The New Shape of Search: How Conversational AI Recomposes Information Seeking

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Information seeking is among the most common conversational-AI uses.

“Information seeking is among the most common conversational-AI uses [7]”

• cites [7] [7] Aaron Chatterji, Tom Cunningham, David Deming, Zoë Hitzig, Christopher Ong, Carl Shan, and Kevin Wadman. 2025. How People Use ChatGPT . Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research. - sourceSupported

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Audits report that AI answers draw on fewer, more central sources and produce engine-specific answer bubbles.

“audits report that AI answers draw on fewer, more central sources [1] and produce engine-specific answer bubbles [10]”

• cites [1] [1] Sinan Aral, Haiwen Li, and Rui Zuo. 2026. The Rise of AI Search: Implications for Information Markets and Human Judgement at Scale. Status: arXiv:2602.13415. -Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

• cites [10] [10] Michelle Huang, Agam Goyal, Koustuv Saha, and Eshwar Chandrasekharan. 2026. Answer Bubbles: Information Exposure in AI-Mediated Search. Status: arXiv:2603.16138. - sourceSupported

May combine two claims.

The topology does not identify demand created or destroyed, which an observational panel cannot recover against burst-selection.

“The topology does not identify demand created or destroyed, which an observational panel cannot recover against burst-selection [2, 11].”

• cites [2] [2] Albert-László Barabási. 2005. The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature 435 (2005), 207-211. doi:10.1038/nature03459 - sourceCould not verify

  Section 1 explains bursty activity through priority-based task queues and examines email waiting times. It does not address whether topology identifies demand created or destroyed, or whether an observational panel can recover that demand in the presence of burst-selection. Searches for those terms and for causal identification found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
• cites [11] [11] Michael Iannelli and Alan Ai. 2026. Event-Time Confounding Under Bursty Human Dynamics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21294 arXiv:2608.21294. -Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

AI-first remains 9-10% and AI-last remains near 15% across 15-, 30-, and 60-minute inactivity gaps.

“AI-first remains 9-10% and AI-last remains near 15%.”

May combine two claims.

Assistant-centered sessions are contained in 37.8% session-weighted and 34.1% user-weighted.

“against 37.8% [36.9, 38.7] and 34.1% [33.5, 34.7] for assistant-centered sessions”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The canonical assistant host list is sufficiently complete to identify assistant surfaces for the primary analysis.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The topology shows where the web sits around assistants.

“The topology so far shows where the web sits around assistants.”

May combine two claims.

The contained/bridge boundary moves with the inactivity gap: contained falls from 46.9% to 29.2%, while bridge rises from 29.4% to 46.9%.

“contained falls from 46.9% to 29.2%, while bridge rises from 29.4% to 46.9%.”

May combine two claims.

Search-centered sessions are contained in 21.1% of cases session-weighted and 19.5% user-weighted.

“Search-centered sessions are contained in 21.1% [20.8, 21.4] of cases session-weighted and 19.5% [19.2, 19.8] user-weighted”

May combine two claims.

Bridge/interleaved is 53.7% session-weighted and 53.5% user-weighted for search-centered sessions.

“bridge/interleaved is 53.7% [53.3, 54.0] / 53.5% [53.1, 53.8]”

The quote only partly states this claim.

User-weighted, AI-first assistant-containing sessions are 10.5% [10.2, 10.9].

“AI-first 10.5% [10.2, 10.9]”

May combine two claims.

Content appears somewhere in 78.9% session-weighted and 80.5% user-weighted of search-centered sessions.

“Content appears somewhere in 78.9% [78.6, 79.2] / 80.5% [80.2, 80.8] of search-centered sessions”

May combine two claims.

Search appears somewhere in 42.1% [41.3, 43.0] of AI-containing sessions session-weighted and 46.0% [45.4, 46.6] user-weighted.

“Search appears somewhere in 42.1% [41.3, 43.0] of sessions session-weighted and 46.0% [45.4, 46.6] user-weighted”

May combine two claims.

Bridge/interleaved accounts for 37.3% [36.5, 38.2] session-weighted and 37.1% [36.5, 37.7] user-weighted of AI-containing temporal sessions.

“Bridge/interleaved is similarly common (37.3% [36.5, 38.2] and 37.1% [36.5, 37.7])”

May combine two claims.

On the within-contained base, single-exchange sessions are 45.2%, leaving a residual well under half a point for contained sessions with several captured events but at most one response.

