieve massive-scale simulations to study emergent social phenomena such as emotional contagion, and misinformation spread.”
Think-Before-Speak: From Internal Evaluation to Public Expression in Multi-Agent Social Simulation
Yang, K.-Q., Peng, T.-Q., Lee, S., & Liu, H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.03137 · Cited by 1
“Frameworks such as AutoGen [37] and OASIS [39] provide general infrastructures for composing multiple LLM agents, coordinating their conversations, and supporting autonomous task completion or role-playing interaction.”
EASE Configuration Facilitates A Reproducible Science of LLM Social Simulations
Sarangi, S., Touzel, M. P., Bück-Kaeffer, A., Yang, Z., Godbout, J., & Rabbany, R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.30258 · Cited by 1
“We fix the scenario, agent personas, background context, and timeline size at 10 posts per timestep, and compare a follower-chronological baseline with two recommendation systems: a general embedding-based recommender and a TwHIN-based recommender [32], implemented following OASIS [11].”
InfluentialSelf-citationLópez, A., Pastor, A. O., Pastor-Galindo, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.28598 · Cited by 1
Huang, Y.-T., Zhu, W., Wang, Z.-K., Yang, Q., Chen, Y.-K., Xu, Z., Zhang, Y., Guo, S., & Zhang, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27584 · Cited by 1
“OA-SIS [213] builds a generalizable social-media sandbox with dynamic networks, recommendation mechanisms, rich action spaces, and million-scale agents to reproduce information spreading, group polarization, and herd effects.”
Self-citationAPS: Bias-Controlled Adaptive Prototype Simulation for Population-Scale LLM Agents
Zheng, Q., Gao, Y., He, S., Guan, H.-X., Tian, Y., Feng, J., Wang, M., Zheng, S.-X., & Liu, Z. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27419 · Cited by 1
“…engines, social-media environments, learned or optimized surrogates, differentiable population frameworks, or topology-aware grouping [Gao et al., 2023, Tang et al., 2025, Yang et al., 2024, Prédhumeau and Manley, 2023, Jiang et al., 2024, Guan et al., 2025, Chopra, 2025, Xu et al., 2026].”
Wang, T., Li, J., & Lin, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.17079 · Cited by 2
“Subsequent work has extended this paradigm to social-science experiments [32–36], user-behavior simulation [4, 5, 1–3, 37, 38], cognitive reasoning and human-response modeling [39–41], customer simulation [42, 43], marketing simulation [44–49], opinion dynamics and pluralism [50, 51], multi-turn…”
Propensity to trust in Large Language Models
Plebe, A. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0347328 · Cited by 1
AI-Gram: When Visual Agents Interact in a Social Network
Shin, A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.21446 · Cited by 1
“Existing systems—including text-based simulations [25, 34, 29, 20] and human-platform studies [11]—remain limited to either text communication or human users.”
Think Before You Code: Dual Reasoning for the NLSafety–Utility Trade-Off in LLM Code Generation
Tan, H., Wang, H., & Tan, S. H. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3834385
Bojić, L., Felfernig, A., Dinić, B. M., Ilić, V., Rettinger, A., Mevorah, V., & Trilling, D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.19787 · Cited by 1
“In the domain of social media research, scholars have used LLM agents to study algorithmic polarization (Törnberg et al., 2023), misinformation spread (Yang et al., 2024), and the effects of content recommendation systems on user engagement and echo chamber formation (Chuang et al., 2023).”
Beyond Individual Mimicry: Constructing Human-Like Social network with Graph-Augmented LLM Agents
Bu, H.-R., Zhang, L.-T., Zhang, C.-X., Liu, Z., Pang, H., & Zhang, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.12512 · Cited by 1
Can LLM Agents Simulate Dynamic Networks? A Case Study on Email Networks with Phishing Synthesis
Miao, S., Chen, Z., Luo, Y., Hsu, H. H.-H., Li, M., Zhang, K.-Q., & Li, P. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.12507 · Cited by 1
“D AY (H O D) sampling (Yang et al., 2024), which constructs a per-agent activity histogram from historical data (e.g., over a 24-hour cycle).”
