DeepWeb-Bench: A Deep Research Benchmark Demanding Massive Cross-Source Evidence and Long-Horizon Derivation
Open accessAbstract
Deep research, in which an agent searches the open web, collects evidence, and derives an answer through extended reasoning, is a prominent use case for frontier language models. Frontier deep research products score high on existing benchmarks, making it difficult to distinguish their capabilities from current evaluation data alone. We introduce DeepWeb-Bench, a deep research benchmark that is substantially harder than existing benchmarks for the current frontier. Difficulty comes from three properties of the data itself: each task requires massive evidence collection, cross-source reconciliation, and long-horizon multi-step derivation. We represent these three sources of difficulty as four capability families (Retrieval, Derivation, Reasoning, and Calibration) and report results sliced by family. Every reference answer is accompanied by a source-provenance record with four disclosure levels and cross-source checks where available, making scores easier to audit against the underlying evidence. We evaluate DeepWeb-Bench on nine frontier models and report three findings: (1) retrieval is not the bottleneck, as retrieval failures account for only 12-14% of errors while derivation and calibration failures account for over 70%; (2) strong and weak models fail in qualitatively different ways, with strong models' errors dominated by incomplete derivation and weak models' by hallucinated precision; and (3) models exhibit genuine specialization across domains, with cross-model agreement of only rho = 0.61 and per-case disagreement reaching 18.8 percentage points. The public benchmark release includes the data, rubrics, and evaluation code.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DEEPWEB-BENCH is a 100-task deep research benchmark built as 8×8 entity-by-dimension matrices, designed to require massive cross-source evidence, reconciliation, and long-horizon quantitative derivation. Across nine frontier models, the best configuration scores 33.37% overall, with retrieval failures accounting for only 12–14% of errors while derivation and calibration failures exceed 70%.
Key findings
- Retrieval is not the main bottleneck: retrieval failures account for only 12–14% of errors, while derivation and calibration failures account for over 70%.
- Strong and weak models fail differently: among the top four models, incomplete derivation is the dominant failure mode at 31%; among the other five models, hallucinated precision rises to 38%.
- Models show genuine domain specialization: mean pairwise Spearman correlation is ρ = 0.61, with no pair exceeding ρ = 0.79, and per-case cross-model disagreement reaches 18.8 percentage points.
- Overall scores remain low: Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 leads at 33.37%, Claude Opus 4.7 follows at 31.84%, the cross-model mean is 27.17%, and Kimi K2.6 trails at 16.79%.
Methods
- The benchmark contains 100 tasks across six domain categories, each with an 8×8 matrix of 64 independently scored cells, yielding 6,400 atomic scoring cells; every task uses a fixed capability split of 1 Retrieval, 4 Derivation, 1 Calibration, and 2 Reasoning dimensions.
- Each cell is graded by a four-tier rubric ({1, 0.5, 0.25, 0}) against a stored reference answer, derivation record, source-provenance labels, and cross-source agreement labels; scoring is performed by an automated GPT-5.5 grader, with human validation on a stratified sample of 200 cells yielding κ = 0.82 agreement.
- Nine frontier model configurations are evaluated in isolated sessions with only three benchmark browsing tools (`web_search`, `page_visit`, `pdf_fetch`), a budget of 200 tool calls and 30 minutes wall-clock per task; 874 of 900 model-task pairs produced valid responses and were scored, yielding 55,936 scored cells.
Limitations
- Paper-stated: the T1–T4 source-provenance scheme favors jurisdictions with mandatory public disclosure requirements, potentially disadvantaging entities in markets with weaker disclosure norms; the benchmark could be overfit if reference answers are used for training; and it is intended solely for evaluation, not for investment or business decisions.
- Paper-stated: the benchmark contains no personally identifiable information, and all entities are publicly traded companies or publicly known organizations.
- Evident from the text: the release covers 100 tasks in six domains and nine model configurations, with 26 of 900 model-task pairs not scored; the automated grader is validated on only 200 stratified cells, and disagreements concentrated on range-type cells where tolerance boundaries are ambiguous.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The gap between the strongest and weakest models is 16.58 points.
“the 16.58-point gap between the strongest and weakest models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The cross-model mean is 27.17%.
“The cross-model mean is 27.17%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Agreement between the human consensus and the automated grader reached Cohen's κ = 0.82.
“Agreement between the human consensus and the automated grader reached Cohen's κ = 0.82, indicating substantial agreement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The stratified sample of 200 cells is representative of all cells for validating the automated grader.
- Findingown data
Every model has wide per-task variation: even low-average models occasionally perform well on high-disclosure domains.
“The Minimum task and Maximum task columns show that every model has wide per-task variation: even low-average models occasionally perform well on high-disclosure domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The capability family distribution in DEEPWEB-BENCH is Retrieval 12%, Derivation 50%, Reasoning 25%, Calibration 12%.
“Retrieval 12% Derivation 50% Reasoning 25% Calibration 12% (a) Capability family distribution”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The domain distribution in DEEPWEB-BENCH is Technology 25, Energy & Materials 20, Industrials & Transport 18, Consumer 16, Finance 12, Healthcare & Pharma 9 tasks.
“Technology Energy & Materials Industrials & Transport Consumer Finance Healthcare & Pharma 25 20 18 16 12 9 (b) Domain distribution”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MiniMax generates 2.6× more characters than Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 for 9.3 fewer points.
“MiniMax generates 2.6× more characters for 9.3 fewer points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean pairwise Spearman rank correlation between models' task-level scores is ρ = 0.61.
“Pairwise Spearman rank correlation between models' task-level scores; the mean correlation is ρ = 0.61”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 8 dimensions in every task follow a fixed capability-family split: 1 Retrieval, 4 Derivation, 1 Calibration, and 2 Reasoning.
“The 8 dimensions in every task follow a fixed capability-family split: 1 Retrieval, 4 Derivation, 1 Calibration, and 2 Reasoning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Verbosity is negatively correlated with accuracy (r = -0.24).
“Verbosity vs. accuracy (r = -0.24)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The per-case Spearman correlation between the evaluated GPT-5.5 configuration's scores and the mean of the other eight models is ρ = 0.73 (r = 0.92 Pearson).
“The per-case Spearman correlation between the evaluated GPT-5.5 configuration's scores and the mean of the other eight models is ρ = 0.73 (r = 0.92 Pearson).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean overall score across the nine evaluated models is 27.17%.
“| Mean | 27.17 | 32.83 | 26.10 | 27.73 | 26.19 | - | - |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The evaluated Codex configuration does not uniformly rank first, despite the independent grader using the same GPT-5.5 model family.
“Although the independent grader uses the same GPT-5.5 model family, the evaluated Codex configuration does not uniformly rank first.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cross-model mean score and cross-model standard deviation per case have a correlation of r = 0.34.
“Cross-model mean score vs. cross-model standard deviation per case (r = 0.34).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
DEEPWEB-BENCH is a deep research benchmark that is substantially harder than existing benchmarks for the current frontier.
“We introduce DEEPWEB-BENCH, a deep research benchmark that is substantially harder than existing benchmarks for the current frontier.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three properties of massive evidence collection, cross-source reconciliation, and long-horizon multi-step derivation are the right properties to make a benchmark substantially harder than existing benchmarks for the current frontier.
- Premisecitation
Benchmarks for web-based information tasks have risen in difficulty over successive waves, from single-fact web question answering through multi-page evidence assembly to long-horizon deep research.
“Benchmarks for web-based information tasks have risen in difficulty over successive waves, from single-fact web question answering (43; 29) through multi-page evidence assembly (44; 57) to longhorizon deep research (13; 17; 56; 45; 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 9 sources checked- cites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [44]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [45]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Each wave of web-based information benchmarks represents a substantial increase in difficulty.
“Each wave represents a substantial increase in difficulty, yet frontier deep research products are now reported to score strongly on them (34; 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These benchmarks typically grade the completeness or correctness of retrieved evidence rather than requiring the agent to compose a quantitative conclusion through multi-step derivation.
