Cited by 38Mind wandering and attentionCognitive Functions and MemoryFlow Experience in Various Fields

Development of Japanese versions of the Daydream Frequency Scale and the Mind Wandering Questionnaire

Open access
Kajimura, Shogo, Nomura, Michio·2016·The Japanese journal of psychology

Abstract

This study developed and examined the validity of Japanese versions of the Daydream Frequency Scale (DDFS) and the Mind Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ), which measures propensity for spontaneous thoughts and mind wandering, respectively. In Study 1, we translated the items of the DDFS and the MWQ into Japanese and verified their validity. In Study 2, we confirmed the correlation of both scales with mind wandering, as measured by thought sampling during an attention-demanding task. These two studies revealed a dissociation between the properties of the scales; while DDFS reflects propensity for spontaneous thoughts, MWQ specifically reflects propensity for mind,wandering. We discuss the usefulness of the DDFS and the MWQ for studying the psychological functions of spontaneous thoughts and mind wandering.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4992/jjpsy.87.14223

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Smallwood, J., Fishman, D. J., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). Counting the cost of an absent mind: Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 230 -236.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kajimura, S., & Nomura, M.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nomura, Michio
Venue
The Japanese journal of psychology
Published
2016
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
79-88
ISSN
  • 0021-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1884-1082
OpenAlex
W2343881401
Cited by
38
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Japanese journal of psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (14J05285, 16H01727)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
Keywords
mind wandering, spontaneous thought, scale translation, Japanese adaptation, psychometric validation, attention-demanding tasks
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Fantasy, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking, Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review