CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 146Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Quantum Tetrahedron in 3 and 4 Dimensions

Open access
Baez, John C., Barrett, John W.·1999·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9903060arXiv gr-qc/9903060
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent work on state sum models of quantum gravity in 3 and 4 dimensions has led to interest in the `quantum tetrahedron'. Starting with a classical phase space whose points correspond to geometries of the tetrahedron in R^3, we use geometric quantization to obtain a Hilbert space of states. This Hilbert space has a basis of states labeled by the areas of the faces of the tetrahedron together with one more quantum number, e.g. the area of one of the parallelograms formed by midpoints of the tetrahedron's edges. Repeating the procedure for the tetrahedron in R^4, we obtain a Hilbert space with a basis labelled solely by the areas of the tetrahedron's faces. An analysis of this result yields a geometrical explanation of the otherwise puzzling fact that the quantum tetrahedron has more degrees of freedom in 3 dimensions than in 4 dimensions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9903060

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Baez, J. C., & Barrett, J. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Baez, John C.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1999
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
815-850
ISSN
1095-0753 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9903060
arXiv
gr-qc/9903060
OpenAlex
W2137570591
Cited by
146
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/assumed-1991-2003/
Locations
  • Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
state sum models, quantum gravity, geometric quantization, face area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review