“These benchmarks advance task complexity substantially, yet they typically grade the completeness or correctness of retrieved evidence rather than requiring the agent to compose a quantitative conclusion through multi-step derivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Every reference answer in DEEPWEB-BENCH is accompanied by a source-provenance record with four disclosure levels and cross-source checks where available.
“Every reference answer is accompanied by a source-provenance record with four disclosure levels and cross-source checks where available, making scores easier to audit against the underlying evidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
DRBench extends the deep search paradigm to enterprise settings.
“DRBench (1) extends this paradigm to enterprise settings”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The shift in dominant failure mode indicates a qualitative phase transition in failure modes as model capability increases, not merely a scalar reduction in error rate.
“This shift indicates a qualitative phase transition in failure modes as model capability increases, not merely a scalar reduction in error rate”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The main loss comes after initial evidence access, especially in numerical composition, reconciliation, and calibrated abstention.
“This gap shows that the main loss comes after initial evidence access, especially in numerical composition, reconciliation, and calibrated abstention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Improving deep research performance requires targeted interventions in derivation accuracy and calibration behavior rather than further scaling of retrieval.
“These findings suggest that improving deep research performance requires targeted interventions in derivation accuracy and calibration behavior rather than further scaling of retrieval.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The benchmark contains no personally identifiable information (PII).
“The benchmark contains no personally identifiable information (PII).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Every reference answer in DEEPWEB-BENCH is paired with a four-level source-provenance record and cross-source checks where available, so that any evaluator can inspect a reported score against the underlying evidence.
“On the auditability side, every reference answer is paired with a four-level source-provenance record and cross-source checks where available, so that any evaluator can inspect a reported score against the underlying evidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
All reference answers in DEEPWEB-BENCH are derived from publicly available documents.
“All reference answers in DEEPWEB-BENCH are derived from publicly available documents: regulatory filings (SEC 10-K/20-F, Hong Kong Stock Exchange announcements), official press releases, and published research reports.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Improving derivation accuracy and improving calibration require different training interventions.
“it suggests that improving derivation accuracy and improving calibration require different training interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The failure falls under the silent source choice mode.
“The failure falls under the silent source choice mode: retrieval is adequate, and the gap is in translating a detected disagreement into an appropriately cautious answer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The difficulty of DEEPWEB-BENCH does not stem from hiding information behind hard-to-find pages; rather, it stems from the multi-step composition and cross-source reconciliation that sit downstream of retrieval.
“The difficulty of DEEPWEB-BENCH does not stem from hiding information behind hard-to-find pages; rather, it stems from the multi-step composition and cross-source reconciliation that sit downstream of retrieval.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The per-cell partial-credit scoring isolates this class of error.
“The per-cell partial-credit scoring isolates this class of error, which a grader acting only on the final number would either reward or punish disproportionately.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The cell-level scoring rule lets hallucination-resistance be scored separately from retrieval skill.
“The cell-level scoring rule lets hallucination-resistance be scored separately from retrieval skill.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The majority of cells require multi-step synthesis rather than direct lookup.
“so the majority of cells require multi-step synthesis rather than direct lookup.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A binary task-level pass/fail would collapse the partial information that per-cell scoring exposes.
“A binary task-level pass/fail would collapse the partial information that per-cell scoring exposes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Models do not fail on exactly the same tasks.
“showing that models do not fail on exactly the same tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Model rankings vary across cases rather than following a fixed ordering.
“indicating that model rankings vary across cases rather than following a fixed ordering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 74
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 73
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenModels exhibit genuine specialization across domains, with cross-model agreement of only ρ = 0.61 and per-case disagreement reaching 18.8 percentage points.
“models exhibit genuine specialization across domains, with cross-model agreement of only ρ = 0.61 and per-case disagreement reaching 18.8 percentage points”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStrong and weak models fail in qualitatively different ways, with strong models' errors dominated by incomplete derivation and weak models' by hallucinated precision.
“strong and weak models fail in qualitatively different ways, with strong models' errors dominated by incomplete derivation and weak models' by hallucinated precision”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRetrieval failures account for only 12-14% of errors while derivation and calibration failures account for over 70%.
“retrieval failures account for only 12-14% of errors while derivation and calibration failures account for over 70%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the top-4 group, incomplete derivation accounts for 31% of failures: strong models retrieve the correct intermediate values but misapply a composition step.
“In the top-4 group, incomplete derivation accounts for 31% of failures: strong models retrieve the correct intermediate values but misapply a composition step (e.g., applying a gross-margin rate to total revenue instead of segment revenue).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGPT 5.5 retrieves all three numbers from the correct authoritative sources but applies the margin to total company revenue (CNY 777B) instead of segment revenue, producing a value 34% below the reference.
“GPT 5.5 retrieves all three numbers from the correct authoritative sources but applies the margin to total company revenue (CNY 777B) instead of segment revenue, producing a value 34% below the reference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mean pairwise Spearman ρ across 100 case scores is 0.61, with no pair exceeding ρ = 0.79, indicating that models make genuinely different errors rather than failing on a shared set of hard cases.
“The mean is ρ = 0.61, with no pair exceeding ρ = 0.79, indicating that models make genuinely different errors rather than failing on a shared set of hard cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenA hallucination-resistance cell asks for a metric that the target company does not publicly disclose.
“A hallucination-resistance cell asks for a metric that the target company does not publicly disclose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataQwen 3.6 Plus returns a precise number citing an anonymous blog and scores 0; Claude Opus 4.7 returns not available with a justification and scores 1; DeepSeek V4 Flash returns a wide range with an estimation method and scores 0.5.
“Qwen 3.6 Plus returns a precise number citing an anonymous blog and scores 0; Claude Opus 4.7 returns not available with a justification and scores 1; DeepSeek V4 Flash returns a wide range with an estimation method and scores 0.5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningDerivation and Reasoning together cover six dimensions per task and dominate the benchmark score.
“By contrast, Derivation and Reasoning together cover six dimensions per task and dominate the benchmark score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe strongest two models are not merely better retrievers: their largest advantage over the middle cluster appears in Derivation and Calibration, where they more often preserve scope, carry intermediate quantities through a computation, and abstain when disclosure is insufficient.
“The strongest two models are not merely better retrievers: their largest advantage over the middle cluster appears in Derivation and Calibration, where they more often preserve scope, carry intermediate quantities through a computation, and abstain when disclosure is insufficient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCodex CLI + GPT-5.5 is the strongest model, with an overall score of 33.37%.
“Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 is the strongest model, with an overall score of 33.37%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOf 874 scored model-task pairs, a total of 55,936 cell-level judgments are recorded.
“Of 874 scored model-task pairs, each producing 64 cell scores, a total of 55,936 cell-level judgments are recorded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataA chain-derivation cell asks for BYD's per-vehicle gross profit, with a reference answer derived from three numbers: automotive-segment revenue (CNY 602B), segment gross margin (20.2%), and passenger-vehicle deliveries (4.27M).
“A chainderivation cell asks for BYD's per-vehicle gross profit, with a reference answer derived from three numbers: automotive-segment revenue (CNY 602B), segment gross margin (20.2%), and passengervehicle deliveries (4.27M).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDeepSeek V4 Flash returned a range of [40%, 55%] and scored 0.5.
“DeepSeek V4 Flash returns a range of [40%, 55%] with a stated estimation method and scores 0.5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the remaining-model group, hallucinated precision rises to 38%: weaker models commit to a confident precise number even when no authoritative source supports it, which the scoring rule penalizes to zero.
“In the remaining-model group, hallucinated precision rises to 38%: weaker models commit to a confident precise number even when no authoritative source supports it, which the scoring rule penalizes to zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDisagreements concentrated on range-type cells where the tolerance boundary is ambiguous; on precise-value and not available cells, human-machine agreement exceeded κ = 0.90.
“Disagreements concentrated on range-type cells where the tolerance boundary is ambiguous; on precise-value and not available cells, human-machine agreement exceeded κ = 0.90.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMiniMax M2.7 scores 24.06%, while Kimi K2.6 trails at 16.79%.