“On that same within-contained base, single-exchange sessions are 45.2%, so the two leave a residual well under half a point: contained sessions with several captured events but at most one response, for example a provider session split by the inactivity rule.”

May combine two claims.

Every variant of the search definition stays within a narrow band of the primary rule, none approaches the rejected registrable-domain rule's inflated values (46.6% / 50.6% search-anywhere), and the comparator's containment level and the within-user contrast move by well under the contrast itself.

“Every variant stays within a narrow band of the primary rule, none approaches the rejected registrabledomain rule's inflated values (46.6% / 50.6% search-anywhere), and the comparator's containment level and the within-user contrast move by well under the contrast itself.”

May combine two claims.

User-weighted, the contained share decomposes into 19.0% [18.5, 19.4] with one prompt and one response, 7.4% [7.1, 7.7] with multiple exchanges in one provider session, and 7.7% [7.4, 8.0] with multiple provider sessions.

“User-weighted, the contained share decomposes into 19.0% [18.5, 19.4] with one prompt and one response, 7.4% [7.1, 7.7] with multiple exchanges in one provider session, and 7.7% [7.4, 8.0] with multiple provider sessions.”

May combine two claims.

Contained falls from 37.7% with at least one active day to 26.7% among users active on all 28 days; bridge rises from 37.3% to 43.5%.

“Contained falls from 37.7% with at least one active day to 26.7% among users active on all 28 days; bridge rises from 37.3% to 43.5% (Table 4).”

May combine two claims.

The observed journeys more often run the other way: content usually follows search but more often precedes assistant use.

“we find the observed journeys more often run the other way. Content usually follows search but more often precedes assistant use.”

May combine two claims.

AI-last accounts for 15.3% [15.0, 15.7] session-weighted and 18.3% [17.8, 18.7] user-weighted of AI-containing temporal sessions.

“followed by AI-last (15.3% [15.0, 15.7] and 18.3% [17.8, 18.7])”

May combine two claims.

Search-last is 9.8% session-weighted and 9.2% user-weighted.

“and search-last 9.8% [9.7, 9.9] / 9.2% [9.0, 9.3]”

May combine two claims.

AI-first accounts for 9.6% [9.4, 9.8] session-weighted and 10.5% [10.2, 10.9] user-weighted of AI-containing temporal sessions.

“and AI-first (9.6% [9.4, 9.8] and 10.5% [10.2, 10.9])”

May combine two claims.

The same reversal holds session-weighted: search 54.2% after versus 44.2% before; assistants 42.6% before versus 36.5% after.

“The same reversal holds session-weighted (54.2% [53.9, 54.5] versus 44.2% [43.9, 44.5] around search; 42.6% [41.8, 43.3] versus 36.5% [35.8, 37.3] around assistants)”

May combine two claims.

Search-first is 15.4% session-weighted and 17.9% user-weighted.

“The one-sided classes are search-first 15.4% [15.3, 15.5] / 17.9% [17.6, 18.1]”

May combine two claims.

Search-centered sessions are 48.6% search and 51.4% content by steps, with a median duration of 9 minutes and 4.0 surface switches.

“Searchcentered sessions are 48.6% search and 51.4% content by steps, with a median duration of 9 minutes and 4.0 [3.9, 4.1] surface switches.”

May combine two claims.

A next web event appears by five minutes for 21.8% of sessions, by fifteen minutes for 32.3%, by thirty minutes for 39.7%, and by one hour for 50.5%.

“a next web event appears by five minutes for 21.8% [21.2, 22.3] of sessions, by fifteen minutes for 32.3% [31.6, 33.0], by thirty minutes for 39.7% [39.1, 40.5], and by one hour for 50.5% [49.7, 51.4]”

May combine two claims.

Assistant-side containment is 50.9% in the United States and 20.7% in Great Britain.

“Assistant-side containment, user-weighted throughout this paragraph, is 50.9% in the United States and 20.7% in Great Britain”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The canonical assistant host list is sufficiently complete to identify assistant surfaces for the primary analysis.

May combine two claims.

Across all AI-containing sessions, 19.1% have a next search event by 30 minutes and 26.8% by one hour.

“Across all AI-containing sessions (not the contained subset), search is less frequent: 19.1% [18.7, 19.6] have a next search event by 30 minutes and 26.8% [26.2, 27.5] by one hour.”

May combine two claims.