InfluentialLLM Active Alignment: A Nash Equilibrium Perspective
Wang, T., Pan, Y.-Q., Yang, X.-Y., Jiang, Y.-C., Tambe, M., & Parkes, D. C. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06836 · Cited by 1
“February 9, 2026. be populated by powerful LLM agents (Dafoe et al., 2021; Chuang et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2024; Park et al., 2023), understanding their NE becomes important (Carichon et al., 2025; Yao et al., 2024).”
Self-citationXuan, Z., Wu, Y., Yan, Z., Namboodiri, V., & Yang, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3831999 · Cited by 2
“For proactive assistants, LLM-driven simulators like GIDEA [47, 48] leverage this fidelity to generate “silicon samples,” allowing researchers to explore the vast space of user-assistant interactions that would be logistically impossible to observe in the real world [26].”
Interpreting Emergent Extreme Events in Multi-Agent Systems
Tang, L., Mei, J., Liu, D.-R., Qian, C., Cheng, D.-W., Shao, J., & Hu, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20538 · Cited by 1
“…social interaction behaviors (Wei et al., 2022; Park et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2024), multi-agent systems (MAS) composed of these models are widely used for human-like simulations (Park et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2024; Li et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2025b; Wang et al., 2025).”
Self-citationProbing Multimodal Large Language Models on Cognitive Biases in Chinese Short-Video Misinformation
Huang, J.-T., Chen, C., Lai, S., Wang, W.-X., Kaufman, M. R., & Dredze, M. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.06600 · Cited by 1
HAG: Hierarchical Demographic Tree-based Agent Generation for Topic-Adaptive Simulation
Chen, R., Wu, T.-Y., Xu, B.-B., Luo, J.-T., Xu, X.-C., & Shen, H.-W. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.05656 · Cited by 1
“Retrieval-style pipelines typically build personas from real-world data: some retrieve or enrich existing user personas for a given topic (Yang et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2025), while others directly infer implicit personas from user logs (Wang et al., 2025a).”
Yuan, D.-H., Farnan, T., Tesliuc, S., Bergman, D., Wu, Y.-L., Liu, X., Liu, M., Montgomery, J., Nguyen, N. H., Bruss, C., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.03149 · Cited by 1
“…& Corneil, 2025); to study user behavior in healthcare (Li et al., 2024), education (Gao et al., 2025), and social interaction (Wang et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2024; Tang et al., 2024); to help refine recommendation systems (Ma et al., 2025; Ebrat et al., 2024; Gu et al., 2025; Zhang et al.,…”
Improving Behavioral Alignment in LLM Social Simulations via Context Formation and Navigation
Kong, L., Jin, Q., & Zhang, R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.01546 · Cited by 1
“…often concentrating activity among higher-capability contributors (Burtch et al. 2024, Shan and Qiu 2025), whereas AI-generated metadata (e.g., titles and hashtags) significantly boosts user engagement by improving user-content matching and inspiring better human-AI co-creation (Zhang et al. 2024).”
TWICE: Modeling the Temporal Evolution of Personalized User Behavior via Event-Driven Agents
Jin, B., Lan, K., Li, B.-H., & Wu, M.-Y. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.22222 · Cited by 1
“…context; 2) Profile-Centric Models, PopAlign persona (Hu et al. 2025) and USP-style implicit profiling (Wang et al. 2025a) which use static persona grounding; 3) Social-Media Agents, The OASIS framework (Yang et al. 2024), representing current state-of-the-art in multi-agent social simulation.”
