PreprintCited by 2Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceFree Will and AgencyPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis

Why does time feel the way it does? Towards a principled account of temporal experience

Open access
Comolatti, Renzo, Grasso, Matteo, Tononi, Giulio·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Time flows, or at least the time of our experience does. Can we provide an objective account of why experience, confined to the short window of the conscious present, encompasses a succession of moments that slip away from now to then--an account of why time feels flowing? Integrated Information Theory (IIT) aims to account for both the presence and quality of consciousness in objective, physical terms. Given a substrate's architecture and current state, the formalism of IIT allows one to unfold the cause-effect power of the substrate, yielding a cause-effect structure. According to IIT, this accounts in full for the presence and quality of experience, without any additional ingredients. In previous work, we showed how unfolding the cause-effect structure of non-directed grids, like those found in many posterior cortical areas, can account for the way space feels--namely, extended. Here we show that unfolding the cause-effect structure of directed grids can account for how time feels--namely, flowing. First, we argue that the conscious present is experienced as flowing because it is composed of phenomenal distinctions (moments) that are directed, and these distinctions are related in a way that satisfies directed inclusion, connection, and fusion. We then show that directed grids, which we conjecture constitute the substrate of temporal experience, yield a cause-effect structure that accounts for these and other properties of temporal experience. In this account, the experienced present does not correspond to a process unrolling in "clock time," but to a cause-effect structure specified by a system in its current state: time is a structure, not a process. We conclude by outlining similarities and differences between the experience of time and space, and some implications for the neuroscience, psychophysics, and philosophy of time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2412.13198

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cause-effect structure of pQrS is composed of 13 distinctions and 8184 relations and has Φ = 391.25 ibits.

    “Its cause-effect structure, unfolded according to [18,42], is composed of 13 distinctions and 8184 relations and has Φ = 391.25 ibits”

    From Dissociating Artificial Intelligence from Artificial Consciousness (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    Section 3.1 describes how a cause-effect structure is unfolded and explains that it consists of distinctions and relations, but it gives no result for pQrS. Searches for pQrS, 8184, and 391.25 found no passage supporting the stated counts or Φ value; the citation in the printed sentence appears beside the unfolding method rather than those figures. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Albertazzi, L. (1996). Comet tails, fleeting objects and temporal inversions. Axiomathes, 7(1), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357202 · DOI
  2. Augustine, S., & Chadwick, H. (2009). Confessions (1st edition ed.). Oxford University Press.
  3. Boly, M., Smith, R., Borrego, G. V., Pozuelos, J. P., Alauddin, T., Malinowski, P., & Tononi, G. (2024). Neural correlates of pure presence. In: bioRxiv.
  4. Brecher, G. A. (1932). Die Entstehung und biologische Bedeutung der subjektiven Zeiteinheit, -des Momentes. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 18(1), 204-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00338160 · DOI
  5. Curran, S., & Wattis, J. P. (1998). Critical flicker fusion threshold: a useful research tool in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 13(5), 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099- 1077(199807)13:5<337::AID-HUP7>3.0.CO;2-P Dainton, B. (2000). Stream of Consciousness: Unity and Continuity in Conscious Experience. Routledge. · DOI
  6. Dainton, B. (2008). Sensing Change. Philosophical Issues, 18(1), 362-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2008.00152.x · DOI
  7. Dainton, B. (2012). Time and Temporal Experience. In A. Bardon (Ed.), The Future of the Philosophy of Time (pp. 123-148). Routledge.
  8. Elliott, M. A., & Giersch, A. (2016). What Happens in a Moment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01905 · DOI
  9. Hayashi, M. J., van der Zwaag, W., Bueti, D., & Kanai, R. (2018). Representations of time in human frontoparietal cortex. 1(1), 233-233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0243-z · DOI
  10. Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet Anticipation: Music And the Psychology of Expectation. Mit Press.
  11. James, W. (1879). The Spatial Quale. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 13(1), 64-87.
  12. Kant, I., Guyer, P., & Wood, A. W. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(5), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016. · DOI
  14. Lotze, H. (1884). Lotze's system of philosophy. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
  15. Mayner, W., Juel, B. E., & Tononi, G. Meaning, perception, and matching: quantifying how the structure of experience matches the environment. arXiv., 2024.
  16. McTaggart, J. E. (1908). The Unreality of Time. Mind, New Series, 17(68), 457-474.
  17. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (0 edition ed.). Oxford University Press.
  18. Prosser, S. J. (2017). Rethinking the Specious Present. In I. Phillips (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience (pp. 146-156). Routledge.
  19. Roenneberg, T. (2012). Internal Time: Chronotypes, Social Jet Lag, and Why You're So Tired. Harvard University Press.
  20. Saenz, M., & Langers, D. R. M. (2014). Tonotopic mapping of human auditory cortex. Hearing Research, 307, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.07.016 (Human Auditory NeuroImaging) · DOI
  21. Singhal, I., & Srinivasan, N. (2024). Just one moment: Unifying theories of consciousness based on a phenomenological "now" and temporal hierarchy. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, No-Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000393 · DOI
  22. Skow, B. (2015). Objective Becoming. Oxford University Press UK.
  23. Strawson, G. (2009). Selves: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
  24. Tooley, M. (1997). Time, Tense, and Causation. Oxford University Press.
  25. Varela, F. J. (1999). The Specious Present: A Neurophenomenology of Time Consciousness. Stanford University Press, Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science, 41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Comolatti, R., Grasso, M., & Tononi, G.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405875864
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Templeton World Charity Foundation (#TWCF0216, TWCF0526)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Keywords
temporal experience, time perception, passage of time, integrated information theory, causal structure, philosophy of time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review