From a 15- to a 60-minute gap the contained share falls from 46.9% to 29.2% and bridge rises from 29.4% to 46.9%, while the one-sided classes move by at most a point.

“Fourth, session boundaries : from a 15- to a 60-minute gap the contained share falls from 46.9% to 29.2% and bridge rises from 29.4% to 46.9%, while the one-sided classes move by at most a point.”

May combine two claims.

Among sessions classified contained at 30 minutes, 12.0% have a web event by one hour and 49.5% by six hours.

“Among sessions classified contained at 30 minutes, 12.0% [11.6, 12.4] have a web event by one hour and 49.5% [48.3, 50.6] by six hours.”

May combine two claims.

Search-contained is 18.2% user-weighted and bridge 55.6% in the all-search sensitivity.

“Search-contained is 18.2% [17.9, 18.4] user-weighted and bridge 55.6% [55.2, 55.9]”

May combine two claims.

The familiar query-to-content sequence coexists, in the same panelists, with temporal sessions in which people bring prior browsing into dialogue, remain inside dialogue, begin from dialogue, or move repeatedly between the assistant and the web.

“The familiar query-to-content sequence now coexists, in the same panelists, with temporal sessions in which people bring prior browsing into dialogue, remain inside dialogue, begin from dialogue, or move repeatedly between the assistant and the web.”

May combine two claims.

The paired difference is +20.6 percentage points and repeats in a second month.

“The paired difference is +20.6 [19.9, 21.3] percentage points and repeats in a second month.”

May combine two claims.

Those sessions are a small minority and organize their content much as pure search sessions do.

“those sessions are a small minority and organize their content much as pure search sessions do.”

May combine two claims.

About a third of sessions are assistant-contained user-weighted, while search appears somewhere in just under half.

“About a third of sessions are assistant-contained user-weighted, while search appears somewhere in just under half.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The canonical assistant host list is sufficiently complete to identify assistant surfaces for the primary analysis.

May combine two claims.

Within assistant-centered sessions, assistant events make up 59.7% of steps, search events 8.8%, and content pageviews 31.5%.

“Within assistant-centered sessions, assistant events make up 59.7% of steps, search events 8.8%, and content pageviews 31.5%”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The canonical assistant host list is sufficiently complete to identify assistant surfaces for the primary analysis.

May combine two claims.

Bridge in March is 36.2% for assistant and 52.8% for search.

“bridge is 36.2% [35.6, 36.7] (assistant) and 52.8% [52.5, 53.2] (search)”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Weighting, inactivity gaps, and browsing-observation density all move the apparent balance.

“Weighting, inactivity gaps, and browsing-observation density all move the apparent balance.”

May combine two claims.

The median assistant-centered session lasts 22 minutes and switches surface 5.2 times on average.

“the median session lasts 22 minutes and switches surface 5.2 [5.0, 5.4] times on average.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The canonical assistant host list is sufficiently complete to identify assistant surfaces for the primary analysis.

May combine two claims.

Assistant-centered containment in March is 35.3% versus February's 34.1%.

“Assistant-centered containment is 35.3% [34.8, 36.0] user-weighted against February's 34.1% [33.5, 34.7]”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The canonical assistant host list is sufficiently complete to identify assistant surfaces for the primary analysis.

May combine two claims.

22.5% of assistant-anchored and 24.3% of search-anchored sessions carry a category.

“22.5% of assistant-anchored and 24.3% of search-anchored sessions carry a category”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The content-pageview domain lexicons are valid for categorizing sessions into coarse task categories.

May combine two claims.

In the same panelists, conventional search more often precedes content, while assistant use more often follows it.

“In the same panelists, conventional search more often precedes content, while assistant use more often follows it.”

May combine two claims.

Both components flip sign within every stratum: assistant before-minus-after positive and search before-minus-after negative.

“Both components flip sign within every stratum, assistant beforeminus-after positive and search before-minus-after negative.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The content-pageview domain lexicons are valid for categorizing sessions into coarse task categories.

May combine two claims.

Across two months, the old and new anchors show a consistent directional contrast: search tends to open the observed journey, while conversational assistants sit deeper inside it.

“Across two months, the old and new anchors show a consistent directional contrast: search tends to open the observed journey, while conversational assistants sit deeper inside it.”

May combine two claims.

The directional mirror holds in every split: the search side is strongly negative throughout and the assistant side stays positive with intervals excluding zero.

