PreprintCited by 630Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryMathematical and Theoretical Analysis

Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity

Open access
Hooft, G. 't·1993·arXiv

Abstract

The requirement that physical phenomena associated with gravitational collapse should be duly reconciled with the postulates of quantum mechanics implies that at a Planckian scale our world is not 3+1 dimensional. Rather, the observable degrees of freedom can best be described as if they were Boolean variables defined on a two-dimensional lattice, evolving with time. This observation, deduced from not much more than unitarity, entropy and counting arguments, implies severe restrictions on possible models of quantum gravity. Using cellular automata as an example it is argued that this dimensional reduction implies more constraints than the freedom we have in constructing models. This is the main reason why so-far no completely consistent mathematical models of quantum black holes have been found. Essay dedicated to Abdus Salam.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9310026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The holography principle suggests only one degree of freedom per Planck area.

    “For example the holography principle [9] suggests only one degree of freedom per Planck area ¯ hG/c 3 .”

    From Entropic Issues in Contemporary Cosmology (2003) · cites this paper as [9]

  • S(ρ_H) is very much larger than the initial entropy quantifying correlations between matter in sectors M and A, because S_BH increases faster with mass than the entropy of any known matter.

    “Notably, S ρ H is very much larger than the initial entropy quantifying correlations between matter in sectors M and A. This is because S BH increases faster with mass than the entropy of any known matter [65].”
  • The number of degrees of freedom in nature is fundamentally limited, as proposed in refs.[10,11].

    “This leaves no choice but to conclude that the number of degrees of freedom in nature is fundamentally limited, as proposed in refs.[10,11].”

    From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [10]

  • The holographic principle states that all physical data inside a volume of spacetime can be represented by data encoded on its boundary.

    “All physical data inside a volume of spacetime may be presented on its outer surface; the main problems describe locality as well as dimensionality.”

    From Holographic Principle Applications to Cosmology (2025) · cites this paper as 't Hooft, 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hooft, G. '.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Hooft, G. 't
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1993
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158033100
Cited by
630
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
Keywords
Navier-Stokes global regularity, singularity formation, continuum mechanics, actual infinity, potentiality, quantum localization, quantum gravity, dimensional reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review