The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adult Norms for a Commercially Available Nine Hole Peg Test for Finger Dexterity
Abstract
The Nine Hole Peg Test is commonly used by occupational therapists as a simple, quick assessment for finger dexterity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interrater and test–retest reliability of the commercially available Smith & Nephew Rehabilitation Division version of the Nine Hole Peg Test, and to establish new adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity utilizing this particular version. Two of the researchers established interrater and test–retest reliability by evaluating 25 occupational therapy student volunteers. Seven hundred and three subjects, ranging in age from 21 to 71+ years, were tested to establish norms, using the standard protocol. Results showed high interrater reliability and only moderate test–retest reliability. Scores obtained by using the commercially available version were not statistically different from previously published norms (Mathiowetz, Weber, Kashman, & Volland, 1985). This study supports the original norms and further assists occupational therapists to evaluate dexterity accurately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adult Norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of Finger Dexterity
Mathiowetz, V., Weber, K., Kashman, N., & Volland, G. (1985) · The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research · doi:10.1177/153944928500500102 · Cited by 972
Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction
Radomski, M. V., & Latham, C. (1977) · Cited by 576
Kellor, M., Frost, J., Silberberg, N. E., Iversen, I., & Cummings, R. (1971) · PubMed · Cited by 397
Cited by
Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke
Takahashi, C. D., Der-Yeghiaian, L., Le, V., Motiwala, R. R., & Cramer, S. C. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm311 · Cited by 624
Self-citationDuncan, R. P., & Earhart, G. M. (2012) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968311421614 · Cited by 354
Assessing Dexterity Function: A Comparison of Two Alternatives for the NIH Toolbox
Wang, Y.-C., Magasi, S. R., Bohannon, R. W., Reuben, D. B., McCreath, H. E., Bubela, D. J., Gershon, R. C., & Rymer, W. Z. (2011) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jht.2011.05.001 · Cited by 210
Lambercy, O., Dovat, L., Yun, H., Wee, S. K., Kuah, C. W., Chua, K. S., Gassert, R., Milner, T. E., Teo, C. L., & Burdet, E. (2011) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-8-63 · Cited by 144
Sepulveda-Falla, D., Barrera-Ocampo, A., Hagel, C., Korwitz, A., Vinueza-Veloz, M. F., Zhou, K., Schonewille, M., Zhou, H., Velazquez-Perez, L., Rodriguez-Labrada, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci66407 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Oxford Grice, K., Vogel, K. A., Le, V., Mitchell, A., Muniz, S., & Vollmer, M. A.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Publisher
- AOTA Press
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 570-573
- ISSN
- 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7676
- OpenAlex
- W2142887818
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adult Norms for a Commercially Available Nine Hole Peg Test for Finger Dexterity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5014/ajot.57.5.570
- The paper
- Oxford Grice, K., Vogel, K. A., Le, V., Mitchell, A., Muniz, S., & Vollmer, M. A. (2003). Adult Norms for a Commercially Available Nine Hole Peg Test for Finger Dexterity. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.5.570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