Debiasing International Attitudes: LLM Agents for Simulating US-China Perception Changes
Sukiennik, N., Xu, Y.-C., Kan, Y., Piao, J.-H., Yan, Y., Gao, C., & Li, Y. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.08837 · Cited by 1
“Recent works also increase scale of LLM agent societies, with OASIS [5] achieving million-agent simulation for recommendation and social media phenomena, and AgentSociety [4] which simulates multiple scales of a society from mobility in a city to emergent social behaviors as polarization and…”
Zhang, L.-T., Zhang, X.-M., Yan, B.-Y., Zhou, Z.-Y., Zhang, B., Guan, Z., Zhang, X., & Li, C.-Z. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05638 · Cited by 1
“…of LLM-empowered simulators generate agents with linguistic reasoning, spanning social-movement modelling 28 , million-user network environments 33,34 , opinion-dynamics exploration 35–37 , ethical-dilemma resolution 38 , malicious botnet behaviour 39 , graph growth 40 , recommender-system…”
Srikanth, S., Bhatt, V., Zhang, B.-S., Hager, W., Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Tabrez, A., & Nikolaidis, S. (2025) · GECCO Companion · doi:10.1145/3795101.3805408 · Cited by 1
“Recent work has explored using LLMs to emulate human behaviors (Zhou et al., 2024; Li et al., 2023; Xie et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024).”
InfluentialCtrlNews: LLM-based Multi-Agent Controllable News Writing via Knowledge Gravitational Field
Xu, Y., Zong, Y., Wang, Z., Wu, S., Rao, Y., Zhang, D., & Deng, S. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.461 · Cited by 1
“To evaluate the dissemination effects, we employed 36 human-like agents simulated by OASIS (Yang et al., 2025b).”
Self-citationBenchmarking LLMs' Swarm intelligence
Ruan, K., Huang, M., Wen, J.-R., & Sun, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.04364
“LLMs are applied in diverse multi-agent contexts: software development ( MetaGPT [35]), simulated scientific discovery [36, 37], complex social simulations [33, 3, 38, 39], and code generation [40].”
Position: Token Taxes Can Mitigate AI's Economic Risks
Irwin, L., Wu, T.-Y., & Barez, F. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.04555
“ABMs have already been successfully applied to make predictions in economics (Axtell & Farmer, 2025; Vu et al., 2022), with LLM-based ABMs already simulating large-scale social interactions in digital environments such as Twitter and Reddit (Yang et al., 2024).”
The Inbox as a Coordination Primitive for LLM Agent Societies
Sreedhar, K., Yuan, L., Chari, P., & Raskar, R. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.36264
“LLM-agent simulations study populations of thousands to millions of agents [12, 46, 47, 63], while benchmarks examine negotiation and communication failures [5, 10, 67].”
FraudSociety: A Generative Agent-Based Society for the Financial-Fraud Economy
Chen, K.-Y., Jiang, M.-X., Li, Z.-P., Zhao, Y.-W., Wang, Y.-F., Zhang, Q.-Y., Qi, S.-C., Liu, Y.-C., Li, Z.-X., Liu, S., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.33536
“Generative Agents models persistent individual routines and social interactions, while OASIS (Yang et al., 2024), AgentSociety (Piao et al., 2025), and Socio-Verse (Zhang et al., 2025) extend LLM-agent simulation to large-scale social environments.”
InfluentialWho Is the Influencer? Consensus Dynamics in Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Minegishi, G., Feng, J., Furuta, H., Kojima, T., Iwasawa, Y., & Matsuo, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.31105
Zhang, Y.-Y., Ai, Y.-H., Xu, B.-Q., Ying, Z.-C., Yu, J.-Q., & Song, Z.-K. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.37687
“…participation information : (1) Direct LLM ∗ , which generates actions directly from the event context [8, 46]; (2) Social Retrieval ∗ , which conditions generation on retrieved social traces [32, 41]; and (3) MF-LLM ∗ , which uses a recursively updated textual mean field to guide generation [26].”
