Validation of the Japanese Version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The AAQ-II is a 7-item unidimensional scale of experiential avoidance.
“The AAQ-II is a 7-item unidimensional scale of EA rated on a seven-point scale”
From Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the experiential avoidance in caregiving questionnaire (EACQ) (2023) · cites this paper as Shima et al., 2013
The AAQ-II validation passage (p. 271) repeatedly identifies a seven-item AAQ-II and includes a one-factor result. Our copy’s text is too degraded to establish that responses were rated on a seven-point scale, so that part of the citing sentence remains unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe Japanese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II has a one-factor structure with good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .88).
“Moreover, the Japanese version (Shima et al., 2013) has a one-factor structure with good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .88).”
From Relationships Between Throwing Yips in Baseball, Experiential Avoidance, Cognitive Fusion, Values, and Social Factors (2024) · cites this paper as Shima et al., 2013
The Japanese edition of the AAQ-II has an α-coefficient of 0.88, representing high reliability and validity.
“The Japanese edition of AAQ-II, which has an α-coefficient of 0.88, representing high reliability and validity, was developed by Shima, et al. [24].”
From Psychometric Properties of the Japanese Version of the Parental Acceptance and Action Questionnaire in Parents with Infants and Toddlers (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
The Japanese version of the AAQ-II has confirmed validity and reliability.
“The validity and reliability of the Japanese version have been confirmed [21].”
From Validation of the Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire: Japanese Version (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological factors associated with social withdrawal (Hikikomori)
Nonaka, S., & Sakai, M. (2021) · Psychiatry Investigation · doi:10.30773/pi.2021.0050 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The effects of passion and mindfulness on the intrinsic motivation of Japanese athletes
Amemiya, R., & Sakairi, Y. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.006 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Mind wandering in anxiety disorders: A status report
Fell, J., Chaieb, L., & Hoppe, C. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105432 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
The Validity and Reliability of the Short Form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Japan
Takahashi, T., Saito, J., Fujino, M., Sato, M., & Kumano, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833381 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationTakahashi, T., Kikai, T., Sugiyama, F., Kawashima, I., Kuroda, A., Usui, K., Maeda, W., Uchida, T., Guan, S., Oguchi, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/jcpsy-d-19-00015 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationDrake, C. E., Masuda, A., Dalsky, D. J., Stevens, K. T., Kramer, S. L., Primeaux, S., Muto, T., & Mitamura, T. (2018) · International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling · doi:10.1007/s10447-018-9342-2 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ito, M., & Muto, T. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.009 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Masuda, A., Muto, T., Tully, E. C., Morgan, J. R., & Hill, M. L. (2014) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022114534982 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Nagasawa, Y., Shibata, A., Fukamachi, H., Ishii, K., Wicksell, R. K., & Oka, K. (2021) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s287549 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Emotion regulation processes and middle-aged Japanese women’s health
Hashiguchi, K., Yoshikawa, S., & Muto, T. (2020) · Climacteric · doi:10.1080/13697137.2020.1784135 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Morimoto, H., Kishita, N., Kondo, H., Tanaka, N., Abe, Y., & Muto, T. (2023) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.02.003 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Okajima, J., & Okajima, I. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20095674 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Development of the Japanese Version of the Mindful Eating Scale ( MES )
Takahashi, M. K., Sekiya, D., Suzuki, T., & Morimoto, Y. (2023) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12450 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Profiles of psychological flexibility in Japan: A conceptual replication
Shima, T., & Muto, T. (2023) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.11.006 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationValidation of the Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire: Japanese Version
Takabatake, S., Takahashi, M., Kabaya, K., Sekiya, Y., Sekiya, K., Harata, I., Kondo, M., & Akechi, T. (2022) · Audiology Research · doi:10.3390/audiolres12010006 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Inoué, K., Shima, T., Takahashi, M., Lee, S. K., Ohtsuki, T., & Kumano, H. (2020) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-020-00416-z · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationValidation of the Japanese version of the 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8)
Fukumori, T., Fujishima, K., Iwasa, K., Takao, Y., Kobayashi, Y., & Nishie, H. (2023) · The Journal of Medical Investigation · doi:10.2152/jmi.70.88 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Saito, J., Kumano, H., Ghazizadeh, M., Shimokawa, C., & Tanemura, H. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/45998 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Development of a Japanese Version of the State Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire
Kang, R. N., Tanaka, Y., Sato, T., Maeda, S., & Shimada, H. (2023) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12453 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Inoue, K., Yamada, T., & Ohtsuki, T. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jcsp.2022-0057 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Validity and reliability of the generalized pliance and tracking 2-way scale: GPT-2s
Inoué, K., & Okajima, I. (2025) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100931 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Shima, T., Inoué, K., Takashi, M. U. T. O., & Kumano, H. (2021) · Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies · doi:10.24193/jebp.2021.1.8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationOkajima, J., & Okajima, I. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1637071/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Development and validation of a Japanese version of the Teachers Acceptance and Action Questionnaire
Koh, Y., Iwasawa, N., Inoue, K., & Ohtsuki, T. (2024) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100726 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Effects of Values on Pain Tolerance and Activity Under a Laboratory‐Induced Pain Condition1,2
Sakano, A., Ohya, A., & Muto, T. (2021) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12340 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Haitani, T., Sakai, N., & Mori, K. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4sc5t
Tozawa, A., & Tsuchiya, M. (2025) · Environmental and Occupational Health Practice · doi:10.1539/eohp.2024-0015-fs
Tsuchiya, M., & Tozawa, A. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Sakai, M., Toyama, T., Hashimoto, H., Ueno, T., Wanifuchi‐Endo, Y., Fujita, T., Asano, T., Horisawa, N., Uchida, M., & Akechi, T. (2026) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s574843
Kuribayashi, C., Inoué, K., Noguchi, Y., Kinugasa, T., Lundqvist, C., Wylleman, P., & Kukidome, T. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jcsp.2025-0040
- Authors
- SHIMA, T., YANAGIHARA, M., KAWAI, T., & KUMANO, H.
- Affiliations
- Waseda University (JP)
- Venue
- The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
- Published
- 2013-09-19
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 1AM-042-1AM-042
- ISSN
- 2433-7609 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3168521297
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, Japanese version, psychometric validation, acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological flexibility, questionnaire adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review