PreprintCited by 248Particle physics theoretical and experimental studiesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Cosmological Breaking of Supersymmetry?

Open access
Banks, T.·2000·arXiv

Abstract

It is conjectured that M-theory in asymptotically flat spacetime must be supersymmetric, and that the observed SUSY breaking in the low energy world must be attributed to the existence of a nonzero cosmological constant. This would be consistent with experiment, if the {\it critical exponent} $α$ in the relation $M_{SUSY} \sim M_P (Λ/M_P^4)^α$ took on the value 1/8, rather than its classical value 1/4. We attribute this large renormalization to the effect of large virtual black holes via the UV/IR correspondence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0007146

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since the universe is accelerating, distant galaxies will continue to move away rather than collapsing together to form a black hole, but the entropy of the de Sitter phase to which the universe will ultimately evolve can be calculated, obtaining the same number 10^122.

    “Since the universe is accelerating, distant galaxies will continue to move away from us rather than collapsing together to form a black hole, but we can also calculate the entropy [13, 14] of the de Sitter phase to which the universe will ultimately evolve, obtaining the same number 10 122 .”

    From In What Sense Is the Early Universe Fine-Tuned? (2014) · cites this paper as [13]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. S. Kachru, J. Kumar, E. Silverstein, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 106004 [hep-th/9807076]; · arXiv
  2. S. Kachru, E. Silverstein, J. High Energy Phys. 9811 (1998) 001 [hep-th/9808056]; · arXiv
  3. J. High Energy Phys. 9901 (1999) 004 [hep-th/9810129]. · arXiv
  4. T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. Shenker, L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112 [hep-th/9610043]; · arXiv
  5. T. Banks, Nuc. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 67, (1998) [hep-th/9710231]; · arXiv
  6. D. Bigatti, L. Susskind, hep-th/9712072. · arXiv
  7. T. Banks, L. Motl, J. High Energy Phys. 0003 (2000) 027 [hep-th/9910164]. · arXiv
  8. L. Susskind, E. Witten, hep-th/9805114 · arXiv
  9. E. Witten, Adv. Th. Math. Phys. 2, (1998), 505 [hep-th/9803131]. · arXiv
  10. N.D. Birrell, P.C.W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982, and references therein.
  11. R. Bousso, J. High Energy Phys. 9907 (1999) 004 [hep-th/9905177]; · arXiv
  12. J. High Energy Phys. 9906 (1999) 028 [hep-th/9906022]; Classical and Quantum Gravity 17, (2000), 997 [hep-th/9911002]; · arXiv
  13. E.E. Flanagan, D. Marolf, R. Wald, hep-th/9908070. · arXiv
  14. M.R. Douglas, D. Kabat, P. Pouliot, S. Shenker, Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 85 [hep-th/9608024]. · arXiv
  15. T. Banks, Talk at the Strings at the Millenium Conference, CalTech-USC, January 2000, and Manuscript in Preparation.
  16. T. Banks, W. Fischler, hep-th/9906038 · arXiv
  17. W. Fischler, L. Susskind, hep-th/9806039 · arXiv
  18. P. Horava, D. Minic, hep-th/0001145 · arXiv
  19. T. Banks, hep-th/9906126 · arXiv
  20. M. Dine, E. Silverstein, hep-th/9712166; · arXiv
  21. M. Dine, S. Thomas, L. Randall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 398 [hep-th/9503303]; · arXiv
  22. M. Dine, Y. Nir, Y. Shadmi, Phys. Lett. B 438 (1998) 61 [hep-th/9806124]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banks, T.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Banks, T.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2000
Volume
16
Issue
05
Pages
910-921
ISSN
0217-751X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953285765
Cited by
248
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
12.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Modern Physics A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐FG02‐)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
supersymmetry breaking, cosmological constant, vacuum energy, toy model, field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review