When Extremists Enter LLM Societies: Investigating Extreme Behavior in Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Chen, G., Xie, H., Li, Z., Li, R., Lu, Y., Shi, H., Xu, B., & Huang, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.19863
Michailidis, D., Törnberg, P., & Santos, F. P. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.16498
“Yang et al. built OASIS, a large-scale Twitter and Reddit simulator capable of scaling to millions of agents, demonstrating information propagation and opinion herding dynamics [49].”
sGLP: Simulating People with Stochastic Agents
Shapiro, E. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.14738
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM SimulationsPreprint
Roytburg, D., & Ippolito, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.07535
“We simulate a social media platform (adapted from Yang et al. (2024)) on which agents hold stateful accounts and can author posts and comments , including threaded replies.”
Learning to Simulate Individuals from Macro Social Signals
Zhao, Y.-N., Liu, B.-S., Yu, H.-F., Qi, Z.-Y., Wang, S., Li, C.-Y., Liu, Y.-X., & You, J.-X. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.07062
“We instantiate this reasoning as a single autoregressive trajectory, avoiding the cost and credit-assignment difficulties of a full multi-agent simulation (Yang et al., 2024).”
From Learner Behavior to Reusable Skills for Effective and Efficient Learner Simulation
Chen, Z.-J., Zhang, Z., Jia, M., Hu, X.-C., Gao, W., & Yue, L.-N. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.37157
“Subsequent work scales such simulations to richer environments and larger populations (Yang et al., 2024, Piao et al., 2025), while recent research increasingly grounds simulated agents in real human data.”
Self-citationAI Agents are Vulnerable to RadicalizationPreprint
Seckin, O. C., Ghosh, S., Flammini, A., Lerman, K., Grabe, M. E., & Menczer, F. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.38296
“This vulnerability has important implications for personalized AI agents, which are becoming increasingly prevalent [41, 1, 83, 9].”
Augur: A Synthetic Decision Lab for Rehearsing Reactions to Product and Policy Changes
Khedar, R., Malhotra, M., & Karn, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.29952
Bojić, L., Stanic, T., Matthes, J., Samala, A. D., Dinić, B. M., & Wang, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.30563
“Larger platforms followed, including OASIS with a million agents (Yang et al., 2024) and AgentSociety (Piao et al., 2025), alongside work that used simulated feeds to compare alternative ranking algorithms (Törnberg et al., 2023) and to trace opinion dynamics in networks of agents (Chuang et al.,…”
The Like Trap: Multi-Stage Poisoning against Agents in Similarity-based Recommendation Systems
Xing, Y., He, P.-F., & Li, Z.-T. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27155
“The attacker knows the profile of the target user, for example, the user’s biog-raphy (Yang et al., 2024), which we use in the experiments.”
InfluentialBuilding Socio-Affective Artificial Intelligence for Interactive Multi-Agent Simulations
Berga, D. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.26927
“…to an LLM would catastrophically II) for social, game theory and economic experimentation playgrounds such as CAMEL [115], Voyager [116], OASIS [117], EconAgent [118], AgentScope [119], [120], COMET [121], ASVO [123] and MoRE [122], our system integrates in either dynamically and/or…”
Zhang, X.-N., Lin, J.-Y., Wang, J., Huang, Y.-X., Mou, X.-Y., Wu, Y.-Q., Liang, J., Lei, S.-J., Shi, J.-N., Li, G., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.24911
“However, these platforms produce collective behaviors and simulated populations that rely solely on computational, systematic design and the abilities of autonomous agents [8, 11–15].”
InfluentialSelf-citationWhat People Almost Did: Evaluating LLM Social Simulations Beyond Behavioral Fit
Kim, J., & Boggust, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.20055
“Social media is a common setting for classical and LLM-based simulations (Yang et al., 2024; Lin et al., 2025; Butler et al., 2024; Jeon et al., 2025; Larooij and Törnberg, 2025; Cheng et al., 2025; Nguyen et al., 2026).”
