Automatic Construction of a Legal Citation Graph from 100 Million Ukrainian Court Decisions: Large-Scale Extraction, Topological Analysis, and Ontology-Driven Clustering
Open accessAbstract
Half a billion citation edges extracted from 100.7 million Ukrainian court decisions reveal that judicial citation structure encodes legal domain boundaries without supervision and predicts future legislative importance with near-perfect accuracy. We construct the first large-scale citation graph from the complete EDRSR registry (99.5 million full texts, 1.1 TB), extracting 502 million citation links across six types via regex on commodity hardware in approximately 5 hours, with precision of 1.00 on a 200-decision validation sample (95% Wilson CI: [0.982, 1.000]). Three principal findings emerge. (1) The degree distribution follows a power law (alpha = 1.57 +/- 0.008), placing the Ukrainian court network near the EU Court of Justice and below the US Supreme Court, with hub articles cited by millions of decisions. (2) Louvain community detection on the co-citation projection recovers legal domain boundaries (civil, criminal, administrative, commercial) with modularity Q = 0.44-0.55 and temporal stability (NMI = 0.83-0.86 across periods), constituting an automatically constructed legal ontology grounded in judicial practice. (3) Citation features predict top-1000 articles with AUC = 0.9984, substantially outperforming a naive frequency baseline (P@1000 = 0.655); temporal dynamics detect legislative regime changes as phase transitions and the 2022 invasion as a citation entropy spike (H: 11.02 -> 13.49) with emergent wartime legislation nodes. The citation-derived ontology is operationalized as the domain layer of a workflow memory system for LLM-assisted legal analysis, connecting to the ontology-controlled paradigm. The extraction pipeline, analysis code, and aggregated statistics are released as open data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Citation extraction uses compiled regular expressions with precision 1.00 on a 200-decision validation sample.
“Extraction uses compiled regular expressions with precision 1.00 on a 200-decision validation sample; full construction details are in Ovcharov [18].”
From Citation Grounding: Detecting and Reducing LLM Citation Hallucinations via Legal Citation Graphs (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Vincent D. Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10):P10008, 2008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008. · DOI · Paper page
- Ilias Chalkidis, Marios Fergadiotis, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Nikolaos Aletras, and Ion An- droutsopoulos. LEGAL-BERT: The muppets straight out of law school. In Findings of EMNLP, pages 2898-2904, 2020. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.261. URL https: //aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp.261/. · DOI
- Aaron Clauset, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, and Mark E. J. Newman. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4):661-703, 2009. doi: 10.1137/070710111. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/0706.1062. · DOI · Paper page
- Corinna Coupette, Janis Beckedorf, Dirk Hartung, Michael Bommarito, and Daniel Martin Katz. Measuring law over time: A network analytical framework with an application to statutes and regulations in the united states and germany. Frontiers in Physics, 9:658463, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.658463. URL https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.658463. · DOI
- James H. Fowler, Timothy R. Johnson, James F. Spriggs, Sangick Jeon, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. Network analysis and the law: Measuring the legal importance of precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Analysis, 15(3):324-346, 2007. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpm011. · DOI · Paper page
- Anton Geist. Using citation analysis techniques for computer-assisted legal research in conti- nental jurisdictions. Graduate thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2009.
- Thomas R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220, 1993. doi: 10.1006/knac.1993.1008. · DOI
- Pierre Mazzega, Danièle Bourcier, and Romain Boulet. The network of french legal codes. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 236-237, 2009. doi: 10.1145/1568234.1568271. · DOI
- Atieh Mirshahvalad, Argimiro V. Esquivel, Ludvig Lizana, and Martin Rosvall. Dynamics of interacting information waves in networks. Physical Review E, 89:012809, 2014. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevE.89.012809. · DOI
- Enys Monés, Piotr Sapiezynski, Simon Thordal, Henrik Palmer Olsen, and Sune Lehmann. Emergence of network effects and predictability in the judicial system. Scientific Reports, 11: 2740, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82430-x. · DOI
- Mark E. J. Newman and Michelle Girvan. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2):026113, 2004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113. · DOI · Paper page
- Vladimir Ovcharov. Workflow memory for long-horizon agentic composition: Architecture, dual-mode retrieval, and retrieval-correction signal. arXiv preprint, 2026.
- Alexander V. Palagin. Architecture of ontology-controlled computer systems. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 42(2):254-264, 2006. doi: 10.1007/s10559-006-0061-z. · DOI
- Oleksandr Palagin, Vitalii Velychko, Kyrylo Malakhov, and Oleksandr Shchurov. Distribu- tional semantic modeling: A revised technique to train term/word vector space models ap- plying the ontology-related approach. Problems in Programming, (2-3):341-351, 2020. doi: 10.15407/pp2020.02-03.341. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.03350. · DOI
- Oleksandr Palagin, Vladislav Kaverinskiy, Anna Litvin, and Kyrylo Malakhov. OntoChat- GPT information system: Ontology-driven structured prompts for ChatGPT meta-learning. International Journal of Computing, 22(2):170-183, 2023. doi: 10.47839/ijc.22.2.3086. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05082. · DOI
- Radboud Winkels, Jelle de Ruyter, and Henryk Kroese. Determining authority of dutch case law. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2011), pages 103-112, 2011. doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-981-3-103. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Untitled work
Ovcharov, V. (2026) · arXiv
“Extraction uses compiled regular expressions; construction of the extraction pipeline is described in the companion paper [18].”
Influential
- Authors
- Ovcharov, V.
- Affiliations
- Lexmark (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ovcharov, Volodymyr
- ORCID
- Ovcharov, Volodymyr
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2605.15362
- OpenAlex
- W7161555495
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Keywords
- judicial decisions, citation extraction, power-law degree distribution, Louvain community detection, legal ontology, citation prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
