CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 71Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Einstein-Aether Theory

Open access
Eling, C., Jacobson, T., Mattingly, D.·2004·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/0410001arXiv gr-qc/0410001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We review the status of "Einstein-Aether theory", a generally covariant theory of gravity coupled to a dynamical, unit timelike vector field that breaks local Lorentz symmetry. Aspects of waves, stars, black holes, and cosmology are discussed, together with theoretical and observational constraints. Open questions are stressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/0410001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jacobson and Mattingly (2001, 2004) and Eling et al. (2004) proposed a theory where in addition to metric, a unit timelike vector field is added providing direction of time and preferred frame breaking Lorentz invariance under boosts.

    “Jacobson and Mattingly (2001, 2004) and Eling et al. (2004) followed a decade later by proposing a theory where in addition to the metric, a unit timelike vector field is added to the theory providing a direction of time and a preferred frame breaking Lorentz invariance under boosts.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Eling et al. 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]1. See for example the following and references therein: V. A. Kostelecky, Ed., Proceedings of the 'Second Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry' , Bloomington, Usa, 15-18 August 2001'. Singapore, World Scientific (2002); G. Amelino-Camelia, 'The three perspectives on the quantum-gravity problem and their implications for the fate of Lorentz symmetry,' arXiv:gr-qc/0309054; N. E. Mavromatos, 'CPT violation and decoherence in quantum gravity,' arXiv:gr-qc/0407005; T. Jacobson, S. Liberati and D. Mattingly, 'Astrophysical bounds on Planck suppressed Lorentz violation,' arXiv:hep-ph/0407370. · arXiv
  2. [2]2. V. A. Kostelecky, 'Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,' Phys. Rev. D 69 , 105009 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0312310]. · arXiv
  3. [3]3. R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, 'Chern-Simons modification of general relativity,' Phys. Rev. D 68 , 104012 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0308071]. · arXiv
  4. [4]4. C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour and V. Mukhanov, 'k-inflation,' Phys. Lett. B 458 , 209 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9904075]. · arXiv
  5. [5]5. N. Arkani-Hamed, H. C. Cheng, M. A. Luty and S. Mukohyama, 'Ghost condensation and a consistent infrared modification of gravity,' JHEP 0405 , 074 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0312099]. · arXiv
  6. [6]6. N. Arkani-Hamed, H. C. Cheng, M. Luty and J. Thaler, 'Universal dynamics of spontaneous Lorentz violation and a new spin-dependent inverse-square law force,' arXiv:hep-ph/0407034. · arXiv
  7. [9]9. M. A. Clayton, 'Causality, shocks and instabilities in vector field models of Lorentz symmetry breaking,' arXiv:gr-qc/0104103. · arXiv
  8. [10]10. J. F. Barbero G. and E. J. Villase˜ nor, 'Lorentz Violations and Euclidean Signature Metrics,' Phys. Rev. D 68 , 087501 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0307066]. · arXiv
  9. [12]12. J. D. Bekenstein, 'Relativistic gravitation theory for the MOND paradigm,' arXiv:astro-ph/0403694. · arXiv
  10. [13]13. S. M. Carroll and E. A. Lim, 'Lorentz-violating vector fields slow the universe down,' Phys. Rev. D 70 , 123525 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0407149]. · arXiv
  11. [14]14. E. A. Lim, 'Can We See Lorentz-Violating Vector Fields in the CMB?,' arXiv:astro-ph/0407437. · arXiv
  12. [16]16. D. Mattingly and T. Jacobson, 'Relativistic gravity with a dynamical preferred frame,' in CPT and Lorentz Symmetry II , ed. V.A. Kostelecky (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002) [arXiv:gr-qc/0112012]. · arXiv
  13. [17]17. T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, 'Generally covariant model of a scalar field with high frequency dispersion and the cosmological horizon problem,' Phys. Rev. D 63 , 041502 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0009052]. · arXiv
  14. [18]18. C. Eling and T. Jacobson, 'Static post-Newtonian equivalence of GR and gravity with a dynamical preferred frame,' Phys. Rev. D 69 , 064005 (2004) [arXiv:gr-qc/0310044]. · arXiv
  15. [19]19. T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, 'Einstein-Aether waves,' Phys. Rev. D 70 , 024003 (2004) [arXiv:gr-qc/0402005]. · arXiv
  16. [21]21. R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, 1984).
  17. [23]23. G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and A. Starobinsky, 'Caustics in tachyon matter and other Born-Infeld scalars,' JHEP 0209 , 026 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0208019]. · arXiv
  18. [24]24. J. Bjorken, 'Emergent gauge bosons,' arXiv:hep-th/0111196. · arXiv
  19. [25]25. J. W. Moffat, 'Spontaneous violation of Lorentz invariance and ultra-high energy cosmic rays,' Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 12 , 1279 (2003) [arXiv:hepth/0211167].
  20. [26]26. B. M. Gripaios, 'Modified gravity via spontaneous symmetry breaking,' arXiv:hep-th/0408127. · arXiv
  21. [31]31. C.M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics , (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993).
  22. [32]32. C. M. Will, 'The confrontation between general relativity and experiment,' Living Rev. Rel. 4 , 4 (2001) [arXiv:gr-qc/0103036]. · arXiv
  23. [33]33. D. Sudarsky and K. G. Zloshchastiev, 'The coplanarity of planetary orbits places bounds on dynamical aether,' arXiv:gr-qc/0412086. · arXiv
  24. [35]35. I. Racz and R. M. Wald, 'Global extensions of space-times describing asymptotic final states of black holes,' Class. Quantum Grav. 13 , 539 (1996) [arXiv:gr-qc/9507055]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eling, C., Jacobson, T., & Mattingly, D.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2004
Pages
163-179
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/0410001
arXiv
gr-qc/0410001
OpenAlex
W2170222232
Cited by
71
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/assumed-1991-2003/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Einstein-aether theory, aether, general relativity, gravitational waves, compact stars, black holes, cosmology, observational constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review