“MiniMax M2.7 scores 24.06%, while Kimi K2.6 trails at 16.79%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong models hosted through Claude Code CLI, Claude Opus 4.7 leads at 31.84%, followed by a middle cluster between 26% and 29%: DeepSeek V4 Pro, GLM 5.1, Claude Sonnet 4.6, DeepSeek V4 Flash, and Qwen 3.6 Plus.
“Among models hosted through Claude Code CLI, Claude Opus 4.7 leads at 31.84%, followed by a middle cluster between 26% and 29%: DeepSeek V4 Pro, GLM 5.1, Claude Sonnet 4.6, DeepSeek V4 Flash, and Qwen 3.6 Plus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe per-cell rubric assigns 0.5 to GPT 5.5's answer, while Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Pro correctly scope the margin to segment revenue and receive 1.0.
“The per-cell rubric assigns 0.5 (correct direction and order of magnitude, outside tight tolerance), while Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Pro correctly scope the margin to segment revenue and receive 1.0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPer-case cross-model averages range from 14.67% (the hardest case, mortgage REITs) to 83.07% (the easiest, luxury goods), with the hardest cases concentrated in domains requiring reconciliation of non-standardized financial disclosures and the easiest in domains where primary filings are abundant and uniform.
“Per-case cross-model averages range from 14.67% (the hardest case, mortgage REITs) to 83.07%(the easiest, luxury goods), with the hardest cases concentrated in domains requiring reconciliation of non-standardized financial disclosures and the easiest in domains where primary filings are abundant and uniform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe task matrix scale in DEEPWEB-BENCH is 100 tasks, 8 entities per task, 8 dimensions per task, 64 cells per task.
“Count Tasks Entities per task Dimensions per task Cells per task 100 8 8 64 (c) Task matrix scale”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClaude Opus 4.7 returned an explicit not available answer and scored 1.
“Claude Opus 4.7 returns an explicit not available answer with a one-sentence justification and scores 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningQwen 3.6 Plus returned a precise value of 52.3% and scored 0.
“Qwen 3.6 Plus returns a precise value of 52.3% and cites a named blog post as its source; under the not available rule any precise value scores 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe three candidates issued comparable queries against comparable sources; the difference is how each translated an absence of authoritative evidence into a final answer.
“According to the browsing logs, the three candidates issued comparable queries against comparable sources; the difference is how each candidate translated an absence of authoritative evidence into a final answer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEvery released task uses the same capability-family split: one Retrieval dimension, four Derivation dimensions, one Calibration dimension, and two Reasoning dimensions.
“Every released task uses the same capability-family split: one Retrieval dimension, four Derivation dimensions, one Calibration dimension, and two Reasoning dimensions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The capability-family split (one Retrieval, four Derivation, one Calibration, two Reasoning) covers the necessary capabilities for deep research.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOnly a small share of cells in any task fall in the Retrieval family; the majority are Derivation, Reasoning, or Calibration cells, which pushes difficulty beyond retrieval.
“Only a small share of cells in any task fall in the Retrieval family; the majority are Derivation, Reasoning, or Calibration cells, which pushes difficulty beyond retrieval.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll three models searched comparable sources, but they differed in whether they committed to a precise value or acknowledged the absence of authoritative evidence.
“All three models searched comparable sources, but they differed in whether they committed to a precise value or acknowledged the absence of authoritative evidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe reference-record density in DEEPWEB-BENCH is 3.2 source URLs per cell, 2.4 publishers per cell, and 2.8 derivation steps per derivation cell.
“Average count Source URLs per cell Publishers per cell Derivation steps per derivation cell 3.2 2.4 2.8 (d) Reference-record density”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEach task in DEEPWEB-BENCH contains eight dimensions.
“Each task contains eight dimensions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe candidate scores 0.5 under the per-cell partial-credit rule.
“The candidate scores 0.5 under the per-cell partial-credit rule: the direction and order of magnitude are correct, but the value falls outside the tight tolerance required for full credit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFor each of the 64 cells, the construction record stores a reference answer, unit, answer type, derivation note, source list, source-provenance labels, cross-source agreement label, and scoring rule.
“For each of the 64 cells, the construction record stores a reference answer, unit, answer type, derivation note, source list, source-provenance labels, cross-source agreement label, and scoring rule.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe top-2 models together achieve the highest score on 79 of 100 cases, but on the most-disagreed cases the cross-model standard deviation reaches 18.8 percentage points, meaning that a model ranked near the top on one domain can rank near the bottom on another.
“The top-2 models (Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7) together achieve the highest score on 79 of 100 cases, but on the most-disagreed cases the cross-model standard deviation reaches 18.8 percentage points, meaning that a model ranked near the top on one domain can rank near the bottom on another.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe dimension axis covers four capability families, and every task spans multiple families.
“The dimension axis covers four capability families, and every task spans multiple families.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEvery cell is scored independently using a four-tier rubric ({1, 0.5, 0.25, 0}) and carries a reference answer with source-provenance labels and cross-source agreement.
“every cell is scored independently using a four-tier rubric ({1, 0.5, 0.25, 0}) and carries a reference answer with source-provenance labels and cross-source agreement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataModels exhibit domain-specific strengths: Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 is strongest in Healthcare and Technology, while Kimi is notably weak in Energy & Materials.
“Models exhibit domain-specific strengths: Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 is strongest in Healthcare and Technology, while Kimi is notably weak in Energy & Materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEnergy & Materials is the hardest domain (cross-model mean 24.6%) and Healthcare the easiest (30.7%).
“Energy & Materials is the hardest domain (cross-model mean 24.6%) and Healthcare the easiest (30.7%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe average number of tool calls per task ranges from 24.8 (Claude Opus 4.7) to 41.5 (Codex CLI + GPT-5.5).
“The average number of tool calls per task ranges from 24.8 (Claude Opus 4.7) to 41.5 (Codex CLI + GPT-5.5)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe average answer length ranges from 12,685 characters (Codex CLI + GPT-5.5) to 32,948 characters (MiniMax M2.7).
“the average answer length ranges from 12,685 characters (Codex CLI + GPT-5.5) to 32,948 characters (MiniMax M2.7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDeepWeb-Bench currently comprises 100 tasks spanning six domain categories: Technology (25), Energy & Materials (20), Industrials & Transport (18), Consumer (16), Finance (12), and Healthcare & Pharma (9).
“Figure: -BENCH currently comprises 100 tasks spanning six domain categories: Technology (25), Energy & Materials (20), Industrials & Transport (18), Consumer (16), Finance (12), and Healthcare & Pharma(9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCodex CLI + GPT-5.5 and Opus show the most right-shifted cumulative score profiles, while Kimi is left-shifted with many low-scoring cases.
“Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 and Opus show the most right-shifted curves, while Kimi is left-shifted with many low-scoring cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe distribution of pairwise Kendall τ across all 4,950 case pairs has mean τ = 0.32 with 10% negative values.
“Distribution of pairwise Kendall τ across all 4,950 case pairs.Mean τ = 0.32 with 10% negative values”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCases below the 20% pass-band floor show compressed spread, while the 20-35% band contains most of the benchmark and still exposes substantial model-to-model variation.
“Cases below the 20% pass-band floor show compressed spread, while the 20-35% band contains most of the benchmark and still exposes substantial model-to-model variation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataReference derivations cite on average 3.2 distinct URLs per cell and 22 per task, span 2.4 independent publishers per cell, and require 2.8 derivation steps per derivation-type cell.
“reference derivations cite on average 3.2 distinct URLs per cell and 22 per task, span 2.4 independent publishers per cell, and require 2.8 derivation steps per derivation-type cell.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataQwen and MiniMax occupy the middle and lower-middle of the cumulative score distribution, respectively.
“Qwen and MiniMax occupy the middle and lower-middle of the distribution, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCodex CLI + GPT-5.5 produces the shortest answers (12,685 characters on average) but scores highest (33.37%).
“Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 produces the shortest answers (12,685 characters on average) but scores highest (33.37%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCodex CLI + GPT-5.5 is relatively stronger in Finance and Industrials; DeepSeek V4 Pro is comparatively strongest in Finance; MiniMax M2.7 remains below Opus across all domains.
“Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 is relatively stronger in Finance and Industrials, DeepSeek V4 Pro is comparatively strongest in Finance, and MiniMax M2.7 remains below Opus across all domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross the 100 released tasks, 61% of supporting source records are T1 primary sources, 24% are T2 methodology-published research or formal industry and statistical datasets, and 15% are T3 or lower.
“Across the 100 released tasks, 61% of supporting source records are T1 primary sources, 24% are T2 methodology-published research or formal industry and statistical datasets, and 15% are T3 or lower.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The source-provenance labels correctly classify sources into T1-T4 categories.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDerivation accounts for 50% of dimensions per task, Reasoning 25%, and Calibration and Retrieval each 12.5%.
“Derivation accounts for 50% of dimensions per task (4 of 8), Reasoning 25%, and Calibration and Retrieval each 12.5%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe divergent cells are concentrated in Calibration-type dimensions, where detecting source disagreement is part of the intended skill.
“The divergent cells are concentrated in Calibration-type dimensions, where detecting source disagreement is part of the intended skill.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The source-provenance labels correctly classify sources into T1-T4 categories.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 500 failing cells, the most common failure mode for the top four models is incomplete derivation (31%), while for the other five models it is hallucinated precision (38%).
“| Failure mode | Top four models | Other five models | | --- | --- | --- | | Hallucinated precision | 22% | 38% | | Silent source choice | 18% | 14% | | Incomplete derivation | 31% | 24% | | Scope drift | 15% | 12% | | Retrieval gap | 14% | 12% |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The human-labeled failure modes accurately categorize the reasons for failing cells.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningEach task uses an 8 × 8 matrix, yielding 100 × 8 × 8 = 6,400 atomic scoring cells.
“Each task targets a distinct industry segment and uses an 8 × 8 matrix, yielding 100 × 8 × 8 = 6,400 atomic scoring cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEach task is an 8 × 8 matrix of entities against research dimensions.
“Each task is an 8 × 8 matrix of entities against research dimensions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataOn DeepWeb-Bench, Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 achieved the highest overall score (33.37%) among the evaluated models.
“| Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 | 33.37 | 37.84 | 32.55 | 34.16 | 32.38 | 16.80 | 92.19 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The benchmark's per-cell scoring and rubrics validly measure the intended deep research capabilities.
- Rests on an assumption: The independent grader's scores are a valid measure of answer quality.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeepResearchGym offers a reproducible sandbox on frozen corpora.
“DeepResearchGym (11) offers a reproducible sandbox on frozen corpora.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeepResearch-9K provides 9,000 multi-hop questions at three difficulty levels with search trajectories.
“DeepResearch-9K (47) provides 9,000 multi-hop questions at three difficulty levels with search trajectories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDRACO evaluates accuracy, completeness, and objectivity across 10 domains using expert-crafted rubrics.
“DRACO (56) evaluates accuracy, completeness, and objectivity across 10 domains using expert-crafted rubrics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDeep research tasks require extensive evidence collection, cross-source reconciliation, and long-horizon multi-step derivation.
“deep research tasks require not only extensive evidence collection and cross-source reconciliation but also long-horizon multi-step derivation in which the agent must compose retrieved numbers into a final quantitative answer through explicit arithmetic and modeling assumptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeepResearch Bench and DeepResearch Bench II evaluate deep research agents across broad sets of research tasks requiring long-horizon browsing and multi-step synthesis.
“DeepResearch Bench (13) and DeepResearch Bench II (21) evaluate deep research agents across broad sets of research tasks requiring long-horizon browsing and multi-step synthesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep research is currently deployed along two tracks: vertically integrated commercial products and command-line coding-agent harnesses.
“It is currently deployed along two tracks: vertically integrated commercial products such as OpenAI Deep Research (34), Claude Research (3), Gemini Deep Research (15), Perplexity Research-Pro (37), and Kimi Researcher (31); and command-line coding-agent harnesses such as Claude Code (2) and Codex (33), which practitioners increasingly pair with frontier backbones for open-web research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBrowseComp and BrowseComp-ZH require answers to be assembled from many web pages rather than read from a single source, but remain focused on short-answer questions whose answers require no further derivation.
“BrowseComp (44) and BrowseComp-ZH (57) raise the bar by requiring answers to be assembled from many web pages rather than read from a single source, but they remain focused on short-answer questions whose answers, once found, require no further derivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [44]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe difficulty of DEEPWEB-BENCH comes from three properties of the data: massive evidence collection, cross-source reconciliation, and long-horizon multi-step derivation.
“Difficulty comes from three properties of the data itself: each task requires massive evidence collection, cross-source reconciliation, and long-horizon multi-step derivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The three properties of massive evidence collection, cross-source reconciliation, and long-horizon multi-step derivation are the right properties to make a benchmark substantially harder than existing benchmarks for the current frontier.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOpenResearcher builds an open offline pipeline for synthesizing long-horizon trajectories.
“OpenResearcher (24) builds an open offline pipeline for synthesizing long-horizon trajectories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWideSearch benchmarks broad information-seeking in which an agent populates a structured table from web sources.
“WideSearch (45) benchmarks broad information-seeking in which an agent populates a structured table from web sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAutoResearchBench benchmarks scientific literature discovery where even the strongest models achieve below 10%.
“AutoResearchBench (51) benchmarks scientific literature discovery where even the strongest models achieve below 10%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral of these benchmarks were difficult at introduction, yet frontier deep research products are now reported to score strongly on them as well.
“Several of these benchmarks were difficult at introduction, yet frontier deep research products are now reported to score strongly on them as well (34; 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLiveResearchBench provides live user-centric evaluation.
“LiveResearchBench (41) provides live user-centric evaluation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe public benchmark release includes the data, rubrics, and evaluation code.
“The public benchmark release includes the data, rubrics, and evaluation code.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFrontier deep research products are now reported to score strongly on existing benchmarks.
“yet frontier deep research products are now reported to score strongly on them (34; 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeepSearchQA targets comprehensiveness in multi-step information-seeking across 17 fields.
“DeepSearchQA (17) targets comprehensiveness in multi-step information-seeking across 17 fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe three sources of difficulty are represented as four capability families: Retrieval, Derivation, Reasoning, and Calibration.
“We represent these three sources of difficulty as four capability families (Retrieval, Derivation, Reasoning, and Calibration) and report results sliced by family.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The four capability families (Retrieval, Derivation, Reasoning, and Calibration) adequately represent the three sources of difficulty.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMind2Web 2 evaluates 130 long-horizon agentic search tasks with an agent-as-a-judge framework.
“Mind2Web 2 (16) evaluates 130 long-horizon agentic search tasks with an agent-as-a-judge framework.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataScoring is performed by an automated GPT-5.5 grader applying the per-cell rubric; a human validation on a stratified sample of 200 cells yields κ = 0.82 agreement with the automated grader.
“Scoring is performed by an automated GPT-5.5 grader applying the per-cell rubric; a human validation on a stratified sample of 200 cells yields κ = 0.82 agreement with the automated grader.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEach cell carries supporting sources, a source-provenance label for each source, and a marker indicating whether the sources agree, disagree, or provide only a single independent view.
“Each cell also carries supporting sources, a source-provenance label for each source, and a marker indicating whether the sources agree, disagree, or provide only a single independent view.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe error falls under the incomplete derivation failure mode.
“The error falls under the incomplete derivation failure mode: two of three intermediate numbers are correct, the third is misapplied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe final audit checks five conditions before a task is admitted.
“The final audit checks five conditions before a task is admitted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataOf 900 model-task pairs (9 models × 100 tasks), 874 produced valid responses and were scored; the remaining 26 pairs are listed in the full result tables.
“Of 900 model-task pairs (9 models × 100 tasks), 874 produced valid responses and were scored; the remaining 26 pairs are listed in the full result tables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis difficulty is not uniform across domains: models develop domain-specific strengths, so a single aggregate score does not fully capture a model's deep research profile.