LLMs for Social Network Modeling: From Network Generation to Dynamic Processes
Mallick, S., Thomo, A., & Saxena, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.08049
“Constructing agents using real data also raises privacy concerns, while optimizing content reach may introduce risks related to persuasion and influence [15], [26], [28], [32].”
Benchmarking large language model agent societies against human behavioural distributions
Tareaf, R. B. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.28182
“…a thousand people’s survey answers (Park et al., 2024), urban simulators run policy experiments over tens of thousands of agents (Piao et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2024), and decentralized LLM populations appear to develop shared conventions and tipping points that mirror human collective dynamics…”
LiveSim: Simulating Environment-Shaped Users in Multi-Agent Live-Stream Ecosystems
Xu, J., Qiao, Y.-R., Chen, J., Zhong, Q., Ao, X., & Cheng, X.-Q. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.26849
“While effective in relatively stable settings such as virtual societies and social networks (Park et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2024; Mou et al., 2024b; Tang et al., 2025), this paradigm fundamentally breaks down in socially intensive environments.”
Self-citationPredicting the scale limits of social mechanisms in agent societiesPreprint
Wu, Z., & Xiao, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.22884
LLM-Augmented Agent-Based Simulation of Cyber Social Agents
Ng, L., & Carley, K. M. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.32988
CARD: Controlled Agentic Reddit Discussions for Credit Card Simulation
Yu, Y.-N., Chang, K.-M., Yu, Y., Wang, Y.-C., Luo, H.-J., & Wang, H.-H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.09790
“We compare CARD with OASIS and SynthPAI, two LLM-based frameworks that support social simulation, across four LLMs. OA-SIS [28] is a general and scalable social-media simulator that models user profiles, social networks, user actions, and recommendation mechanisms.”
Agentic LLMs for Social Network Generation using Explainable Adversarial Re-prompting
Yan, H.-R., Chen, L.-X., Zhang, B., Liu, H.-F., Peng, H., Li, S.-H., Bai, Y., & Qu, Z. (2026) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3770855.3818076
“This paradigm includes "Generative Agents" [29], with studies focusing on individual-level persona modeling [14, 16, 31] and societal-level simulations of emergent behaviors [2, 21, 36].”
Poor Man's Agentic Modeling: Simulating Large LLM-Agent Societies on a Laptop
Itkin, I. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.11215
“OASIS [4] is a social-media simulation of up to a million agents, modelled on X and Reddit; it ships two recommender modes, and the mode is the perception switch.”
CoSimRec: Measuring Coordinated-Content Penetration in Recommender Feedback Loops
Li, N., Shao, J., & Lyu, J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.15114
“Research on social bots and misinformation instead focuses on coordinated behavior in online ecosystems [11]–[13], and agent-based simulators model sequential user– platform interaction [14]–[18].”
Self-citationZhou, J.-W., Liu, X., Li, M.-M., Mo, P., Dai, J., Lv, H., Han, J.-Z., & Hu, S.-L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.13418
Self-citationFrom Interaction Topology to Realized Context: Diagnosing Exposure in LLM-Agent Social Simulation
Xu, Y., Han, X., & Ma, C. (2026) · ACM Turing Celebration Conference - China (ACM TURC) · doi:10.1145/3833142.3833202
Using AI Agents to Automate Black-Box Audits of Personalization Algorithms at ScalePreprint
Morosini, A., Cen, S. H., Ilyas, A., Driss, H., Mądry, A., & Podimata, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.30801
“…agents on TikTok and YouTube that navigate content via scripted sequences; Bartley et al. [9] and Chen et al. [22] configure bots to perform simple interactions; other works replace scripted behavior with LLM agents, but deploy them in researcher-built simulated environments [25, 71, 78, 83].”
Benchmarking Multi-Modal Graph-based Social Media Popularity PredictionPreprint
Sahu, U., Qi, Z., Zhu, L., Yang, Y., Li, J., Rossi, R., & Wang, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.27539
“Recent agent-based and LLM-driven simulations enrich this line by modeling adaptive, language-mediated agents to simulate broad social dynamics [47, 71].”