“The directional mirror, with userclustered intervals, holds in every split: the search side is strongly negative throughout (-18.3 [-18.9, -17.8] and -9.8 [-10.2, -9.4] by market; -12.4 [-12.8, -12.0] and -16.2 [-16.9, -15.5] by provider), and the assistant side stays positive with intervals excluding zero (+1.9 [+1.1, +2.7] and +10.3 [+9.5, +11.0] by market; +9.1 [+8.4, +9.8] for ChatGPT).”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The canonical assistant host list is sufficiently complete to identify assistant surfaces for the primary analysis.

May combine two claims.

The Gemini assistant side is +1.2 percentage points, still positive but small, with a lower bound close to zero.

“The one thin case is the Gemini assistant side (+1.2 [+0.2, +2.2]): still positive but small, with a lower bound close to zero”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The canonical assistant host list is sufficiently complete to identify assistant surfaces for the primary analysis.

May combine two claims.

These are temporal positions, not evidence that the assistant synthesized prior pages or caused later search.

“These are temporal positions, not evidence that the assistant synthesized prior pages or caused later search.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

The comparator's sessions are selected by their own anchor, making the contrast descriptive between how two anchors organize their surroundings in the same people, not a matched-task or historical comparison.

“The comparator's sessions are selected by their own anchor-this is a descriptive contrast between how two anchors organize their surroundings in the same people, not a matched-task or historical comparison; the selection caveats are developed at the end of this section.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Remaining same-timestamp orderings affect only display order, never classification, which depends on inequalities alone.

“Remaining same-timestamp orderings affect only display order, never classification, which depends on inequalities alone.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The cross-surface temporal session is a proxy for, not proof of, a coherent task episode.

“We call the resulting object a cross-surface temporal session ; it is a proxy for, not proof of, a coherent task episode.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

Selection into assistant use and the semantic relationship among co-timed events are not identified away.

“Selection into assistant use and the semantic relationship among co-timed events are not identified away.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

The coverage sensitivity is not a preferred-sample ladder; heavier browsers are a selected population that plausibly differs in tasks and habits, not a denoised version of the frame, but it shows why containment must always be reported with an instrumentation/coverage rule.

“This is not a preferred-sample ladder-heavier browsers are a selected population that plausibly differs in tasks and habits, not a denoised version of the frame-but it shows why containment must always be reported with an instrumentation/coverage rule.”

May combine two claims.

The stable result is the presence of several positions and the relative stability of the one-sided classes, not one universal contained share.

“The stable result is the presence of several positions and the relative stability of the one-sided classes, not one universal contained share.”

May combine two claims.

The positional marginals are not mutually exclusive, so they do not sum to the anywhere share.

“The positional marginals are not mutually exclusive-one session can contribute to before and after at once-so they do not sum to the anywhere share.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Both companion preprints are public, so nothing in the paper rests on work a reader cannot check.

“Both companions are public, so nothing here rests on work a reader cannot check.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Between-only sessions belong to bridge but have nothing before the first assistant event, so before/after marginals are estimated directly rather than reconstructed by adding classes.

“Between-only sessions belong to bridge but have nothing before the first assistant event, so before/after marginals are estimated directly rather than reconstructed by adding classes.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Assistant use through unmetered channels is not observed, so absence of events is treated as absence of observation, never as absence of activity.

“Assistant use through unmetered channels (for example native mobile apps or API access) is not observed, which is one reason we treat absence of events as absence of observation , never as absence of activity.”

May combine two claims.

Assistant-contained does not mean resolved: timestamps alone cannot establish one task, satisfaction, or completion.

“Assistant-contained also does not mean resolved: timestamps alone cannot establish one task, satisfaction, or completion.”

May combine two claims.

The four-to-five-point gap between session-weighted and user-weighted estimands is informative: highly active users contribute more sessions, while an equal-user estimand gives more weight to lighter users.

“The four-to-five-point gap between the estimands is itself informative: highly active users contribute more sessions, while an equal-user estimand gives more weight to lighter users.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Uncertainty comes from a nonparametric cluster bootstrap that resamples panelists with replacement, 500 replicates, percentile 95% intervals, with the full weighting recomputed inside each replicate.

“Uncertainty comes from a nonparametric cluster bootstrap that resamples panelists (never individual sessions or events) with replacement, 500 replicates, percentile 95% intervals, with the full weighting recomputed inside each replicate.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Because both the AI-side search marginals and the entire comparator rest on what counts as 'search,' the load-bearing quantities are recomputed under four defensible rules using only privacy-safe retained fields.