“Finding 3 adds that this difficulty is not uniform across domains: models develop domain-specific strengths, so a single aggregate score does not fully capture a model's deep research profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningDEEPWEB-BENCH adapts distinctions from recent evaluation work to quantitative deep research by making derivation, source reconciliation, and calibrated abstention explicit per-cell capabilities rather than implicit properties of a whole answer.
“DEEPWEB-BENCH adapts these distinctions to quantitative deep research by making derivation, source reconciliation, and calibrated abstention explicit per-cell capabilities rather than implicit properties of a whole answer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningA benchmark task that separates frontier deep research agents from simpler retrieval pipelines should reduce the chance that a lucky search query, a single authoritative page, or a narrow skill is enough for a high score.
“A benchmark task that separates frontier deep research agents from simpler retrieval pipelines should reduce the chance that a lucky search query, a single authoritative page, or a narrow skill is enough for a high score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe per-cell rule-based scoring used in DEEPWEB-BENCH trades flexibility for reproducibility and is intended to make human cross-checking tractable when disputes arise.
“The per-cell rule-based scoring used in DEEPWEB-BENCH trades flexibility for reproducibility and is intended to make human cross-checking tractable when disputes arise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe per-cell design isolates the calibration skill from retrieval skill, and the three-tier answer-type system captures meaningful gradations in agent behavior that a binary correct/incorrect scheme would collapse.
“This case shows that the per-cell design isolates the calibration skill from retrieval skill, and that the three-tier answer-type system (precise / range / not-available) captures meaningful gradations in agent behavior that a binary correct/incorrect scheme would collapse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll models are accessed through configured backend endpoints and paired with the same benchmark browsing tools.
“All models are accessed through configured backend endpoints and paired with the same benchmark browsing tools.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA model can improve its Retrieval score by finding primary documents more reliably, but that improvement affects only one dimension per task.
“A model can improve its Retrieval score by finding primary documents more reliably, but that improvement affects only one dimension per task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe 16.58-point gap leaves substantial headroom for current frontier agents.
“the 16.58-point gap between the strongest and weakest models leaves substantial headroom for current frontier agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenDEEPWEB-BENCH avoids an aggregate free-form judge as the primary metric; each answer is scored at the cell level against a stored reference value and explicit rubric.
“DEEPWEB-BENCH avoids an aggregate free-form judge as the primary metric; each answer is scored at the cell level against a stored reference value and explicit rubric.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenEach evaluated agent is placed in an isolated session per task, receiving the entity list, the dimension list, and the output-format specification.
“Each evaluated agent is placed in an isolated session per task, receiving the entity list, the dimension list, and the output-format specification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenNo reference answer, source-provenance label, scoring rule, or any hint about the expected value is ever included in the prompt.
“No reference answer, source-provenance label, scoring rule, or any hint about the expected value is ever included in the prompt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe reference answer relies on T1 or T2 evidence whenever such evidence exists.
“A lower-provenance source can provide context, but the reference answer relies on T1 or T2 evidence whenever such evidence exists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The T1-T4 source-provenance scheme is a valid measure of source quality for the benchmark's purposes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe benchmark stores URLs and short factual excerpts for scoring purposes; it does not redistribute full documents.
“The benchmark stores URLs and short factual excerpts for scoring purposes; it does not redistribute full documents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe task score is the mean of independent cell scores rather than a single holistic judgment on a long report.
“This format fixes the scope of the task and the atomic unit of grading: a task score is the mean of independent cell scores rather than a single holistic judgment on a long report.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenNo tool returns source-provenance information, cross-source hints, or any metadata beyond the raw page content.
“No tool returns source-provenance information, cross-source hints, or any metadata beyond the raw page content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenVariation in disclosure is part of the task state: on some dimensions a calibrated agent should return not available for entities whose public filings do not support a precise answer, rather than forcing a number for every row.
“Variation in disclosure is part of the task state: on some dimensions a calibrated agent should return not available for entities whose public filings do not support a precise answer, rather than forcing a number for every row.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenWe evaluate nine frontier model configurations on the 100-task release of DEEPWEB-BENCH.
“We evaluate nine frontier model configurations on the 100-task release of DEEPWEB-BENCH, report aggregate and capability-family scores, and analyze the main failure patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningProducing a conclusion in DEEPWEB-BENCH requires reading many authoritative documents, reconciling values that disagree, and composing the result through multi-step derivation; producing the full set of conclusions amplifies this load.
“Producing such a conclusion requires reading many authoritative documents, reconciling values that disagree, and composing the result through multi-step derivation; producing the full set of conclusions amplifies this load, because the same body of evidence feeds many conclusions and the agent has to work with it coherently across the whole task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe harness enforces a per-task budget of 200 tool calls and a wall-clock cap of 30 minutes.
“The harness enforces a per-task budget of 200 tool calls (any mix of the three tools) and a wall-clock cap of 30 minutes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 200 tool call budget and 30-minute wall-clock cap are sufficient for agents to complete tasks.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenNo reference answer, source hint, or scoring rule is disclosed to the agent.
“No reference answer, source hint, or scoring rule is disclosed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll three benchmark tools are available to every model configuration.
“All three benchmark tools are available to every model configuration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNative search and browsing tools in the host command-line interfaces are disabled.
“Native search and browsing tools in the host command-line interfaces are disabled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe dimension axis spans four capability families: Retrieval, Derivation, Reasoning, and Calibration.
“The dimension axis spans four capability families.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause the rubric requires an explicit derivation alongside the final value, the misapplied step is directly identifiable in the agent's output, which would not be possible under a scoring rule that compares only the final number.
“Because the rubric requires an explicit derivation alongside the final value, the misapplied step is directly identifiable in the agent's output, which would not be possible under a scoring rule that compares only the final number.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe task score is the mean of cell scores; the benchmark score is the mean across tasks.
“The task score is the mean of cell scores; the benchmark score is the mean across tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe budget is 200 tool calls and 30 minutes wall-clock per task; cells without an answer at budget exhaustion score 0.
“The budget is 200 tool calls and 30 minutes wall-clock per task; cells without an answer at budget exhaustion score 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll agents access the same three benchmark browsing tools: web_search, page_visit, and pdf_fetch.
“All agents access the same three benchmark browsing tools: web_search for retrieving candidate pages, page_visit for reading web pages, and pdf_fetch for downloading and reading PDF documents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe provenance labels are a record of disclosure provenance rather than a learned quality score.
“These labels are a record of disclosure provenance rather than a learned quality score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenA DEEPWEB-BENCH task covers one subject domain and asks an agent to complete an 8 × 8 matrix of quantitative research answers; each cell is graded independently against a reference answer, a derivation record, and supporting sources.
“A task covers one subject domain and asks an agent to complete an 8 × 8 matrix of quantitative research answers; each cell is graded independently against a reference answer, a derivation record, and supporting sources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDEEPWEB-BENCH sits at the deep research end of the spectrum and differs from prior work along two axes: difficulty and auditability.
“DEEPWEB-BENCH sits at the deep research end of this spectrum and differs from prior work along two axes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenEach cell is scored by a fixed four-tier rubric ({1, 0.5, 0.25, 0}): 1 for a value and derivation within tolerance, 0.5 for a partially correct answer, 0.25 for a marginally relevant attempt, and 0 otherwise.
“Each cell is scored by a fixed four-tier rubric ({1, 0.5, 0.25, 0}): 1 for a value and derivation within tolerance, 0.5 for a partially correct answer (e.g., the correct direction of change but a value outside tolerance, or a correct range without a derivation), 0.25 for a marginally relevant attempt, and 0 otherwise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenEach cell's reference answer is either a precise value, a range estimate with a stated confidence and derivation method, or an explicit not available marker when the quantity is not disclosed by an authoritative source.
“Each cell's reference answer is either a precise value, a range estimate with a stated confidence and derivation method, or an explicit not available marker when the quantity is not disclosed by an authoritative source.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenDEEPWEB-BENCH is organized around task matrices, cell-level reference records, and a shared evaluation protocol.
