The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Quantum Tetrahedron in 3 and 4 Dimensions
Open accessAbstract
Recent work on state sum models of quantum gravity in 3 and 4 dimensions has led to interest in the `quantum tetrahedron'. Starting with a classical phase space whose points correspond to geometries of the tetrahedron in R^3, we use geometric quantization to obtain a Hilbert space of states. This Hilbert space has a basis of states labeled by the areas of the faces of the tetrahedron together with one more quantum number, e.g. the area of one of the parallelograms formed by midpoints of the tetrahedron's edges. Repeating the procedure for the tetrahedron in R^4, we obtain a Hilbert space with a basis labelled solely by the areas of the tetrahedron's faces. An analysis of this result yields a geometrical explanation of the otherwise puzzling fact that the quantum tetrahedron has more degrees of freedom in 3 dimensions than in 4 dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Its construction relies on methods from geometrical quantization [21, 23], but can also be related to the generalised Palatini action (with Immirzi parameter) through a generalised constrained BF theory [24, 25, 26].”
From SU(2)loop quantum gravity seen from covariant theory (2003) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of the Theory of Representations
Kirillov, A. A. (1976) · Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-66243-0 · Cited by 1,493
State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols
Turaev, V. G., & Viro, O. Y. (1992) · Topology · doi:10.1016/0040-9383(92)90015-a · Cited by 1,145
(2010) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789814313735_0006 · Cited by 1,106
Quantization and unitary representations
Kostant, B. (1970) · Lecture notes in mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0079068 · Cited by 1,060
Guillemin, V., & Sternberg, S. (1977) · Mathematical surveys and monographs · doi:10.1090/surv/014 · Cited by 769
Bott, R. (1957) · The Annals of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/1969996 · Cited by 714
Woodhouse, N. M. J. (1992) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198536734.001.0001 · Cited by 686
Spin networks and quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1995) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.5743 · Cited by 629
Geometric quantization and multiplicities of group representations
Guillemin, V., & Sternberg, S. (1982) · Inventiones mathematicae · doi:10.1007/bf01398934 · Cited by 580
Angular Momentum in Quantum Physics: Theory and Application
Biedenharn, L. C., & Louck, J. D. (1984) · Cited by 491
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity
Perez, A. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-3 · Cited by 677
Spin foam models for quantum gravity
Perez, A. (2003) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/6/202 · Cited by 532
A new spin foam model for 4D gravity
Freidel, L., & Krasnov, K. (2008) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/12/125018 · Cited by 521
Loop-Quantum-Gravity Vertex Amplitude
Engle, J., Pereira, R., & Rovelli, C. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.161301 · Cited by 335
A Lorentzian signature model for quantum general relativity
Barrett, J. W., & Crane, L. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/16/302 · Cited by 275
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baez, J. C., & Barrett, J. W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baez, John C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 815-850
- ISSN
- 1095-0753 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- gr-qc/9903060
- OpenAlex
- W2137570591
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- state sum models, quantum gravity, geometric quantization, face area
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