“Because both the AI-side search marginals and the entire comparator rest on what counts as 'search,' we recompute the load-bearing quantities under four defensible rules using only privacy-safe retained fields (Table 1).”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

A tracked result manifest records every reported share and interval; LaTeX values and figures are generated from that manifest, over the unsampled eligible frame.

“A tracked result manifest records every reported share and interval; LaTeX values and figures are generated from that manifest, over the unsampled eligible frame.”

May combine two claims.

The comparator describes assistant adopters' own non-assistant search sessions, never a pre-AI population or a historical baseline.

“The comparator thus describes assistant adopters' own non-assistant search sessions, never a pre-AI population or a historical baseline.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

Workbench-versus-seeking, topical continuity, satisfaction, and per-task splits require a separately governed content-validation pass and are not inferred here.

“Workbench-versus-seeking, topical continuity, satisfaction, and per-task splits require a separately governed content-validation pass and are not inferred here.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The paper makes no causal-volume claim; every quantity is descriptive of temporal session structure.

“We make no causal-volume claim. Every quantity is descriptive of temporal session structure.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

An external event exactly coincident with an assistant event does not identify an ordering, so it makes the session bridge/interleaved rather than fabricating a before/after position.

“An external event exactly coincident with an assistant event does not identify an ordering, so it makes the session bridge/interleaved rather than fabricating a before/after position”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The topology on its own cannot say whether the observed shape is new.

“On its own it cannot say whether that shape is new : perhaps any anchoring activity-search included-produces the same positional mix.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

The paper treats the task episode as the conceptual unit but the inactivity-defined temporal session as the observed proxy.

“We treat the task episode as the conceptual unit but the inactivity-defined temporal session as the observed proxy; this distinction is central to the paper's claim discipline.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Search is defined by full host against the canonical search-host list; the registrable-domain alternative and its measured effect are reported.

“Search is defined by full host against the canonical search-host list in the footnote above; the registrable- domain alternative and its measured effect are reported there.”

May combine two claims.

Multiple responses establish more assistant activity, but multiple provider sessions may reflect distinct tasks, revisitation, or parallel use.

“Multiple responses establish more assistant activity, but multiple provider sessions may reflect distinct tasks, revisitation, or parallel use.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

A provider session can span an inactivity boundary, so one temporal session may contain only part of an eligible provider session's events.

“A provider session can span an inactivity boundary, so one temporal session may contain only part of an eligible provider session's events.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

The primary population requires one pageview-active day, the least restrictive threshold of the ladder in Table 4; thresholds through all 28 days are reported.

“The primary population requires one pageview-active day, the least restrictive threshold of the ladder in Table 4; we report thresholds through all 28 days.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

A large same-user before/after study finds no drop in search usage after assistant adoption.

“a large same-user before/after study finds no drop in search usage after assistant adoption [23]”

• cites [23] [23] Semrush. 2025. ChatGPT Is Not Replacing Google: It's Expanding Search. https:// www.semrush.com/blog/google-usage-after-chatgpt-adoption/ Status: Semrush blog/report; analysis of 260 billion rows of clickstream data, Jan 2024-Jun 2025, same-user before/after ChatGPT adoption. -Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

May combine two claims.

The decomposition undercuts the tempting 'multi-response equals internalized search' inference as a general reading of the trace, although the data do not test an internalization construct directly.

“This decomposition undercuts the tempting 'multi-response equals internalized search' inference as a general reading of the trace, although the data do not test an internalization construct directly.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The 30-minute inactivity gap is the conventional web-sessionization default and the middle of the sensitivity range reported at 15, 30, and 60 minutes.

“The 30-minute inactivity gap defines temporal-session boundaries; it is the conventional web-sessionization default and the middle of the sensitivity range we report at 15, 30, and 60 minutes (Table 3).”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The before-and-after web context measured is defined only for standalone assistant surfaces, not for search-embedded AI.

“The before-and-after web context we measure is therefore defined only for the standalone case.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

Assistant-contained is a measurement category, not a behavioral outcome.

“Assistant-contained is therefore a measurement category, not a behavioral outcome.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Both-sided bridge sessions are consistent with the web-to-AI-to-web pattern the bridge label suggests, while between-only sessions are assistant activity punctuated by browsing; the topology keeps them under one headline class because both defeat any one-sided reading.