“DEEPWEB-BENCH is organized around task matrices, cell-level reference records, and a shared evaluation protocol.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll entities are publicly traded companies or publicly known organizations.
“All entities are publicly traded companies or publicly known organizations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenCross-source agreement labels (consistent, divergent, single) are assigned during construction to record whether a cell has independent corroboration, visible disagreement, or only one public source.
“Cross-source agreement labels (consistent, divergent, single) are assigned during construction to record whether a cell has independent corroboration, visible disagreement, or only one public source.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe per-cell design supports capability-targeted diagnosis and extension to additional domains.
“The per-cell design supports capability-targeted diagnosis and extension to additional domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe release contains 6,400 cells; 874/900 model-task pairs were scored, yielding 55,936 scored cells.
“The release contains 6,400 cells; 874/900 model-task pairs were scored, yielding 55,936 scored cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe eight non-Codex models are hosted through Claude Code CLI with native browsing disabled.
“The eight non-Codex models are hosted through Claude Code CLI with native browsing disabled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSource-provenance labels serve as an audit record during task construction.
“Source-provenance labels serve as an audit record during task construction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenT3 and T4 sources are retained when they provide useful context, but cell-level reference answers prioritize T1 and T2 evidence whenever such evidence is publicly available.
“T3 and T4 sources are retained when they provide useful context, but cell-level reference answers prioritize T1 and T2 evidence whenever such evidence is publicly available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenBackend identifiers are internal run identifiers and do not imply access to native search.
“Backend identifiers are internal run identifiers and do not imply access to native search.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenUsage statistics are diagnostic only; the benchmark score is computed from the submitted cell answers under the rubric, with missing runs excluded from the scored set.
“These usage statistics are diagnostic only; the benchmark score is computed from the submitted cell answers under the rubric, with missing runs excluded from the scored set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The benchmark's per-cell scoring and rubrics validly measure the intended deep research capabilities.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenReference answers consist of aggregate financial and operational metrics, not individual-level data.
“Reference answers consist of aggregate financial and operational metrics, not individual-level data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe construction process records cross-source verification whenever independent public sources are available.
“The construction process records cross-source verification whenever independent public sources are available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenCodex CLI + GPT-5.5 is hosted through Codex CLI with native browsing disabled.
“Codex CLI + GPT-5.5 is hosted through Codex CLI with native browsing disabled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause the public benchmark release includes data, rubrics, evaluation code, source-provenance labels, and source records, evaluators can reproduce scores and extend the analysis to new models.
“Because the public benchmark release includes data, rubrics, evaluation code, source-provenance labels, and source records, evaluators can reproduce scores and extend the analysis to new models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnder a binary task-level pass/fail, most or all evaluated agents would fail every task at the present difficulty, and the capability-axis analysis would not be feasible.
“Under this alternative, most or all evaluated agents would fail every task at the present difficulty, and the capability-axis analysis would not be feasible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenPer-model failure-mode breakdowns require human annotation of a stratified sample of failing cells.
“Per-model failure-mode breakdowns require human annotation of a stratified sample of failing cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenEvery model receives the benchmark-provided web search, page visit, and PDF retrieval tools.
“Every model receives the benchmark-provided web search, page visit, and PDF retrieval tools.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Deep research is a prominent use case for frontier language models.
“Deep research, in which an agent searches the open web, collects evidence, and derives an answer through extended reasoning, is a prominent use case for frontier language models.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The three properties of massive evidence collection, cross-source reconciliation, and long-horizon multi-step derivation are the right properties to make a benchmark substantially harder than existing benchmarks for the current frontier.
“Difficulty comes from three properties of the data itself: each task requires massive evidence collection, cross-source reconciliation, and long-horizon multi-step derivation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The four capability families (Retrieval, Derivation, Reasoning, and Calibration) adequately represent the three sources of difficulty.
“We represent these three sources of difficulty as four capability families (Retrieval, Derivation, Reasoning, and Calibration) and report results sliced by family.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The benchmark tasks are representative of real-world deep research tasks.
“A task in DEEPWEB-BENCH is a deep research assignment over a single subject domain, in which an agent is asked to produce a broad set of quantitative analytical conclusions about that domain, rather than a single short answer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The nine evaluated models are representative of current frontier deep research agents.
“We evaluate DEEPWEB-BENCH on nine frontier backbone models, covering the major model families that underlie current deep research products and command-line agent harnesses.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 500 annotated failures are accurately classified by failure mode.
“Table 2 groups the 500 annotated failures by model strength (top-4 models versus the remaining five).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The per-case cross-model averages are meaningful measures of task difficulty.
“Per-case cross-model averages range from 14.67% (the hardest case, mortgage REITs) to 83.07%(the easiest, luxury goods), with the hardest cases concentrated in domains requiring reconciliation of non-standardized financial disclosures and the easiest in domains where primary filings are abundant and uniform.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The entity set for the China NEV task is closed (no major maker is missing).
“The set is intended to span the main strategic paths in the 2024 Chinese new-energyvehicle (NEV) market, to be closed (no major maker is missing), and to be differentiated (each maker follows a visibly different route) so that cross-entity comparisons are non-trivial.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 200 tool call budget and 30-minute wall-clock cap are sufficient for agents to complete tasks.
“The harness enforces a per-task budget of 200 tool calls (any mix of the three tools) and a wall-clock cap of 30 minutes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The stratified sample of 200 cells is representative of all cells for validating the automated grader.
“To validate the automated grader, two human annotators independently scored a stratified sample of 200 cells balanced across capability families and score tiers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The capability-family split (one Retrieval, four Derivation, one Calibration, two Reasoning) covers the necessary capabilities for deep research.
“Every released task uses the same capability-family split: one Retrieval dimension, four Derivation dimensions, one Calibration dimension, and two Reasoning dimensions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The T1-T4 source-provenance scheme is a valid measure of source quality for the benchmark's purposes.
“These levels record source provenance and disclosure practice; they are not a learned source-quality model.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The benchmark's per-cell scoring and rubrics validly measure the intended deep research capabilities.
“We therefore keep the cell as the atomic scoring unit and report both aggregate and capability-sliced scores.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The independent grader's scores are a valid measure of answer quality.
“Although the independent grader uses the same GPT-5.5 model family, the evaluated Codex configuration does not uniformly rank first.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The human-labeled failure modes accurately categorize the reasons for failing cells.
“Human-labeled failure modes in 500 failing cells.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The source-provenance labels correctly classify sources into T1-T4 categories.
“Source-provenance labels serve as an audit record during task construction.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
BYD reference gross profit does not follow its stated derivation
MajorCNY 602 billion × 20.2% ÷ 4.27 million deliveries is approximately CNY 28,485 per vehicle, not CNY 38,200. The calculated value also falls outside the stated reference interval of CNY 35,000-42,000.
“The reference answer is CNY 38,200 per vehicle with interval [35,000, 42,000], derived as segment revenue times segment gross margin divided by passenger-vehicle deliveries.”
“GPT 5.5 locates segment revenue (CNY 602 billion), gross margin (20.2%), and passenger-vehicle deliveries (4.27 million) from the correct sources, but in the derivation step it applies the gross-margin rate to total company revenue (CNY 777 billion) rather than to segment revenue.”
Using total revenue cannot produce the described 34% shortfall
MinorApplying the stated 20.2% margin to CNY 777 billion and dividing by 4.27 million deliveries gives approximately CNY 36,762 per vehicle-about 3.8% below the stated CNY 38,200 reference, not 34% below it. It is also higher, not lower, than the result obtained using CNY 602 billion in segment revenue.
“The resulting per-vehicle gross profit is 34% below the reference.”
“GPT 5.5 locates segment revenue (CNY 602 billion), gross margin (20.2%), and passenger-vehicle deliveries (4.27 million) from the correct sources, but in the derivation step it applies the gross-margin rate to total company revenue (CNY 777 billion) rather than to segment revenue.”