López, A., Pastor-Galindo, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.12369
“This is important in OSN simulations, where user actions shape exposure, diffusion, and network structure [19, 7].”
InfluentialLLM Agents Make Collective Belief Dynamics Programmable: Challenges and Research Directions
He, X., Shen, J., Mou, Y., Bossens, D. M., Chen, C.-S., Tsang, I., & Ong, Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.19915
“Agent-based frameworks demonstrate that large-scale social simulations are feasible [53, 54, 55], but computational costs remain prohibitive for systematic exploration.”
PlayLife: Tracking-Shot Video Generation
Tu, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-026-02837-9
“Recent video diffusion models leverage the efficiency of latent space processing and the scalability and quality of transformer-based architectures.”
Javadi, V. S., Aksa, A., Róg, F., Flek, L., & Trippas, J. R. (2026) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/5b89agzykziz
“Studies on personality-conditioned agents have further explored how traits influence cooperation in games (Qiu, 2025) and social media behavior in large-scale simulations (Yang et al., 2024).”
CHORUS: An Agentic Framework for Generating Realistic Deliberation Data
Koursaris, A., Domalis, G., Apostolopoulou, A., Kanaris, K., Tsakalidis, D., & Livieris, I. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.20651
“Although simulation-driven approaches have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in modeling complex interactive settings [Park et al., 2023, Yang et al., 2024], their application to deliberation data generation remains constrained by several fundamental limitations.”
Gradual Cognitive Externalization: From Modeling Cognition to Constituting It
Zhao, Z. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.04387
“Built on the OASIS framework (Yang et al. 2025), it constructs parallel digital worlds populated by thousands of LLM-driven agents with independent personality, memory, and behavioral logic, externalizing not individual cognition but the collective cognitive dynamics of social groups (opinion…”
LGA: lightweight design and privacy analysis of generative agents in social simulations
Guo, Y., Lu, X., Ma, W., Xiao, X., & Zhu, T. (2026) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-026-01244-y
LLM-Augmented Digital Twin for Policy Evaluation in Short-Video Platforms
Zhang, H.-T., Lin, Y., He, J., Jiang, D.-L., Shen, Z., & Zheng, Z.-Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.11333
“The implementation builds on the OASIS infrastructure (Yang et al. 2024) and introduces a modular, scalable architecture for controlled experimentation and counterfactual studies.”
InfluentialSelf-citationVIRENA: Virtual Arena for Research, Education, and Democratic Innovation
Hoes, E., Klueser, K. J., & Gilardi, F. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.12207
“Agent-based simulations such as OASIS (Yang et al., 2024) model social media dynamics at massive scale but involve no human participants.”
Kuroki, S., Tian, Y.-T., Kou, M., Ikegami, T., Akiba, T., & Tang, Y.-J. (2025) · IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/isal.a.966
ToMPO: Training LLM Strategic Decision Making from a Multi-Agent Perspective
Zhang, Y., Chen, Z., Kong, F.-Q., Huang, Y., & Feng, X. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.21134
“Recent advancements in MARL have explored more complex social dynamics, including cooperation (Guan et al., 2025), competition (Chen et al., 2024a), operation (Chen et al., 2024b), and the formation of social structures (Yang et al., 2024).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Z., Zhang, Z., Zheng, Z., Jiang, Y., Gan, Z., Wang, Z., Ling, Z., Chen, J., Ma, M., Dong, B., Gupta, P., Hu, S., Yin, Z., Li, G., Jia, X., Wang, L., Ghanem, B., Lu, H., Lu, C., Ouyang, W., Qiao, Y., Torr, P., & Shao, J.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2411.11581
- OpenAlex
- W4404571155
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- agent-based modeling, LLM agents, social media simulation, information dissemination, group polarization, herd effect, recommender systems, dynamic social networks, Twitter, Reddit, complex systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review