Cited by 63Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringAging, Health, and Disability

Impact of Participating in Volunteer Activities for Residents Living in Long-Term-Care Facilities

Yuen, Hon Keung, Huang, Peng, Burik, Jerry K., Smith, Thomas G.·2008·American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a volunteer activity on the perceived well-being of long-term-care (LTC) residents. Residents from five LTC facilities were randomly assigned into either a mentoring or a usual-care control group. Residents in the mentoring group tutored conversational skills to English-as-a-second-language students on a one-on-one basis for 1 hour twice per week for 12 weeks. Well-being, as a global outcome construct, was measured at baseline, after intervention, and at 3-month follow-up using the Geriatric Depression Scale, Life Satisfaction Index–A, and a self-rated health question. After intervention, residents who participated in the mentoring group rated their level of well-being higher ( p = .047) than those in the usual-care group on the basis of a multivariate nonparametric global statistical test. The positive effect of mentoring on well-being relative to the control was sustained at 3-month follow-up assessment ( p = .029). Findings provide preliminary support for engaging LTC residents in volunteer mentoring activities to improve their well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5014/ajot.62.1.71

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 2 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuen, H. K., Huang, P., Burik, J. K., & Smith, T. G.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Peng Huang, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Epidemiology, College of Graduate Studies, Medical University of Charleston, Charleston
  • Jerry K. Burik, MHS, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Occupational Therapy Educational Program, College of Health Professions, Medical University of Charleston, Charleston
  • Thomas G. Smith, PhD, is Associate Professor, Center for Academic Excellence, Medical University of Charleston, Charleston
Venue
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2008-01
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
71-76
ISSN
  • 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7676
OpenAlex
W2053739599
Cited by
63
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03ag021786-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (1 R03 AG21786-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
volunteer mentoring, long-term care residents, well-being, English as a second language, life satisfaction, depression, self-rated health, older adults, long-term care facilities
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Residential Facilities, South Carolina, Volunteers, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review