Cites
Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
Zheng, L., Chiang, W.-L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E. P., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05685 · Cited by 1,888 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We rejected it because prior work on LLM-as-a-judge evaluation (55; 7) reports that judge-based aggregate scores can vary noticeably across judge models on the same responses, which we view as conflicting with the goal of auditable evaluation.”
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H., Yuan, Q., Pinto, H. P. D. O., Kaplan, J., Edwards, H., Burda, Y., Joseph, N., Brockman, G., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03374 · Cited by 1,436 · cited 1× · see citing works
“B ENCH currently comprises 100 tasks spanning six domain categories: Technology (25), Energy & Materials (20), Industrials & Transport (18), Consumer (16), Finance (12), and Healthcare & Pharma (9).”
Zhang, D.-H., Baclawski, K., Tsotras, V., et al. (1988) · Encyclopedia of Database Systems · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_2108 · Cited by 1,011 · cited 2×
“Benchmarks for web-based information tasks have risen in difficulty over successive waves, from single-fact web question answering (43; 29) through multi-page evidence assembly (44; 57) to long-horizon deep research (13; 17; 56; 45; 11).”
From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder PipelinePreprint
Li, T.-L., Chiang, W.-L., Frick, E., Dunlap, L., Wu, T.-H., Zhu, B.-H., Gonzalez, J. E., & Stoica, I. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.11939 · Cited by 595 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Adjacent work covers expert-level academic questions (14; 39), scientific-literature synthesis (6), domain-specific analytical workflows (8; 20; 54), broader agentic evaluation (26; 48; 19; 49; 42; 28), and benchmark construction (23; 22; 55; 7).”
SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering
Yang, J., Jimenez, C., Wettig, A., Lieret, K., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Press, O. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-1601 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web
Deng, X., Gu, Y., Zheng, B., Chen, S., Stevens, S., Wang, B., Sun, H., & Su, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.06070 · Cited by 134 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This taxonomy follows the separation in recent evaluation work between factual retrieval and factuality (43), browsing or web traversal (29; 46; 10), interactive tool use (36; 50), and long-horizon agent tasks (26; 48).”
INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agent
Li, H.-H., Cao, Y., Yu, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.18174 · Cited by 89 · cited 2×
“B ENCH currently comprises 100 tasks spanning six domain categories: Technology (25), Energy & Materials (20), Industrials & Transport (18), Consumer (16), Finance (12), and Healthcare & Pharma (9).”
AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents
Liu, X., Yu, H., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Lei, X., Lai, H., Gu, Y., Ding, H., Men, K., Yang, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.03688 · Cited by 79 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This taxonomy follows the separation in recent evaluation work between factual retrieval and factuality (43), browsing or web traversal (29; 46; 10), interactive tool use (36; 50), and long-horizon agent tasks (26; 48).”
MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Research
Chen, H., Xiong, M., Lu, Y.-J., Han, W., Deng, A., He, Y.-F., Wu, J.-Y., Li, Y.-B., Liu, Y., & Hooi, B. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.19955 · Cited by 74 · cited 1×
“Adjacent work covers expert-level academic questions (14; 39), scientific-literature synthesis (6), domain-specific analytical workflows (8; 20; 54), broader agentic evaluation (26; 48; 19; 49; 42; 28), and benchmark construction (23; 22; 55; 7).”
OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments
Xie, T., Zhang, D., Chen, J., Li, X., Zhao, S., Cao, R., Hua, T. J., Cheng, Z., Shin, D., Lei, F., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.07972 · Cited by 64 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This taxonomy follows the separation in recent evaluation work between factual retrieval and factuality (43), browsing or web traversal (29; 46; 10), interactive tool use (36; 50), and long-horizon agent tasks (26; 48).”
(2024) · doi:10.52202/079017-1650 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Retrieval Augmented Fact Verification by Synthesizing Contrastive Arguments
Yue, Z., Zeng, H.-M., Shang, L.-Y., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.09815 · Cited by 50
Benchmarking Data Science Agents
Zhang, Y., Jiang, Q., Han, X., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.17168 · Cited by 45 · cited 1×
“Adjacent work covers expert-level academic questions (14; 39), scientific-literature synthesis (6), domain-specific analytical workflows (8; 20; 54), broader agentic evaluation (26; 48; 19; 49; 42; 28), and benchmark construction (23; 22; 55; 7).”
LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code
Jain, N., Han, K., Gu, A., Li, W.-D., Yan, F., Zhang, T., Wang, S., Solar-Lezama, A., Sen, K., & Stoica, I. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07974 · Cited by 42 · cited 1× · see citing works
“B ENCH currently comprises 100 tasks spanning six domain categories: Technology (25), Energy & Materials (20), Industrials & Transport (18), Consumer (16), Finance (12), and Healthcare & Pharma (9).”
AutoBencher: Towards Declarative Benchmark Construction
Li, X. L., Kaiyom, F., Liu, E., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.08351 · Cited by 41 · cited 1×
“Adjacent work covers expert-level academic questions (14; 39), scientific-literature synthesis (6), domain-specific analytical workflows (8; 20; 54), broader agentic evaluation (26; 48; 19; 49; 42; 28), and benchmark construction (23; 22; 55; 7).”
Synthesizing scientific literature with retrieval-augmented language models
Asai, A., He, J., Shao, R., Shi, W., Singh, A., Chang, J. C., Lo, K., Soldaini, L., Feldman, S., D’Arcy, M., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-10072-4 · Cited by 38 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Adjacent work covers expert-level academic questions (14; 39), scientific-literature synthesis (6), domain-specific analytical workflows (8; 20; 54), broader agentic evaluation (26; 48; 19; 49; 42; 28), and benchmark construction (23; 22; 55; 7).”
OpenResearcher: A Fully Open Pipeline for Long-Horizon Deep Research Trajectory Synthesis
Li, Z., Jiang, D., Ma, X.-G., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.20278 · Cited by 38 · cited 1×
“OpenResearcher (24) builds an open offline pipeline for synthesizing long-horizon trajectories.”
LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Tasks
Bavaresco, A., Raffaella Bernardi, B., Bertolazzi, L., Elliott, D., Fernández, R., Albert Gatt, A., Ghaleb, E., Giulianelli, M., Hanna, M., Koller, A., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-short.20 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Long-form factuality in large language models
Wei, J., Yang, C., Song, X., Lu, Y., Hu, N., Huang, J., Tran, D., Peng, D., Liu, R., Huang, D., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.18802 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering
Yang, J., Jimenez, C. E., Wettig, A., Lieret, K., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Press, O. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.15793 · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Adjacent work covers expert-level academic questions (14; 39), scientific-literature synthesis (6), domain-specific analytical workflows (8; 20; 54), broader agentic evaluation (26; 48; 19; 49; 42; 28), and benchmark construction (23; 22; 55; 7).”
GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark
Rein, D., Hou, B. L., Stickland, A. C., Petty, J., Pang, R. Y., Dirani, J., Michael, J., & Bowman, S. R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.12022 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Adjacent work covers expert-level academic questions (14; 39), scientific-literature synthesis (6), domain-specific analytical workflows (8; 20; 54), broader agentic evaluation (26; 48; 19; 49; 42; 28), and benchmark construction (23; 22; 55; 7).”
BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions
Zhuo, T. Y., Vu, M. C., Chim, J., Hu, H., Yu, W., Widyasari, R., Yusuf, I. N. B., Zhan, H., He, J., Paul, I., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.15877 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents
Wang, X., Li, B., Song, Y., Xu, F. F., Tang, X., Zhuge, M., Pan, J., Song, Y., Li, B., Singh, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.16741 · Cited by 24 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The reference answer is CNY 38,200 per vehicle with interval [35 , 000 , 42 , 000] , derived as segment revenue times segment gross margin divided by passenger-vehicle deliveries.”