“Both-sided sessions are consistent with the webto-AI-to-web pattern the bridge label suggests, while between-only sessions are assistant activity punctuated by browsing; the topology keeps them under one headline class because both defeat any onesided reading.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The gap and coverage tables display point estimates for readability; their user-clustered intervals are computed identically, recorded in the tracked result manifest, and have half-widths of at most 1.0 and 1.2 percentage points respectively.

“The gap and coverage tables display point estimates for readability; their user-clustered intervals are computed identically, are recorded in the tracked result manifest, and have half-widths of at most 1.0 and 1.2 percentage points respectively.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The estimator is a raw cumulative fraction under a strict risk-set rule for the administrative window end.

“The estimator is a raw cumulative fraction under a strict risk-set rule for the administrative window end (2026-0301)”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The primary frame requires at least one pageview-active day, not guaranteed continuous instrumentation.

“Third, observation density : the primary frame requires at least one pageview-active day, not guaranteed continuous instrumentation.”

May combine two claims.

Assistant hosts outside the canonical list are not recognised as assistant surfaces, so their pageviews stay in the web stream and count as ordinary web activity; a session that moves from a recognised assistant to an unrecognised one is read as AI-last or bridge rather than contained.

“Assistant hosts outside the canonical list (for example Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI, you.com) are not recognised as assistant surfaces, so their pageviews stay in the web stream and count as ordinary web activity; a session that moves from a recognised assistant to an unrecognised one is therefore read as AI-last or bridge rather than contained.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The canonical assistant host list is sufficiently complete to identify assistant surfaces for the primary analysis.

May combine two claims.

The mirror's assistant-side magnitude is provider-dependent even though its sign and the containment ordering are not.

“so the mirror's assistant-side magnitude is provider-dependent even though its sign and the containment ordering are not.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

It is not a task-continuation curve because the next event may be unrelated.

“This is deliberately named by what it measures: it is not a task-continuation curve because the next event may be unrelated.”

May combine two claims.

The first two questions (where activity occurs, how activity is composed) are observable here; causal displacement is not.

“The first two are observable here; causal displacement is not.”

May combine two claims.

The extract admits assistant events whose captured content is between 2 and 30,000 bytes, so an unusually long response is dropped from the stream, which can move the last observed assistant timestamp earlier and reclassify a following pageview from 'between' to 'after'.

“And the extract admits assistant events whose captured content is between 2 and 30,000 bytes, so an unusually long response is dropped from the stream, which can move the last observed assistant timestamp earlier and reclassify a following pageview from 'between' to 'after'.”

May combine two claims.

Google's search-embedded AI is excluded from the assistant stream by construction, meaning some comparator searches were themselves AI-answered on the results page.

“Google's search-embedded AI is excluded from the assistant stream by construction, which means some comparator searches were themselves AI-answered on the results page.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

We state this as coexistence because 'AI does not displace search' is a demand counterfactual the design cannot identify.

“We state this as coexistence precisely because 'AI does not displace search' is a demand counterfactual the design cannot identify.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

Concurrent needs can merge, one need can split, and provider sessions are not validated task labels.

“Concurrent needs can merge, one need can split, and provider sessions are not validated task labels.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Sessions near the end of February drop out of long horizons rather than biasing them.

“so sessions near the end of February drop out of long horizons rather than biasing them”

May combine two claims.

Neither position establishes substitution, verification, or causation.

“but neither position establishes substitution, verification, or causation.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

These are event-share summaries of observed activity, not time-use estimates; dwell is observed only for pageviews.

“These are event-share summaries of observed activity, not time-use estimates; dwell is observed only for pageviews.”

May combine two claims.

Their long-horizon values mostly reflect ordinary browsing opportunity and must not be read as delayed completion of the same need.

“Their long-horizon values mostly reflect ordinary browsing opportunity and must not be read as delayed completion of the same need.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

A multiresponse assistant session is not an empty interval merely because no pageview follows it.

“A multiresponse assistant session is not an empty interval merely because no pageview follows it.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

We do not identify whether co-timed events share one task, whether an assistant resolved the need, or whether assistants caused the observed difference.

“We do not identify whether co-timed events share one task, whether an assistant resolved the need, or whether assistants caused the observed difference.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

These curves quantify sensitivity to the observation horizon.

