Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity
Open accessAbstract
The requirement that physical phenomena associated with gravitational collapse should be duly reconciled with the postulates of quantum mechanics implies that at a Planckian scale our world is not 3+1 dimensional. Rather, the observable degrees of freedom can best be described as if they were Boolean variables defined on a two-dimensional lattice, evolving with time. This observation, deduced from not much more than unitarity, entropy and counting arguments, implies severe restrictions on possible models of quantum gravity. Using cellular automata as an example it is argued that this dimensional reduction implies more constraints than the freedom we have in constructing models. This is the main reason why so-far no completely consistent mathematical models of quantum black holes have been found. Essay dedicated to Abdus Salam.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The holography principle suggests only one degree of freedom per Planck area.
“For example the holography principle [9] suggests only one degree of freedom per Planck area ¯ hG/c 3 .”
From Entropic Issues in Contemporary Cosmology (2003) · cites this paper as [9]
S(ρ_H) is very much larger than the initial entropy quantifying correlations between matter in sectors M and A, because S_BH increases faster with mass than the entropy of any known matter.
“Notably, S ρ H is very much larger than the initial entropy quantifying correlations between matter in sectors M and A. This is because S BH increases faster with mass than the entropy of any known matter [65].”
From Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, gravitational entropy and quantum information (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
The number of degrees of freedom in nature is fundamentally limited, as proposed in refs.[10,11].
“This leaves no choice but to conclude that the number of degrees of freedom in nature is fundamentally limited, as proposed in refs.[10,11].”
From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [10]
The holographic principle states that all physical data inside a volume of spacetime can be represented by data encoded on its boundary.
“All physical data inside a volume of spacetime may be presented on its outer surface; the main problems describe locality as well as dimensionality.”
From Holographic Principle Applications to Cosmology (2025) · cites this paper as 't Hooft, 1993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Banks, T., Fischler, W., Shenker, S. H., & Susskind, L. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.5112 · Cited by 2,748 · see citing works
Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State
Jacobson, T. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.1260 · Cited by 2,603 · see citing works
A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/062 · Cited by 1,822 · see citing works
A covariant entropy conjecture
Bousso, R. (1999) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/07/004 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Jerusalem lectures on black holes and quantum information
Harlow, D. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015002 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant
Dyson, L., Kleban, M., & Susskind, L. (2002) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/10/011 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
The trouble with de Sitter space
Goheer, N., Kleban, M., & Susskind, L. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/07/056 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Positive vacuum energy and the <i>N</i>-bound
Bousso, R. (2000) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/11/038 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Causal holographic information
Hubeny, V. E., & Rangamani, M. (2012) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2012)114 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Spontaneous inflation and the origin of the arrow of time
Carroll, S. M., & Chen, J. (2004) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0410270 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Holographic framework for eternal inflation
Freivogel, B., Sekino, Y., Susskind, L., & Yeh, C.-P. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.086003 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Bousso, R. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.124023 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
In What Sense Is the Early Universe Fine-Tuned?
Carroll, S. M. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.3057 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“Evidence from the holographic principle [42, 43, 44], black hole complementarity [45], the gauge-gravity correspondence [46, 47], the entanglement/spacetime connection [48, 49, 50, 51], and thermodynamic approaches to gravity [52, 53] suggests that gravity can be thought of emerging from non-local degrees of freedom,…”
BackgroundThe Physical Meaning of the Holographic Principle
Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F., & Marcianò, A. (2022) · Quanta · doi:10.12743/quanta.v11i1.206 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The Quantum Memory Matrix: A Unified Framework for the Black Hole Information Paradox
Neukart, F., Brasher, R., & Marx, E. (2024) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26121039 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Extending the QMM Framework to the Strong and Weak Interactions
Neukart, F., Marx, E., & Vinokur, V. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27020153 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, gravitational entropy and quantum information
Eckstein, M. (2023) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03070-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Causal set dynamics: a toy model
Criscuolo, A., & Waelbroeck, H. (1999) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/6/315 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Entropic Issues in Contemporary Cosmology
COULE, D. H. (2003) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271803003530 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Associate Professor, U. O. W. S. O. M. D. O. R., & Shriki, J. E. (2024) · Diálogo · doi:10.51917/dialogo.2024.11.1.19
Holographic Principle Applications to Cosmology
Bunde, P. B., & Pawar, D. N. (2025) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-28530
- Authors
- Hooft, G. '.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Hooft, G. 't
- ORCID
- Hooft, G. 't
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1993
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- gr-qc/9310026
- OpenAlex
- W2158033100
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
- Keywords
- Navier-Stokes global regularity, singularity formation, continuum mechanics, actual infinity, potentiality, quantum localization, quantum gravity, dimensional reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review