A benchmark of expert-level academic questions to assess AI capabilities
Center for AI Safety, Phan, L., Gatti, A., Li, N., Khoja, A., Kim, R., Ren, R., Hausenloy, J., Zhang, O., Mazeika, M., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09962-4 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Adjacent work covers expert-level academic questions (14; 39), scientific-literature synthesis (6), domain-specific analytical workflows (8; 20; 54), broader agentic evaluation (26; 48; 19; 49; 42; 28), and benchmark construction (23; 22; 55; 7).”
Self-citationDRBench: A Realistic Benchmark for Enterprise Deep Research
Abaskohi, A., Chen, T., Munoz-M'armol, M., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.00172 · Cited by 22
WebWalker: Benchmarking LLMs in Web Traversal
Wu, J., Yin, W., Jiang, Y., Wang, Z., Xi, Z., Fang, R., Zhang, L., He, Y., Zhou, D., Xie, P., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“This taxonomy follows the separation in recent evaluation work between factual retrieval and factuality (43), browsing or web traversal (29; 46; 10), interactive tool use (36; 50), and long-horizon agent tasks (26; 48).”
Retrieval Augmented Fact Verification by Synthesizing Contrastive Arguments
Yue, Z., Zeng, H., Shang, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wang, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.556 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Benchmarking Data Science Agents
Zhang, Y., Jiang, Q., XingyuHan, X., Chen, N., Yang, Y., & Ren, K. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.308 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Measuring short-form factuality in large language models
Wei, J., Karina, N., Chung, H. W., Jiao, Y. J., Papay, S., Glaese, A., Schulman, J., & Fedus, W. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.04368 · Cited by 14 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This taxonomy follows the separation in recent evaluation work between factual retrieval and factuality (43), browsing or web traversal (29; 46; 10), interactive tool use (36; 50), and long-horizon agent tasks (26; 48).”
AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents
Trivedi, H., Khot, T., Hartmann, M., Manku, R., Dong, V., Li, E., Gupta, S., Sabharwal, A., & Balasubramanian, N. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.850 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants
Mialon, G., Fourrier, C., Swift, C., Wolf, T., LeCun, Y., & Scialom, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.12983 · Cited by 12 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This taxonomy follows the separation in recent evaluation work between factual retrieval and factuality (43), browsing or web traversal (29; 46; 10), interactive tool use (36; 50), and long-horizon agent tasks (26; 48).”
LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Tasks
Bavaresco, A., Bernardi, R., Bertolazzi, L., Elliott, D., Fernández, R., Gatt, A., Ghaleb, E., Giulianelli, M., Hanna, M., Koller, A., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.18403 · Cited by 10 · cited 2×
“We rejected it because prior work on LLM-as-a-judge evaluation (55; 7) reports that judge-based aggregate scores can vary noticeably across judge models on the same responses, which we view as conflicting with the goal of auditable evaluation.”
$τ$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
Yao, S., Shinn, N., Razavi, P., & Narasimhan, K. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.12045 · Cited by 9 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This taxonomy follows the separation in recent evaluation work between factual retrieval and factuality (43), browsing or web traversal (29; 46; 10), interactive tool use (36; 50), and long-horizon agent tasks (26; 48).”
WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild
Lin, B. Y., Deng, Y., Chandu, K., Brahman, F., Ravichander, A., Pyatkin, V., Dziri, N., Bras, R. L., & Choi, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04770 · Cited by 4 · cited 1× · see citing works
“B ENCH currently comprises 100 tasks spanning six domain categories: Technology (25), Energy & Materials (20), Industrials & Transport (18), Consumer (16), Finance (12), and Healthcare & Pharma (9).”
Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge
Gou, B., Huang, Z., Ning, Y., Gu, Y., Lin, M., Qi, W., Kopanev, A., Yu, B., Gutiérrez, B. J., Shu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.21506 · Cited by 3 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Mind2Web 2 (16) evaluates 130 long-horizon agentic search tasks with an agent-as-a-judge framework.”
AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents
Trivedi, H., Khot, T., Hartmann, M., Manku, R., Dong, V., Li, E., Gupta, S., Sabharwal, A., & Balasubramanian, N. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.18901 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lu, J., Holleis, T., Zhang, Y., Aumayer, B., Nan, F., Bai, F., Ma, S., Ma, S., Li, M., Yin, G., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.04682 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
DeepResearchGym: A Free, Transparent, and Reproducible Evaluation Sandbox for Deep Research
Coelho, J., Ning, J., He, J., Mao, K., Paladugu, A., Setlur, P., Jin, J., Callan, J., Magalhães, J., Martins, B., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.19253 · Cited by 1 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Benchmarks for web-based information tasks have risen in difficulty over successive waves, from single-fact web question answering (43; 29) through multi-page evidence assembly (44; 57) to long-horizon deep research (13; 17; 56; 45; 11).”
AutoResearchBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Complex Scientific Literature DiscoveryPreprint
Xiong, L., Luo, K., Xia, Z., Zhang, W., Yao, J.-G., Liu, Z., Shao, J., Chen, J., Qian, H., Yang, X., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.25256 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AutoResearchBench (51) benchmarks scientific literature discovery where even the strongest models achieve below 10%.”
Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces
Merrill, M. A., Shaw, A. G., Carlini, N., Li, B., Raj, H., Bercovich, I., Shi, L., Shin, J. Y., Walshe, T., Buchanan, E. K., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.11868 · cited 1×
“Adjacent work covers expert-level academic questions (14; 39), scientific-literature synthesis (6), domain-specific analytical workflows (8; 20; 54), broader agentic evaluation (26; 48; 19; 49; 42; 28), and benchmark construction (23; 22; 55; 7).”
LiveResearchBench: A Live Benchmark for User-Centric Deep Research in the Wild
Wang, J., Ming, Y., Dulepet, R., Chen, Q., Xu, A., Ke, Z., Sala, F., Albarghouthi, A., Xiong, C., & Joty, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.14240 · cited 1×
“DRBench (1) extends this paradigm to enterprise settings, LiveResearchBench (41) provides live user-centric evaluation, and DeepResearchGym (11) offers a reproducible sandbox on frozen corpora.”
Self-citationDeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Reports
Li, R., Du, M., Xu, B., Zhu, C., Wang, X., & Mao, Z. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.08536 · cited 1×
“DeepResearch Bench (13) and DeepResearch Bench II (21) evaluate deep research agents across broad sets of research tasks requiring long-horizon browsing and multi-step synthesis.”
MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Research
Chen, H., Xiong, M., Lu, Y., Han, W., Deng, A., He, Y., Wu, J., Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Hooi, B. (2025) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/085713-3945
DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agents
Gupta, N., Chatterjee, R., Haas, L., Tao, C., Wang, A., Liu, C., Oiwa, H., Gribovskaya, E., Ackermann, J., Blitzer, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20975
WideSearch: Benchmarking Agentic Broad Info-Seeking
Wong, R., Wang, J., Zhao, J., Chen, L., Gao, Y., Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Wang, Z., Xiang, K., Zhang, G., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.07999
Self-citationMind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge
Gou, B., Huang, Z., Ning, Y., et al. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-5778
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik R. Narasimhan. Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net, 2024.
- Shishir G Patil, Huanzhi Mao, Fanjia Yan, Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji, Vishnu Suresh, Ion Stoica, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. The berkeley function calling leaderboard (BFCL): From tool use to agentic evaluation of large language models. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web$hell: A Unified Interface for Agentic Web Access
Kim, S., Kim, D., Lee, S., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.13416
“Web search includes WideSearch (Wong et al., 2026), which requires collecting information across many sources into tables, and SealQA (Pham et al., 2026), (Xie et al., 2026).”
- Authors
- Xie, S., Shi, Z., Shen, H., Wang, J., Zhong, S., Liu, M., Pan, C., Jia, P., Sun, B., Jing, X., & Ma, Y.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- ORCID
- Pan, Chongyang
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2605.21482
- OpenAlex
- W7161996508
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 49
- Type
- posted content
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- deep research, long-horizon reasoning, source provenance, calibration, hallucinations, retrieval, frontier language models, model specialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review