“These curves quantify sensitivity to the observation horizon.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

All reported shares carry user-clustered intervals, but precision does not remove these construct limitations.

“All reported shares carry user-clustered intervals, but precision does not remove these construct limitations.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

We characterize temporal-session composition and make no causal-volume claim.

“First, scope of claim : we characterize temporal-session composition and make no causal-volume claim.”

May combine two claims.

The durable findings are the plurality of positions, the old/new directional contrast, and the need to keep observed containment separate from inferred task completion.

“The durable findings are therefore the plurality of positions, the old/new directional contrast, and the need to keep observed containment separate from inferred task completion.”

May combine two claims.

The ordering travels; the exact shares and directional magnitude are contextual.

“The ordering travels; the exact shares, and the directional magnitude, are contextual.”

May combine two claims.

Those curves count unrelated browsing and are horizon diagnostics, not task-continuation estimates.

“those curves count unrelated browsing and are horizon diagnostics, not task-continuation estimates.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

We report observed position, not a counterfactual about what the journey would otherwise have contained.

“We report observed position, not a counterfactual about what the journey would otherwise have contained.”

May combine two claims.

The strong movement across active-day thresholds shows that containment is partly a measurement-density quantity; the threshold populations also differ behaviorally, so no row is an unbiased correction for another.

“The strong movement across active-day thresholds shows that containment is partly a measurement-density quantity; the threshold populations also differ behaviorally, so no row is an unbiased correction for another.”

May combine two claims.

The result suggests a three-layer view of the emerging information environment: search remains an access layer, browsing remains an evidence and discovery layer, and conversational AI can become a synthesis layer deeper in the journey.

“The result suggests a three-layer view of the emerging information environment. Search remains an access layer that commonly opens movement toward documents. Browsing remains an evidence and discovery layer. Conversational AI can become a synthesis layer deeper in the journey”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

We do not separate workbench production from information seeking because doing so requires prompt-content classification intentionally excluded from the primary extract.

“We do not separate workbench production from information seeking because doing so requires prompt-content classification intentionally excluded from the primary extract.”

May combine two claims.

The two structural results-assistant use is far more contained than search, and the before/after order reverses between the anchors-hold unchanged across the two months we can observe.

“the two structural results-assistant use is far more contained than search, and the before/after order reverses between the anchorshold unchanged across the two months we can observe.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

These are conceptual functions motivated by the aggregate temporal grammar, not labels assigned to individual sessions.

“These are conceptual functions motivated by the aggregate temporal grammar, not labels assigned to individual sessions.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

We do not infer verification from an onward visit or compare citation-forward and citation-light assistants without adjustment for their different users, tasks, and interaction styles.

“We also do not infer verification from an onward visit or compare citation-forward and citationlight assistants without adjustment for their different users, tasks, and interaction styles.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Domains are coarse; onward visits are timing-linked rather than click-observed; and next-event curves count unrelated activity.

“Sixth, measurement : domains are coarse; onward visits are timing-linked rather than click-observed; and next-event curves count unrelated activity.”

May combine two claims.

Both push the same way-against containment and against the directional contrast-so the reported figures are the conservative side of each.

“Both push the same way - against containment and against the directional contrast - so the reported figures are the conservative side of each.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The study covers the United States and Great Britain, an AI-forward opt-in panel, two adjacent months (February and March 2026), observed visits rather than reading depth, and standalone assistants only.

“Finally, external validity : the study covers the United States and Great Britain, an AI-forward opt-in panel, two adjacent months (February and March 2026; the structural results replicate across them, but two months is still a short and possibly atypical window), observed visits rather than reading depth, and standalone assistants only.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

Workbench-versus-seeking, same-task continuity, resolution, internalization, verification, and satisfaction require a separately governed content-validation sample.

“Fifth, deferred constructs : workbench-versus-seeking, same-task continuity, resolution, internalization, verification, and satisfaction require a separately governed content-validation sample.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The search-centered comparator is selected by its own anchor, so old-versus-new contrasts are descriptive of how each anchor organizes its surroundings; the within-user contrast conditions on the person, and the category-stratified sensitivity conditions only coarsely on the task mix, so semantic task matching remains open.

“Seventh, comparator selection : the search-centered comparator is selected by its own anchor, so old-versus-new contrasts are descriptive of how each anchor organizes its surroundings; the within-user contrast conditions on the person, and the category-stratified sensitivity conditions only coarsely on the task mix, so semantic task matching remains open.”